Re: [alac] [fwd] [council] Staff-Prepared Issues Report on Privacy Issues Related to Whois (from: touton@icann.org)

[Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am a little disappointed by the fact that the process suggested by
the document seems quite long. I understand that not everyone might
share the same priorities that we would give to the different issues
(disclosure policy through Whois being the top one, I think) but I
really hope that this does not mean that ICANN won't be taking actions
for years on the hottest issues because it's busy in a very complex
process to handle everything at a time. Correctly, the report calls
for a prioritization of the list of issues as the first task, but we
have to ensure that this really happens.

If a specific working group on this matter is created, I think that
someone from the ALAC should be on it. (The report only calls for
representation of all GNSO constituencies, but I guess it will be
possible to add the ALAC as well.)


On Wed, 14 May 2003 09:47:58 +0200, you wrote:

>----- Forwarded message from Louis Touton <touton@xxxxxxxxx> -----
>
>From: Louis Touton <touton@xxxxxxxxx>
>To: council@xxxxxxxx
>Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 23:37:13 -0700
>Subject: [council] Staff-Prepared Issues Report on Privacy Issues Related to 
>Whois
>X-Spam-Level: 
>
>Tothe GNSO Council:
>
>As requested by the GNSO Council at its 25 March 2003 meeting, the staff 
> has prepared an "Issues Report on Privacy Issues Related to Whois". 
>It is posted at 
><http://www.icann.org/gnso/issue-reports/whois-privacy-report-13may03.htm>. 
>   Discussion of this document appears as item 6 of the agenda for the 
>22 May 2003 Board meeting, as circulated by the GNSO Secretariat on 7 
>May 2003.
>
>Best regards,
>
>Louis Touton
>
>
>----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
vb.                  [Vittorio Bertola - vb [at] bertola.eu.org]<---
-------------------> http://bertola.eu.org/ <-----------------------