[Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]
Well, the process for the future should not be based on the TLD extension itself, but the sponsor, registry operator and registrar network be the focus. ( ALL the processes below are before LIVE Operations) . 1. That All TLDs Application should be conditionally approved for the Internet Community. ( one or two (max) TLDs per applicant) 2. Registry Operator and Registrar Services needs to assembled, the hardware and software requirements need load testing to a international standard set by ICANN / IANA 3. Financial Stability and Accounting Processes then need to be finalized and signed off by ICANN Then final processes are enabled to bring the TLD live to the Internet Community. In this way the domains can meet all hurdles before going live and support mechanisms are in place and tested and proven. That is the issues that the Fall 2000 "Proof of Concept" wasn't properly delivered. Therefore all the candidates could have been through this process, and we could have had about twenty + new domains some restricted, some unrestricted, and some with new sponsors and still providing a stable and robust internet community with exciting growth for the future. Then the process only controls the call for new applications, the market force will control the issuing of domains to the set standards. and therefore the "selective processes that Fall 2000 Exercise" had wouldn't come into future application calls. The above process still has safeguards for the internet community and ICANN still would be the gatekeeper Yours Faithfully Brian Burnett [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index] |