ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[ssac-gnso-irdwg]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Re: LAST CALL: DEADLINE Monday 5 March: Final Report

  • To: "'Rafik Dammak'" <rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>, "'James M. Galvin'" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Re: LAST CALL: DEADLINE Monday 5 March: Final Report
  • From: "Andrei Kolesnikov" <andrei@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 18:17:04 +0400

I support the declaration of consensus on the report.

(not a noncom member of gNSO anymore but still in WG)

 

--andrei

 

From: owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx] 
On Behalf Of Rafik Dammak
Sent: Tuesday, March 06, 2012 4:56 PM
To: James M. Galvin
Cc: ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] Re: LAST CALL: DEADLINE Monday 5 March: Final 
Report

 

hi James,

 

I support the declaration of consensus on the report.

 

Best,




Rafik 

 

2012/3/6 James M. Galvin <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>


This is reminder that we need your statement of support.  Please reply to this 
message and indicate if you support this work or your reason for not supporting 
the work.

Thanks,

Jim




On Mar 2, 2012, at 10:43 AM, James M. Galvin wrote:

Folks,

It is time to declare what the consensus is for our final report and the 
summary of public comments.  The documents have been prepared according to all 
comments and discussions and we need to submit the work products to our 
chartering organizations: GNSO (registry constituency) and the SSAC.

On behalf of Edmon and myself, as co-chairs, I am going to make a declaration 
of consensus and ask for agreement or statement of objection.  Our decision 
making methodology defined in our charter requires that folks explicitly state 
if they agree (or state their objection) and based on those statements the 
chairs will designate the status of the working group as one of the following:

               • Unanimous consensus position
               • Rough consensus position where no more than 1/3 disagrees and 
at least 2/3 agree
               • Strong support (at least a simple majority), but significant 
opposition (more than 1/3)
               • No majority position

In addition, we are required to include the names and affiliations of those in 
support of each position.  There is an appeal process defined in the charter if 
anyone needs it.

The current response declarations are noted for the record.

Avri (okay with changes incorporated)
Scott (okay with revised version)
Owen (okay with change incorporated)
Bob Hutchinson (okay as is)
Jiankang (okay as is)
Jim (okay as is)
Edmon (okay as is)

The following WG members have yet to respond.

Erick Iriarte Ahon - ALAC, LACTLD
Jay Daley --- GNSO Registry Stakeholder Group, .NZ
Rafik Dammak -- GNSO Non-Commercial Users Stakeholder Group, Tunisia
Jeremy Hitchcock, GNSO Registrar Stakeholder Group, DYN-DNS
Sarmad Hussain, SSAC
Andrei Kolesnikov -- Nominating Committee Appointee, .RU
Mark Kosters – SSAC, ARIN
Steven Metalitz -- GNSO Intellectual Property Interests Constituency, 
Commercial Stakeholder Group
Ram Mohan, Board Liaison, SSAC, Afilias
June Seo, GNSO Registry Stakeholder Group, VeriSign

The deadline for your declaration will be 1600 UTC on Tuesday, 6 March 2012.  
That is 4 days or 2 business days from now.

The declaration of consensus is as follows.

The Internationalized Registration Working Group accepts the attached Final 
Report and Public Comment documents as its work product.

Thanks!

Jim

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy