Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the IRD-WG (Draft)

[Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Avri,

Thanks so much for your comments/edits.  Steve and I will let you know if we 
have any questions.

Best regards,

Julie


On 2/3/12 5:48 PM, "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I am just reading it now, apologies for the last minute, and have attached a 
copy with some minor issues notated.

I just noticed, however, that with the except of the definition of 
transcription, there is no other mention of this in the report.  did we decide 
after all that conversation to remove this completely.  If so, I missed that.

thanks

avri



On 30 Jan 2012, at 15:40, Julie Hedlund wrote:

> Dear IRD-WG members,
>
> Please send any comments on the final report by 03 February.  Attached is the 
> version with comments from Scott Austin.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> ------ Forwarded Message
> From: Julie Hedlund <julie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 05:14:15 -0800
> To: "ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx" <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: FW: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the 
> IRD-WG (Draft)
>
> Dear IRD-WG members,
>
> Attached are the comments from Scott Austin for your consideration.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
> From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Julie Hedlund
> Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 8:54 AM
> To: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] REMINDER FOR REVIEW: Final Report of the IRD-WG 
> (Draft)
>
> Dear IRD-WG members,
>
> This is a reminder that we need your comments on the attached report.  The 
> deadline was 11 January but we will extend it to give you more time for a 
> review.  Please review this draft of the Final Report and send and questions, 
> comments, or concerns by **COB Wednesday, 18 January.**
>
> Attached in word and PDF is a draft of the Final Report of the 
> Internationalized Registration Data Working Group for your review.  Steve 
> Sheng and I have tried to capture the changes agreed to based on the comments 
> received in the public forum and discussed in subsequent meetings.  The 
> changes are included in redline for ease of review.
>
> NOTE: It will be extremely helpful if you could respond to this message even 
> if you have no changes to the document to indicate that you have read it and 
> agree with it.  Also, if you have any objections to the document please 
> suggest revisions that would address your concerns.  This is an important 
> step because once the report is finalized we will ask the Chairs to send it 
> to the GNSO and SSAC for approval with the assumption that it has the 
> approval of all of the IRD-WG members (or if there are objections they are 
> noted in the report).  Of course, if this document changes substantially in 
> this review we will send another version and we may also schedule a meeting 
> to discuss it if the WG desires it.
>
> Thank you very much for your assistance.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Julie
>
>
>
> San Francisco * San Diego * Los Angeles * Sacramento * Orange County * Las 
> Vegas * Portland * Seattle * Houston * Chicago * Phoenix * Dallas * New York 
> * Long Island * Florham Park * Denver * Miami * Atlanta * Austin * Hartford
>
> This email communication may contain CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION WHICH ALSO MAY 
> BE LEGALLY PRIVILEGED and is intended only for the use of the intended 
> recipients identified above. If you are not the intended recipient of this 
> communication, you are hereby notified that any unauthorized review, use, 
> dissemination, distribution, downloading, or copying of this communication is 
> strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient and have received 
> this communication in error, please immediately notify us by reply email, 
> delete the communication and destroy all copies.
> IRS CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE
> To ensure compliance with requirements by the IRS, we inform you that any 
> U.S. tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) 
> is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of 
> (i) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (ii) promoting, 
> marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter 
> addressed herein.
> GORDON & REES LLP
> http://www.gordonrees.com <http://www.gordonrees.com/>
>
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
>
>
> ------ End of Forwarded Message
> <SRA rev of FINAL Internationalized Registration Data Working Group Report 
> 04.doc>