<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On the v6 requirement
- To: "soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] On the v6 requirement
- From: Eric Brunner-Williams <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:51:51 -0500
Colleagues,
Yesterday I was able to obtain support from ARIN for new gTLD
operators to be able to receive post-exhaustion provider independent
address space from the reserve proposed for Criticial Infrastructure (CI).
While this does not assist any new gTLD operator demonstrate the v6
requirement that is in the DAG, it reduces the possible impulse for
the contractual requirement, which is imposed as early as when the
application is submitted (and "frozen"), or as late as the transition
to delegation, if that impulse is that new gTLD registries must be
able to operate in a post-v4-exhaustion environment.
Whether the v6 requirement is relaxed from an unconditional
requirement, or made conditional upon the purpose of the applicant and
therefore the presumed address capability of the registrars,
registrants, and name-to-address resolving users, the access to CI
reserved resources is something that needs-qualified applicants will
benefit by, and not have to purchase provider independent v4 address
assets in the transfer market, or settle for provider dependent v4
address assets as a tenant of a hosting operator, registry technical
services provider, or competitor.
One more tool in the assistance toolkit. Post-v4-exhaustion PI blocks
reserved for CI.
The proposal is ARIN-prop-123. Reserved Pool for Critical Infrastructure.
Next, making the same request to the other regional registries --
RIPE, APNIC, AfriNIC, LACNIC.
Eric
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|