Re: [alac] Summary: Prioritizing UDRP issues.
- To: Esther Dyson <edyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [alac] Summary: Prioritizing UDRP issues.
- From: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 17:27:22 +0200
On 2003-09-14 09:50:50 -0400, Esther Dyson wrote:
> Re item 1: Just because it would be easy doesn't mean it
> shouldn't be done!~ I'm happy to leave it off, especially if we
> can find someone to do it.... but I think it should be mentioned
> as something desirable.
The question is *not* whether something is to be done, or not, but
very specifically what kinds of issues should be the GNSO's
priorities for starting policy-development processes. To me, it
seems like issue 1 is better solved elsewhere, so I'm reluctant to
suggest it as a priority for policy development.
(Also, if we leave off 1, the question is what to fill in instead,
and I'd be most interested in your input about what the replacement
should look like.)
Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/