Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Follow up from yesterday's call (what would registration record look like

[Dave Piscitello <dave.piscitello@xxxxxxxxx>]

When I am transliterating I am mapping from one script to another, either
word by word or character (dipthong) by character (dipthong). Thus spaketh
Wikipedia, thus it is so.

If true, then when you mapped Chocolate Factory from Latin script into
Cyrillic script, you associated "Ch" to "Sh", "o" to "o", etc. The purpose
was to be able to reverse map and get the same string irrespective of which
script you started from.

To accommodate multi-linguality (is this correct), you are saying that it's
best to correlate (A) and (B)

This seems less about sound than symbol/glyph except for the need to come up
with a way to deal with characters for which there is no 1:1 correspondence
but I think I now understand where I erred. Thanks for your patience.

On 4/30/10 9:04 AM  Apr 30, 2010, "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dave,
> 
> When I refer to "transliteration" I am speaking of how the sounds written in
> one script would be rendered in another script, rather than a semantic
> translation of the meaning of those sounds.
> 
> Thus with respect to "registrant organization," your translation as "Chocolate
> Factory" may be accurate, but the transliteration would be something like
> "Fabrika Shokolada."  (Apologies to all those who actually speak Russian and
> could transliterate this more accurately than I can!)
> 
> Particularly with respect to data elements such as registrant name and
> address, transliteration is far more effective than translation in enabling
> contact with the registrant.
> 
> Steve Metalitz
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Dave Piscitello
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:07 AM
> To: Andrei Kolesnikov; Avri Doria; Ird
> Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Follow up from yesterday's call (what would
> registration record look like
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On 4/30/10 4:37 AM  Apr 30, 2010, "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> 
>> Dave, you've ruined the translation/transliteration 100%.
>> The address/domain name - all killed in your
> 
> Well, if I'm going to fail, I may as well fail spectacularly.
> 
> While I failed in one respect, I think I demonstrated what may be a commonly
> encountered misunderstanding. I don't speak or read Russian. If I were to go
> to Russia, I might bring a pocket translator. If I see a sign with what
> appears to be a word майна, I'll type in the Cyrillic characters to
> "translate" the word. The device is called a translator, so why should I think
> it does anything but translate? More importantly, what is the difference
> between what the device "translates" and what you would call "transliterate"?
> 
> Similarly, today when I search and find a web page in Japanese, Chinese,
> Arabic, Cyrillic..., my search results offer me the opportunity to "translate"
> the page. If I were to search and get a result that has a WHOIS record and
> allow my browser to "translate" the page, will the result be different from
> the "transliterated" response that a WHOIS/43 application would display?
> 
> Do these questions have implications on our work? Perhaps they simply prove
> how utterly ignorant of the world of character sets and languages I am? :-O
> 
>> Lets stay on the position, that address should be transliterated or
>> left untouched in local script.
> 
> Agree, but please give those of us who struggle to understand the differences
> between transliteration and translation an example of what any of the data I
> mangled would look like transliterated.
> 
>> But - we've got your idea about no need to duplicate the same data
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> --andrei
>> 
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-
>>> irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 7:34 PM
>>> To: Ird
>>> Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Follow up from yesterday's call (what
>>> would registration record look like
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> Apologies for missing yesterday's call (and not even sending in prior
>>> apologies)  I had a work call at the time.  But I should have
>>> remembered to send apologies.
>>> 
>>> This may have been discussed, but I think it might make sense to
>>> translate the Registrar provided information. For the most part these
>>> will be canned translation of setting data so it should not involve
>>> significant marginal cost/effort to do it.
>>> 
>>> Of course translating the names of the nameserver and email only work
>>> if those are indeed existing domain names and email addresses.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> a.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 27 Apr 2010, at 08:02, Dave Piscitello wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I thought it might be helpful to provide an example of what a WHOIS
>>> reply might look like if a consensus were reached by the committee to
>>> recommend that
>>>> 
>>>>       both an ASCII-7 and UTF-8 (IRD) version of a registration
>>> record be returned
>>>> 
>>>> *and* that, by convention,
>>>> 
>>>>       all data elements would be of a format
>>> <identifier><separator><value><CRLF>
>>>> 
>>>> Set aside the issue of "who" submits the ASCII7 and UTF-8 versions
>>> for the moment. I think that is a separate issue with other impacts.
>>>> 
>>>> Note that the following examples are presented to allow everyone on
>>> the call to see what I described verbally, and to allow folks not on
>>> the call to see as well. There are other formats the committee might
>>> consider superior to this and members are encouraged to comment.
>>>> 
>>>> The version I create here duplicates all registration information.
>>>> As
>>> we have discussed on the list, there may be no need to duplicate the
>>> fields that the registrar provides (i.e., the committee could
>>> recommend that these would be represented in ASCII7 only).
>>>> 
>>>> I used Russian because I know many of the characters (I wrote a
>>> keyboard translator for a minicomputer in the lat 1970s:-) I'm using
>>> crude translation from babelfish.yahoo.com and a fictitious IDN TLD
>>> so there is a high probability that I've botched the
>>> translation/transliteration - but I hope this conveys the idea.
>>>> 
>>>> ------ Part 1 of the registration record is in the
>>>> mandatory/ASCII7--
>>> ---
>>>> Domain ID:D2347548-LROR
>>>> Domain Name:ROCK.STAR
>>>> Created On:14-Sep-1998 04:00:00 UTC
>>>> Last Updated On:26-Mar-2010 15:12:28 UTC Expiration Date:07-Dec-2012
>>>> 17:04:26 UTC Sponsoring Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR)
>>>> Status:CLIENT DELETE PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED
>>>> Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
>>>> Status:DELETE PROHIBITED Status:RENEW PROHIBITED Status:TRANSFER
>>>> PROHIBITED Status:UPDATE PROHIBITED Registrant ID:CR12376439
>>>> Registrant Name:Administrator Registrant Organization:Chocolate
>>>> Factory Registrant Street1:Cherry Lane Registrant Street2:
>>>> Registrant Street3:
>>>> Registrant City:Moscow
>>>> Registrant State/Province:
>>>> Registrant Postal Code:
>>>> Registrant Country:Russia
>>>> Registrant Phone:+7.922.555.1234
>>>> Registrant Phone Ext.:
>>>> Registrant FAX:+7.922.555.1235
>>>> Registrant FAX Ext.:
>>>> Registrant Email:administrator@xxxxxxxxx Admin ID:CR12376441 Admin
>>>> Name:Administrator Admin Organization:Chocolate Factory Admin
>>>> Street1:Cherry Lane Admin Street2:
>>>> Admin Street3:
>>>> Admin City:Moscow
>>>> Admin State/Province:
>>>> Admin Postal Code:
>>>> Admin Country:Russia
>>>> Admin Phone:+7.922.555.1234
>>>> Admin Phone Ext.:
>>>> Admin FAX:+7.922.555.1235
>>>> Admin FAX Ext.:
>>>> Admin Email:administrator@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Tech ID:CR12376440
>>>> Tech Name:Administrator
>>>> Tech Organization:Chocolate Factory
>>>> Tech Street1:Cherry Lane
>>>> Tech Street2:
>>>> Tech Street3:
>>>> Tech City:Moscow
>>>> Tech State/Province:
>>>> Tech Postal Code:
>>>> Tech Country: Russia
>>>> Tech Phone:+7.922.555.1234
>>>> Tech Phone Ext.:
>>>> Tech FAX:+7.922.555.1235
>>>> Tech FAX Ext.:
>>>> Tech Email:domain-admin@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> Name Server:NS1.rock.star
>>>> Name Server:NS2.rock.star
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> DNSSEC:Signed
>>>> DS Created:26-Mar-2010 15:12:06 UTC
>>>> DS Maximum Signature Life 1:3456000 seconds DS Created:26-Mar-2010
>>>> 15:12:28 UTC DS Maximum Signature Life 2:3456000 seconds
>>>> ------- Part 2 of the record is in a character set the registrant
>>>> Domain ID:D2347548-LROR Domain Name: утес.звезда Created
>>>> On:14-Sep-1998 04:00:00 UTC Last Updated On:26-Mar-2010 15:12:28 UTC
>>>> Expiration Date:07-Dec-2012 17:04:26 UTC Sponsoring
>>>> Registrar:GoDaddy.com, Inc. (R91-LROR) Status:CLIENT DELETE
>>>> PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT RENEW PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT TRANSFER
>>>> PROHIBITED Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED Status:DELETE PROHIBITED
>>>> Status:RENEW PROHIBITED Status:TRANSFER PROHIBITED Status:UPDATE
>>>> PROHIBITED Registrant ID:CR12376439 Registrant Name:администратор
>>>> Registrant Organization: Фабрика шоколада Registrant Street1: майна
>>>> вишни Registrant Street2:
>>>> Registrant Street3:
>>>> Registrant City: Москва
>>>> Registrant State/Province:
>>>> Registrant Postal Code:
>>>> Registrant Country: Россия
>>>> Registrant Phone:+7.922.555.1234
>>>> Registrant Phone Ext.:
>>>> Registrant FAX:+7.922.555.1235
>>>> Registrant FAX Ext.:
>>>> Registrant Email: администратор@утес.звезда Admin ID:CR12376441
>>>> Admin Name: администратор Admin Organization: Фабрика шоколада Admin
>>>> Street1: майна вишни Admin Street2:
>>>> Admin Street3:
>>>> Admin City: Москва
>>>> Admin State/Province:
>>>> Admin Postal Code:
>>>> Admin Country: Россия
>>>> Admin Phone:+7.922.555.1234
>>>> Admin Phone Ext.:
>>>> Admin FAX:+7.922.555.1235
>>>> Admin FAX Ext.:
>>>> Admin Email: администратор@утес.звезда Tech ID:CR12376440 Tech Name:
>>>> администратор Tech Organization: Фабрика шоколада Tech Street1:
>>>> майна вишни Tech Street2:
>>>> Tech Street3:
>>>> Tech City: Москва
>>>> Tech State/Province:
>>>> Tech Postal Code:
>>>> Tech Country: Россия
>>>> Tech Phone:+7.922.555.1234
>>>> Tech Phone Ext.:
>>>> Tech FAX:+7.922.555.1235
>>>> Tech FAX Ext.:
>>>> Tech Email: администратор@утес.звезда Name Server: ns1.утес.звезда
>>>> Name Server:ns2.утес.звезда Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> Name Server:
>>>> DNSSEC:Signed
>>>> DS Created:26-Mar-2010 15:12:06 UTC
>>>> DS Maximum Signature Life 1:3456000 seconds DS Created:26-Mar-2010
>>>> 15:12:28 UTC DS Maximum Signature Life 2:3456000 seconds
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
>