ICANN ICANN Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Comments regarding Transfer Denial Reasons

  • To: transfer-comments-c@xxxxxxxxx
  • Subject: Comments regarding Transfer Denial Reasons
  • From: PSI-USA Hostmaster <hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2005 14:55:40 +0100


several problems with the Transfer Denial Reasons:

- There is no standardized way for Registrars to communicate the
NACK. It should be done by e-mail, but there is not a standard format.
On the other hand, e-mail is not the right way. It isn't protocol
conform and hard to automize for the GR. The Transfer Denial Reason
should be sent directly to the Registries through RRP or EPP, and
forwarded to the GR.

- Whose responsibility is it?

(Transfer Denial Reason 9)

A domain name is within 60 days (or a shorter period to be
determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back
to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree
and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs).

Should the Registrar or the Registry check if this rule applies?
Who has to implement this? In my opinion, it should be at the Registry

- There sould be also an extenstion:

10. A domain name was not canceled correctly.

Best regards

Curd Bems

With best regards,
TEAM PSI-USA / Hostmaster
PSI-USA Inc., DNS Service Center (Hostmaster)
Maximilianstrasse 6, 93047 Regensburg, Germany
Curd Bems, hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Tel. +49 941 59559-235  Fax. +49 941 59559-457

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy