ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: [council] JAS Final Report - GNSO

  • To: "SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx" <SOAC-newgtldapsup-wg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [soac-newgtldapsup-wg] FW: [council] JAS Final Report - GNSO
  • From: Karla Valente <karla.valente@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:53:52 -0700

fyi

Karla Valente
Director, gTLD Registry Programs
Mobile:  +1 310 936 4639

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Stéphane Van Gelder
Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 2:42 PM
To: Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] JAS Final Report

Olivier,

In my capacity as GNSO Council Chair, it is my pleasure to inform you, in your 
capacity as ALAC Chair, that the Council voted to approve the motion shown 
below during its meeting today.

Best,

Stéphane Van Gelder
GNSO Council Chair


Whereas:

The GNSO Council and ALAC established the Joint SO/AC Working Group (JASWG) on 
support for new gTLD applicants in April of 2010; and

The Joint SO/AC Working Group released its second Milestone Report, posted for 
consideration by the Board, Chartering Organizations and at-large Community. 
This report documented the completion of work as defined in the extended 
charter and,

The Joint SO/AC Working Group received and discussed the public comments, and

The Joint SO/AC Working Group has completed the enumerated items as defined in 
its extended charter and has published a final report 
(https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations#<https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations>)
 on 14 September 2011 covering those chartered items 
(http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#20110113-1) entitled Final Report of the 
Joint SO/AC new GTLD applicant support working group. and

The Joint SO/AC Working Group is still in the process of completing some last 
tasks including completion of the formal documentation of the comment responses 
for the second milestone community review, and

The GNSO council has not had a chance to review the Final Report nor digest any 
of its contents,

However, the GNSO Council does not wish to delay implementation of support 
programs for applicants from developing regions,

Resolved:

The GNSO Council thanks the members of the Joint SO/AC Working Group for its 
efforts and its dedication to completing these work items on such a tight 
schedule, and

The GNSO Council approves forwarding the final Report to the ICANN Board for 
review and approval, but reserves its right to provide comments to the ICANN 
Board on all of the recommendations contained therein; and

The GNSO Council request ICANN staff begin working on  develop an 
implementation plan following the JAS WG of therecommendations, subject to 
comments received from the GNSO community , and

The GNSO Council requests that ICANN staff publish the implementation plan for 
public comment prior to consideration by the ICANN Board, and

The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group complete the 
publication of its formal Milestone 2 response document as quickly as possible, 
and

The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group remain on call to 
review the outcome of the ICANN implementation of the JAS recommendations.

Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to communicate 
its decision to the ALAC Chair.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy