<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Study Suggestion Number 24
- To: study-suggestions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Study Suggestion Number 24
- From: study-suggestion-response@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 17:14:52 -0800
Submitted By:
[Redacted for privacy reasons]
Topic:
Whether registrars include in their registration agreements the Whois-related
terms required by the Registrar Accreditation Agreement (RAA).
Hypothesis:
Many registrars are not appropriately obtaining agreement to all of the terms
required under Section 3.7.7 of the RAA (including without limitation the
requirement that registrants agree to provide accurate information (3.7.7.1),
an acknowledgement by registrants that the provision of false information is a
material breach (3.7.7.2), agreement to the proxy provision and the acceptance
of liability flowing from use of a proxy (3.7.7.3), consent to the use of
registrant data (3.7.7.4), etc.), and this hinders the validity of the
registrarsâ?? use of personal data and the legitimate enforcement of
intellectual property rights.
How the hypothesis could be falsified:
If it can be shown that all or nearly all registrars are appropriately
obtaining agreement to all of the terms required under Section 3.7.7 of the
RAA.
Utility:
It would identify whether registrars are appropriately complying with the RAA.
It would also identify whether problems with Whois currently require policy
changes or better enforcement of existing agreements. It would also act as a
barometer concerning whether registrars and their affiliates could be relied on
to enter into required agreements with registrants and enhanced obligations,
should a more restrictive Whois system such as OPoC be implemented where
registrars and their affiliates undoubtedly would be required to obtain the
registrantsâ?? consent to act as the custodian of information and relay
communications in a much more robust way than in the current Whois regime.
Type of Study Needed:
This study could be done by obtaining a representative and historical sampling
of registrarsâ?? terms and conditions to which registrants must agree in order
to register a domain name.
Data that needs to be collected:
The data collected would include a statistically relevant sampling of
registrarsâ?? terms and conditions -- covering various gTLDs -- to which
registrants must agree in order to register a domain name.
Population to be surveyed:
ICANN-accredited registrars.
Sample Size:
We cannot readily determine how to identify a statistically relevant sample.
This of course could be accomplished by specialized survey personnel.
Type of Analysis:
Once the data is collected, a statistical analysis could be performed to help
understand what percentage of sampled registrars is appropriately obtaining
agreement to all of the terms required under Section 3.7.7 of the RAA.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|