Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Milestone Report 2 - public comment?

[Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>]

Given discussions on the GNSO list, I would say that the GNSO is 
likely to approve sending the report out for public comment at its 
meeting this Thursday.
However, that notwithstanding, it is common practice for a WG to 
submit reports for public comment without any intervention of their 
chartering body.
Alan

At 07/06/2011 02:58 PM, Evan Leibovitch wrote:

> Our most-likely current scenario is for our Chairs to ask the two 
> chartering bodies to submit it for comment.
> It would be inappropriate for the JAS to solicit comment on its own. 
> However, ALAC -- having already accepted, approved and published MR2 
> -- has no reason to avoid or delay solicitation of public feedback 
> (and indeed we in JAS would benefit from receiving such feedback ASAP).
> Given that the other chartering body has yet to accept even the 
> *first* Milestone Report, I see no reason to needlessly delay 
> solicitation of public comment for MR2 by waiting further.
> At least to me, it would look pretty ridiculous if we were held back 
> from soliciting community participation through public feedback -- 
> for an already-published document -- because of procedural issues.
> - Evan