Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Draft summary of public comment (second milestone report) ready for JAS WG review

["Michele Neylon :: Blacknight" <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 5 Aug 2011, at 12:05, <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 <ebw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Michele,
> 
>> The DAG refers to ipv6 - it doesn't specify that it has to be native.
> 
> The problem with viewing the requirements in the DAG to be made in bad faith,
> that is, capable of being satisfied by the weakest possible means, is that if
> one assumes that -- that ICANN-as-a-contracting-party -- is making bad faith
> demands on its counter-parties, it means (a) that ICANN can't expect that its
> compliance will be supported by the courts, which don't reward language that
> is unsupported by intent (*), and (b) that the applicant is risking that the
> interpretation which does it the least harm will be the interpretation that
> applies.
> 
> Eric
> 
> (*) I Am Not A Lawyer (IANAL) but the question of how California courts treat
> contacts where the intent and the language differ came up this week so I just
> happen to have asked.


Eric

I honestly don't understand what you are talking about

I never said anything about the requirements in the DAG as being made in bad 
faith - that is your concept - NOT mine

Some of you view IPv6 as a "problem". I read the DAG and its requirements with 
respect to IPv6. IPv6 is not a problem unless you insist on making it one.

Regards

Michele


Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting & Colocation, Brand Protection
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.com/
http://blog.blacknight.com/
http://blacknight.mobi/
http://mneylon.tel
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612 
UK: 0844 484 9361
Locall: 1850 929 929
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845