ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Friday 15 October JAS meeting.

  • To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Friday 15 October JAS meeting.
  • From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 22:04:30 -0700

Dear Avri and all:

Please see attached the Addenda that has the draft of the public comments for 
your discussion and review. In my opinion, the Final report addresses most of 
the concerns/suggestions raised during the public comment period and we should 
keep the Summary Analysis simple and refer to the Final Report as much as 
possible. It is your call and I am happy to adjust.
There are few responses I still need to work on based on the recent FAQ and 
revisions made to the Final report.

Regarding the Final Report:

On FAQ 4.1.1, we might consider referencing the New gTLD Policy Implementation 
Guideline N which states: 
"ICANN may put in place a fee reduction scheme for gTLD applicants from 
economies classified by the UN as least developed."
I personally believe this gives more strength to this work.

I see the note we have that these recommendations would not impact the 
Applicant Guidebook.... In my personal opinion and looking from an applicant 
perspective, the Applicant Guidebook should, at a minimum, have some reference 
that a support program exists or is under development and where to find current 
information about this.

I was reminded that the board expects us to directly answer to the recent 
resolution. Do you believe we have done this?

The reviewed budget for the New gTLD Program has not yet been posted, but I 
expect it any time... I know, it has been a  week :-(. It looks like there has 
been an overall increase in the budget to address deployment costs, but, most 
importantly, we are looking at creating funds for non-financial support of 
applicants as recommended by this WG. I will keep you posted.



Thanks,

Karla Valente
+1 310 936 4639  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:owner-soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 9:22 PM
To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Friday 15 October JAS meeting.

Hi,

While I was hoping that we could start to work through the addendum, especially 
the responses to the comments at Friday's meeting, that report was not sent in 
time for the group to discuss it.  Hopefully, it will be submitted in the near 
future as it is a critical component of out final delivery.

I have attached an updated version of the final Draft.  While some of the 
issues still penidng the clue that the poll is supposed to offer us, I think 
there is still work we need to do on the report.

- A there is lots of changed language in the report that has not been discussed.
- given the first hints that the poll is giving, we may want to look at some of 
the language on the polled items and see if thee is any way to close gaps.

I suggest that is what we do.

Talk to you all in a few hours.

a.

Attachment: ADDENDA- JAS WG OCT8.docx
Description: ADDENDA- JAS WG OCT8.docx



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy