[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] WT H REPORT
Hi everyone, Sorry for the start-stop on this. I had overlooked an ICANN document on the new gTLD budget, issued last October. Having perused it, there does'nt appear to be new considerations on the application fee components, so the attachments to this message are valid. Tony ----- Original Message ----- From: Anthony Harris To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 4:45 PM Subject: Fw: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] WT H REPORT Dear all, Please disregard my submission, I will repost asap. Must take into account an update that I had missed. Sorry! Tony ----- Original Message ----- From: Anthony Harris To: soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 3:55 PM Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] WT H REPORT Dear all, Please find attached brief summary from my one-man work team, on the thorny issue of seeking loopholes from application fee reduction. (AAA-ICANN-SOAC-FEES). It is a full-consensus document within the WT. I am not too sure if I interpreted the mission of WT H correctly, but am willing to be reprimanded and set straight should that be the case... For reference purposes, please also see my previous submission on this subject, which was submitted back in the days of WT 1. And Alan, yes, it probably will result in being a waste of time... Tony Attachment:
AAA-ICANN-SOAC-FEES.doc Attachment:
AAA-New gTLD Applicant Support.doc
|