<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Review of draft report
- To: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>, Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx>, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Review of draft report
- From: Robert Hoggarth <robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:57:51 -0700
Alan;
Yes. I am also working to create a running tally of issues that come from WG
member comments or that I cannot reconcile as I go through the past meeting
transcripts and draft text. I am hopeful those matters can be discussed during
upcoming WG calls. Thanks for the effort you and Avri have taken to review and
write comments.
Best,
RobH
From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 11:15:22 -0700
To: Robert Hoggarth
<robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:robert.hoggarth@xxxxxxxxx>>, Olivier MJ
Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx<mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx>>, Avri Doria
<avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
Cc: JAS <soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Review of draft report
Rob, I hope in cases where Avri and I have disagreed, you present both or leave
them as comments for group discussion. Same with comments I made that are
questions without a proposed way to resolve.
Alan
At 21/08/2011 12:54 PM, Robert Hoggarth wrote:
Dear Avri and Olivier;
I am experiencing the same problem reading the latest document comments. Even
Alan's original comments seem to be affected.
Consistent with the discussion on Friday's call, I have already begun
incorporating Alan and Avri's suggestions into the main document. We hope to
have a revised document posted to the wiki some time late tomorrow.
Best,
RobH
From: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond <ocl@xxxxxxx<mailto:ocl@xxxxxxx>>
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2011 09:40:05 -0700
To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
Cc: JAS < soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:soac-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] Review of draft report
Hello all,
I've read Alan's comments & agree with the vast majority of them. Good catch on
the corrections!
Avri, is it only with my computer, but the comment boxes (in the .doc document)
appear to have shrunk so much I can't read the text inside them.
Anyone else has the same problem? Anyone know how to get around this?
Kind regards,
Olivier
On 21/08/2011 17:26, Avri Doria wrote :
Hi,
I have added comments to all of your comments. I have attached a
version with my comments added to yours.
Also, I had done my own review - although I did it by adding sticky notes
on the PDF version of the file. I did not move those comments over to
your review. I have attached that as well.
a.
On 20 Aug 2011, at 20:11, Alan Greenberg wrote:
I have reviewed the most recent copy of the report prepared by Rob
and Seth, and a copy with my comments are attached.
There are a number of comments which are substantive and it would be very
useful to know to what extent others agree or disagree with them.
Regards, Alan<Draft_Final_Report_JASWG_20110818_Reordered,
clean-ag.doc>
--
Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond, PhD
http://www.gih.com/ocl.html
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|