<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [alac] Proposed process for At Large Structure applications
- To: Vittorio Bertola <vb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, alac@xxxxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: [alac] Proposed process for At Large Structure applications
- From: "Matsumoto, Tommy" <Tommy.Matsumoto@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2003 08:15:32 +0900
Vittorio
This is Tommy and My comments are below;
Questions:
- is 2 weeks a reasonable time for the review?
Tommy ; It is reasonable.
- should the reviewer be an ICANN staff person, or should he/she be a
Committee member (perhaps from the same Region as the applicant) chosen
by rotation? Or perhaps a group composed by staff + members from the Region?
Tommy ; I recommend Staff + Member from the region
- should there be a recommendation with the report, or just a report?
Tommy ; A recommendation with the report
- should the report and/or recommendation of the reviewer be
confidential to Committee members, or public?
Tommy ; I think it will be confidential to Committee
- is 3 days a reasonable time for voting? (also, to approve do we need
2/3 of those who vote, or 2/3 of all members?)
Tommy ; 5 days will be reasonable and 2/3 of those who vote with
over 2/3 member's vote
- should individual votes be public or private?
Tommy ; Private
I also have one question taht is the application form a fixed form or a free
form?
Best Regards,
Tommy Matsumoto
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|