Comments regarding Transfer Denial Reasons
several problems with the Transfer Denial Reasons:
- There is no standardized way for Registrars to communicate the NACK. It should be done by e-mail, but there is not a standard format. On the other hand, e-mail is not the right way. It isn't protocol conform and hard to automize for the GR. The Transfer Denial Reason should be sent directly to the Registries through RRP or EPP, and forwarded to the GR.
- Whose responsibility is it?
(Transfer Denial Reason 9)
A domain name is within 60 days (or a shorter period to be determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs).
Should the Registrar or the Registry check if this rule applies? Who has to implement this? In my opinion, it should be at the Registry Level.
- There sould be also an extenstion:
10. A domain name was not canceled correctly.
-- With best regards, TEAM PSI-USA / Hostmaster _______________________________________________ PSI-USA Inc., DNS Service Center (Hostmaster) Maximilianstrasse 6, 93047 Regensburg, Germany Curd Bems, hostmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxx Tel. +49 941 59559-235 Fax. +49 941 59559-457