<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
- To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Adobe Connect - Chat Transcript from Joint SO/AC WG on New gTLD Applicant Support
- From: Gisella Gruber-White <Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 07:46:19 -0700
Dear All,
Please find hereafter today's Chat transcript.
Have a lovely weekend.
Kind regards,
Gisella
On 29/04/2011 15:33, "Gisella Gruber-White"
<Gisella.Gruber-White@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Gisella Gruber-White:Welcome to the JAS call on Friday 29th April 2011
> CLO:Hi G
> CLO:Hi Rafik
> Rafik:Hi Cheryl
> CLO:Hi Alan
> CLO:Hi Olivier
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:hello everybody
> CLO:Hi Seb
> Sébastien:Hello Cheryl
> CLO:Hi Rahman
> Rahman Khan:Hi
> Gisella Gruber-White:Rahman Khan has joined the call
> Cintra
>Sooknanan:https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recomme
>ndations
> Sébastien:Can you confirm the link you are working with?
> Sébastien:thanks
> Sébastien:there is no // between 2 to 5 and the 5 bullets points
> Cintra Sooknanan:SUGGESTED serves the public interest criteria -Social
>relevance for instance by increasing skills; investment in the skills
>base of a target community; fostering gender balance and presence of
>minorities; and positive contribution to regional or national economies.
> Cintra Sooknanan:is this maybe something we can look at?
> CLO:Public Interest or meets a need currently unmet by existing gTLD's
> Tijani BEN JEMAA:It is also important that support is not provided to
>controversial or opposable application. The cost of the extended
>evaluation and dispute resolution might be too high, and can prevent the
>(needy) applicant from paying the due amounts
> CLO:You will not be able to identify contention before you have had to
>commit to Support...
> CLO: this won't work IMO
> CLO:Applicant support as erik said can NOT guaruntee success so
> CLO:'return' of support will have to be a factor jsut as it would be
>if it can out of the applicants own resources
> Alan Greenberg:I believe that "new" issues should only be discussed at
>this point if when raised, there is widespread support.
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:yes - if known then take it into account - but
>this could be in a section "any other reason why the paplicant should not
>receive support"
> Alan Greenberg:I need to go. See you on list and on Tuesday.
> Olivier Crepin-Leblond:LOL :-)
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|