ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[transparency-2007]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [ga] Limitations of report on ICANN transparency and accountabilty

  • To: Joop Teernstra <terastra@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, ICANN transparency-2007 <transparency-2007@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [ga] Limitations of report on ICANN transparency and accountabilty
  • From: Jeff Williams <jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 21:29:16 -0700

Joop and all,

  ICANN's complaint handeling is anything but robust except in
reports and statements, ect.  The RegistryFly disaster proves
such glaringly...

Joop Teernstra wrote:

> At 05:09 a.m. 26/04/2007, Edward Hasbrouck wrote:
> >Limitations of report on ICANN transparency and accountabilty:
> >
> >http://forum.icann.org/lists/transparency-2007/msg00003.html
> >
> >The deadline for comments on the report is Friday, 27 April 2007:
> >
> >http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-4-29mar07.htm
>
> According to the report :"While comprehensive, this does not represent
> a
> definitive review of ICANN's accountability and transparency.
> Accountability is a normative concept and the
> framework used for the review represents just one way of approaching
> the
> issue. "
>
> And so it is. Accountability to those who are ultimately paying for
> ICANN's
> budget is not addressed.
> Comparisons are made (not in ICANN's favor) with an organization like
> the
> ADB, which is accountable to the participating governments.
>
> Praise for the ICANN complaints handling system:  "Robust approach".
> "In relation to complaint and response procedures, ICANN has developed
> three
> separate but interrelated mechanisms: the Ombudsman, Reconsideration
> Committee, and Independent Review Panel of Board actions. Together
> they offer a
> robust approach to complaints handling; providing internal oversight
> of Board
> decisions and staff actions, and thus reducing the likelihood of
> litigation."
>
> The report also speaks about "ICANN's bottom up tradition" ... perhaps
> what
> is meant is that it was a corporate private sector initiative, not a
> governmental one.
>
>
> -joop-
> Part 1.1   Type: Plain Text (text/plain)

Regards,

--
Jeffrey A. Williams
Spokesman for INEGroup LLA. - (Over 134k members/stakeholders strong!)
"Obedience of the law is the greatest freedom" -
   Abraham Lincoln

"Credit should go with the performance of duty and not with what is
very often the accident of glory" - Theodore Roosevelt

"If the probability be called P; the injury, L; and the burden, B;
liability depends upon whether B is less than L multiplied by
P: i.e., whether B is less than PL."
United States v. Carroll Towing  (159 F.2d 169 [2d Cir. 1947]
===============================================================
Updated 1/26/04
CSO/DIR. Internet Network Eng. SR. Eng. Network data security
IDNS. div. of Information Network Eng.  INEG. INC.
ABA member in good standing member ID 01257402
E-Mail jwkckid1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Registered Email addr with the USPS
Contact Number: 214-244-4827


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy