e164.arpa is a better system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have to agree with everyone else who objects to this version of .tel: I don't see anything in the proposal that can't be done better with e164.arpa. Also, making the service provider the actual registrant bothers me as much as it bothers Larry Boston. It looks like a new way to give service providers more power over consumers, while vastly complicating the subscribers life if something goes wrong. And the lame-ass astroturf campaign is not inspiring any confidence in Pulver, either. *Of course* the service providers are going to support something designed to make money for them. The repeated form letters do nothing but reinforce the impression that even Pulver's consitituents don't understand the full implications of a .tel TLD. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.01 iD8DBQFAkKnpcpuEJT2bpHsRArLvAKC6hPmEYj4rqAPlTGQRESco16P30wCg2agw 4DipGoo6zAs8yRyWL++ucAg= =5QhE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |