ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support

  • To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
  • From: Gisella Gruber-White <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:46:19 -0700

Dear All,

Please find hereafter today's Chat transcript.

Have a lovely weekend.
Kind regards,
Gisella

On 29/04/2011 15:33, "Gisella Gruber-White"
<Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>  Gisella Gruber-White:Welcome to the JAS call on Friday 29th April 2011
>  CLO:Hi  G
>  CLO:Hi Rafik
>  Rafik:Hi Cheryl
>  CLO:Hi Alan
>  CLO:Hi Olivier
>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:hello everybody
>  CLO:Hi Seb
>  Sébastien:Hello Cheryl
>  CLO:Hi Rahman
>  Rahman Khan:Hi
>  Gisella Gruber-White:Rahman Khan has joined the call
>  Cintra 
>Sooknanan:https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recomme
>ndations
>  Sébastien:Can you confirm the link you are working with?
>  Sébastien:thanks
>  Sébastien:there is no // between 2 to 5 and the 5 bullets points
>  Cintra Sooknanan:SUGGESTED serves the public interest criteria -Social
>relevance for instance by increasing skills; investment in the skills
>base of a target community; fostering gender balance and presence of
>minorities; and positive contribution to regional or national economies.
>  Cintra Sooknanan:is this maybe something we can look at?
>  CLO:Public Interest  or meets a need currently unmet by existing gTLD's
>  Tijani BEN JEMAA:It is also important that support is not provided to
>controversial or opposable application. The cost of the extended
>evaluation and dispute resolution might be too high, and can prevent the
>(needy) applicant from paying the due amounts
>  CLO:You will not be able to identify contention  before you have had to
>commit  to Support...
>  CLO: this  won't  work IMO
>  CLO:Applicant  support as erik said  can NOT guaruntee success  so
>  CLO:'return'  of  support will have to be a factor  jsut as it would be
>if it can out of the applicants own resources
>  Alan Greenberg:I believe that "new" issues should only be discussed at
>this point if when raised, there is widespread support.
>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:yes - if known then take it into account - but
>this could be in a section "any other reason why the paplicant should not
>receive support"
>  Alan Greenberg:I need to go. See you on list and on Tuesday.
>  Olivier Crepin-Leblond:LOL :-)





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy