ICANN ICANN Email List Archives

[At-Large Advisory Committee]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [alac] Losing SiteFinder

  • To: Thomas Roessler <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [alac] Losing SiteFinder
  • From: Esther Dyson <edyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2003 14:48:56 -0400

Veri*S*ign....    more substantive comments inline.

At 12:03 PM 10/5/2003, Thomas Roessler wrote:
Here's a draft for an ALAC statement based on Wendy's text...



The ALAC welcomes ICANN's decision to remind Verisign of its
obligations TO RUN ITS REGISTRIES FOR THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NOT AS THE FOUNDATION OF A NEW REVENUE STREAM, [[[[by demanding immediate suspension of its

*SiteFinder**
"service", and Verisign's compliance with this demand.

SiteFinder's suspension was [[[[not only]]] necessary NOT ONLY

because it broke
hundreds of specific applications, and because it was forced on
Internet users around the globe without any advance consultation or
notice: SiteFinder ALSO NEEDED [[needs]]] to be stopped because it BROKE [[breaks with]] the
end-to-end architecture of the Internet to give one company
monopolistic control of a resource in the center. It's not a contest
between SiteFinder's search page and MSN's, but between giving
VeriSign sole, centralized control of the error-handling for
incorrect URLs and distributing that choice among users and
applications at the edge of the network. The question is whether
users can choose what services fit their needs best, or whether
Verisign can take that choice away from users, forcing them to do
what's best for Verisign's commercial benefit.


Sitefinder [[[not only]]] affects NOT ONLY the web, but ***M***any other applications
running on the net. The question here is whether the network is
kept open for new protocols and applications, or whether it's left
to Verisign to decide which applications the Internet supports well.


Keeping SiteFinder out of the center leaves the greatest flexibility
in the network for those who want to innovate by adding new
protocols, services, and features AT [[[on]]] the ends.

ICANN has called for "further evaluation and study" of the impact of
SiteFinder. The proper QUESTION [[[evaluation is]] for VeriSign to CONSIDER IS [[[determine]]]
whether it will reimplement its REDIRECTION AND advertiser-supported search as an
option at the edge of the network -- where users can elect or
decline to use it at their will -- or not at all.









--
Thomas Roessler  <roessler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
At-Large Advisory Committee: http://alac.info/



Esther Dyson Always make new mistakes! chairman, EDventure Holdings writer, Release 3.0 (on Website below) edyson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 1 (212) 924-8800 -- fax 1 (212) 924-0240 104 Fifth Avenue (between 15th and 16th Streets; 20th floor) New York, NY 10011 USA http://www.edventure.com

see my new blog (finally!) at
http://release4.blogspot.com/

Release 1.0 - the first good look
at technology that matters





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy