ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[ssac-gnso-irdwg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Re: LAST CALL: DEADLINE Monday 5 March: Final Report

  • To: "'James M. Galvin'" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Re: LAST CALL: DEADLINE Monday 5 March: Final Report
  • From: "Metalitz, Steven" <met@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 18:38:17 +0000

I support the declaration of consensus.

Steve Metalitz 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of James M. Galvin
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2012 1:34 PM
To: James M. Galvin
Cc: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Re: LAST CALL: DEADLINE Monday 5 March: Final Report


This is reminder that we need your statement of support.  Please reply to this 
message and indicate if you support this work or your reason for not supporting 
the work.

Thanks,

Jim


On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:43 AM, James M. Galvin wrote:

> Folks,
>
> It is time to declare what the consensus is for our final report and 
> the summary of public comments.  The documents have been prepared 
> according to all comments and discussions and we need to submit the 
> work products to our chartering organizations: GNSO (registry
> constituency) and the SSAC.
>
> On behalf of Edmon and myself, as co-chairs, I am going to make a 
> declaration of consensus and ask for agreement or statement of 
> objection.  Our decision making methodology defined in our charter 
> requires that folks explicitly state if they agree (or state their
> objection) and based on those statements the chairs will designate the 
> status of the working group as one of the following:
>
>               * Unanimous consensus position
>               * Rough consensus position where no more than 1/3 disagrees and 
> at 
> least 2/3 agree
>               * Strong support (at least a simple majority), but significant 
> opposition (more than 1/3)
>               * No majority position
>
> In addition, we are required to include the names and affiliations of 
> those in support of each position.  There is an appeal process defined 
> in the charter if anyone needs it.
>
> The current response declarations are noted for the record.
>
> Avri (okay with changes incorporated)
> Scott (okay with revised version)
> Owen (okay with change incorporated)
> Bob Hutchinson (okay as is)
> Jiankang (okay as is)
> Jim (okay as is)
> Edmon (okay as is)
>
> The following WG members have yet to respond.
>
> Erick Iriarte Ahon - ALAC, LACTLD
> Jay Daley --- GNSO Registry Stakeholder Group, .NZ Rafik Dammak -- 
> GNSO Non-Commercial Users Stakeholder Group, Tunisia Jeremy Hitchcock, 
> GNSO Registrar Stakeholder Group, DYN-DNS Sarmad Hussain, SSAC Andrei 
> Kolesnikov -- Nominating Committee Appointee, .RU Mark Kosters - SSAC, 
> ARIN Steven Metalitz -- GNSO Intellectual Property Interests 
> Constituency, Commercial Stakeholder Group Ram Mohan, Board Liaison, 
> SSAC, Afilias June Seo, GNSO Registry Stakeholder Group, VeriSign
>
> The deadline for your declaration will be 1600 UTC on Tuesday, 6 March 
> 2012.  That is 4 days or 2 business days from now.
>
> The declaration of consensus is as follows.
>
> The Internationalized Registration Working Group accepts the attached 
> Final Report and Public Comment documents as its work product.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Jim
>







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy