<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Study Suggestion Number 12
- To: study-suggestions@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Study Suggestion Number 12
- From: study-suggestion-response@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2008 00:58:04 -0800
Submitted By:
[Redacted for privacy reasons]
Topic:
A. In which way can privacy sensitive information of private persons be
secured, while law enforcers have at the same time a proportional access which
does justice to the international complications that Whois registrations bring
with it for law enforcement.
2. How can Whois registrations become more false proof?
Hypothesis:
How the hypothesis could be falsified:
Utility:
The better the data in Whois is and a proportional access is assured the less
the need for strict rules for access will be.
Type of Study Needed:
An inventory of requirements on the privacy side as well as on the enforcement
side, a comparison of such and conclusions which lead to a middle way.
What is needed to make Whois registrations better and how can they be checked?
Data that needs to be collected:
Research into: proportionality; needs of law enforcers; what data is necessary
in Whois?; what data needs to be checked/checkable at registration?; which
terms of contract on breaches of contract, e.g. on misuse between
registrars/registrees and costumer have to be in place to make the internet a
safer palce for end users?
Population to be surveyed:
Law enfocers; data protection agencies; registrars/registrees; end users
organisations
Sample Size:
Type of Analysis:
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|