ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [alac] Current status of the action list

  • To: "Interim ALAC" <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [alac] Current status of the action list
  • From: "Sebastian Ricciardi" <sricciardi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sat, 19 Apr 2003 19:08:52 -0300

I'm sure Thomas and I will reach an agreement on the internal procedures
very soon. In fact, I like Thomas'  last draft. I will submit my comments on
that matter before tuesday. I also have some thougths regarding IDNs. I hope
to submit some ideas this week, based on Hong's comments.

I also thank Wendy for her mail about current GNSO position on new TLDs. I'm
sure all of us read Ross Rader's and Brett Fausett's proposals on this
issue. There is a new and worth reading work by Milton Mueller and  Lee Mc
Knight, from the Convergence Center of Syracuse University. You can get the
article at http://dcc.syr.edu/miscarticles/NewTLDs-MM-LM.pdf

Best Regards, and happy Easters.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Vittorio Bertola" <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <alac@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:44 PM
Subject: [alac] Current status of the action list

> This is a revision of the action list originally posted on April 7.
> Please review it and add your comments.
> * gTLD
> There has been some discussion on this on the list.
> Wendy: prepare a draft comment on the sTLD criteria document (Denise:
> deadlines?)
> * IDN
> Hong has posted some initial considerations. I'm asking everyone to
> submit comments (I have some) so that we can proceed with a draft.
> * ENUM
> Esther: any news? Perhaps we should aim to prepare an initial short
> statement of general points (such as "a simple and clear opt-in
> mechanism is necessary before publishing names and phone numbers of
> individuals through WHOIS", at least in my opinion)
> * Budget
> There have been some comments. Particularly, we have Thomas's proposal
> to ask for further money to pay for the travel of the GNSO liaison and
> the Board liaison (and perhaps the Chair) to meetings. Should we
> proceed with this? Also we have to decide what to do with the money
> not spent for Rio.
> * Internal procedures
> Work is proceeding (see the related thread). Thomas & Sebastian: can
> you prepare a final draft?
> * At Large Structure Criteria & RALO MoU
> Waiting for public comments. Did we already get any? (Perhaps we
> should (re)circulate the call for input?)
> --
> vb.                  [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
> -------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy