<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Agenda for 9 Nov
- To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Agenda for 9 Nov
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 07:55:58 -0500
Hi,
Sorry I confused you.
I wasn't canceling the meeting at that time, just asking what should be on the
agenda, with an assumption that if we had nothing, then we might consider
canceling it.
Since Karla came through quickly with at least one agenda item, I figured we
were on.
a.
On 9 Nov 2010, at 07:50, Alex Gakuru wrote:
>
> hi,
>
> Based on your earlier message and Evans response, I scheduled another
> activity.
>
> my apologies.
>
> Alex
>
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 3:05 PM, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I seem to have confused the works.
>>
>> We do still have a meeting today. In about an hour from when I am sending
>> this message - at out normal UTC time of 1300 - I leave the relative time up
>> to you all.
>>
>> the Agenda:
>>
>> - Planning for Catagena
>> - Last comments on the Press Releases (have we seen an update?)
>> - Charter extension
>> - do we want to ask out liaison to file the motion with the GNSO Council
>> and ALAC this week
>> - If so, discuss the draft motion.
>>
>> The poll of sharing the schedule pain will come out sometime today. Though
>> as I said in scheduling times, in all previous such polls I have seen, the
>> tyranny of the majority timezones prevails. But it might be different this
>> time. I know the Board rotates timezones.
>>
>> Talk to you all in a bit.
>>
>> a.
>>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|