<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
.MOBI
- To: stld-rfp-mobi@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: .MOBI
- From: Tim Chown <tjc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:57:31 +0100
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4i
This is bad.
Why fragment the namespace by function, when the namespace has no
guarantees on function? Or screen size, or whatever. Why can't
a provider just use mobi.provider.com?
Yet more defensive registrations to argue over.
Maybe ICANN just wants the $$$?
ICANN's credibility will be damaged further if this goes through.
Tim
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|