<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] GAC response to scorecard
- To: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] GAC response to scorecard
- From: Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 21:42:27 -0700
This part is of particular interest:
GAC welcomes the commitment of the Board to implement the necessary
mechanisms to
ensure an inclusive new gTLD program.
The GAC would appreciate clarity from ICANN on whether cost
considerations for
developing and least developed country applications will be given due
attention. The
reduction of costs should be applied to all the steps (including but
not limited to objections
by SMEs, trademark clearing house) of the process.
GAC looks forward to the final JAS WG report. The report will need to
propose sustainable
mechanisms for implementation within a deadline that ensures the
introduction of new
gTLDS is inclusive.
(Additional reaction: we propose 70% fees reduction for developing
country applicants and
free for least developed countries)
Elaine
On Apr 12, 2011, at 4:30 PM, Karla Valente wrote:
Dear all:
Please see attached GAC comments on the ICANN Board’s response to
the GAC Scorecard.
Thank you,
Karla Valente
Director, gTLD Registry Programs
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Direct: + 1 310 301 3878
Mobile: +1 310 936 4639
Skype: kdlvalente
<20110412_GAC_comments_on_the_Board_response_to_the_GAC_scorecard.pdf>
Elaine Pruis
VP Client Services
elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 509 899 3161
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|