ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[ssac-gnso-irdwg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting

  • To: "Julie Hedlund" <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>, <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting
  • From: "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 15:00:33 +0800

Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting

>Edmon noted that a more important question to address is what will the
>purpose or use of the transliterated information. He emphasized that if we 
>could
>determine who will use the information then we could decide how the 
>transliteration
>could work.

I agree with Edmon that we should know that who will be the customers of the 
transliterated information.

we should know why we do it and any benefits.

If the customers are the public users, I think that many user will not know the 
other language's transliterated information.

for example, I am chinese and know chinese and english, If i check some domain 
name information registered in Arabic characters
 in Sadi Arab and the domain names whois information are transliterated, I 
don't know Arabic and the transliterated information.
so this transliterated information is no use to me.

the persontage of people who know english is larger than the persontage of 
people who know the transliterated information of other language instead of 
native language. 

if the customers are the big organziations such as FBI, the transliterated 
information is useful to them because they have enough resource to decode the 
transliterated information. of course, even the domain name information is not 
the transliterated information, they can also decode it.

if doing it without customers oriented, we may fall in "do it just because we 
want to do it " even the ascii transliterated information is no use to most of 
the public.


Jiankang Yao
CNNIC



  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Julie Hedlund 
  To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 11:22 PM
  Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Actions/Discussion Points: 10 May Meeting


  Dear IRD-WG members,

  Below and in the attached document are the action items and main discussion 
points for the 10 May 2010 meeting of the IRD-WG.  These also are on the wiki 
at: 
https://st.icann.org/int-reg-data-wg/index.cgi?internationalized_registration_data_working_group.
   Please let me know if you have any changes or questions.  

  Our next meeting is scheduled for Monday, 24 May at 1900 UTC, 12:00 PDT, 
15:00 EDT, 20:00 London, 21:00 CEST, 03:00 Beijing, 04:00 Kyoto, 07:00 NZDT 
(Tues 25.05)

  Best regards,

  Julie

  Julie Hedlund, Director, SSAC Support

  IRD-WG Meeting: 10 May 2010 at 1400 UTC

  Attendees: Edmon Chung, Rafik Dammak, Jim Galvin, Jeremy Hitchcock, and Bob 
Hutchinson; from staff: Julie Hedlund, Dave Piscitello, and Steve Sheng. 

  Action Items: 1) Staff will outline a Model 4 along the lines suggested by 
Jim Galvin with assistance from Jim; 2) Staff will develop a draft preliminary 
approach for Working Group consideration as a basis for a Public Forum in 
Brussels.

  Discussion Summary: See attached file.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy