<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[no subject]
- To: xxx-icm-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
- From: "Trevor Gerald" <hardbodies@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 21:54:52 +0800
Hi Icann!
I believe in the scientific method, I say we give dot XXX a try.
Here are two possibilities
1. Webmasters will not use .xxx
No one adopts it. Result, no negative affects, in a way... Porn
continues to be unmarked with a TLD. But highly accessible using a search
engines. People continue to click on links unaware that what they might find.
2. Use .xxx
First let's say that .xxx does create more porn. (Although I'm never
seen catsup labels create more catsup, buyer demand does that.)
If it does create more porn then it means there is more demand, right?
THEN .xxx will be more highly adopted. Although people claim that the volume
of porn is spiraling out of control at present without .xxx.
If .xxx is more highly adopted then people wishing to block porn can
use .xxx as a key to block those sites.
Maybe I'm just being too logical here, but I can't see a downside of trying it
out.
Sincere thanks,
Trevor Gerald
=
Mobile Messaging and Email for Business
Save money and time with Hosted Exchange synced with mobile devices.
http://a8-asy.a8ww.net/a8-ads/adftrclick?redirectid=19f0dc27b51e62f6eed079f03121f022
--
Powered By Outblaze
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|