Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Re: JAS WG answers to questions from GNSO RyC and Wolf.

[Elaine Pruis <elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We should answer this question directly:
 What happens if progress payments are not made on time?
I propose "Pay as you go."  If the applicant does not make the  
(staggered fee) payment on time, they lose their "slot:"   For  
example, after paying the $5k  and then  $50,000 at submission of  
application,  $65,000 is due after the initial evaluation.  If the  
applicant doesn't pay the $65K after initial evaluation, they drop out  
of the running.  I see no need to make it complicated.
And to Karla's question about the green text:
> 2.       Should these stay as they are or be merged into the text?
>
> As they are
Those green responses are already built into the (red) text.  The  
green responses should be carefully read, and anything that may not be  
already incorporated in the "red" responses should be added.   
Otherwise it is just a repeat of stuff already written.
Elaine

On Jun 8, 2011, at 8:35 AM, Carlton Samuels wrote:

> Dear Karla:
> Many thanks for this.  Please see my responses inline.
>
> Best,
> Carlton
>
> ==============================
> Carlton A Samuels
> Mobile: 876-818-1799
> Strategy, Planning, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround
> =============================
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 10:43 PM, Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx 
> > wrote:
> Dear Rafik, Carlton,
>
>
> Please find attached the answers to the questions that were  
> discussed by the JAS WG and captured at the Wiki. All I did was to  
> put this in a word document.
>
> Format is OK with me.
>
> I know the responses in red were discussed during a call and had  
> consensus.
>
> Yes. This is my recollection as well.
>
>
> The individual responses at the end of the document, in green, are  
> from e-mails.
> 1.       Do these answers in green have consensus?
>
> Formally, I'd say no.  But since we have no noted objections....
>
> 2.       Should these stay as they are or be merged into the text?
>
> As they are
> 3.       This word document has all 3 sets of questions from GNSO,  
> RyC and Wolf (I assume this is all we got, please double check). I  
> recommend we keep all in one document. Do you agree?
> Yes
> 4.       Are there any modifications the JAS WG wants to make either  
> content or formatting?
> Would wait to see any response from the list.  But mindful of  
> Rafik's reqt for pushing the answers in time for GNSO's Thursday  
> call, such responses not likely to impact action on GNSO front
> I look forward to hear from you.
>
>
> Kind regards,
>
>
>
> Karla Valente
>
> Director, gTLD Registry Programs
>
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>
> Direct:  + 1 310 301 3878
>
> Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639
>
> Skype: kdlvalente
Elaine Pruis
VP Client Services
elaine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1 509 899 3161