Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] rev 2.19-1 after listening to the phone call.

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Ok.

I propose that this view be inserted in an appendix in the Final report (not 
the addendum) and that it be referenced with a footnote from this section.   

I also ask that you have that ready before the end of the week if possible.

thanks

a.

On 20 Oct 2010, at 08:22, Eric Brunner-Williams wrote:

> 
>> 3.  Re 2.4
>> 
>> The issue as I understood the consensus:
>> 
>> The was a consensus that the period be shortened. Though there were a few 
>> people, like me, who are not sure we support this as a special fix for 
>> eligible applicants or who are against it in general, so it wasn't full 
>> consensus.
>> 
>> What I don't see is any clear consensus among those who want to see it 
>> lowered on whether it be shortened to  a year or to six months.  By this 
>> lack of consensus, I don't mean we have sharp disagreements.  I believe that 
>> we have a few people who feel strongly about 6 months, and a few people who 
>> feel strongly about 1 year, and a bunch who are fine either way.  Of course 
>> I may be wrong.
>> 
>> Perhaps this can be cleared up if everyone on the list  replies to this 
>> message saying either:
>> 
>> a. i support reducing the period to 6 months
>> b. i support reducing the period to 1 year.
>> c. As long as it is reduced, I am fine with either a or b and am willing to 
>> go a long with the prevalent viewpoint order to build consensus.
> 
> I will submit a separate statement on the issue.
> 
> Eric