<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting
- To: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting
- From: "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:00:33 +0800
Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting
>Edmon noted that a more important question to address is what will the
>purpose or use of the transliterated information. He emphasized that if we
>could
>determine who will use the information then we could decide how the
>transliteration
>could work.
I agree with Edmon that we should know that who will be the customers of the
transliterated information.
we should know why we do it and any benefits.
If the customers are the public users, I think that many user will not know the
other language's transliterated information.
for example, I am chinese and know chinese and english, If i check some domain
name information registered in Arabic characters
in Sadi Arab and the domain names whois information are transliterated, I
don't know Arabic and the transliterated information.
so this transliterated information is no use to me.
the persontage of people who know english is larger than the persontage of
people who know the transliterated information of other language instead of
native language.
if the customers are the big organziations such as FBI, the transliterated
information is useful to them because they have enough resource to decode the
transliterated information. of course, even the domain name information is not
the transliterated information, they can also decode it.
if doing it without customers oriented, we may fall in "do it just because we
want to do it " even the ascii transliterated information is no use to most of
the public.
Jiankang Yao
CNNIC
----- Original Message -----
From: Julie Hedlund
To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:22 PM
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting
Dear IRD-WG members,
Below and in the attached document are the action items and main discussion
points for the 10 May 2010 meeting of the IRD-WG. These also are on the wiki
at:
https://st.icann.org/int-reg-data-wg/index.cgi?internationalized_registration_data_working_group.
Please let me know if you have any changes or questions.
Our next meeting is scheduled for Monday, 24 May at 1900 UTC, 12:00 PDT,
15:00 EDT, 20:00 London, 21:00 CEST, 03:00 Beijing, 04:00 Kyoto, 07:00 NZDT
(Tues 25.05)
Best regards,
Julie
Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support
IRD-WG Meeting: 10 May 2010 at 1400 UTC
Attendees: Edmon Chung, Rafik Dammak, Jim Galvin, Jeremy Hitchcock, and Bob
Hutchinson; from staff: Julie Hedlund, Dave Piscitello, and Steve Sheng.
Action Items: 1) Staff will outline a Model 4 along the lines suggested by
Jim Galvin with assistance from Jim; 2) Staff will develop a draft preliminary
approach for Working Group consideration as a basis for a Public Forum in
Brussels.
Discussion Summary: See attached file.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|