Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] TEXT FOR DISCUSSION WT-1

[Alex Gakuru <gakuru@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 3:20 PM, Michele Neylon :: Blacknight
<michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 1 Jun 2010, at 13:10, Tijani BEN JEMAA wrote:
>
>>
>> I wanted to highlight that the Board resolution 20 spoke about the recovery 
>> of application and on-going costs only. The development and risk costs can’t 
>> be part of those costs.
>> Now we have to find how the application and on-going costs can be paid 
>> progressively for the categories WT2 will define, and finally, define the 
>> support to be provided for them.
>
> The board may not have covered all angles.
>
> Surely if a "solution" of some kind were put together / proposed by this 
> group it would need to be comprehensive? ie. cover things that the board 
> might simply have overlooked ?
>

I believe we should make all the recommendations the WG feels would be
beneficial for the target applicants then leave the board to adopt or
reject as per their best judgement.