<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] 48 HR LAST CALL: Final Report of the IRD WG
- To: "Steve Sheng" <steve.sheng@xxxxxxxxx>, "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] 48 HR LAST CALL: Final Report of the IRD WG
- From: "Jiankang YAO" <yaojk@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 10:38:44 +0800
I am ok with the changes reflected in the report.
Jiankang Yao
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Sheng" <steve.sheng@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 8:44 AM
Subject: Re: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] 48 HR LAST CALL: Final Report of the IRD WG
Thanks Jim, I have included a redline version reflecting the proposed
changes on the IRD-WG list so far.
Kind regards,
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 14:12:22 -0700
To: "ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx" <ssac-gnso-irdwg@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "James M. Galvin" <jgalvin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ssac-gnso-irdwg] 48 HR LAST CALL: Final Report of the IRD WG
>This is a formal announcement of the last call for this document. I
>have attached the last version distributed by Steve. There have been
>a few comments already but nothing substantive. If you have any
>issues or concerns please do respond to the list to make sure they get
>addressed.
>
>Since the working group has already formally approved this document,
>the purpose of this review is to focus on the SSAC comments. General
>editorial comments are always welcome but substantive comments need to
>focus on the SSAC changes. In addition, silence will be interpreted
>as acceptance of the changes.
>
>The LAST CALL will close at the end of business everywhere, Wednesday,
>9 May 2012.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Jim
>Co-Chair IRD WG
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|