<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
XXX comment
- To: xxx-icm-agreement@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: XXX comment
- From: WebMagic101@xxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:40:57 EST
To the ICANN administrators:
I am very much opposed to allowing the use of a XXX extension. By allowing
it, an entire can of worms can be opened that will be almost impossible to
stop and will certainly cause a tremendous web of legal nightmares.
Companies within the adult industry will be subject to lawsuits deciding
whether the owners of the .com, .net or .biz effectively have '1st chance'
registration rights, 'IF' in fact there isn't already a trademark involved.
Beyond that there are basic freedoms to be considered. If the extension is
allowed, there is nothing to keep everyone from merchant processors, banking
institutes and even government from trying to enforce a virtual 'red light
district' to those involved. Does ICANN truly want to be known as the
catalyst
behind countless, {possibly unconsidered} negative possibilities?
Its already been established over and over that the adult online industry
does NOT want the extension, how many more times does this have to be
addressed
before the message is taken to heart? Just because one company (obviously
ICM - the proposed monetary recipient) uses its money to continually try and
hammer this through your organization does not mean you cannot say and mean
the word 'NO' once and for all; you can and should.
The adult industry does not want it, countries outside of the US do not want
it and even you at ICANN have stated your negativity towards it - once again
I implore you to reject this proposal.
Respectfully,
Victoria
<BR><BR><BR>**************************************<BR> AOL now offers free
email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at
http://www.aol.com.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|