ICANN Public Comments Forum | New TLD Agreements

This comment forum is now closed.

ICANN Public Comment Forum

New TLD Agreements

This Public Comment Forum has been established for comments and discussion about the proposed agreements between ICANN and sponsors/operators of the TLDs selected in November 2000 for introduction into the domain-name system as a "proof of concept." A topic paper regarding the new TLD agreements has been prepared to prompt public discussion. This topic will be discussed at the ICANN Public Forum to be held in Melbourne, Australia, on 12 March 2001.

Comments through Tuesday, 19 March 2002

.info List (1594 sites), .info News (67 articles), .info Awards (votes welcome), .info Directory — Christian Castresana, March 19, 2002 @ 10:20 AM (0/0)

AtoZ.info — Atoz.info, March 19, 2002 @ 8:34 AM (0/0)

Registrars.com and their missing refunds — richard04, March 19, 2002 @ 7:43 AM (1/1)

it appears in the culture of corruption presided over by ICANN - — antipathy, March 19, 2002 @ 8:36 AM (0/0)

Karl Auerbach sues ICANN — cation, March 19, 2002 @ 2:10 AM (1/3)

I wish to see — cello, March 19, 2002 @ 3:41 AM (1/2)

let's all say a prayer for Karl and wish him well - he's up — antipathy, March 19, 2002 @ 8:38 AM (1/1)

Good luck Karl! — moler, March 19, 2002 @ 11:02 AM (0/0)

XXX Management — Voting Parent, March 19, 2002 @ 10:51 PM (2/5)

Great idea! others have it already... — EasyTech2, March 19, 2002 @ 2:12 AM (1/2)

SPAM Alert! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 19, 2002 @ 4:39 AM (1/1)

Even if this would be true... — EasyTech2, March 19, 2002 @ 9:55 AM (0/0)

XXX may be a good idea, but censorship is a bad idea — richard04, 11:37 PM (1/1)

good post Richard - eom — antipathy, March 19, 2002 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)

Over 11000 challenges : deadline for 'defendants' to submit paperwork is May 17 — richard04, 10:18 PM (1/2)

How I know — richard04, 11:21 PM (1/1)

Opinion: Would it appear that all applicants are not treated equally? — vera-city, March 19, 2002 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)

ABOUT DIRECTNIC ABUSES AND BADFAITH — gillwall, March 18, 2002 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)

How to archive or download this forum? — EasyTech2, March 18, 2002 @ 7:15 AM (1/1)

Get the Offline Explorer tool — iswrong, March 18, 2002 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)

Slimy rapids - Neulevel case study 1 — moler, March 17, 2002 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

Closing this forum would be a political mistake. — DomeBase, March 17, 2002 @ 3:49 PM (2/3)

"Net Governace Reform Could Spark Congressional Hearings" — DomeBase, 5:13 PM (1/1)

"ICANN is not a global democracy," Lynn added. "ICANN has work to do." — antipathy, 7:46 PM (0/0)

It's not closing, its moving on, but only after the .biz and .info LL2 slimy rapids elom — moler, March 17, 2002 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)

Just to remind ICANN of their contract - which Domainbank broke and Afilias ignored — richard04, March 17, 2002 @ 2:05 PM (1/3)

This forum alerted ICANN and Afilias to Sunrise fraud - BEFORE Afilias directors... — richard04, March 17, 2002 @ 2:16 PM (1/2)

And on August 3rd 2001 Kelly Jones highlighted the Afilias shambles so well — richard04, March 17, 2002 @ 3:06 PM (1/1)

Sunrise is a Joke - not this forum — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 4:34 PM (0/0)

Afilias : they were told in advance — richard04, March 17, 2002 @ 1:40 PM (1/1)

Afilias : they planned it in advance — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)

Created the ".info Awards" — Christian Castresana, March 17, 2002 @ 9:02 AM (3/4)

I agree. Great idea! I'll highlight award-winning .INFO sites on list — DomeBase, March 17, 2002 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)
Excellent idea Christian! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 17, 2002 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)
Excellent idea! Especially for promoting .info as an "information" brand (eom) — richard04, March 17, 2002 @ 9:44 AM (1/1)

Thank you! - votes are welcome for the better .info sites — Christian Castresana, March 18, 2002 @ 11:21 AM (0/0)

it's too hot in the kitchen for ICANN - so they are closing — antipathy, March 17, 2002 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)

The Trademark Lobby! — richard04, March 16, 2002 @ 8:42 PM (1/3)

well, what do you make of that? Liberty.info goes to a car — antipathy, March 16, 2002 @ 10:33 PM (2/2)

Lobby over-reach of trademarks is corruption — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 6:32 AM (0/0)
Trademarks and preferential rights to a domain name — moler, March 17, 2002 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

Another "info" only Search Engine.....Cool! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 16, 2002 @ 8:17 PM (1/1)

Good luck for this new project — Christian Castresana, March 17, 2002 @ 8:46 AM (0/0)

This Forum Is An Active and Vital Part of the ICANN Community... — richard04, March 16, 2002 @ 8:03 PM (2/10)

Most key .info and .biz names are still locked up - this new tld forum is not over — richard04, March 17, 2002 @ 12:16 AM (2/2)

We have a right to ask questions and make comment — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)
proof of concept — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 4:48 AM (0/0)

I would ask ICANN to keep this particular forum open....[Vote Here] — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 16, 2002 @ 8:50 PM (4/6)

Vote to keep site open — Domebase, March 17, 2002 @ 7:47 PM (0/0)
Yes, this forum is still vital... in the midst of 2 botched domain rollouts, and... — ebiz, March 17, 2002 @ 9:32 AM (0/0)
Public Participation Forum - yes & watch out for censorship — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 5:08 AM (0/0)
add my vote for the maintenance of this forum - eom — antipathy, March 16, 2002 @ 9:34 PM (1/2)

Yes, well I obviously request that it stays open too (eom) — richard04, March 16, 2002 @ 9:58 PM (1/1)

YES, this forum has relevance.eom — Amar Ochani, March 17, 2002 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)

Curious. Has enameco.com submitted .biz group 2B applications for anyone? (eom) — sfeibish, March 16, 2002 @ 6:59 PM (1/1)

I don't know about enameco.com but DomainBank.com sure did... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 16, 2002 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Another thing that could help: Make www.DotInfoSearchEngine.info your "Homepage" — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 16, 2002 @ 6:46 PM (1/1)

How many times do you open a "new page" on your computer every day?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 16, 2002 @ 6:56 PM (0/0)

ICANN: this forum will be closed in the next few days — richard04, March 16, 2002 @ 12:44 AM (1/4)

Opinion: Virtual Censorship? eom — vera-city, March 16, 2002 @ 7:12 PM (1/3)

This is clearly the most active ICANN forum - so WHY close it down? — richard04, March 16, 2002 @ 7:26 PM (2/2)

Off Topic Forum? — Garry Anderson, March 17, 2002 @ 4:11 AM (0/0)
if you are doing nothing wrong, you are not afraid of scrutiny. — antipathy, March 16, 2002 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)

ICANN WATCH report the bi-partisan politicians letter sceptical of ICANN changes — Richard04, March 15, 2002 @ 7:05 PM (1/3)

that's the best news we have had in a long while - I suspect — antipathy, March 15, 2002 @ 7:18 PM (1/2)

Stuart Lynn - guilty of arbitrary and non-democratic management? — Richard04, March 15, 2002 @ 8:36 PM (1/1)

it's time to go live Richard - Stuart Lynn has proven his — antipathy, March 15, 2002 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)

Dotinfosearchengine - some suggestions — tomstersNY, March 15, 2002 @ 4:46 PM (3/4)

It's really up to DotInfoLink....if he/she wants to make it mandatory.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 15, 2002 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
I agree, that obligations wont create a good climax — Christian Castresana, March 15, 2002 @ 8:05 PM (0/0)
good suggestions! — DomeBase, March 15, 2002 @ 6:35 PM (1/1)

I noted earlier suggestions for a porn-free .info listing - — antipathy, March 15, 2002 @ 8:03 PM (0/0)

Oh shit, mailbombing goes on... — EasyTech2, March 15, 2002 @ 12:16 AM (3/3)

All quiet on the western front. Cease fire in effect for about a day now (eom) — sfeibish, 7:37 PM (0/0)
I appreciate that emails aren't coming in all at once. Has to do with ISP email limits. — sfeibish, March 15, 2002 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)
I'm getting these messages also. I appreciate them because ... — sfeibish, March 15, 2002 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

ICANN - 'GO FORTH AND MULTIPLY' — Garry Anderson, March 15, 2002 @ 10:25 AM (0/0)

ICANN reject public elections to its Board as "invalid" and "unrepresentative" — richard04, March 14, 2002 @ 7:03 PM (2/2)

public repression — Garry Anderson, March 14, 2002 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)
Stuart's up to the oldest tricks in the book - telling the — antipathy, March 14, 2002 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)

received email from a registrar telling me an IP claim has been filed — housecat, March 14, 2002 @ 5:54 PM (1/1)

Your IP claims should be trickling in any time now... — ebiz, March 15, 2002 @ 3:09 AM (0/0)

IOD Site Down Again (Yesterday & Today), Must Be Another Cut Cable, Right? — GettingScrewed, March 14, 2002 @ 2:32 PM (3/12)

Register with a reliable ISP and quit this ridiculous behavior already... — ebiz, March 15, 2002 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)
Traceroute... — cambler, March 14, 2002 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
Sorry, must be you — cambler, March 14, 2002 @ 4:42 PM (1/9)

Sure, Chris ... — GettingScrewed, March 14, 2002 @ 9:45 PM (1/8)

There's no way to convince someone with an agenda — 410, March 14, 2002 @ 10:04 PM (2/7)

Agenda ... — GettingScrewed, March 14, 2002 @ 11:56 PM (2/2)

How long does it take to see everything on the web? — arbitrage, March 15, 2002 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
Regardless. . . — 410, March 15, 2002 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

And the last several days too — 410, March 14, 2002 @ 10:26 PM (1/3)

My last name — cambler, March 15, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (1/2)

Cambler — 410, March 15, 2002 @ 5:36 AM (1/1)

Yeah... — cambler, March 15, 2002 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)

DotInfoSearchEngine indexes 1000 sites and counting... but how are we going to network? — DotInfoLink, March 14, 2002 @ 2:24 PM (2/3)

Mandatory is never good — Christian Castresana, March 15, 2002 @ 9:41 AM (1/1)

Thank you to include the other directories, I didn't se it before :-) EOM — Christian Castresana, March 15, 2002 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)

I see no problem making it mandatory..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 15, 2002 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)

Courts shut down Dot-USA... — ebiz, March 14, 2002 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Domebase/.info list on ICANNWatch.com — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 14, 2002 @ 3:26 AM (2/2)

The viral marketing is the better way to promote the .info — Christian Castresana, March 14, 2002 @ 10:10 AM (0/0)
Well done, Domebase. Congratulations! EOM — Amar Ochani, March 14, 2002 @ 8:31 AM (0/0)

DomeBase List of Working .INFO Sites (over 1,000 sites) — DomeBase, March 14, 2002 @ 12:08 AM (2/3)

Suggestion: Afilias should say "thanks" for a great job. eom — vera-city, March 14, 2002 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)
It's nice to see all the different .info sites that people have created.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 14, 2002 @ 3:08 AM (1/1)

two points - one from the ICANN Watch article on DomeBase's — antipathy, March 14, 2002 @ 8:06 AM (0/0)

The .INFO registry requires the AUTH-INFO — luggi, March 13, 2002 @ 9:01 PM (1/1)

ask your current registrar (domainbank)...they have it (eom) — EasyTech2, March 14, 2002 @ 8:27 AM (0/0)

.BIZ confirmation - can not login the first time — infodomain1, March 13, 2002 @ 3:29 PM (1/1)

reasons you might not be able to login — sfeibish, March 13, 2002 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)

DotInfoSearchEngine.info is Live and accepting submissions — DotInfoLink, March 13, 2002 @ 3:04 PM (3/6)

Hey Nice Site DotInfoLink!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 14, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (2/2)

a lot more professional than my site! feel free to cut and past URLS — DomeBase, March 14, 2002 @ 3:13 AM (0/0)
Did a "travel" search on your site.....Perfect!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 14, 2002 @ 3:12 AM (0/0)

The big companies are not using the .info — Christian Castresana, March 13, 2002 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)
411Directory.info Submissions being accepted. — landofop, March 13, 2002 @ 9:20 PM (1/1)

I better hurry up on my other info sites while the getting is good!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 14, 2002 @ 3:31 AM (0/0)

Would have appreciated way of checking .biz proceed/cancel status. — sfeibish, March 13, 2002 @ 5:40 AM (1/2)

Would have appreciated means to correct proceed/cancel status. (eom) — sfeibish, March 13, 2002 @ 5:59 AM (1/1)

How long is it going to take Neulevel to email out these Notices... — ebiz, March 13, 2002 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)

Theatre of the Absurd. — vera-city, March 13, 2002 @ 3:14 AM (0/0)

Congress calls ICANN role into question — richard04, March 13, 2002 @ 12:01 AM (2/4)

if it takes the "national security" of the US to remove the — antipathy, March 13, 2002 @ 8:42 PM (1/1)

I doubt any changes will be beneficial to the public — spot2, March 14, 2002 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)

ICANN — S. Hudgens, March 13, 2002 @ 2:43 PM (1/1)

I am of the opinion — Garry Anderson, March 13, 2002 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)

Did Catalog.com re-submit previous .biz applications? any idea? — domainboy, March 12, 2002 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)

.biz IP problems... — jman, March 12, 2002 @ 3:34 AM (1/1)

all my proceed/cancel notifications came in perfect, with closing date of March 20, 2002 — sfeibish, March 12, 2002 @ 8:34 AM (0/0)

Registering Political Candidate Sites Legal? — Quo, March 12, 2002 @ 2:52 AM (1/1)

Bad Faith — LegalEagle, March 12, 2002 @ 3:09 AM (0/0)

Redacted per data subject's request and his magnificent, magical trademark machine ... — sfeibish, March 11, 2002 @ 11:08 PM (2/6)

Redacted per data subject's request and sex.biz — EasyTech2, March 13, 2002 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)
message posted for entertainment purposes only — sfeibish, March 11, 2002 @ 11:10 PM (1/4)

Correct — Legal Eagle, March 12, 2002 @ 3:11 AM (1/3)

The gaming of trademarks, Gary Anderson was right. — moler, March 12, 2002 @ 3:19 PM (2/2)

Corrupt ICANN cannot defend Sunrise — Garry Anderson, March 12, 2002 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)
Bora Bora trademarks now available for domain fraud, Banana money accepted. — moler, March 12, 2002 @ 3:24 PM (0/0)

hijacking .info registrars - more a plague than a pestilence — antipathy, March 11, 2002 @ 10:56 PM (2/3)

CPI Sites dba URLCOLLECTION.com also Hijacking — landofop, March 13, 2002 @ 1:34 PM (1/1)

if CPI Sites dba URLCOLLECTION.com registered 700 .info names — antipathy, March 13, 2002 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)

Manipulation of round robin queues by unscrupulous registrars — moler, March 12, 2002 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

.info Directory now updated — Christian Castresana, March 11, 2002 @ 11:15 AM (3/5)

Updated. Now with categories. Please, help me to find new .info active sites. — Christian Castresana, March 13, 2002 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)
Great start Christian and LandofOp... — DomeBase, March 11, 2002 @ 2:59 PM (2/2)

I believe a "Porn Free" .info listing is best.. A.question though... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 12, 2002 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)
I agree .info TLD is no place for porn ! — landofop, March 11, 2002 @ 3:33 PM (0/0)

411Directory.info Submissions being accepted. — landofop, March 11, 2002 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)

POTENTIAL LIABILITY WARNING: the .pro registration system — waldospice, March 11, 2002 @ 4:20 AM (0/0)

TLD Launches VS Landrushes — Ouch!, March 11, 2002 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)

Afilias is doing nothing to promote .info — Cation, March 10, 2002 @ 11:50 PM (2/3)

What Afilias Promised... — S. Hudgens, March 12, 2002 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

Afilias may have been expecting millions of applications, not knowing... — moler, March 12, 2002 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)

Afilias' Promotions for .info - the full list... — Ouch!, March 11, 2002 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)

Why did Afilias Director Eric Schaetzlein submit wrong TM info for eric.info at Sunrise? — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 11:38 PM (1/9)

And will he confirm that Webstart.info was also a false Sunrise claim? — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 11:43 PM (1/8)

61 Sunrise names registered by Afilias Board member Eric Schaetzlein — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 11:47 PM (3/7)

Studying those names, he appears to be attempting to develop a VIRTUA network of sorts ..elom — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 3:54 PM (1/1)

Lousy choice......e, virtual, virtua, i just doesn't hack it like it used to in the dotcom sickness — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)

Question: Maybe they are all just a "test" like Hawaii? eom — vera-city, March 10, 2002 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)
Richard, how are you able to pull up the domain names by registrant? ... — DaveKing2, March 10, 2002 @ 1:33 AM (1/3)

I will give you my theory Richard why Eric grabbed 61 .info — antipathy, March 10, 2002 @ 5:10 AM (1/2)

Registrars SHOULD NOT be allowed to participate in future Landrushes — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 5:42 AM (1/1)

Agreed - the new TLD launches must be run by one body - THE REGISTRY — ebiz, March 10, 2002 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)

The 6122 sunrise names of Worldnic (Verisign) — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 10:50 PM (1/8)

7 months on, has Siegfried Langenbach of Joker managed to find the missing data... — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 11:33 PM (1/7)

The Afghan trademark loophole must STOP for all future Sunrises — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 6:05 AM (1/6)

This highlights precisely why allocating on basis of trademarks is an arse — spot2, March 10, 2002 @ 7:41 AM (2/5)

Suggestion: Why not get a trademark from the Principality of Sealand? — vera-city, March 10, 2002 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)
The role of ccTLDs and trademarks — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 8:07 AM (1/3)

Sunrise is Bull* Propaganda — Garry Anderson, March 10, 2002 @ 10:28 AM (1/2)

The legitimacy of trademark claims — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 12:44 AM (1/1)

'Passing off' — Garry Anderson, March 10, 2002 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

Landrush 2 names start to appear — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 9:14 PM (1/4)

But why are Afilias offering a Country name in the Landrush 2? — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 9:17 PM (1/3)

On the subject of Scotland.info ..... — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 9:51 PM (2/2)

shambolic - an apt description of the ICANN/Afilias Ltd. — antipathy, March 10, 2002 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)
http://landrush2.afilias.info url does not work.. eom — domainboy, March 9, 2002 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)

OK you have lite the fire under my Butt Start your 411Directory.info — landofop, March 9, 2002 @ 4:13 PM (1/1)

Likewise....you've lit a fire under my butt!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 9, 2002 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)

.INFO — huskies, March 9, 2002 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)

Afilias' Successes - the full list... — Ouch!, March 9, 2002 @ 7:43 AM (0/0)

Please submit your suggestions of working, useful .info sites — Domebase, March 8, 2002 @ 6:46 PM (8/17)

Modest but live — attilio, March 10, 2002 @ 6:35 AM (1/1)

In time, these INFO sites will grow and grow — richard04, March 10, 2002 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

I have one if it's not too local! — richard04, March 9, 2002 @ 8:20 PM (1/1)

BERKHAMSTED . INFO - all about our town — moler, March 10, 2002 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

I've got a couple... — dtobias, March 9, 2002 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)
The thing with a .info SE is that when people use it...will reinforce the "info" TLD as a viable sou — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 9, 2002 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)
Anyone with a .BIZ List of websites??? "411" will make some $$$ on his ESE — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 9, 2002 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)
That's a great idea, I will help. — Christian Castresana, March 9, 2002 @ 10:25 AM (2/2)

mini "info Directory" active — Christian Castresana, March 10, 2002 @ 8:42 AM (0/0)
Nice collection you have there Christian ;-) --elom — moler, March 9, 2002 @ 2:35 PM (0/0)

Hey thanks Domebase...I will have a couple for you.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 9, 2002 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)
thanks for the offer Bob - — antipathy, March 8, 2002 @ 8:41 PM (1/5)

411Directory.info — landofop, March 9, 2002 @ 2:15 PM (3/4)

good luck to you - how long does the free listing offer last? — antipathy, March 9, 2002 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)
Good, LandofOp, I'll send whatever URLs I get to you as well... — DomeBase, March 9, 2002 @ 4:01 PM (1/1)

Exactly Domebase...and you are the catalyst!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 9, 2002 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)

Looking forward to your .Info ESE!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 9, 2002 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)

Stuart Lynn's disdainful insult of this Forum — richard04, March 7, 2002 @ 10:31 PM (2/6)

Agreement — S. Hudgens, March 8, 2002 @ 4:09 PM (0/0)
the first joke of the new millenium — cello, March 8, 2002 @ 5:14 AM (1/4)

you're only as good as your last gig - .info launch? .biz launch? — antipathy, March 8, 2002 @ 11:44 AM (1/3)

Not in good taste. — Amar Ochani, March 8, 2002 @ 4:30 PM (1/2)

Don't be fooled — spot2, March 8, 2002 @ 5:38 PM (1/1)

Stuart Lynn's Agenda - regarding forums — Garry Anderson, March 8, 2002 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)

Will Hal Lubsen refund the $15000 he charged William Lorenz — rachelmacgregor, March 7, 2002 @ 5:49 PM (0/0)

VeriSign .INFO Domains No Longer In Limbo — Ron_Bennett, March 7, 2002 @ 7:39 AM (0/0)

Status of Dotster .BIZ Lottery Refunds????? — Ron_Bennett, March 7, 2002 @ 7:28 AM (0/0)

Yo, Afilias! — GettingScrewed, March 7, 2002 @ 2:45 AM (1/6)

Afilias and .INFO — S. Hudgens, March 7, 2002 @ 8:50 PM (1/5)

Afilias and .info — Amar Ochani, March 8, 2002 @ 12:40 AM (1/4)

you're right $5 or $6.50, rest is for registrars (eom) — EasyTech2, March 8, 2002 @ 9:01 AM (1/3)

I stand by $35. — S. Hudgens, March 8, 2002 @ 2:10 PM (1/2)

One more thing... — S. Hudgens, March 8, 2002 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

I would have thought that the .info Sunrise windfall - the — antipathy, March 8, 2002 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)

Vint - "The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil..." — Garry Anderson, March 6, 2002 @ 10:25 PM (1/2)

"When good men do nothing..." — richard04, March 7, 2002 @ 7:28 AM (1/1)

To understand — Garry Anderson, March 7, 2002 @ 9:23 AM (0/0)

Looks Like Adios For IOD And .WEB — GettingScrewed, March 6, 2002 @ 3:17 PM (1/12)

No, looks like a cable cut — cambler, March 6, 2002 @ 4:17 PM (2/11)

Yes... — S. Hudgens, March 6, 2002 @ 5:24 PM (0/0)
Problem Resolved — cambler, March 6, 2002 @ 5:15 PM (1/9)

Don't Shoot The Messenger — GettingScrewed, March 6, 2002 @ 8:21 PM (1/8)

Bang! — S. Hudgens, March 7, 2002 @ 2:47 AM (2/7)

Don't Worry Shelby — GettingScrewed, March 7, 2002 @ 4:36 PM (1/5)

Uptime — cambler, March 8, 2002 @ 8:28 PM (1/4)

"Doing Pretty Well"? — GettingScrewed, March 9, 2002 @ 1:26 PM (1/3)

I am impressed by Cambler's willingness to dialogue here... — DomeBase, March 9, 2002 @ 5:19 PM (1/2)

I'd Rather ... — GettingScrewed, March 9, 2002 @ 6:26 PM (1/1)

Of course! — cambler, March 9, 2002 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

BT.com — hiltonian, March 7, 2002 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)

SHAME ??????? — SanjeevGoyal, March 6, 2002 @ 5:06 AM (1/2)

Just weird but not a problem — richard04, March 6, 2002 @ 7:21 AM (1/1)

just glad you are not trying to pass yourself off as Richard III — antipathy, March 6, 2002 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

RealEstate.info : "is it true...?" — richard04, March 6, 2002 @ 12:09 AM (2/13)

One thing for shure: Plaintiff and Defendant are affiliated! — EasyTech2, March 6, 2002 @ 1:00 PM (2/3)

actually Redacted per data subject's request is the CEO of ICYP (EOM) — RinniV, March 7, 2002 @ 2:10 PM (1/1)

any reference / evidence ? (eom) — EasyTech2, March 7, 2002 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)

perjury — DaveKing2, March 6, 2002 @ 2:24 PM (0/0)

very interesting — DaveKing2, March 6, 2002 @ 2:21 AM (1/8)

more on the realestate.info scam... — rjjohnson, March 6, 2002 @ 4:49 AM (2/7)

.info from Mr. Palage? — AfghanTM, March 6, 2002 @ 10:38 AM (0/0)
Very strange — richard04, March 6, 2002 @ 7:18 AM (1/5)

Redacted per data subject's request — daveking2, March 6, 2002 @ 8:18 AM (2/4)

Redacted per data subject's request a busy guy. Redacted per data subject's request is trying to trademark yellowpages.biz and yellowpages.info (eom) — sfeibish, March 6, 2002 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
This man also challenged my client — arbitrator, March 6, 2002 @ 8:49 AM (1/2)

Rubbish — DaveKing2, March 6, 2002 @ 10:11 AM (1/1)

Your're right, see the judgement here (link) — EasyTech2, March 6, 2002 @ 10:26 AM (0/0)

This is my fourth username so far - richard_henderson got blocked — richard04, March 6, 2002 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)

WHAT IS THIS ON AFILIAS SITE? — SanjeevGoyal, March 5, 2002 @ 5:32 PM (1/1)

Now working fine............eom — SanjeevGoyal, March 5, 2002 @ 5:45 PM (0/0)

Vinton Cerf on trademarks, "We screwed up--" — Garry Anderson, March 5, 2002 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)

ICANN's Accreditation Agreement with Registrars - and consumer protection — richard_henderson, March 5, 2002 @ 12:21 AM (2/3)

What about Sunrise registrations by Siegfried Langeback of Joker.com — Amar Ochani, March 5, 2002 @ 2:27 AM (0/0)
NeuLevel explains the fiasco. But doesn't fix the problem. — O, March 5, 2002 @ 1:35 AM (1/1)

NeuLevel explains the fiasco. But won't fix the problem. What? — O, March 5, 2002 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)

.info sunrise domains without trademark data ! — EasyTech2, March 4, 2002 @ 11:40 PM (2/7)

RETIREMENT.INFO... — arbitrage, March 5, 2002 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
Take, for example, these 93... Hal Lubsen's DomainBank charged $15000 to sponsor these — richard_henderson, March 5, 2002 @ 12:00 AM (2/5)

Speculation: It might be that the absent TM data... — vera-city, March 5, 2002 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
Thanks Richard...but I thought about something like this: — EasyTech2, March 5, 2002 @ 12:18 AM (1/3)

The interesting thing about this one... — richard_henderson, March 5, 2002 @ 12:27 AM (2/2)

and where did realesatate.info get the four year registration? eom — antipathy, March 5, 2002 @ 7:26 AM (0/0)
This names was challenged several times — EasyTech2, March 5, 2002 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

.info unlock — whoknows, March 4, 2002 @ 7:02 PM (1/3)

No conclusions — erikdw2, March 4, 2002 @ 7:40 PM (1/2)

but... — carunchio, March 4, 2002 @ 8:31 PM (1/1)

They're breaking their own rules again... — rachelmacgregor, March 4, 2002 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

Puzzled by .biz LandRush II ... — sfeibish, March 4, 2002 @ 1:18 PM (2/2)

puzzled — crs, March 5, 2002 @ 5:42 PM (0/0)
Puzzle solved. Answer: People are ticked off at the frauds. Read more here ... — O, March 5, 2002 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)

Problem Solving — Garry Anderson, March 4, 2002 @ 10:04 AM (0/0)

Which cup is the domain, ...er pea, under? — vera-city, March 4, 2002 @ 3:04 AM (0/0)

The dot-biz round 2 is a fiasco. — O, March 4, 2002 @ 12:32 AM (1/2)

Artificial Scarcity — RayF, March 4, 2002 @ 3:24 AM (1/1)

NeuLevel explains the fiasco. But doesn't fix the problem. — O, March 5, 2002 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)

Quote 2 from Vint Cerf — richard_henderson, March 3, 2002 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)

Quote from Vint Cerf — richard_henderson, March 3, 2002 @ 10:12 PM (1/1)

Integrity and Honesty — Garry Anderson, March 4, 2002 @ 9:37 AM (0/0)

The eNom .biz bidding fiasco — moler, March 3, 2002 @ 7:11 PM (3/7)

I submitted the highest bid at 10:59:40 AM PST on one & 10:59:50 AM PST on a second one. — O, March 4, 2002 @ 12:42 AM (0/0)
Corruption is obvious to all... — Garry Anderson, March 3, 2002 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)
what's happening here? - RayF says eNom closed early - thank — antipathy, March 3, 2002 @ 7:44 PM (3/4)

Enom closed early — RayF, March 3, 2002 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
March 3 11am PST - official close — moler, March 3, 2002 @ 8:04 PM (1/1)

Agreed - these new TLD launches have to be run by one central body... — ebiz, March 3, 2002 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

eNom closed only a few minutes early — domainboy, March 3, 2002 @ 7:58 PM (0/0)

Vint Cerf and Stuart Lynn : public message and request for dialogue — richard_henderson, March 3, 2002 @ 6:06 PM (2/3)

Quote by Vint Cerf at Worldcom : "Let us punish those who abuse the Internet's privileges" — richard_henderson, March 3, 2002 @ 10:20 PM (1/1)

Two-faced says, "The Internet is for everyone" - why the flip... — Garry Anderson, March 4, 2002 @ 8:57 AM (0/0)

Is it reasonable to expect that, an industry with a world — antipathy, March 3, 2002 @ 7:31 PM (0/0)

I don't know Spot, but why don't ICANN enter into dialogue to answer these points? — richard_henderson, March 3, 2002 @ 1:34 PM (1/1)

One would think this forum — Garry Anderson, March 3, 2002 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)

Doesn't ICANN receive commission on every domain sold by its 'accredited' registrars? — spot2, March 3, 2002 @ 11:20 AM (0/0)

.info unlock — carunchio, March 3, 2002 @ 10:43 AM (1/1)

Last Friday they said they would release "in a few days". EOM — erikdw2, March 3, 2002 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)

ICANN's plans to abolish elections, involve national governments, and become more powerful than ever — spot2, March 3, 2002 @ 8:14 AM (1/1)

"Flawed from the beginning...fatally flawed." — Garry Anderson, March 3, 2002 @ 10:26 AM (0/0)

007names pulls a fast one — crs, March 2, 2002 @ 7:09 PM (4/10)

Enom closes early — RayF, March 3, 2002 @ 7:12 PM (0/0)
I received Email of their closing date to their credit (though they do remain suspicious) --- eom — ebiz, March 2, 2002 @ 11:46 PM (0/0)
phone call — RayF, March 2, 2002 @ 9:12 PM (1/1)

but why — crs, March 2, 2002 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)

What's the betting the insider is Mustard Seed? -eom — spot2, March 2, 2002 @ 8:03 PM (2/5)

GRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR.... — domainboy, March 2, 2002 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)
Mustard Seed eCommerce and 007Names — antipathy, March 2, 2002 @ 9:48 PM (1/3)

STILL Vint Cerf says nothing about all the corruption... — richard_henderson, March 3, 2002 @ 12:27 AM (1/2)

Vint — Ouch!, March 3, 2002 @ 5:59 AM (1/1)

Vint - deny that words have been bastardised — Garry Anderson, March 3, 2002 @ 8:37 PM (0/0)

Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue — Garry Anderson, March 2, 2002 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION: ALL. — TheInternetAdvocate, March 2, 2002 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

Rudolph ICANN Moderator cannot leave me alone! — TheInternetAdvocate, March 2, 2002 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)

who is taking .biz applications (make a list) — Cation, March 1, 2002 @ 11:27 PM (3/4)

some of them — domainboy, March 2, 2002 @ 3:50 AM (1/1)

Don't Trust DomainDiscover — gettingscrewed, March 2, 2002 @ 4:45 AM (0/0)

there are other registrars still open, try the list at neulevel.biz (see link) — sfeibish, March 2, 2002 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)
better be quick, 123Registration closes at 11:59PM EST -- multiple applicants for same name accepted — sfeibish, March 2, 2002 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)

Another Stupid WIPO Decision — RinniV, March 1, 2002 @ 10:04 PM (1/4)

I disagree — erikdw2, March 1, 2002 @ 11:52 PM (2/3)

Nup — RinniV, March 2, 2002 @ 11:38 AM (1/1)

Lauren - a challenge for the Authorities & Lawyers — Garry Anderson, March 2, 2002 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)

WIPO is FAIR — SanjeevGoyal, March 2, 2002 @ 5:01 AM (0/0)

More Reasons why Dotster Sucks — RinniV, March 1, 2002 @ 8:07 PM (1/1)

I'll top that one — SNAFU, March 2, 2002 @ 3:52 AM (0/0)

new.net, looks like Chadima's gone .... — snitch, March 1, 2002 @ 7:52 PM (1/2)

Chadima went to another Idealabs startup — Cation, March 1, 2002 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)

New.net CEO Says Different ... Not An Idealab — gettingscrewed, March 2, 2002 @ 4:50 AM (0/0)

.BIZ and .BIZ — GettingScrewed, February 28, 2002 @ 11:32 PM (2/9)

thats easy... — EasyTech2, March 1, 2002 @ 7:35 AM (1/7)

I am not totally clear... — S. Hudgens, March 1, 2002 @ 3:11 PM (2/6)

You can use both — rs79, March 2, 2002 @ 2:08 AM (1/1)

And you can use the new NameSlinger / PacificRoot plug-in ! — EasyTech2, March 2, 2002 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)

As far as I can say at this time... — EasyTech2, March 1, 2002 @ 5:53 PM (2/3)

Reply — S. Hudgens, March 1, 2002 @ 8:03 PM (1/1)

reply — EasyTech2, March 1, 2002 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)

Did you really want such a long answer? ;-) (eom) — EasyTech2, March 1, 2002 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)

Ah, the beauty of alternate roots! — S. Hudgens, March 1, 2002 @ 3:19 AM (0/0)

YESNIC and RGNAMES : successfully challenged fakes, but still accredited — richard_henderson, February 28, 2002 @ 9:09 PM (3/5)

What about Registry? — Garry Anderson, March 1, 2002 @ 9:19 AM (1/1)

Question: Has Icann't ever done anything about the abomination? — vera-city, March 1, 2002 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)

ICANN asked to post response here.... will they... or don't they take their own forum seriously? — richard_henderson, February 28, 2002 @ 9:52 PM (1/1)

OK Vint - so now you've had a look... what does ICANN say? — richard_henderson, March 1, 2002 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

There is no consumer protection. As simple as that. It's different in the UK - — spot2, February 28, 2002 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)

EasyTech/EasyTech2/SimonSteinle = A Sunrise Fraudster! — TheSunriseFraudsters, February 28, 2002 @ 6:01 PM (4/5)

I do not understand you — AfghanTM, March 2, 2002 @ 3:32 PM (1/1)

AfghanTM = Simon Steinle? — Garry Anderson, March 2, 2002 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)

100% Proof that EasyTech = Easytech2 = Cybersquatter Simon Steinle — spot2, March 1, 2002 @ 9:07 AM (0/0)
Steinle challenges himself to avoid Afilias challenge? — erikdw2, March 1, 2002 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)
huh??? (eom) — EasyTech2, February 28, 2002 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

Names4ever opens .biz queue — moler, February 28, 2002 @ 5:51 PM (1/2)

Boy, Does Their System Suck — GettingScrewed, February 28, 2002 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)

Yeah, i tried a few less popular names, went thru the whole process and got the same result. ARSE! — spot2, February 28, 2002 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

un-lock date for .info sunrise domains!? — EasyTech2, February 28, 2002 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)

Since Febraury 28 Afilias un-locks the names manually one by one (eom) — AfghanTM, March 2, 2002 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

Announce - new At Large Member Organization — joanna lane, February 28, 2002 @ 4:09 AM (0/0)

How can Register.com offer One-Year registration for .info/.biz ? — infodomain1, February 28, 2002 @ 3:14 AM (1/1)

Who cares - their one year fee is the same as most for 2 years, and their service sucks! (eom) — ebiz, February 28, 2002 @ 4:01 AM (0/0)

It's ME! Mike 'lil dick' Hou (1960s man) - I'm back! And now I'm here to stay!!! — 1ntemetAdvocate, February 28, 2002 @ 1:51 AM (3/3)

Hows the poster, 60's-man? eom — spot2, February 28, 2002 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)
.NOT - I like it! — arbitrage, February 28, 2002 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
Welcome back — Kotter, February 28, 2002 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)

Boardsquatter Hans Kraberjink tries to covers up ICANN vacation — Cation, February 27, 2002 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)

New.net Juicy Rumor, 2002 @ fuckedcompany.com — GettingScrewed, February 27, 2002 @ 8:47 PM (1/1)

rumor not more...read here — EasyTech2, February 27, 2002 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)

New forum. Relates to some issues previously rasied here. — Ouch!, February 27, 2002 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)

.info Lock Period already Over — arbitrator, February 27, 2002 @ 3:36 AM (1/1)

but records appear to be locked — spot2, February 27, 2002 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)

.info Challenges End — investor, February 26, 2002 @ 10:40 PM (1/3)

Or do they? — arbitrage, February 26, 2002 @ 11:46 PM (1/2)

Maybe — investor, February 27, 2002 @ 2:12 AM (1/1)

This is Why They May Not Unlock Names..... — investor, February 27, 2002 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)

Marketing of dot info/biz...(my idea revisted) for Roland LaPlante and the neulevel marketing guru — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 26, 2002 @ 5:01 AM (4/4)

search engines are big money loosers — Cation, February 27, 2002 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)
Marketing .biz and .info — S. Hudgens, February 27, 2002 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)
translation — DaveKing2, February 26, 2002 @ 11:50 AM (0/0)
Excellent Idea Greg! eom — investor, February 26, 2002 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)

TISCOVER: Big story in austrian newspaper! — Lachmann, February 25, 2002 @ 8:35 PM (1/1)

English version HERE — arbitrator, February 26, 2002 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)

NEW FORUM FOR .INFO COUNTRY NAME — arbitrator, February 25, 2002 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)

DomainDiscover opens doors... see following link — ebiz, February 24, 2002 @ 11:35 AM (0/0)

Riddle me this, then! — Ouch!, February 24, 2002 @ 6:57 AM (1/3)

Afilias won't even delete them if you admit it! — micksinclair, February 24, 2002 @ 9:18 AM (1/2)

We want Ombudsman....... — Amar Ochani, February 25, 2002 @ 5:15 PM (1/1)

Ombudsman would also be in pocket of big business — Garry Anderson, February 25, 2002 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)

What's the deal with http://www.NameSecuregtld.com....Points to Verisign...can't get into "account" — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 23, 2002 @ 11:36 PM (3/6)

Looks like the old page is back up.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 24, 2002 @ 5:19 AM (0/0)
Bang! — RichMull, February 24, 2002 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
Yes, That Problem Not Unique — Getting Screwed, February 23, 2002 @ 11:41 PM (2/3)

.WEB — S. Hudgens, February 24, 2002 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

wait 5 years minimum... when ever (eom) — EasyTech2, February 24, 2002 @ 1:49 PM (0/0)

Yes the dot web TLD is behind me.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 23, 2002 @ 11:51 PM (0/0)

Has anyone ever thought to create a Dot biz directory....or a dot info for that matter.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 23, 2002 @ 5:24 PM (3/7)

Search engine rankings — Elvis, February 24, 2002 @ 9:34 PM (1/1)

works, mine are reaching top in google — domino, February 24, 2002 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)

Yahoo and dot-coms — dtobias, February 23, 2002 @ 10:43 PM (1/1)

Reply — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 23, 2002 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)

Differentiation will be the key to getting new TLDs recognized — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 23, 2002 @ 6:11 PM (1/2)

I have both directories — landofop, February 25, 2002 @ 1:17 PM (1/1)

Excellent....Let us know when you get them up.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 26, 2002 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

Richard - the YesNIC list of 261 TM frauds and .info Sunrise — antipathy, February 23, 2002 @ 2:30 AM (0/0)

will .biz get anywhere? — Cation, February 22, 2002 @ 6:51 PM (1/1)

if there are many good .biz websites, .biz will flourish -- if not, .biz will languish — sfeibish, February 22, 2002 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)

NameBay makes a grand .biz group 2B entrance — sfeibish, February 22, 2002 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)

Verisign opens .biz group 2B, sends email at 12:01 EST -- its 3 AM EST -- 5,000 names gone — sfeibish, February 22, 2002 @ 8:34 AM (2/4)

Site is DOWN! — RichMull, February 22, 2002 @ 10:14 PM (2/2)

Yeah, well earlier today it took like 15 minutes to check whether a .biz name is available, — spot2, February 23, 2002 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)
Don't wait for the email - check this board to get in first - eom — spot2, February 23, 2002 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)

NetworkSolutions BIZ Queue... — ebiz, February 22, 2002 @ 10:36 AM (0/0)

NameScout opens for Group 2B --- list full from previous round ;) — ebiz, February 21, 2002 @ 9:29 PM (2/5)

are these registrars honest? — Cation, February 22, 2002 @ 1:58 AM (0/0)
Namesecure opens with full list too... http://www.namesecuregtld.com/ — ebiz, February 21, 2002 @ 11:55 PM (2/3)

This just takes you to network solutions' page — RichMull, February 22, 2002 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
Thanks ebiz....NameSecure has a pretty smooth registration system.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 22, 2002 @ 12:29 AM (1/1)

all these "gtld.com" Registrars again... — ebiz, February 22, 2002 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

many fraudsters will be able to keep their names — Cation, February 21, 2002 @ 8:09 PM (2/7)

Official Afilias Challenge Task Force Response — Challenge-Afilias, February 22, 2002 @ 9:19 PM (2/4)

Hi Challenge@Afilias.info — DomeBase, February 23, 2002 @ 6:09 PM (1/1)

Don't get your hopes up — RichMull, February 23, 2002 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)

Yesnic smells extremely fishy, but I can't read or access Korean tms — moler, February 23, 2002 @ 8:01 AM (1/1)

Mole, they lost some .info Sunrise Challenge cases...says it all !!! (eom) — EasyTech2, February 24, 2002 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)

Possible. But you are wrong: victoria.info is valid — Watchman, February 22, 2002 @ 2:54 PM (1/1)

On what planet is it the year 0197-01-01? — RichMull, February 22, 2002 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Will YesNIC Co., LTD. Get To Keep DIAMOND.INFO? — GettingScrewed, February 21, 2002 @ 2:43 PM (1/5)

Yesnic - so many fake applications — rachelmacgregor, February 21, 2002 @ 4:38 PM (1/4)

YesNIC faked TMs 261 times in the .info Sunrise but is still — antipathy, February 21, 2002 @ 8:30 PM (1/3)

ICANN will condone their behaviour — Cation, February 21, 2002 @ 8:41 PM (1/2)

ICANN: "We accredit these people : consumers - these guys are honest" — richard_henderson, February 21, 2002 @ 10:20 PM (1/1)

They were hoping no one will be able to check Korea trademarks. — moler, February 23, 2002 @ 7:56 AM (0/0)

Interesting Letter from Registrars to Neulevel - Re: Group 2B — ebiz, February 21, 2002 @ 7:10 AM (1/2)

it became apparent through emails with various registrars — antipathy, February 21, 2002 @ 9:04 AM (1/1)

Amen, antipathy — RichMull, February 22, 2002 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

Landrush 11 - the domain names will be familiar, but how — antipathy, February 21, 2002 @ 1:56 AM (1/2)

I Recommend Verisign ... — GettingScrewed, February 21, 2002 @ 3:39 AM (1/1)

thanks GS - this is where we are at with .info - go for a — antipathy, February 21, 2002 @ 8:56 AM (0/0)

Major ICANN Restructuring — Garry Anderson, February 20, 2002 @ 11:18 PM (1/3)

what's really going on — Cation, February 21, 2002 @ 12:11 AM (1/2)

I believe — Garry Anderson, February 21, 2002 @ 12:33 AM (1/1)

Allows Icann to solve their legitimacy problem — Cation, February 21, 2002 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

logo trademarks and IP claims — Cation, February 20, 2002 @ 10:00 PM (1/1)

ICANN -IS- Big Business — RichMull, February 24, 2002 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)

Interesting article in magazine about the marketing of the dot-info domain (interesting) — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 20, 2002 @ 9:44 PM (0/0)

registrars are going to fleece you with .info — Cation, February 20, 2002 @ 9:32 PM (1/2)

how did you found out ? Look at BIZ-2 coming from $29.90 EOM — domino, February 20, 2002 @ 11:00 PM (1/1)

Landrush 11 - the .info fleecing will continue - how many — antipathy, February 21, 2002 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)

.info Landrush 11 - the domain names will be familiar, but — antipathy, February 20, 2002 @ 9:15 PM (0/0)

Total Registrations .biz group 2B started - tiered pricing ($250/yr max.) — sfeibish, February 20, 2002 @ 1:27 PM (4/7)

where is the list (can you post it here) — Cation, February 20, 2002 @ 9:47 PM (1/1)

to get Total Registrations list, follow instructions in body of message ... — sfeibish, February 21, 2002 @ 8:47 AM (0/0)

Worst Group 2B Scam Yet... — ebiz, February 20, 2002 @ 5:48 PM (2/2)

same happened to me — EasyTech2, February 21, 2002 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)
exactly the same shocks.. — domino, February 20, 2002 @ 8:47 PM (0/0)

tried again, good names were available -- warning, have to have money in account — sfeibish, February 20, 2002 @ 4:16 PM (0/0)
I've noticed the same thing about the couple names I want... — housecat, February 20, 2002 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)

Joe Sims organizing a clandestine Operation — EasyTech2, February 20, 2002 @ 10:50 AM (0/0)

Relationship between Microsoft .Net and Domain Names? — DomeBase, February 20, 2002 @ 4:09 AM (1/2)

Link inside explains Microsoft's Dot Net (no connection with domain names) — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 20, 2002 @ 4:50 AM (1/1)

Thanks Gregory! <eom> — DomeBase, February 20, 2002 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

Korean landrush party disturbed by server meltdown. — domino, February 20, 2002 @ 1:19 AM (2/3)

rgnames? Jonh Lee is their executive and look what he took at .info sunrise — richard_henderson, February 21, 2002 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
could anyone resolve their pricing policy? What is current USD/KRW ratio? — domino, February 20, 2002 @ 2:18 AM (1/1)

http://www.oanda.com has currency converter — sfeibish, February 20, 2002 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)

how long will .info take? — Cation, February 19, 2002 @ 4:12 AM (1/3)

how long for .info? — DomeBase, February 19, 2002 @ 4:32 AM (1/2)

Thanks! :) — dtobias, February 20, 2002 @ 1:41 PM (1/1)

I agree with your comments and observations Bob. I have — antipathy, February 20, 2002 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)

Alldomains.com Opens Registration... ** Note Link... — ebiz, February 19, 2002 @ 1:33 AM (3/7)

I wont bother freezing my bugs with registrars who keep the best names themselves. FUCK — domino, February 19, 2002 @ 12:15 AM (2/4)

I believe these domains had previous app's in the first round... — ebiz, February 20, 2002 @ 12:46 AM (1/1)

Let's hope so. EOM — domino, February 20, 2002 @ 2:13 AM (0/0)

yeah, I noticed a few of my names, like job.biz, wouldn't display in "taken/available" list (eom) — sfeibish, February 19, 2002 @ 1:39 PM (1/1)

Are Registrars eligible to submit any names on Their Behalf???? — domino, February 19, 2002 @ 2:34 PM (0/0)

thanks also (eom) — sfeibish, February 19, 2002 @ 9:18 AM (0/0)
thanks — domino, February 19, 2002 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)

Afilias Re-distribution Process — Garry Anderson, February 19, 2002 @ 1:26 AM (1/2)

Like so many other posters I got stung in the .info Landrush — antipathy, February 19, 2002 @ 11:01 AM (1/1)

Stay Away From DomainPeople — GettingScrewed, February 19, 2002 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)

Yesnic and Linda Govinda — Cation, February 19, 2002 @ 12:58 AM (1/1)

she's deleted them — richard_henderson, February 19, 2002 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)

.us rules? — cation, February 18, 2002 @ 11:14 PM (2/2)

not just U.S. citizens/companies; but you have to meet "nexus" requirements — sfeibish, February 19, 2002 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
you must have a business there or a branch at least. — domino, February 19, 2002 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)

Round Robin for Land Rush II, No Mention of Land Rush I Folks — domebase, February 18, 2002 @ 9:44 PM (1/5)

You were right all along — richard_henderson, February 18, 2002 @ 10:53 PM (1/4)

As with Enron - Corruption is widespread — Garry Anderson, February 19, 2002 @ 12:18 AM (1/3)

Landrush 2 - with no standing for the original Landrushers!! — antipathy, February 19, 2002 @ 9:52 PM (1/2)

disagree - go after names you originally wanted - as long as you're not charged pre-reg fees — sfeibish, February 20, 2002 @ 10:39 AM (1/1)

thanks Stephan - I agree with the sentiment - I don't like — antipathy, February 20, 2002 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)

Want a Good Laugh? — Garry Anderson, February 18, 2002 @ 9:20 AM (2/10)

Afilias Challenges — investor, February 19, 2002 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
Where are challenges & results posted? (eom) — sfeibish, February 18, 2002 @ 1:08 PM (2/8)

No challenges at Wipo — erikdw2, February 18, 2002 @ 11:05 PM (3/6)

Opinion: Perhaps WIPO challenges may be eventually posted... — vera-city, February 19, 2002 @ 5:34 AM (1/1)

Where money went? On the Profit Line — Garry Anderson, February 19, 2002 @ 8:55 AM (0/0)

WIPO has a duty to list challenges — Garry Anderson, February 19, 2002 @ 12:23 AM (1/2)

Damned right. What's good for the goose is good for the dumbass gander. — spot2, February 19, 2002 @ 2:54 AM (1/1)

WIPO also a question of Openness & Integrity — Garry Anderson, February 19, 2002 @ 9:16 AM (0/0)

no wonder ..;))) — domino, February 19, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

Legitimate question. Haven't seen anything on WIPOs site (eom) — EasyTech2, February 18, 2002 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)

Hosting question... — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 18, 2002 @ 5:12 AM (4/4)

Hosts — S. Hudgens, February 18, 2002 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
try webhostingtalk.com — Cation, February 18, 2002 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)
Hosting.. — peeved, February 18, 2002 @ 11:50 AM (0/0)
Need I say more? — Interland Are Thieves, February 18, 2002 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)

did godaddy submit .info applications — Cation, February 17, 2002 @ 9:20 PM (1/2)

They submitted at least a few, but the crucial incriminating question is when did they submit them? — spot2, February 17, 2002 @ 11:38 PM (1/1)

I think a lot of us were conned and paid money to registrars — antipathy, February 18, 2002 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)

.info transfers.... make a list of Registrars... — R. Johnson, February 17, 2002 @ 6:46 PM (2/8)

Registrant or Registrar Transfer ? (eom) — EasyTech2, February 17, 2002 @ 8:33 PM (1/2)

.info ownership changes — RJ Johnson, February 18, 2002 @ 2:37 AM (1/1)

What's with your username? — EasyTech2, February 18, 2002 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)

All you need is both-sides signed and notarized hardcopy — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 6:52 PM (1/4)

verisign won't — Cation, February 17, 2002 @ 7:02 PM (3/3)

Go Daddy are are bunch of twats — spot2, February 17, 2002 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
oh, bad luck in that case ... ;-( EOM — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)
Those I provided do it for free — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 7:07 PM (0/0)

Slow uptake with Landrush 2 .biz names? — richard_henderson, February 17, 2002 @ 1:07 AM (2/8)

I disagree.....There will be a definite demand for .biz in time....(not with speculators though) — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 17, 2002 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)
I think you are right on the money Richard - .info has a — antipathy, February 17, 2002 @ 2:59 AM (2/6)

.info — Amar Ochani, February 17, 2002 @ 7:09 AM (2/3)

TLD's — S. Hudgens, February 18, 2002 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
I feel as you do Amar. I also have a horrible feeling that — antipathy, February 18, 2002 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

Competition with .com — S. Hudgens, February 18, 2002 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)

non English biz — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 3:28 AM (1/1)

.biz for B2B sites — moler, February 17, 2002 @ 4:06 AM (0/0)

.biz phase 2 registrars - make a list — Cation, February 17, 2002 @ 12:38 AM (1/4)

DomainBank, DomainPeople, Secura - single applicant... — richard_henderson, February 17, 2002 @ 12:57 AM (2/3)

about authorisations freezing your card — spot2, February 17, 2002 @ 5:43 PM (1/1)

Sure, it's clearly unfair, just count your chances to get the name.. — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)

Secura seems to get multiples and Domainpeople ... — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Will asians open for BIZ II ? — domino, February 16, 2002 @ 11:58 PM (2/4)

I think you should consider whether the .biz extension will — antipathy, February 17, 2002 @ 2:25 AM (2/2)

business is the first English word Asian's learn when they exit the womb — moler, February 17, 2002 @ 4:11 AM (0/0)
Babelfish: "Korean to English" investigation ;-) — domino, February 17, 2002 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)

you can use translation services (expensive), software/webpages (has errors) — sfeibish, February 17, 2002 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)

4domains/blueberry open .biz group 2B applications -- lottery system :-( — sfeibish, February 15, 2002 @ 11:44 PM (1/3)

waw furthermore "internal domains" here ... — domino, February 16, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (1/2)

Auctioning off a mere CHANCE to get a .biz — RichMull, February 17, 2002 @ 2:32 AM (1/1)

It's still a lottery.Only difference is you buy multiple tickets from registrars instead of Neulevel — spot2, February 17, 2002 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)

Want to have a laugh? Take a look at Realnames — erikdw2, February 15, 2002 @ 11:26 PM (2/3)

Who types keywords into their address field anyway? — spot2, February 16, 2002 @ 2:31 PM (1/1)

Agree. It is corrupt monopoly on keywords — Garry Anderson, February 16, 2002 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

You do not know the half of it — Garry Anderson, February 16, 2002 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)

secura (domainregistry.de) joins .biz group 2B party — sfeibish, February 15, 2002 @ 8:53 PM (1/2)

I found Secura very good in the .info Landrush — richard_henderson, February 16, 2002 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)

And now they even support credit card payment — domino, February 16, 2002 @ 1:36 AM (0/0)

joker opens .biz group 2B, invites only those who attended first party (eom) — sfeibish, February 15, 2002 @ 7:33 PM (1/1)

We - and our lawyers - are on our own! — RichMull, February 17, 2002 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)

Afilias Director/ICANN committee member Philip Grabensee — richard_henderson, February 15, 2002 @ 6:46 PM (4/26)

Why clarification is needed — richard_henderson, February 15, 2002 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
P. Grabensee — Sanjeev Goyal, February 15, 2002 @ 7:51 PM (1/1)

Maybe thats the Afilias Challenge of last resort / Bulkchallenge? lol — EasyTech2, February 15, 2002 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)

violation of its own rules! — EasyTech2, February 15, 2002 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)
Is this a german lawyer ? — Sanjeev Goyal, February 15, 2002 @ 7:44 PM (2/21)

New investigations in the Grabensee case — corneliusheise, February 16, 2002 @ 11:30 AM (1/11)

Mr. Garbensee lost some Sunrise Challenge cases! — EasyTech2, February 16, 2002 @ 12:09 AM (1/10)

The evidence is indisputable — spot2, February 16, 2002 @ 2:50 PM (1/9)

You know my opinion — Garry Anderson, February 16, 2002 @ 4:00 PM (1/8)

It would be helpful if Mr Grabensee posted an explanation here — richard_henderson, February 16, 2002 @ 6:51 PM (2/7)

Cornelius Heise is a Philip Grab — Sanjeev Goyal, February 17, 2002 @ 4:52 AM (1/5)

Holy shit, now I am any longer myself, I have transfered myself into another person ;-) — corneliusheise, February 17, 2002 @ 5:15 PM (1/4)

The 8 domains — richard_henderson, February 18, 2002 @ 7:12 AM (1/3)

NOW WHAT YOU SAY.... — sanjeevgoyal, February 18, 2002 @ 8:13 AM (1/2)

The 8 most worse domain I ever saw Ha, Ha, Ha — corneliusheise, February 19, 2002 @ 10:49 PM (1/1)

Mr. Philip Challenged himself — Sanjeevgoyal, February 20, 2002 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

They have the Fifth Amendment — Garry Anderson, February 17, 2002 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)

Yes it is the same! — EasyTech2, February 15, 2002 @ 7:54 PM (3/8)

Grabensee deserves more bad publicity than any of the others — spot2, February 15, 2002 @ 8:14 PM (1/1)

WE SHOULD BE THANKFUL TO RICHARD — Sanjeev Goyal, February 15, 2002 @ 8:17 PM (0/0)

list of Sunrise names — richard_henderson, February 15, 2002 @ 8:04 PM (1/3)

Thanks My Friend Richard — Sanjeev Goyal, February 15, 2002 @ 8:11 PM (2/2)

decision is based only on a prima facie examination of your TM — EasyTech2, February 15, 2002 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
Go on! Drop him in the shit. — spot2, February 15, 2002 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)

THEN I FEAR ABOUT THE DECISION — Sanjeev Goyal, February 15, 2002 @ 8:03 PM (1/1)

about the challenge — EasyTech2, February 15, 2002 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

nominate.net joins .biz group 2B mini-landrush party (eom) — sfeibish, February 15, 2002 @ 4:05 PM (0/0)

Group 2B --- Registrars not Re-opening their cueues... — ebiz, February 15, 2002 @ 9:18 AM (1/5)

Perhaps it's a mustard seed "help yourself" scam - eom — spot2, February 15, 2002 @ 3:41 PM (1/4)

Of course duh. Game the system, that's the only way to make money or get good names. — moler, February 15, 2002 @ 6:01 PM (1/3)

Have you sold your morals? What next, sell your mother? — spot2, February 16, 2002 @ 3:04 PM (1/2)

I was being sardonic. — moler, February 16, 2002 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)

Rock their boat and see where it gets ya — RichMull, February 17, 2002 @ 2:51 AM (0/0)

dot.USA TLD's? — jgallaway, February 15, 2002 @ 1:57 AM (2/2)

Be careful when on the internet, full of bullshit. — moler, February 15, 2002 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
It's a scam stay away from them — peeved, February 15, 2002 @ 11:37 AM (0/0)

Hi folks and ICANN bastards — Elvis, February 14, 2002 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)

1stdomain.net is accepting .biz applications. — domainboy, February 14, 2002 @ 10:08 PM (3/4)

That's the Govinda site? Did anyone get any names in the .info rush from them? — moler, February 15, 2002 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
thank you - I used your link - I couldn't find a link on their home page (eom) — sfeibish, February 15, 2002 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)
all good ones are gone — EasyTech2, February 14, 2002 @ 10:15 PM (1/1)

Of course they are gone. Govinda has undoubtedly reserved them. — spot2, February 15, 2002 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)

.us Sunrise — Garry Anderson, February 14, 2002 @ 12:17 AM (1/3)

I emailed TV stations, newspapers, legislators about generic trademarks & sunrise -> no action (eom) — sfeibish, February 14, 2002 @ 1:16 PM (2/2)

"Small Business Administration's independent Office of Advocacy wrote letter to NTIA chief" ... — sfeibish, February 15, 2002 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
Blinking Typical — Garry Anderson, February 14, 2002 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)

ICANN open secret - corruption or incompetence? — Garry Anderson, February 13, 2002 @ 11:53 PM (0/0)

.us April 24th first-come-first-served, .biz week of April 15th. ----> payment authorization h_ll — sfeibish, February 13, 2002 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

"Inappropriate Lending of Registry Access" — Casino, February 13, 2002 @ 10:48 AM (1/1)

I'm so scared! — Casino, February 13, 2002 @ 11:15 AM (0/0)

ICANN say, "The best and brightest have been working on this," — Garry Anderson, February 13, 2002 @ 10:07 AM (1/1)

The Real McCoy — Casino, February 13, 2002 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)

Newest Suffixes Help to Increase Net's Population — Casino, February 13, 2002 @ 8:31 AM (3/5)

Fool — spot2, February 14, 2002 @ 1:53 AM (1/1)

Rajesh? — Garry Anderson, February 14, 2002 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)

The article is there, but... — dtobias, February 13, 2002 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)
...and the URL for the article you posted yesterday...? — richard_henderson, February 13, 2002 @ 8:41 AM (1/1)

According to Carl Werner — Casino, February 13, 2002 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

ICANN's Troubling Admission — Casino, February 12, 2002 @ 11:02 AM (2/5)

The boardsquatter's are the problem — Cation, February 12, 2002 @ 9:03 PM (1/1)

the rules of accountability which govern most of us don't — antipathy, February 14, 2002 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)

Vint Cerf's astonishing defence — richard_henderson, February 12, 2002 @ 3:54 PM (2/2)

They appear spoof - no link - nothing on latimes (eom) — Garry Anderson, February 12, 2002 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)
Unless these are "spoof" reports... they seem too astonishing to be true (eom) — richard_henderson, February 12, 2002 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)

Register.com comes in clean, but I don't know about the length of the queue... hmmm — moler, February 12, 2002 @ 4:21 AM (1/5)

Not quite........... — Amar Ochani, February 12, 2002 @ 6:50 AM (1/4)

What's this then? — moler, February 12, 2002 @ 7:46 AM (2/3)

Refunds — Amar Ochani, February 12, 2002 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)
received the same message from Register.com — housecat, February 12, 2002 @ 1:41 PM (1/1)

INWW is doing the same, although no notification yet. — moler, February 12, 2002 @ 2:10 PM (0/0)

ICANN approves new names — Casino, February 11, 2002 @ 12:13 AM (2/7)

New Extesions — Amar Ochani, February 12, 2002 @ 3:40 AM (2/3)

We Need More TLDs — S. Hudgens, February 12, 2002 @ 3:23 PM (1/1)

Agree - TLDs aren't problem, Sunrise is (trademarks) — Garry Anderson, February 12, 2002 @ 6:49 PM (0/0)

I'm waiting for the day that CNN uses CNN.biz — moler, February 12, 2002 @ 4:24 AM (0/0)

Arrogant snake oil sellers — dtobias, February 11, 2002 @ 1:21 PM (1/2)

whahahahhaaaaahahahahaaaaaaaaaa — moler, February 11, 2002 @ 2:04 PM (1/1)

thanks Dan - just goes to show that some in the registry and — antipathy, February 12, 2002 @ 10:51 AM (0/0)

neulevel in breach of regulations! — Safron, February 10, 2002 @ 7:07 AM (1/2)

You mean there are registrars around that will do a .biz or .info transfer for you? — moler, February 10, 2002 @ 9:13 AM (1/1)

Yes there are. — Safron, February 10, 2002 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

.biz will be very good for speculators — cation, February 9, 2002 @ 11:20 PM (3/5)

"biz" will be good for "business".....have seen "biz" used more and more often lately.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 10, 2002 @ 6:25 AM (1/2)

Agreed. Application is key. Great for B2B exchanges. — moler, February 10, 2002 @ 9:07 AM (1/1)

good posts Gregory and Mole - I thank the gods that my — antipathy, February 10, 2002 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)

But you can't actively sell your .biz domains. .biz is on restricted lease. — moler, February 10, 2002 @ 4:47 AM (0/0)
Yes. All the best ,biz names are still stuck in Neulevel's bedroom closet — moler, February 10, 2002 @ 4:41 AM (0/0)

Dotster starts .biz auction - Did they refund previous application fees? — domainboy, February 8, 2002 @ 1:07 AM (2/5)

dotster can't be trusted — Cation, February 8, 2002 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)
amazing...the dotster site explains how neulevel got in trouble for — housecat, February 8, 2002 @ 2:13 PM (1/3)

Boy, the dotster .biz interphase sure sucks! Very confusing navigation. — moler, February 8, 2002 @ 4:58 PM (1/2)

Interphase? Is that Klingon for interface? SAWry just kidding! -eom — spot2, February 8, 2002 @ 7:45 PM (1/1)

Ya, spot. I must say Dotster has a Klingon interface. — moler, February 9, 2002 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

BookMyName.com opens for .biz 2B — sfeibish, February 7, 2002 @ 4:35 PM (0/0)

You can have my .org when you pry it from my cold, dead hands — psbyowner, February 7, 2002 @ 4:12 PM (1/2)

.org policy — dtobias, February 8, 2002 @ 12:09 AM (1/1)

Thanks for the clarification EOM — psbyowner, February 8, 2002 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

http://www.domainpeople.com/biz1.cfm — domainboy, February 7, 2002 @ 1:53 AM (2/10)

domainboy rocks! — moler, February 8, 2002 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)
007Names.com --- another bidding system (but $80 downpayment to bid)... blah (eom) — EBIZ, February 7, 2002 @ 2:11 AM (1/8)

007Names and Mustard Seed or 007Names/MustardSeed — antipathy, February 7, 2002 @ 8:29 PM (1/7)

007names gamed the system, we all know that — moler, February 8, 2002 @ 4:51 PM (1/6)

ICANN Registrar's Licence or ICANN Internet Scam Licence — antipathy, February 8, 2002 @ 8:14 PM (1/5)

ICANN's accreditation to scam... — richard_henderson, February 8, 2002 @ 10:53 PM (1/4)

The evidence is overwhelming — Garry Anderson, February 9, 2002 @ 8:48 AM (1/3)

there were some honest registrars in the .info launch, but — antipathy, February 9, 2002 @ 10:43 AM (1/2)

Honest Registrars — Garry Anderson, February 9, 2002 @ 11:03 AM (1/1)

I think the events of the Afilias Ltd. .info launch supports — antipathy, February 10, 2002 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)

porn star in position to screw Houston, makes her former g...bangs look puny in comparison — sfeibish, February 6, 2002 @ 4:14 AM (0/0)

Who wants to email DallyDoo Corp. and let them know porn star Houston gets 1st crack at houston.us? — sfeibish, February 5, 2002 @ 8:20 PM (1/1)

Don't you long for the days when london and paris.com pointed to an escort site. — sfeibish, February 5, 2002 @ 8:35 PM (0/0)

VERISIGN STEALS FROM CUSTOMERS — GettingScrewed, February 5, 2002 @ 2:23 PM (1/3)

We Know — GetYourPages, February 5, 2002 @ 10:13 PM (1/2)

Have you considered a small claims court? EOM — FineE, February 6, 2002 @ 2:07 AM (1/1)

Small Claims Court? — GettingScrewed, February 6, 2002 @ 2:51 AM (0/0)

us allowing mere tm applications at sunrise. What happens if tm application later rejected? (eom) — sfeibish, February 5, 2002 @ 1:48 PM (0/0)

VeriSign is a sunrise fraudster! — EasyTech2, February 5, 2002 @ 7:47 AM (1/1)

Perhaps an 'error' or 'test' or something ;-) — Garry Anderson, February 5, 2002 @ 9:24 AM (0/0)

More names available — Casino, February 5, 2002 @ 3:06 AM (2/6)

scamming by numbers - taking the .info and .biz launch scams — antipathy, February 5, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
More domains = more confusion, less quality sites, more 404 page ERRORs — Gregory W. Krajewski, February 5, 2002 @ 4:55 AM (3/4)

artificial arguments — RayF, February 5, 2002 @ 3:09 PM (1/1)

More TLDs — S. Hudgens, February 11, 2002 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)

More restricted TLD = less confusion + less 404 page ERRORs — Garry Anderson, February 5, 2002 @ 10:13 AM (0/0)
what about .WEB ? ;-) (eom) — EasyTech2, February 5, 2002 @ 8:00 AM (0/0)

where does ICANN's six million dollar budget go — Cation, February 5, 2002 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

And they have nerve to want charge At Large members — Garry Anderson, February 5, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

While everyoneTALKS.... I shall be taking Action! — GetYourPages, February 4, 2002 @ 4:42 PM (2/16)

Question: Might it be that potential plaintiffs are awaiting Landrush Redux? eom — vera-city, February 5, 2002 @ 5:37 AM (2/2)

Let's Use our heads for a second — GetYourPages, February 5, 2002 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)
Opinion: There is a difference between revealing the truth... — vera-city, February 5, 2002 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)

Sunrise abridges the right of common people to common words — Garry Anderson, February 4, 2002 @ 10:14 PM (2/12)

I certanly hope none of you give up the fight — GetYourPages, February 5, 2002 @ 9:33 PM (1/2)

I had a TRADEMARK and STILL Got the SHAFT — GetYourPages, February 5, 2002 @ 9:47 PM (1/1)

Is that you Patrick? (eom) — AfghanTM, February 8, 2002 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)

AFILIAS is CHEATING — sgupta, February 4, 2002 @ 11:28 PM (1/8)

If you charge for registering "NONE" data, you are a crook... — richard_henderson, February 5, 2002 @ 12:14 AM (1/7)

ICANN have ultimate responsibility — Garry Anderson, February 5, 2002 @ 12:40 AM (1/6)

Need a Class Action Suit — sgupta, February 5, 2002 @ 12:44 AM (1/5)

Refunds — investor, February 5, 2002 @ 1:44 AM (3/4)

a fraudulent application is just that, a fraudulent application — antipathy, February 5, 2002 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)
This is NOT just about losing money — Garry Anderson, February 5, 2002 @ 9:52 AM (0/0)
Afilias Must Not Be Allowed To Profit From Fradulent Rgistartions Twice eom — investor, February 5, 2002 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)

Maybe they won't Profit. — GetYourPages, February 5, 2002 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)

Is there a chance .biz, .info, .us open at about the same time? (eom) — sfeibish, February 4, 2002 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)

Neulevel drops design/logo trademarks from .us Sunrise - Thank you Neulevel - however — sfeibish, February 4, 2002 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)

MelbourneIT/INWW comes in clean as a whistle for .biz reserve — moler, February 4, 2002 @ 3:00 AM (0/0)

What is afilias doing to promote .info? — Cation, February 4, 2002 @ 2:46 AM (1/4)

show me the money — RayF, February 4, 2002 @ 6:25 AM (1/3)

This was anticipated — cambler, February 4, 2002 @ 9:06 PM (1/2)

data analysis — RayF, February 5, 2002 @ 3:39 PM (1/1)

footnote — RayF, February 5, 2002 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)

I'd like to see Neulevel work with its Registrars by... — ebiz, February 3, 2002 @ 5:59 PM (1/1)

I'm curious, how was the money lost? — sfeibish, February 3, 2002 @ 6:40 PM (0/0)

Be careful about Internetters Feb. 4 Landrush II. Read the FAQ. — sfeibish, February 2, 2002 @ 3:05 PM (3/6)

Wow, the Internetters landrush2.biz site crashed. — moler, February 4, 2002 @ 4:31 PM (1/1)

at the time i pre-registered my names there... — EasyTech2, February 4, 2002 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)

APOLOGIES TO INTERNETTERS, why didn't you just tell us the first time! — sfeibish, February 3, 2002 @ 2:46 PM (0/0)
Plus you get the pleasure of pre-paying for a 10-year registration with them... lovely! (eom) — ebiz, February 2, 2002 @ 4:45 PM (1/2)

Pre-paying. Do they charge your card for 500 pounds first before successful registration ? — moler, February 3, 2002 @ 5:11 AM (1/1)

Internetter's reply for the benefit of the forum — moler, February 3, 2002 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

Weird e-mail from eNom — richard_henderson, February 2, 2002 @ 9:13 AM (2/4)

Same here — DaveKing2, February 2, 2002 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)
Must be my names. Send them over to me. — moler, February 2, 2002 @ 10:00 AM (1/2)

No - they're mine. Dont send them - send me the money. SHOW ME THE MONEY ("Moe Money") - MEOW! — Moe, February 3, 2002 @ 2:50 AM (1/1)

Easy, is that you? — moler, February 3, 2002 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)

The real Internet Advocate hasn't posted since December 14, 2001- All such posts by ICANN Moderator — TheInternetAdvocate, February 2, 2002 @ 12:52 AM (2/4)

oh shit - you're back! Any chance of getting the cretin in the — antipathy, February 2, 2002 @ 10:43 AM (1/1)

lol — spot2, February 2, 2002 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

Mike - lil dick (1960s man) - Hou — 1ntemetAdvocate, February 2, 2002 @ 10:34 AM (1/1)

U wotch out! U wotch out - My Gerog Brush has "New Killer" bomb! — IntemetAdvocate, February 3, 2002 @ 11:08 AM (0/0)

The .NAME Game... — dtobias, February 1, 2002 @ 8:27 PM (2/6)

Do these things work? I got one. But idregister doesn't have a clue what the next steps are. — moler, February 2, 2002 @ 10:02 AM (1/2)

wahahahaa.. it works now. It's funny seeing all these new .name addresses. — moler, February 3, 2002 @ 7:52 AM (1/1)

.con — rachelmacgregor, February 3, 2002 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)

Don't Feel So Bad ... — GettingScrewed, February 1, 2002 @ 10:27 PM (1/2)

Web forwarding — dtobias, February 1, 2002 @ 10:45 PM (1/1)

Gee - thats nice advice: "Form part of my pyramid scheme, dude..." — Moe, February 4, 2002 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)

Why I believe the reserved names .biz round robin will be another insider trading scam — moler, February 1, 2002 @ 5:24 PM (1/2)

All names in a hat - is fair way — Garry Anderson, February 1, 2002 @ 7:48 PM (1/1)

It should be audited by an impartial auditor (Arthur Andersen excluded) — Cation, February 1, 2002 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)

123 Registration opens .biz "2B". First come, first served??? (eom) — sfeibish, February 1, 2002 @ 2:56 PM (1/1)

I've been informed multiple applicants may queue same name (eom) — sfeibish, February 1, 2002 @ 3:39 PM (0/0)

Stop action cannot be used against you....Is this right? — jackbenson, January 31, 2002 @ 5:36 PM (1/1)

They need to show 'bad faith'. — spot2, January 31, 2002 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)

Sunrise .info for sale — arbitrator, January 31, 2002 @ 12:46 AM (1/1)

Probably why no registrar allows .info transfers right now.. too messy — moler, January 31, 2002 @ 3:55 PM (0/0)

eNom joins reserved .biz queue with bidding system — moler, January 30, 2002 @ 12:13 AM (3/24)

What a bunch of wankers. — spot2, January 30, 2002 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)
Very creative in money making those bastards... — EasyTech2, January 30, 2002 @ 1:20 PM (0/0)
http://www.domainbank.net/landbiz/index.cfm — domainboy, January 30, 2002 @ 1:07 PM (5/21)

thank you, I would have missed domainbank. — sfeibish, January 30, 2002 @ 6:34 PM (1/3)

DomainBank is a pretty good registry.....I had success with them during the dot info LR. — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 31, 2002 @ 2:38 AM (1/2)

One of the best. eom — vera-city , February 3, 2002 @ 8:17 AM (1/1)

Yes DomainBank is the best company in the universe. almost eom — rachelmacgregor, February 3, 2002 @ 2:37 PM (0/0)

Questions to the forum — richard_henderson, January 30, 2002 @ 4:19 PM (1/3)

If my use of trademark doesn't infringe, I'll sue to get it back ... — sfeibish, January 30, 2002 @ 6:47 PM (1/2)

and then the trademark holder will probably bring up the LANHAM ACT ... — sfeibish, January 30, 2002 @ 6:52 PM (1/1)

Wouldn't he have to prove protecting HIS mark? — Garry Anderson, January 30, 2002 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)

.biz launch what a joke — crs, January 30, 2002 @ 4:01 PM (1/6)

why challenged??? — EasyTech2, January 30, 2002 @ 4:22 PM (1/5)

...so, what's the answer? — richard_henderson, January 30, 2002 @ 6:24 PM (1/4)

OK- I got the answer for myself — richard_henderson, January 30, 2002 @ 6:41 PM (3/3)

Yup, you could be registering a name that involves STOP without you knowing... — moler, January 31, 2002 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)
Please read for yourself and make your own opinion.... — EasyTech2, January 31, 2002 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)
BBC own FIZZ? BBC = Bloody Bad Cheats — Garry Anderson, January 30, 2002 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

thank you for that information... — housecat, January 30, 2002 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)
Hey thanks, domainboy! — moler, January 30, 2002 @ 1:40 PM (1/4)

media.biz is already reserved...eom — EasyTech2, January 30, 2002 @ 2:42 PM (1/3)

Jah, did you pre-register it? — moler, January 30, 2002 @ 3:45 PM (2/2)

No...but I tried it ;-) — EasyTech2, January 30, 2002 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
could be that requesters are going down the reserved list — housecat, January 30, 2002 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)

WIPO backed reverse hijakcing stopped by federal judege — Cation, January 29, 2002 @ 9:51 PM (1/2)

Law should reverse all corrupt WIPO decisions — Garry Anderson, January 30, 2002 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)

right — Cation, January 30, 2002 @ 7:34 PM (0/0)

LegalEagle, what about that? — EasyTech2, January 29, 2002 @ 4:44 PM (1/2)

Non-Priority Challenges — LegalEagle, January 30, 2002 @ 10:21 AM (1/1)

Non-Priority Challenges — EasyTech2, January 30, 2002 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)

What should be done about YESNIC? — cation, January 29, 2002 @ 2:19 AM (1/3)

I guess there are a number of questions which have to be answered — antipathy, January 29, 2002 @ 9:55 AM (1/2)

YesNIC lost some WIPO cases... — EasyTech2, January 29, 2002 @ 3:01 PM (1/1)

Were the DNS regulatory authority about upholding its charter — antipathy, January 30, 2002 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

Hey Legal Eagle... — ElvisSaysHi, January 27, 2002 @ 7:17 PM (2/4)

Can you afford the lawsuit? — Elvis, January 29, 2002 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)
more info .. — LegalEagle, January 28, 2002 @ 2:25 AM (1/2)

for your eagle eye... — ElvisSaysHi, January 28, 2002 @ 5:33 AM (1/1)

some thoughts — LegalEagle, January 29, 2002 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

007 Names — richard_henderson, January 26, 2002 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

How to cure a formal deficience specified in a Sunrise Challenge? — EasyTech2, January 26, 2002 @ 7:32 PM (0/0)

AFILIAS CAN BE SUED ? — arbitrator, January 26, 2002 @ 4:57 PM (1/12)

my opinion — LegalEagle, January 27, 2002 @ 3:32 AM (1/11)

"professional negligence" — Garry Anderson, January 27, 2002 @ 10:27 AM (1/10)

"Professional Negligence" could be proven on at least two levels — Garry Anderson, January 27, 2002 @ 11:40 PM (2/9)

AFILIAS IS A SCAM — sgupta, February 1, 2002 @ 9:54 PM (0/0)
Difficult to prove — LegalEagle, January 28, 2002 @ 2:21 AM (1/7)

Not — Garry Anderson, January 28, 2002 @ 9:50 AM (1/6)

my experience dictates that it is — LegalEagle, January 29, 2002 @ 12:44 AM (2/5)

You are wrong in that they are contractually secure — GetYourPages, February 5, 2002 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
Defendants, you are accused of fraud - how do you plead? — Garry Anderson, January 29, 2002 @ 12:40 AM (2/3)

Sorry — LegalEagle, January 29, 2002 @ 2:09 PM (1/1)

Thank you - very much — Garry Anderson, January 29, 2002 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)

Even Stuart Lynn and Vint Cerf admit Truth — Garry Anderson, January 29, 2002 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)

Richard, honour demands answers — Garry Anderson, January 26, 2002 @ 1:50 PM (0/0)

.info predictions from the grave... — ElvisSaysHi, January 26, 2002 @ 6:56 AM (1/2)

........... — moler, January 26, 2002 @ 10:03 AM (1/1)

µµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµµ — EasyTech2, January 26, 2002 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)

Why isn't KANSAS.INFO locked??? — arbitrage, January 25, 2002 @ 10:06 PM (1/5)

don't know [eom) — EasyTech2, January 25, 2002 @ 10:38 PM (2/4)

don't know lar (eom) — moler, January 26, 2002 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)
25 January 2002 = 180 days after intial registration - the domain is now unlocked EOM — LegalEagle, January 25, 2002 @ 10:46 PM (1/2)

I think you're a bit too fast... — EasyTech2, January 25, 2002 @ 11:45 PM (1/1)

You're absolutely right. — LegalEagle, January 26, 2002 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)

.UK Registry Nominet refuses to pay ICANN fees. They say "We don't know what (ICANN) is there for" — spot2, January 25, 2002 @ 6:41 PM (1/1)

ICANN is there to look after Big Business interests — Garry Anderson, January 25, 2002 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

Nissan loses its REVERSE DOMAIN HIJACKING bid — spot2, January 25, 2002 @ 6:32 PM (1/1)

Read an article... — Garry Anderson, January 25, 2002 @ 7:29 PM (0/0)

copy of email to Dept. of Commerce secretary, etc. — sfeibish, January 25, 2002 @ 12:45 AM (2/2)

corrections — sfeibish, January 26, 2002 @ 10:42 AM (0/0)
Good Luck. You're going to need it. — spot2, January 25, 2002 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)

Attention to DuPont, Sunrise and First Amendment — Garry Anderson, January 25, 2002 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)

ICANN Vacation — Cation, January 25, 2002 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)

umts.info and steel.info — EasyTech2, January 24, 2002 @ 6:02 PM (0/0)

pick a number between 1 and 10 — sfeibish, January 24, 2002 @ 3:34 PM (1/1)

Hey, people have to make money to pay their children's hospital fees — moler, January 24, 2002 @ 6:42 PM (0/0)

Are any registrars accepting .biz reserved name applications? eom — spot2, January 24, 2002 @ 1:25 PM (1/2)

try idregister.com (eom) — sfeibish, January 24, 2002 @ 3:29 PM (1/1)

Any more? — moler, January 24, 2002 @ 6:43 PM (0/0)

.Biz Anyone? — breeves, January 24, 2002 @ 10:05 AM (4/7)

.biz will rock, but it depends... — moler, January 26, 2002 @ 4:06 AM (1/2)

Stop the world! I want to get off .... in 1999 --Moler — moe, January 27, 2002 @ 2:35 AM (1/1)

Hope so, moe — moler, January 27, 2002 @ 5:00 AM (0/0)

In the land of the blind, the one-eared man gets the glasses.... — Moe, January 25, 2002 @ 3:26 AM (1/1)

How true — breeves, January 25, 2002 @ 5:32 AM (0/0)

In the land of the blind, the one eyed man is king. Do you have that eye? --- elom — moler, January 24, 2002 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)
Not sure I agree on that one — hiltonian, January 24, 2002 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)

MAN UTD 0---LIVERPOOL 1....... :-).......EOM — scouser, January 22, 2002 @ 10:37 PM (1/2)

Yes - but ARSENAL have two games in hand - gunner — richard_henderson, January 22, 2002 @ 10:55 PM (1/1)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ — scouser, January 22, 2002 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)

WIPO — nicholasbernstein, January 22, 2002 @ 12:55 AM (1/3)

The usual reasons apply. — spot2, January 22, 2002 @ 5:59 PM (1/2)

Good Points — investor, January 22, 2002 @ 9:39 PM (1/1)

All these .info problems play into ICANN's hands... — richard_henderson, January 22, 2002 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)

What's up with .info ? — breeves, January 22, 2002 @ 3:57 AM (4/19)

It will take time — Cation, January 23, 2002 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
Most trademark dot infos will point to dot com — Garry Anderson, January 23, 2002 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)
.info is stuck in limbo until the sunrise frauds get reallocated — spot2, January 22, 2002 @ 5:57 AM (2/3)

Agree!!!! .info is the killer app in extensions!!! — moler, January 22, 2002 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)
Um.....? — 410, January 22, 2002 @ 9:07 AM (1/1)

correction — spot2, January 22, 2002 @ 10:28 AM (0/0)

.INFO is still a youngin'... give it some time — ebiz, January 22, 2002 @ 4:50 AM (2/12)

Agreed!!! Speculators like us are always 2 years ahead of big businesses ;-) — moler, January 22, 2002 @ 12:37 AM (1/1)

Not really mole — Cation, January 25, 2002 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)

good analysis spot2 and ebiz (410 = FW) and I wish to add — antipathy, January 22, 2002 @ 9:36 AM (2/9)

FW? — 410, January 24, 2002 @ 3:20 AM (1/2)

410 you may be right, but you are still a f*ck wit - regards — antipathy, January 24, 2002 @ 9:43 AM (1/1)

Oh, please — 410, January 26, 2002 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)

410 — nicholasbernstein, January 22, 2002 @ 12:40 AM (1/5)

Well.... — 410, January 24, 2002 @ 3:18 AM (2/4)

410, we agree one one thing - the evident corruption of ICANN — antipathy, January 24, 2002 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)
.web and open TLDs — Garry Anderson, January 24, 2002 @ 9:28 AM (1/2)

Gary — nicholasbernstein, January 24, 2002 @ 9:44 AM (1/1)

We agree on what is an OPEN TLD — Garry Anderson, January 24, 2002 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)

Could someone take a butchers at — scouser, January 21, 2002 @ 11:35 PM (1/2)

Hotel Inter-Continental Dubai - TM looks fraudulant — Garry Anderson, January 22, 2002 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

Sandip etc — richard_henderson, January 22, 2002 @ 7:46 AM (0/0)

Netsol and Emily and .info — moler, January 21, 2002 @ 2:21 PM (1/2)

Just what were you 2 talking about on the phone! :P (eom) — ebiz, January 22, 2002 @ 4:42 AM (1/1)

well, she facilitated my release of a prized .info name. ooooo... — moler, January 22, 2002 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

Lars answered everybodies post - except mine — Garry Anderson, January 21, 2002 @ 11:02 AM (0/0)

Ineligible data, Aug 11- Stuart Lynn "We are aware of the problem" — richard_henderson, January 20, 2002 @ 8:26 PM (1/2)

And Vint Cerf was "very conscious of the situation" too — richard_henderson, January 20, 2002 @ 8:29 PM (1/1)

Richard - on the balance of probability ... — Garry Anderson, January 21, 2002 @ 11:18 AM (0/0)

Vint Cerf: registrars not allowed to buy domains for themselves — richard_henderson, January 20, 2002 @ 7:49 PM (1/2)

the registrars and vint Cerf give ICANN lip service — Cation, January 20, 2002 @ 9:57 PM (1/1)

Truth is, they are without Honour — Garry Anderson, January 21, 2002 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)

Will U.S. Release Grip on ICANN? — Garry Anderson, January 20, 2002 @ 10:09 AM (3/8)

The premeditated CORRUPTION of the US Government — spot2, January 20, 2002 @ 8:26 PM (1/3)

Brilliant analysis — richard_henderson, January 20, 2002 @ 9:56 PM (2/2)

I Concur — Garry Anderson, January 21, 2002 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)
This is getting just like the Matrix. eom — vera-city, January 21, 2002 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

we have to guess that the US Congress/DoC will resist — antipathy , January 20, 2002 @ 12:38 AM (1/2)

Why Fred Upton at DoC will have to face the music — richard_henderson, January 20, 2002 @ 1:38 PM (1/1)

Secretary Evans is ultimately responsible — Garry Anderson, January 20, 2002 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)

They should... since no one respects ICANN anymore. How embarrasing. --elom — moler, January 20, 2002 @ 11:58 AM (0/0)

Opinion: What might have some netizens — vera-city, January 20, 2002 @ 8:44 AM (2/6)

Legal "Due Care" — Garry Anderson, January 20, 2002 @ 9:50 AM (1/1)

Aiding and Abetting alleged fraud? eom — vera-city, January 20, 2002 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

What is clear is that Afilias broke its own contract — richard_henderson, January 20, 2002 @ 9:36 AM (2/3)

Opinion: The alleged "NONE" type registrations mentioned in this forum, — vera-city, January 20, 2002 @ 5:30 PM (0/0)
and if one reads the Afilias Ltd. .info registry bid document — antipathy , January 20, 2002 @ 10:54 AM (1/1)

Lining their pockets through selective incompetence... the outcome speaks the truth -- elom — moler, January 20, 2002 @ 11:56 AM (0/0)

you've got balls Lars - but apparently not very big ones — antipathy, January 19, 2002 @ 10:43 PM (2/15)

The reply you've been waiting for — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 12:18 AM (2/3)

Right!! — really, January 21, 2002 @ 4:08 AM (0/0)
Your fake numbers rendered your customers investments ineligible — richard_henderson, January 21, 2002 @ 12:43 AM (1/1)

clarification upon clarification.... — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

Lars thinks we are kids that can't see the difference between candy and a rock — moler, January 20, 2002 @ 3:36 AM (2/10)

And your point is? — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 12:20 AM (1/1)

Play fair. Or don't play. Hell is just a heartbeat away. -- elom — moler, January 21, 2002 @ 3:00 PM (0/0)

At the very least — really, January 20, 2002 @ 4:54 AM (2/7)

Your remarks are untrue, unfair and obviously directed at the wrong people — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 12:26 AM (0/0)
NO. Lars will never pay back the 5 year registration he sucked out, that's his to keep ---elom — moler, January 20, 2002 @ 11:49 AM (1/5)

No we won't refund, sticks and stones... — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 20, 2002 @ 11:40 PM (1/4)

"SpyProductions did the right thing"... a question — richard_henderson, January 21, 2002 @ 12:30 AM (1/3)

Correct data etc... — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 12:56 AM (2/2)

Your email prior to .INFO launch speaks volumes about your 'ethical' business practices... — ebiz, January 22, 2002 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
Sucked into a culture of corruption — richard_henderson, January 21, 2002 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

Hey Legal Eagle... Elvis needs help... — ElvisSaysHi, January 19, 2002 @ 5:53 PM (2/2)

Elvis.Presley.name is taken .... eheheheheh — moler, January 20, 2002 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
King - those are purdy lyrics and I would love to see it on — antipathy, January 19, 2002 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)

.us domain - deja vu all over again, except you don't even need trademark — sfeibish, January 19, 2002 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)

What sort of cowboy outfits are ICANN and Afilias Ltd.? — antipathy, January 19, 2002 @ 2:19 AM (1/2)

BBC - "Afilias did little to check the information" — Garry Anderson, January 19, 2002 @ 10:33 AM (1/1)

Flaws are considered accidental — Garry Anderson, January 19, 2002 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)

registering domains with image TMs is cybersquatting - what — antipathy, January 18, 2002 @ 10:55 PM (2/3)

In Sunrise they are overreaching trademark — Garry Anderson, January 19, 2002 @ 9:10 AM (0/0)
The purpose of the domain name industry is to make money for itself... — richard_henderson, January 18, 2002 @ 11:26 PM (1/1)

Biggest travesties of Justice — Garry Anderson, January 19, 2002 @ 9:18 AM (0/0)

generics should be reserved by registry and used as entry points into a directory — sfeibish, January 18, 2002 @ 9:01 PM (3/4)

this way website thrives thru skill and not by luck of draw (eom) — sfeibish, January 19, 2002 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)
generics should be used as new TLDs — Garry Anderson, January 19, 2002 @ 9:04 AM (1/1)

that's a good idea too (eom) — sfeibish, January 19, 2002 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)

Well, I Speak For Many Here ... — GettingScrewed, January 18, 2002 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)

what's the shadow whois? — domort, January 18, 2002 @ 4:43 PM (1/1)

http://sunriseupdate.afilias.info/index.cfm — EasyTech2, January 18, 2002 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

What's that ? someone playing with the whois? — EasyTech2, January 18, 2002 @ 4:03 PM (1/1)

whois — EasyTech2, January 18, 2002 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)

Roland LaPlante - please come to the forum to explain what — antipathy, January 18, 2002 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)

.name sucks — Cation, January 18, 2002 @ 3:06 AM (2/4)

.name and email — moler, January 20, 2002 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)
.NAME — GettingScrewed, January 18, 2002 @ 4:14 AM (1/2)

.museum and profits — dtobias, January 18, 2002 @ 2:44 PM (1/1)

If .museum — vera-city, January 18, 2002 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

Did Afilias challenge Linda Govinda? — Cation, January 18, 2002 @ 2:49 AM (2/11)

After six months of cyberquatting... — richard_henderson, January 18, 2002 @ 7:32 AM (1/1)

Will Afilias auction them and make even more money? — Garry Anderson, January 18, 2002 @ 8:31 AM (0/0)

Govinda has lost her domains! — richard_henderson, January 18, 2002 @ 7:23 AM (5/8)

Appeasement? eom — veracity, January 20, 2002 @ 5:15 PM (0/0)
Du Pont has lost their domain — Garry Anderson, January 18, 2002 @ 5:33 PM (1/2)

Dupont still has science.info — Cation, January 18, 2002 @ 7:45 PM (1/1)

Check shadow whois — Garry Anderson, January 19, 2002 @ 8:51 AM (0/0)

Why deletion instead of challenge? eom — vera-city, January 18, 2002 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)
the YesNIC registrations that breach ICANN rules on registrar — antipathy, January 18, 2002 @ 10:32 AM (1/1)

and 007Names apparently posing as a registrar for the .info — antipathy, January 18, 2002 @ 10:45 AM (0/0)

Last your effort paid Richard — SanjeevGoyal, January 18, 2002 @ 8:19 AM (0/0)

Palage: "the symbiotic relationship between registrars and registries" — richard_henderson, January 17, 2002 @ 10:01 PM (1/2)

Contractually valid? — vera-city, January 18, 2002 @ 5:51 AM (1/1)

Moot Point? — vera-city, January 18, 2002 @ 6:08 AM (0/0)

Question for lawyers or coward authorities — Garry Anderson, January 17, 2002 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)

Why Afilias can't criticise Lars Hindsley — richard_henderson, January 17, 2002 @ 6:52 PM (4/6)

Actually, they can..... — really, January 18, 2002 @ 4:02 AM (1/1)

Why encourage them to fraud? — EasyTech2, January 18, 2002 @ 8:26 AM (0/0)

Wrong — really, January 18, 2002 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
Why they are "policing" themselves. — vera-city, January 17, 2002 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)
List of 700 names challenged ? — SanjeevGoyal, January 17, 2002 @ 6:58 PM (1/1)

Here are some..... — TradeGuy1, January 18, 2002 @ 11:11 AM (0/0)

Afilias Challenged first set of Names. — SanjeevGoyal, January 17, 2002 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)

ICANN are to blame - Lynn and Cerf, please contradict — Garry Anderson, January 17, 2002 @ 11:50 AM (0/0)

SpyProductions.com direct response — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 16, 2002 @ 8:27 PM (12/33)

I like the way..... — really, January 18, 2002 @ 5:53 AM (2/3)

I spoke to Reuters — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)
He pointed out glaring errors in system... — Garry Anderson, January 18, 2002 @ 8:16 AM (1/1)

?? — really, January 18, 2002 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)

YOU put in the FAKE trademarks, Lars — richard_henderson, January 17, 2002 @ 11:08 PM (1/4)

Lars has to speak up now for his defence — Garry Anderson, January 17, 2002 @ 11:45 PM (1/3)

Singled out? — really, January 18, 2002 @ 3:44 AM (1/2)

Are you saying others should get away with it? — Garry Anderson, January 18, 2002 @ 8:11 AM (1/1)

Of course not — really, January 18, 2002 @ 4:25 PM (0/0)

DangerMan.info — richard_henderson, January 17, 2002 @ 10:39 PM (2/4)

Domains — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)
...and six others which Lars registered — richard_henderson, January 17, 2002 @ 11:48 PM (1/2)

... and two which Lars has changed in the SHADOW WHOIS — richard_henderson, January 17, 2002 @ 11:53 PM (1/1)

Too funny — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 2:17 AM (0/0)

you've got balls Lars - I will give you that - and you may — antipathy, January 17, 2002 @ 8:52 PM (1/1)

Nonsense — really, January 18, 2002 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)

This registrar is the very worst — really, January 17, 2002 @ 6:17 PM (1/1)

That is not true — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)

SPREE-PRODUCTIONS SHOPPING — reportabuse, January 17, 2002 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)
Gee, Lars ... — GettingScrewed, January 17, 2002 @ 3:23 PM (1/1)

Couldn't agree more — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 2:17 AM (0/0)

SpyProductions - by Reuters — Garry Anderson, January 17, 2002 @ 1:25 PM (2/2)

In deference to Mr. Roland LaPlante: — vera-city, January 18, 2002 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)
http://forum.icann.org3C3AF75700001F05.html — EasyTech2, January 17, 2002 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)

Are you having a nervous breakdown or do you commit professional suicide regularly? — rachelmacgregor, January 17, 2002 @ 10:45 AM (1/1)

Rach, you crack me up — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 1:47 AM (0/0)

Data validation — Garry Anderson, January 17, 2002 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
spy.info and beach.info - was this default data too? — richard_henderson, January 16, 2002 @ 11:34 PM (1/1)

Domains I wanted and use — icannforum@spyproductions.com, January 21, 2002 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

If a customer did not have a valid TM, we supplied default data — reportabuse, January 16, 2002 @ 9:21 PM (1/3)

Affiliated Bank and Mistrust Co. — vera-city, January 17, 2002 @ 5:41 PM (1/2)

Company policy: We don't discriminate... — vera-city, January 17, 2002 @ 6:38 PM (1/1)

Forget a detail or two? — vera-city, January 17, 2002 @ 7:03 PM (0/0)

libel.my.name — moler, January 16, 2002 @ 7:01 PM (1/1)

Stupid extension... — EasyTech2, January 16, 2002 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

.name of celebrities — DaveKing2, January 16, 2002 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

.name : if there's one thing I've learnt by now, when it comes to registry rules, there's always .. — DaveKing2, January 16, 2002 @ 3:00 PM (2/7)

Who cares about .name? — EasyTech2, January 16, 2002 @ 4:58 PM (1/3)

Who cares? — dtobias, January 16, 2002 @ 5:48 PM (1/2)

Wow, .name sucks, I only bought 1 for preventive measures, but .name is unnecessary..yucks — moler, January 16, 2002 @ 7:00 PM (1/1)

lol... you can't resist can you? You even buy a domain that you hate. - eom — spot2, January 16, 2002 @ 8:16 PM (0/0)

Validating .names — dtobias, January 16, 2002 @ 4:14 PM (1/2)

Thanks Dan... — DaveKing2, January 16, 2002 @ 4:23 PM (1/1)

Defensive queries — dtobias, January 16, 2002 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

This really P****s me off! — DOTNZ, January 16, 2002 @ 1:03 PM (1/1)

The authorities hide the truth — Garry Anderson, January 16, 2002 @ 1:37 PM (0/0)

new.net CEO to chat with public — Cation, January 16, 2002 @ 12:05 AM (0/0)

article on .name (ughhh.) — Cation, January 16, 2002 @ 12:04 AM (1/1)

You bet. .name is sick, a compromised tld not a gTLD and my web host thinks it sucks big time — moler, January 16, 2002 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)

Neulevels STOP policy makes hijacking easier than UDRP — spot2, January 15, 2002 @ 2:40 PM (1/1)

They are all on the take — Garry Anderson, January 15, 2002 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)

Nominet — hiltonian, January 14, 2002 @ 12:41 AM (1/9)

They also got internet.me.uk! But everthing else is available. It's a cybersquatter's paradise — spot2, January 14, 2002 @ 2:05 PM (3/8)

But challenging is very easy! — erikdw, January 14, 2002 @ 8:07 PM (1/3)

It depends whether the 'and' legally means the same as a boolean AND — spot2, January 14, 2002 @ 8:31 PM (2/2)

MASSIVE GREY AREA in the rules - according to Nominet — spot2, January 15, 2002 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
Mr. Fuck — erikdw, January 14, 2002 @ 9:40 PM (0/0)

.me.uk release — hiltonian, January 14, 2002 @ 4:18 PM (1/1)

..... — hiltonian, January 14, 2002 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)

they are squatting on lots of uk cities: birmingham.me.uk, manchester, liverpool, sheffield etc- eom — spot2, January 14, 2002 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)

What about windows.me.uk ? whahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! hic btw... — moler, January 14, 2002 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)

This made me smile — Garry Anderson, January 14, 2002 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)

The economics of a restricted TLD....The good, the bad and the ugly... — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 12, 2002 @ 7:36 PM (1/5)

The economics are very good - if they do it right — Garry Anderson, January 13, 2002 @ 10:27 PM (1/4)

My guess is they will implement a "grandfather clause" for current "org" owners... — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 13, 2002 @ 10:45 PM (1/3)

This would NOT be fair and equitable — Garry Anderson, January 13, 2002 @ 11:10 PM (1/2)

You misunderstood me....No current dot org owner would lose their domain. — Gregory W. Krajewski, January 14, 2002 @ 12:20 AM (1/1)

icann.org — dtobias, January 14, 2002 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)

The unacceptable silence of Hal Lubsen — richard_henderson, January 12, 2002 @ 12:58 AM (1/2)

Does anybody wonder why he is silent? — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 1:10 PM (1/1)

Because he is shy? — moler, January 12, 2002 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen - the unanswered questions remain — richard_henderson, January 12, 2002 @ 12:10 AM (1/1)

ALL that abuse system should be challenged — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 1:01 PM (0/0)

what restricted tlds really mean — Cation, January 12, 2002 @ 1:05 AM (2/5)

Nah...Restricted == No More TLDs (at least not any that really matter) For a Very Long Time... — Ron_Bennett, January 13, 2002 @ 6:42 PM (0/0)
Providing unrestricted TLDs as well... — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 1:14 AM (1/3)

Who wants tlds like .aero and .museum anyway? -- elom — moler, January 12, 2002 @ 5:07 AM (1/2)

American.aero and London.museum ;-) — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 10:05 AM (1/1)

.museum — dtobias, January 14, 2002 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)

ICANN (sort of) admit I am right — Garry Anderson, January 11, 2002 @ 9:50 AM (1/2)

I note Stuart Lynn's coment - Cybersquatting disputes are less likely in a tightly regulated domain" — antipathy, January 11, 2002 @ 11:23 AM (1/1)

Playing by the rules — Garry Anderson, January 11, 2002 @ 11:34 AM (0/0)

At last all list of sunrise is out — SanjeevGoyal, January 11, 2002 @ 9:49 AM (2/2)

Misunderstanding — SanjeevGoyal, January 11, 2002 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)
This cannot be all — erikdw, January 11, 2002 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)

fraud countryname registered in sunrise now approved ? — trademark, January 10, 2002 @ 10:33 PM (1/2)

No one person will get a "country" name — peeved, January 11, 2002 @ 2:44 AM (1/1)

Countries have a whole TLD to themselves — Garry Anderson, January 11, 2002 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)

Talk About Squatters ... Check Out New.net! — GettingScrewed, January 10, 2002 @ 3:12 PM (1/17)

IOD has already arrived at a solution — cambler, January 10, 2002 @ 4:02 PM (2/16)

IOD Solution — GettingScrewed, January 10, 2002 @ 9:50 PM (0/0)
Big Business Abuse of the DNS / business.web — Garry Anderson, January 10, 2002 @ 4:40 PM (1/14)

Huh? — cambler, January 11, 2002 @ 5:16 AM (1/13)

I was making couple of points — Garry Anderson, January 11, 2002 @ 9:16 AM (2/12)

good points by Garry — richard_henderson, January 12, 2002 @ 12:21 AM (1/3)

Big Business wish to stop criticism — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 12:58 AM (1/2)

Wow, What A Revelation ... — GettingScrewed, January 12, 2002 @ 9:53 PM (1/1)

There is difference — Garry Anderson, January 13, 2002 @ 10:01 AM (0/0)

Garry Anderson = Bozo — GettingScrewed, January 11, 2002 @ 1:16 PM (3/7)

You wish to muffle peoples voice — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
Foul language is sometimes used to cover up meagre argument — richard_henderson, January 12, 2002 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)

Absolute Logic — Garry Anderson, January 12, 2002 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

knowitall jones = knows nowt at all jones — Garry Anderson, January 11, 2002 @ 8:12 PM (1/3)

Okay ... — GettingScrewed, January 11, 2002 @ 10:40 PM (2/2)

Phutt = the sound of your feeble brain giving up — moler, January 12, 2002 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)
You learn civility first — Garry Anderson, January 11, 2002 @ 11:26 PM (0/0)

Dang, "I eat like a pig .info" is taken... — ElvisSaysHi, January 10, 2002 @ 4:51 AM (0/0)

What can be done about ICANN? — Cation, January 10, 2002 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)

Hi folks, just thought I'd pop in to say ICANN still stinks! — Elvis, January 10, 2002 @ 12:33 AM (1/1)

happy new year Elvis - glad you havent lost your fire - ICANN — antipathy, January 10, 2002 @ 9:53 AM (0/0)

When does Hal Lubsen start to explain...? — rachelmacgregor, January 9, 2002 @ 1:30 PM (4/4)

explanation — Cation, January 9, 2002 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
Afilias and ICANN complicity in .info Sunrise fraud against Landrush applicants — antipathy, January 9, 2002 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)
Dream on --- Hal Lubson will never explain anything here.. he may cost him his job--elom — moler, January 9, 2002 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)
"SPOOF of Concept"? — vera-city, January 9, 2002 @ 5:30 PM (0/0)

Sunrise Challenge Result... — ebiz, January 9, 2002 @ 7:32 AM (3/10)

How much is finance.info worth? any guess? — EasyTech2, January 16, 2002 @ 12:33 AM (1/7)

Less than finance.com more than finance.org ;-) — Garry Anderson, January 16, 2002 @ 1:54 PM (1/6)

Agree — EasyTech2, January 16, 2002 @ 2:56 PM (1/5)

Trademark abuse — Garry Anderson, January 16, 2002 @ 4:39 PM (2/4)

Thanks for that info... — EasyTech2, January 16, 2002 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)
I don't think so — EasyTech2, January 16, 2002 @ 5:10 PM (1/2)

Logic — Garry Anderson, January 16, 2002 @ 11:33 PM (1/1)

Now I understand your point... and you're right sunrise is BS (eom) — EasyTech2, January 17, 2002 @ 8:32 AM (0/0)

No worry... — AfghanTM, January 9, 2002 @ 9:50 AM (0/0)
UDRP and Sunrise underhand intent — Garry Anderson, January 9, 2002 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)

Wipo and Afilias — SanjeevGoyal, January 9, 2002 @ 5:41 AM (0/0)

is Afilias promoting .info? — Cation, January 9, 2002 @ 4:18 AM (1/6)

A Few Million Dollars == One Superbowl Ad or Four Regular TV Ads...that's about all! — Ron_Bennett, January 9, 2002 @ 4:49 AM (1/5)

my guess is that there were only a few thousand people buying — antipathy, January 9, 2002 @ 10:07 AM (1/4)

.info is being run by idiots — spot2, January 9, 2002 @ 11:08 AM (1/3)

its apparent that agreements or contracts with ICANN mean nothing. — antipathy, January 9, 2002 @ 12:47 AM (1/2)

Afiliast -- to cheat you stupid domain obsessed suckers of your money...wahahhahahahhahaa — moler, January 9, 2002 @ 5:29 PM (1/1)

Afilias is following the politicians — Cation, January 9, 2002 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)

business.info — EasyTech2, January 8, 2002 @ 9:11 AM (2/5)

I know who registered Business.info on Dec. 27 — infodomain1, January 9, 2002 @ 7:32 PM (1/1)

I think... — EasyTech2, January 10, 2002 @ 9:03 AM (0/0)

Ok - Spot the Change — SanjeevGoyal, January 8, 2002 @ 12:38 AM (2/2)

I can't find a change except the update date(eom) — EasyTech2, January 8, 2002 @ 1:33 PM (0/0)
I should have post some explanation... — EasyTech2, January 8, 2002 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)

Afilias challenges delayed... — jman, January 8, 2002 @ 12:17 AM (7/11)

What Will Probably Happen — investor, January 8, 2002 @ 10:08 PM (1/1)

That's correct. EOM — fred48, January 9, 2002 @ 3:38 AM (0/0)

Afilias will challenge very soon... — EasyTech2, January 8, 2002 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)
That has been the plan for quite a while actually — fred48, January 8, 2002 @ 12:14 AM (1/2)

Makes sense ... — DaveKing2, January 8, 2002 @ 12:35 AM (1/1)

But March is after the 6 month lock down period! — spot2, January 8, 2002 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)

why I'm NOT impressed by the Afilias challenge... — rachelmacgregor, January 8, 2002 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)
Can they insist on keeping sunrise names locked for longer than 6 month? — spot2, January 8, 2002 @ 5:25 AM (0/0)
Classic Afilias — challenge, January 8, 2002 @ 4:28 AM (1/1)

Afilias Ltd. - testament to the corruption of ICANN - eom — antipathy, January 8, 2002 @ 9:55 AM (0/0)

Hey, isn't the registry lock for sunrise names supposed to come off already?--relom — moler, January 8, 2002 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)

Analysis of Legal Eagle Response — Garry Anderson, January 7, 2002 @ 1:01 PM (2/3)

As no come-back — Garry Anderson, January 8, 2002 @ 1:48 PM (0/0)
Message formatting — dtobias, January 7, 2002 @ 8:11 PM (1/1)

Thanks Dan - reprint for Mozilla browser — Garry Anderson, January 7, 2002 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)

had a call from Bill at NameScout advising of completion of — antipathy, January 7, 2002 @ 9:28 AM (1/1)

Total Registrations — hiltonian, January 7, 2002 @ 6:47 PM (0/0)

Yeah - there are many corrupt registrars, but dont forget INTERLAND Inc ARE THIEVES too! — Interland Are Thieves, January 6, 2002 @ 1:34 PM (1/1)

please come back Barry and tell your story - eom — antipathy, January 6, 2002 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)

Enforcing action against rogue registrars — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 3:58 AM (3/21)

small claims court — Cation, January 6, 2002 @ 4:36 PM (0/0)
Class Action Suit — LegalEagle, January 6, 2002 @ 3:08 PM (2/3)

A harder time? — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 11:52 PM (1/1)

yes — LegalEagle, January 7, 2002 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

great input Legal Eagle - thanks very much. Do you have a — antipathy, January 6, 2002 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)

BoycottRegistrar.com — Garry Anderson, January 6, 2002 @ 4:18 AM (2/15)

One central site — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 7:40 AM (1/5)

Which name would scare bad registrars most? — Garry Anderson, January 6, 2002 @ 9:06 AM (3/4)

F*ckedRegistrars.info — vera-city, January 6, 2002 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)
yourmotherisgoingtospankyou.org — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)
Couldn't agree more — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 9:29 AM (1/1)

this is just the line I have picked up reading posts on the ICANN — antipathy, January 6, 2002 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)

Registrars.com don't care, they are just moving to Verisign who shit cares, so who cares — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 4:27 AM (1/8)

Moler, I beg to hold a different opinion, my fine fellow — rachelmacgregor, January 6, 2002 @ 4:40 AM (1/7)

True rachel, but beauty lies in the eyes of the beholder... — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 5:50 AM (1/6)

Oh uh ... Delivery failed 20 attempts: staff@registrars.com — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 6:03 AM (1/5)

moler, you are irrevocably DEAD — rachelmacgregor, January 6, 2002 @ 6:25 AM (1/4)

So sue me — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 6:32 AM (1/3)

YAY!!! Now you're talking!!! (relom) — rachelmacgregor, January 6, 2002 @ 7:02 AM (1/2)

Rach, the Heart of this board is pumping - good to have you — antipathy, January 6, 2002 @ 8:06 AM (1/1)

can bypass icann — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 8:53 AM (0/0)

Registrars.com gives me back my money but won't let me have it...!!! — rachelmacgregor, January 6, 2002 @ 3:30 AM (2/2)

I would guess that in the corrupt culture of the domain business — antipathy, January 6, 2002 @ 9:18 AM (0/0)
Notice the '.. ' — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 6:48 AM (0/0)

Legal Eagle — SanjeevGoyal, January 5, 2002 @ 5:56 AM (1/15)

I'm afraid I can't ... — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 2:57 PM (2/14)

Hey LegalEagle! — moler, January 5, 2002 @ 10:46 PM (1/12)

good point — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 11:25 PM (1/11)

.biz is a restricted domain, which is a bit of a legal worry — moler, January 5, 2002 @ 11:47 PM (2/10)

How to enforce this? — LegalEagle, January 6, 2002 @ 12:47 AM (1/7)

LegalEagle, you are long winded, but sound. Thanks --- elom — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 12:53 AM (1/6)

I'm a lawyer - what do you expect ;-) EOM (for a change!) — LegalEagle, January 6, 2002 @ 12:57 AM (1/5)

shhhhhh... laywers...are...........the scum of the earth .......shhhhhhhh... — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 1:14 AM (1/4)

if you're interested ... — LegalEagle, January 6, 2002 @ 1:22 AM (2/3)

Thanks — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 4:06 AM (1/1)

Spot on ! --- relom — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)

(^_^) you never know — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)

Yeah but it's infinitely easy to pretend you are a legit business — spot2, January 6, 2002 @ 12:12 AM (1/1)

We are ALL legit businessess, no need to pretend, spot, down boy, down --- elom — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)

THANKS — SanjeevGoyal, January 5, 2002 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)

LegalEagle — EasyTech2, January 4, 2002 @ 6:19 PM (3/41)

goddamnit easytech2 is steinle — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 8:46 AM (1/2)

huh? (eom) — EasyTech2, January 6, 2002 @ 7:58 PM (1/1)

would be a coincidence — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)

Yes ... — LegalEagle, January 4, 2002 @ 9:53 PM (2/4)

Is that something you have searched for? — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
Thanks LegalEagle!... — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 12:43 AM (2/2)

challenge of last resort ... — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)
revised policy — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)

Please - also: — Garry Anderson, January 4, 2002 @ 7:48 PM (2/32)

it depends — LegalEagle, January 4, 2002 @ 10:39 PM (1/9)

2 books and a video — Garry Anderson, January 5, 2002 @ 1:24 AM (1/8)

All licensed uses ... — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 2:36 PM (2/7)

Domain Names for Famous Marks Only — Garry Anderson, January 5, 2002 @ 8:52 PM (1/1)

Garry ... — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)

is a licensing deal correct according to Afilias policy? — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 8:40 PM (1/4)

licensing — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 9:24 PM (1/3)

Thanks for the clarification... — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 10:54 PM (1/2)

Assignment vs. License — LegalEagle, January 5, 2002 @ 11:34 PM (1/1)

Thanks again LegalEagle... it seems Hera was clever with casino.info and sex.info eom — EasyTech2, January 6, 2002 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)

am I right in thinking that in ICANN approving new gTLD — antipathy, January 4, 2002 @ 8:10 PM (1/21)

not quite ... — LegalEagle, January 4, 2002 @ 11:37 PM (2/20)

computers.info / simon steinle — crs, January 5, 2002 @ 9:02 AM (1/18)

please explain... — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 9:40 AM (2/17)

That' not true — EasyTech2, January 5, 2002 @ 8:09 PM (1/14)

sex.info seems to be the exception — crs, January 5, 2002 @ 11:52 PM (2/13)

NO! Fifi Island!! The point is, the tm challenge doesn't work. Even with the revised policies. — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 12:31 AM (1/4)

america.info — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 12:50 AM (1/3)

America is a country name that ICANN has decided to take off the shelf...read the 3 month old news-- — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 12:58 AM (1/2)

travel.info — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 2:02 AM (1/1)

Yup, this Jeff guy outgamed the system... reap and weap... buggy hacker prone sunrise .. wahhahahaha — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)

Thanks for that detailed information... — EasyTech2, January 6, 2002 @ 12:26 AM (1/7)

the url you gave me — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 12:46 AM (1/6)

What URL????? Please post here, now that you've got us all curious. — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 12:48 AM (1/5)

this one — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 12:51 AM (2/4)

Last updated? — EasyTech2, January 6, 2002 @ 1:24 AM (1/2)

so thats the answer — crs, January 6, 2002 @ 2:06 AM (1/1)

time to crawl into a deep dank hole, crs... — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 2:10 AM (0/0)

Aahahhahahahaha... someone went for Google.info ??? wahahahahahaaa -- elom — moler, January 6, 2002 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)

i clicked your link — crs, January 5, 2002 @ 10:55 AM (1/1)

Dang, I should just have paid the $300 bucks and challenged without tim early--elom — moler, January 5, 2002 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)

thanks LegalEagle for the great tutorial - please hang around — antipathy, January 5, 2002 @ 7:31 AM (0/0)

The Lord of The Domains — NewGuy, January 4, 2002 @ 4:08 PM (3/4)

Thanks NewGuy — SanjeevGoyal, January 5, 2002 @ 5:53 AM (1/1)

value not important?? — crs, January 5, 2002 @ 7:45 AM (0/0)

wow - go easy on the lowly Indian stuff - I suspect Sanjeev's — antipathy, January 4, 2002 @ 7:59 PM (0/0)
http://www.lordoftherings.movie — EasyTech2, January 4, 2002 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)

crooks at globalpreregistration.com — crs, January 4, 2002 @ 12:38 AM (1/5)

the .info preregistration period certainly seemed to produce — antipathy, January 4, 2002 @ 1:23 AM (1/4)

007Names actually likes it shaken, not stirred — moler, January 4, 2002 @ 1:37 AM (1/3)

mole, did you preregister through 007 and did you win anything? — antipathy, January 4, 2002 @ 3:00 AM (1/2)

Nup.Nup. I thought the fax credit card details over too hairy and aborted -- elom — moler, January 4, 2002 @ 4:07 PM (1/1)

you are right, 007's .info prereg process was unnecessarily — antipathy, January 4, 2002 @ 7:14 PM (0/0)

Can anybody explain this WIPO decision? — erikdw, January 3, 2002 @ 9:26 PM (2/2)

.info Sunrise Challenges — dtobias, January 4, 2002 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)
Did they have a Trademark? — richard_henderson, January 3, 2002 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)

Dotster Refuses to Refund .BIZ Application Fees - the saga continues... — Ron_Bennett, January 3, 2002 @ 1:37 PM (1/8)

because of the corrupt culture emanating from and overseen — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 2:19 PM (1/7)

Refunds — Amar Ochani, January 3, 2002 @ 7:18 PM (2/6)

Register.com has already initiated refund duh! -- elom — moler, January 4, 2002 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)
refunds - Catalog just ignored my second and subsequent — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 11:15 PM (1/4)

IDRegister and Names4Ever — Amar Ochani, January 4, 2002 @ 12:08 AM (2/3)

idregister is giving those who queued first the option to maintain their place in the .biz queue. — moler, January 4, 2002 @ 1:45 AM (0/0)
Domainbank refunded my .biz applications — EasyTech2, January 4, 2002 @ 12:12 AM (1/1)

Registrars.com ... welll.. I have credit until Verisign, Inc.... hmmmm ... — moler, January 4, 2002 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)

The Govinda Leopold Story — richard_henderson, January 3, 2002 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)

Sounds similiar to the YESNIC and Joker.com stories — cation, January 3, 2002 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen - broken contract and conflicts of interest? — richard_henderson, January 3, 2002 @ 11:30 AM (1/1)

Who protects the consumer? - Well, from ICANN's performance — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)

Sunrise .info domains released on December 27, 2001 — infodomain1, January 3, 2002 @ 6:57 AM (4/6)

I don't want refund, I want domains! — infodomain1, January 3, 2002 @ 11:05 AM (1/1)

can't provide legal advice - but I would love to see you win — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)

hope you didn't register with dotster — cation, January 3, 2002 @ 9:07 AM (1/1)

I am still waiting for a refund from NameScout from the time — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 10:32 AM (0/0)

Just another day in the life of Afilias... — ebiz, January 3, 2002 @ 7:58 AM (0/0)
Can you give Name of domains... to ask to Afilias ? — SanjeevGoyal, January 3, 2002 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen and the need for openness, honesty and transparency — richard_henderson, January 3, 2002 @ 4:42 AM (3/5)

I am disgusted — Garry Anderson, January 3, 2002 @ 9:09 AM (1/2)

Garry, you are another vital member of the community action — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 11:43 AM (1/1)

We are ALL vital — Garry Anderson, January 3, 2002 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)

the events of the Afilias .info launch are the only evidence — antipathy, January 3, 2002 @ 7:40 AM (0/0)
I too tried hard — SanjeevGoyal, January 3, 2002 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

Business TM — SanjeevGoyal, January 3, 2002 @ 4:22 AM (2/3)

there's a difference between an design mark and a wordmark... — helumuc, January 3, 2002 @ 9:35 AM (0/0)
why didnt you — crs, January 3, 2002 @ 6:31 AM (1/1)

it is my choice.. — SanjeevGoyal, January 3, 2002 @ 7:08 AM (0/0)

Public good or private good? — vera-city, January 2, 2002 @ 2:44 PM (0/0)

Karl Auerbach's assessment of ICANN thanks to poster ranniv — antipathy, January 2, 2002 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)

IMAGINE — Garry Anderson, January 1, 2002 @ 7:26 PM (3/3)

a new year - but the same battle - community action against — antipathy, January 2, 2002 @ 10:32 AM (0/0)
Imagine the printing press had just been invented. — Garry Anderson, January 2, 2002 @ 2:58 AM (0/0)
Imagine the postal service had just been invented — Garry Anderson, January 2, 2002 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)

ICANN is anti webmaster anti netizen — cation, January 1, 2002 @ 12:12 AM (2/4)

Business Getting Trademarks — investor, January 1, 2002 @ 2:13 PM (1/1)

Just wanted to add — investor, January 1, 2002 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)

I wholeheartedly agree — rinniv, January 1, 2002 @ 12:25 AM (1/1)

Rinniv - thanks for the inclusion of Karl Auerbach's words — antipathy, January 2, 2002 @ 7:10 AM (0/0)

Happy New Year Everyone — spot2, January 1, 2002 @ 11:07 AM (0/0)

I have copied the WHOIS info on my .biz names and you all — psbyowner, January 1, 2002 @ 3:44 AM (1/1)

Why's that psb? And why just .biz? Happy New Year! — moler, January 1, 2002 @ 3:57 AM (0/0)

TAHOE.INFO — GettingScrewed, January 1, 2002 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)

Forget Business.info Now — SanjeevGoyal, December 31, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)

Oi Sanjeev! — rinniv, December 31, 2001 @ 5:08 PM (1/1)

OK — SanjeevGoyal, December 31, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)

Either way....right or wrong....finally some intelligent discourse... — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 31, 2001 @ 4:15 AM (1/1)

Happy New Year. — SanjeevGoyal, December 31, 2001 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)

Country Trademark Law — Garry Anderson, December 30, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (1/7)

here goes: — LegalEagle, December 30, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (2/6)

claiming business.info with TM business is a so called trademark piracy... — helumuc, December 31, 2001 @ 1:03 PM (1/1)

helumuc geh doch bitte zurück zu domain-people — EasyTech2, January 5 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)

Please explain this: — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 6:55 AM (1/3)

very long response! — LegalEagle, December 31, 2001 @ 4:25 PM (2/2)

ABUSE OF LAW — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (0/0)
I can sum this up ... — rinniv, December 31, 2001 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

Business.info> Threats — SanjeevGoyal, December 30, 2001 @ 5:12 AM (6/19)

is a dumbass — 1ntemetAdvocate, December 31, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)
VALUE — SanjeevGoyal, December 30, 2001 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)
Do you think you have a valid TM for "BUSINESS" or "BUSINESS INFO"? — cello, December 30, 2001 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)
This is to be expected — spot2, December 30, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)
It Would Be Foolish... — investor, December 30, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (1/3)

Paying for toy tm certificates — moler, December 30, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (2/2)

You miss main point of trademarks — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 6:23 PM (0/0)
Good Point! — investor, December 31, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)

Afilias' Sunrise policies have created this hate monster... — ebiz, December 30, 2001 @ 5:49 AM (2/10)

Cat.info is another example — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 30, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)
through the Sunrise process, many corporates with lists of — antipathy, December 30, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (1/8)

Sunrise is not only an abomination, it can't be realistically administered at all ---------elom — moler, December 30, 2001 @ 2:15 PM (4/7)

Sunrise is bull* propaganda - it is all based on lies — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 6:09 AM (1/3)

Sunrise is a corrupt mockery. — spot2, December 31, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (1/2)

Science.info going to Dupont is corrupt mockery — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 6:43 AM (1/1)

It's facially invalid so Afilias 'should' challenge it. — spot2, December 31, 2001 @ 6:59 AM (0/0)

Sunrise does not solve 'consumer confusion', 'trademark conflict' or 'passing off' — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 5:57 AM (0/0)
Sunrise abridges peoples right to use words — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 5:47 AM (0/0)
Sunrise stops small businesses without TM — Garry Anderson, December 31, 2001 @ 5:44 AM (0/0)

Sanjeev Goyal 1 v 0 Stephen Rumney — richard_henderson, December 29, 2001 @ 8:35 PM (3/15)

Nobody should be able to claim trademarks on generic names. eom — geodiego, December 30, 2001 @ 3:40 AM (1/10)

In my honest opinion those "challenged" sunrise names have trouble written all over them.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 30, 2001 @ 3:54 AM (2/9)

an opinion — LegalEagle, December 30, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (2/6)

successful challenge (that wasn't settled) for a generic domain — EasyTech2, January 3, 2002 @ 12:49 AM (2/2)

no successful challenge: kinder.at — EasyTech2, January 3 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)
ambiente.de — EasyTech2, January 3 @ 1:30 AM (0/0)

Rebuttal with respect to "First Come, First Served" — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 30, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (1/2)

not quite — LegalEagle, December 30, 2001 @ 5:34 PM (1/1)

Questions to LegalEagle — EasyTech2, January 3, 2002 @ 12:42 AM (0/0)

NOTE — SanjeevGoyal, December 30, 2001 @ 4:29 AM (1/1)

Sorry Sanjeev.....No threat here....just an opinion if those are still legal.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 30, 2001 @ 11:08 AM (0/0)

TM holder obtaining generic name by challenge is only a victory for TM holder (eom) — sfeibish, December 30, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)
Thanks — SanjeevGoyal, December 29, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (2/2)

Sanjeev - nothing personal - sfeibish is right — Garry Anderson, December 30, 2001 @ 3:12 AM (0/0)
Congratulations....but keep in mind the public also has a "TM" on the word "business"...EOM — Gregory W. Krajewski, December 30, 2001 @ 3:11 AM (0/0)

RE: Any news about the 10.000 challenges by Afilias? — geodiego, December 29, 2001 @ 8:44 AM (3/10)

Afilias is not that Stupid! — Nicholas Bernstein, December 29, 2001 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)
What Afilias told me yesterday — richard_henderson, December 29, 2001 @ 9:25 AM (3/6)

Keep Your Friends Close, But Your Enemies Closer — Garry Anderson, December 29, 2001 @ 8:18 PM (1/1)

No truce with Afilias — richard_henderson, December 29, 2001 @ 8:51 PM (0/0)

Afilias is being Careful — Nicholas Bernstein, December 29, 2001 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
Richard, it concerns me greatly that Afilias is turning to — antipathy, December 29, 2001 @ 9:56 AM (1/2)

doesn't this really take the cake - Afilias's incompetence — antipathy, December 29, 2001 @ 10:10 AM (1/1)

ICANN's failure to protect the consumer from rogue registrars — richard_henderson, December 29, 2001 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)

what do you (Afilias) mean - names won't be released? eom — antipathy, December 29, 2001 @ 9:09 AM (1/1)

I meant the list of names being challenged by Afilias itself. eom — geodiego, December 29, 2001 @ 9:46 AM (0/0)

Guys, why not call Afilias when you are not sure of something? No names were released. — fred48, December 29, 2001 @ 6:12 AM (2/2)

Afilias WHOis problems probably due to them working on their "Shadow WHOis" — ebiz, December 29, 2001 @ 8:26 AM (0/0)
Thanks Higs — moler, December 29, 2001 @ 7:08 AM (0/0)

In defence of Afilias — moler, December 29, 2001 @ 5:16 AM (1/4)

Afilias has treated its customers with contempt - from the — antipathy, December 29, 2001 @ 6:02 AM (2/3)

The State of Denmark? — vera-city, December 30, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)
Many registrars have treated their customers with contempt — moler, December 29, 2001 @ 7:18 AM (1/1)

the Afilias .info launch seems to have made public the fact — antipathy, December 29, 2001 @ 9:42 AM (0/0)

Well, excuse me, this WHOIS shutdown is taking over 12 hours ... — moler, December 29, 2001 @ 4:51 AM (0/0)

Is it my imagination or has Verisign re-niged on the .biz results? — psbyowner, December 29, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (1/3)

When did you receive the first email? — moler, December 29, 2001 @ 3:50 AM (1/2)

actually, I first got an email from Network Solutions — psbyowner, December 29, 2001 @ 5:15 AM (1/1)

ahahahahha... oops Netsol, they screw up EVERYTHING. — moler, December 29, 2001 @ 5:30 AM (0/0)

Interesting article about ICANN, NTIA and DoC from an insider! — EasyTech2, December 28, 2001 @ 11:33 PM (0/0)

Afiliass (sic) REALLY screwed up this time — DaveKing2, December 28, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (5/7)

The Reason: 'unscheduled maintenance' ... — DaveKing2, December 29, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)
whois.afilias.info is down! — EasyTech2, December 28, 2001 @ 10:26 PM (0/0)
Mole — SanjeevGoyal, December 28, 2001 @ 3:12 PM (1/1)

Thanks! — moler, December 28, 2001 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)

I thought there was going to be a 2nd landrush or something? -- elom — moler, December 28, 2001 @ 3:05 PM (0/0)
Can't get the Whois to work, grrrr --- elom — moler, December 28, 2001 @ 2:53 PM (1/1)

Can't get worse than Afilias!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!eom — antipathy, December 28, 2001 @ 8:33 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen : evidence but no explanation — richard_henderson, December 28, 2001 @ 8:16 AM (1/1)

Bad Taste? — vera-city, January 2, 2002 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)

SCIENCE.INFO - still fraudulant? — Garry Anderson, December 27, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (1/9)

WHOIS - keeping them honest? — Garry Anderson, December 27, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (1/8)

good analysis, Garry — richard_henderson, December 28, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (1/7)

Who protects the consumer and the ordinary citizen? — Garry Anderson, December 28, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (1/6)

ICANN and The US government DELIBERATELY enforce silence for their own agenda. — spot2, December 28, 2001 @ 6:04 AM (2/5)

Deeper than that — Garry Anderson, December 28, 2001 @ 8:37 AM (0/0)
The silence of shame — richard_henderson, December 28, 2001 @ 6:56 AM (2/3)

They chose Silence over Self-Incrimination? — Garry Anderson, December 28, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (0/0)
People are laughing at Hal Lubsen and Vint Cerf — richard_henderson, December 28, 2001 @ 7:13 AM (1/1)

Silence is Golden — Garry Anderson, December 28, 2001 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)

Any news about the 10.000 challenges by Afilias? — erikdw, December 27, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)

Dear oh dear Mr Grabensee - GEFUNDEN: 0 MARKEN! — antipathy, December 27, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen's conflict of interest — richard_henderson, December 27, 2001 @ 11:07 AM (0/0)

What is the accreditation status of registrars that made fake applications? — richard_henderson, December 27, 2001 @ 10:32 AM (1/7)

Your Logic is Flawed Mate — NewGuy, December 27, 2001 @ 11:53 AM (2/6)

Nevertheless Mr Grabensee and Joker.com violates the registration policy! — EasyTech2, December 27, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
No, not flawed logic — richard_henderson, December 27, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (1/4)

Woa, Calm Down — NewGuy, December 27, 2001 @ 4:11 PM (2/3)

Alice Registry demanded a copy of the TM certificate! — EasyTech2, December 27, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (1/1)

Why could this not have been made a condition? — Garry Anderson, December 27, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)

Few points — Garry Anderson, December 27, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (0/0)

Afilias board member is a multiple (more than 50 domains) sunrise fraudster! — EasyTech2, December 27, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (1/5)

As I've said before, loads of names were registered in his name — richard_henderson, December 27, 2001 @ 6:58 AM (1/4)

However, the following explanation has been offered in his defence — richard_henderson, December 27, 2001 @ 7:01 AM (2/3)

neutral? — Garry Anderson, December 27, 2001 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)
Mr Grabensee DID have fake TM details submitted in his name — richard_henderson, December 27, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (1/1)

Maybe Mr Grabensee did this for his clients... — EasyTech2, December 27, 2001 @ 8:48 AM (0/0)

26th December: first bulk Challenge reciepts !!!!!!!!!!!!! — andrew24, December 26, 2001 @ 11:23 PM (1/2)

Please explain... — EasyTech2, December 27, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (1/1)

Looks like last-minute challengers started to act. eom. — andrew24, December 27, 2001 @ 2:06 AM (0/0)

LANDRUSH - GENERICS : Afilias strikes! Australian domain names head down "path of maximum profit" — Onion, December 26, 2001 @ 1:32 PM (1/4)

the .com.au was speculation proof when I bought my first — antipathy, December 26, 2001 @ 7:00 PM (1/3)

Bringing ICANN under control - time for openness and transparency — richard_henderson, December 26, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (2/2)

Good Luck — Garry Anderson, December 27, 2001 @ 6:49 AM (0/0)
Publicising the truth — richard_henderson, December 26, 2001 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)

TM fraudsters allowed to use names and make money — sfeibish, December 26, 2001 @ 12:58 AM (1/3)

And we're just sorry we didn't do it first. EOM — registros, December 26, 2001 @ 4:49 AM (1/2)

registros - like many Afilias registrars and an Afilias — antipathy, December 26, 2001 @ 6:35 AM (1/1)

correction - now TWO Afilias board members are TM frauds and — antipathy, December 26, 2001 @ 6:46 AM (0/0)

MERRY CHRISTMAS (Not "Seasons Greetings") — Merry Christmas, December 24, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen challenged on gTLD Registries Mailing List to which he belongs — richard_henderson, December 24, 2001 @ 8:31 AM (1/2)

Good work, Richard, and Merry Christmas everyone. — spot2, December 24, 2001 @ 9:22 AM (1/1)

Good ol' Jim — hiltonian, December 24, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)

more random acts of sensless kindness - my wish for 2002 — antipathy, December 23, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (2/5)

the sanity of kindness... — richard_henderson, December 23, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (1/1)

In Christ we trust, in hope we aspire, in love... we conquer. Merry Christmas Richard.. god bless — moler, December 24, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (0/0)

Are you a writer, John? — moler, December 23, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (1/2)

yes, a writer of sorts, have a novel in progress and spent — antipathy, December 23, 2001 @ 8:53 PM (1/1)

Cheers John. In the chasm of aninomity... we will ALL unite... Merry Christmas -- relom — moler, December 24, 2001 @ 2:16 AM (0/0)

Another challenger "supposedly" holding TMs for generic — scouser, December 22, 2001 @ 8:39 PM (1/1)

Funny <EOM> — geodiego, December 23, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (0/0)

Merry Xmas to all — SanjeevGoyal, December 22, 2001 @ 2:55 PM (4/7)

Jingle bells, jingle bells, jingle on my .biz :-) Seasons Greetings! — moler, December 23, 2001 @ 4:50 AM (0/0)
Best wishes to all. — vera-city, December 23, 2001 @ 4:21 AM (0/0)
I wish to echo that sentiment — Garry Anderson, December 23, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (0/0)
Thank you - Christmas is nigh! — hiltonian, December 23, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (1/3)

Merry Christmas and peaceful New Year to all of you and your families! — Amar Ochani, December 23, 2001 @ 2:48 AM (1/2)

Amar, my guess is that your usename was "borrowed" last week — antipathy, December 23, 2001 @ 7:05 AM (1/1)

John, thanks for putting things in proper perspective. — Amar Ochani, December 23, 2001 @ 11:53 AM (0/0)

RegLand.com - a registrar phoenix? - I will contact them for — antipathy, December 22, 2001 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)

NEWSFLASH: Dotster Refuses to Refund .BIZ Application Fees — Ron_Bennett, December 22, 2001 @ 5:07 AM (1/3)

In the absence of appropriate regulation, human nature will — antipathy, December 22, 2001 @ 8:43 AM (1/2)

Fred Upton and Vint Cerf - responsibility to regulate - the accumulating scandal — richard_henderson, December 22, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/1)

if ICANN is currently acting out of sight of the public, in — antipathy, December 22, 2001 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)

Is Afilias's challenge concentrating on English Language generics? — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:05 AM (18/36)

Afilias Sunrise Challenge Team - Address to send information to — Challenge-Afilias, December 25, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (1/8)

I can help you with YOUR agenda, but does Afilias care about anyone else's? — richard_henderson, December 25, 2001 @ 5:52 AM (2/7)

Re: Challenges — Challenge-Afilias, December 28, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (1/2)

Suggestion: Wanted: a good dose of public relations damage control. — vera-city, December 28, 2001 @ 3:54 AM (1/1)

Doing the 'Right Thing' — Garry Anderson, December 28, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)

What? — NicholasBernstein, December 25, 2001 @ 4:00 PM (3/3)

Richard even missed some name! — EasyTech2, December 25, 2001 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)
Ouch - tender toes - what happened Nicholas - get caught out — antipathy, December 25, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (0/0)
Sorry - I do not believe Afilias — Garry Anderson, December 25, 2001 @ 7:58 PM (0/0)

Please report your Genreic name complain to Afilias — SanjeevGoyal, December 21, 2001 @ 3:05 PM (2/6)

wait a minute - have I missed something here - has WIPO been — antipathy, December 21, 2001 @ 7:05 PM (2/3)

old and new .info Sunrise Challenge rules — DomeBase, December 22, 2001 @ 4:52 AM (1/1)

Even the original rules required a trademark for transfer... — arbitrage, December 23, 2001 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

Of all the dumbass organisations... — spot2, December 22, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

"challenge of last resort" — Garry Anderson, December 21, 2001 @ 5:59 PM (1/1)

Garry Pls SEE — SanjeevGoyal, December 21, 2001 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)

For example, from Greece — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
For example, more Turkish generics — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
Foe example, more Polish generics — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:56 AM (0/0)
For example, some Italian generics — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:52 AM (0/0)
For example, names sent from Austria — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:49 AM (0/0)
For example, Switzerland (not to mention Plankenstein's 4981) — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:41 AM (0/0)
For example, Polish generics — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:36 AM (0/0)
For example, plenty more Germans — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
For example, many more German generics — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:31 AM (0/0)
For example, Dutch generic too — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:23 AM (0/0)
For example, Turkish generics — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:20 AM (1/1)

I noticed the Turkish ones before — spot2, December 21, 2001 @ 11:31 AM (0/0)

For example, Denmark as well — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)
For example, even more German stuff — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:17 AM (0/0)
For example, German stuff — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:15 AM (0/0)
For example, plenty of Spanish and Italian here — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:12 AM (0/0)
For example, Korean... — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:07 AM (1/3)

good work Richard - your putting these foreign frauds in the — antipathy, December 21, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (1/2)

Absolutely right — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 12:30 AM (1/1)

Excuse me please — Garry Anderson, December 21, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (0/0)

Is the domain name industry incapable of "policing" itself? — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 5:39 AM (1/15)

US DoC is supposed to police ICANN — Garry Anderson, December 21, 2001 @ 5:42 AM (2/14)

Specifically, the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 6:44 AM (3/3)

Inserting Levels of Deniability — Garry Anderson, December 21, 2001 @ 8:14 AM (0/0)
Sounds very encouraging — spot2, December 21, 2001 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
none can complain about the tactics being used as the ICANN — antipathy, December 21, 2001 @ 7:10 AM (0/0)

DoC = Department of Corrections — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 5:49 AM (2/9)

Oh , you meant the Department of Commerce. — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 6:04 AM (0/0)
If only they did make corrections instead of turning a blind eye. eom — spot2, December 21, 2001 @ 6:03 AM (1/7)

the fact that we are anticipating the resale of around 10,000 — antipathy, December 21, 2001 @ 6:54 AM (1/6)

The CORRUPTION extends beyond ICANN — spot2, December 21, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (1/5)

Culture of honesty, transparency and EXPOSURE... — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 9:36 AM (2/4)

Like to think of something witty quips to write, however, — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 11:13 AM (1/1)

The tip — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)

Rather amusing (if you're not Govinda) — spot2, December 21, 2001 @ 10:18 AM (1/1)

I'm sure we can do better than that! — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)

notified of credit card refund from Verisign... — housecat, December 21, 2001 @ 12:42 AM (0/0)

Assurance from Afilias — SanjeevGoyal, December 20, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (3/6)

Assurance from Afilias??? — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 4:40 AM (2/2)

Surely, you're not suggesting that Afilias can't be trusted? — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (0/0)
Repair or cover-up? — Garry Anderson, December 21, 2001 @ 5:34 AM (0/0)

There are some people with legitimate trademarks — EasyTech2, December 20, 2001 @ 6:39 PM (1/1)

http://w3-development.info/ — EasyTech2, December 20, 2001 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)

Multiple domain challengers may have shot themselves in the foot. — spot2, December 20, 2001 @ 4:21 PM (0/0)

The ICANN executive, and no one else, bears responsibility — antipathy, December 20, 2001 @ 9:02 AM (3/9)

The US Congress needs to review ICANN's role and staffing... — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 9:48 AM (0/0)
Why would the US government want ICANN to behave any different? — spot2, December 20, 2001 @ 9:45 AM (2/6)

Spot, I am just as cynical as you. Governments rarely — antipathy, December 20, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (1/2)

I am in full support of any plans to put a spanner in the works of Corruption — spot2, December 20, 2001 @ 4:46 PM (1/1)

It can be likened to a bank robbery — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 7:27 PM (0/0)

Very good points, Spot — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 9:58 AM (1/2)

Upton, Stearns and Tauzin - what about Evans (and Mineta)? — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 7:40 PM (1/1)

I agree - Mister Evans deserves some attention too! — richard_henderson, December 21, 2001 @ 6:30 AM (0/0)

How could they be allowed to get away with it? — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (0/0)

the best way, the tested way, would be first-come, first-serve — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 7:32 AM (2/18)

Agree with you Garry - the main problem... — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (1/1)

Corruption was quite clear to me from the start — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 8:59 AM (0/0)

Compare - "random, round-robin" process that is fair to all applicants — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 8:34 AM (1/15)

Suggestion: All Landrush pre-registration fees should be refunded. eom — vera-city, December 20, 2001 @ 9:09 AM (1/14)

Would put them at disadvantage — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 9:17 AM (2/13)

proposal for giving LandRush I participants standing in LandRush II — Domebase, December 20, 2001 @ 9:26 AM (2/7)

Compromise — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)
Why didn't they opt for the original Domebase solution? — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 9:42 AM (2/5)

Have no doubt that the exact sequence of Sunrise, pregreg and challenges was planned — spot2, December 20, 2001 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)
Suggestion: Landrush 1 applicants need to be made whole... — vera-city, December 20, 2001 @ 9:55 AM (1/3)

Thanks for feedback. Excluding new applicants from LR II? — DomeBase, December 21, 2001 @ 2:08 AM (1/2)

Equitable Solution Vs GOLD RUSH - Bob, I would love to be — antipathy, December 21, 2001 @ 5:08 AM (1/1)

Merry Christmas Antipodes/pathy — DomeBase, December 22, 2001 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)

Suggestion amended: The original pool of applicants should not be expanded... — vera-city, December 20, 2001 @ 9:22 AM (2/4)

Vera, I can't see how we can have both. I think the — antipathy, December 20, 2001 @ 9:59 AM (0/0)
That's just silly... — arbitrage, December 20, 2001 @ 9:52 AM (1/2)

Landrush II — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 8:28 PM (1/1)

Please don't misunderstand me... — arbitrage, December 21, 2001 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)

Thanks for stealing my username, you jerk — spot2, December 20, 2001 @ 6:47 AM (1/1)

Name theft on this public forum — reportabuse, December 20, 2001 @ 8:14 AM (0/0)

Is .Sex Dot domains a scam? — jamesbcn, December 20, 2001 @ 5:15 AM (1/1)

This is the greatest scam I have ever seen! — EasyTech2, December 20, 2001 @ 6:39 AM (0/0)

The Internet Challenge now back online — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 4:02 AM (4/5)

Well it has me curious. — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)
Keep up the good work — EasyTech2, December 20, 2001 @ 6:32 AM (1/1)

very clever! — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)

BRAVO! — vera-city, December 20, 2001 @ 6:09 AM (0/0)
Let me assure you, this fraud is not going to be swept under the carpet — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)

WIPO> Posted Challengers Name in .info — SanjeevGoyal, December 19, 2001 @ 10:35 PM (4/8)

Question: What's with all this WIPO stuff anyway? — vera-city, December 20, 2001 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)
Question: What criteria does WIPO use when deciding a challenge? — vera-city, December 20, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (1/2)

It's pretty straightforward--read on.. — Watchman, December 20, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (1/1)

Thank you. — vera-city, December 21, 2001 @ 5:28 AM (0/0)

Blinking heck - have you seen those transfered? — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 7:07 AM (1/2)

Does Kubiak really have valid TMs for America.info etc — spot2, December 20, 2001 @ 7:18 AM (1/1)

I would like to see evidence — Garry Anderson, December 20, 2001 @ 7:39 AM (0/0)

So how do Yesnic explain their fake TMs now?... — richard_henderson, December 20, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

Misuse of INFO shadow database to cover up fraudulent trademarks — erikdw, December 19, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (1/1)

The authorities help in the cover up — Garry Anderson, December 19, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (0/0)

TradeMark Question... — canuck, December 19, 2001 @ 4:21 PM (0/0)

Grand... Many people's Forum ID's hacked (remove this clown from the forum) — canuck, December 19, 2001 @ 4:19 PM (1/1)

Whoops - I just assessed the facts in the cold light of day - I'M THE CLOWN ... sorry! — canuck, December 19, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)

NeuLevel .BIZ Refund Status...how are others doing with getting their refunds?? — Ron_Bennett, December 19, 2001 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)

REGARDING MIKE HOU MESSAGES — moderator, December 19, 2001 @ 11:36 AM (0/0)

I'm SORRY for all the CRAP I've pumped into this forum. I - Mike Hou - confess - I'm a JERK! — InternetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:27 AM (1/1)

And I PROMISE never to send a message with ANY "Z"s in it - at all -EVER! No more "ZZZZZZ" crap! — InternetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:31 AM (0/0)

Mikey Hou - the greatest lil dick in the WORLD!!! — InterNetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:13 AM (1/2)

Got it in one Mikey! Anyone got a pair of tweezers! — mole, December 19, 2001 @ 11:18 AM (1/1)

muhahahahahahahahahahahahah what's happening here? — drako, December 19, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)

I love myself - I REALLY DO!!! I'm ME! Not inteMet or 1nternet or ANYTHING ELSE!!! — InternetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:12 AM (0/0)

.biz preregs — Anion, December 19, 2001 @ 11:04 AM (1/1)

I love myself - I reeeeelllyyyy dooooo! — InternetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:10 AM (0/0)

Message to 'onmove' --- Regarding Joker.com — IncompetentAfilias, December 19, 2001 @ 11:03 AM (1/1)

I am da Joker, guys! I've got the smallest prick this side of George Bush! HEEEEELLLLLP!!! — InternetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:29 AM (0/0)

The Internet Challenge Web site is visible by viewing Google's cached page results. — spot, December 19, 2001 @ 10:40 AM (0/0)

Afilias sunrise challenges — jman, December 19, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (1/1)

re: challenges — geodiego, December 19, 2001 @ 7:45 AM (0/0)

What??? InternetAdvocate physically removed from President Bush... — mBuku, December 18, 2001 @ 10:52 PM (2/7)

Yes, I read that article but new it was not the truth the — drako, December 19, 2001 @ 6:16 AM (0/0)
Well now you know where I've been the last few days folks! — 1ntemetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (1/5)

Liar liar pants on fire ,tell the truth IntemetIntillectual — drako, December 19, 2001 @ 6:49 AM (2/4)

I no were it is! — mBuku, December 19, 2001 @ 11:09 AM (0/0)
That's not fair, and not true. — 1ntemetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 7:57 AM (1/2)

more like foot in mouth disease — drako, December 19, 2001 @ 8:20 AM (1/1)

I'm so sorry! Everyone is right - I'm the saddest bastard in the world! — InternetAdvocate, December 19, 2001 @ 11:27 AM (0/0)

Hi, Afilias — cello, December 18, 2001 @ 3:53 PM (1/1)

Propaganda and the value of words — Garry Anderson, December 18, 2001 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)

it should also be illegal for neulevel and their accredited registrars to — housecat, December 18, 2001 @ 6:59 AM (1/2)

it's wrong, but in an unregulated industry, anything goes — antipodes, December 18, 2001 @ 1:05 PM (1/1)

you are right antipodes... — housecat, December 19, 2001 @ 10:45 AM (0/0)

article in wired about .info and Stephen Rumney — Domebase, December 18, 2001 @ 3:31 AM (2/6)

the .info Sunrise scam or shambles - everyone a loser — antipodes, December 18, 2001 @ 3:19 PM (1/4)

Yes, time to put pressure on the Department of Commerce — richard_henderson, December 18, 2001 @ 7:12 PM (3/3)

looking forward to seeing the details of your plan Richard — antipodes, December 19, 2001 @ 5:58 AM (0/0)
Sherman Antitrust Act, Clayton Antitrust Act and The FTC Act? eom — vera-city, December 19, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)
Is an indictment of the whole system planned? — vera-city, December 18, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)

is obviously selling out to the press to try and recoup some of his excessive losses. — spot, December 18, 2001 @ 8:15 AM (0/0)

500,000 .biz names registered? Compared with 675,000 for .info, .biz is really revving it — mole, December 18, 2001 @ 2:26 AM (1/4)

Actually that's not true — challenge, December 18, 2001 @ 7:30 AM (1/3)

Even insiders don't believe .BIZ will be a big success — challenge, December 18, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (2/2)

already in for 6 — Ray_F, December 18, 2001 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)
Thanks challenge for the assessment and the link - both — antipodes, December 18, 2001 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)

NeuLevel .BIZ Application Refunds?? Any suggestions? — Ron_Bennett, December 17, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (2/8)

dotbizlottery — crs, December 18, 2001 @ 9:03 AM (1/1)

RegLand and the current registry and registrar culture — antipodes, December 18, 2001 @ 11:53 AM (0/0)

Depends on terms of agreement — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 7:57 PM (1/5)

Did more reading - NeuLevel has returned the applications back to their originating BIZ registrars — Ron_Bennett, December 17, 2001 @ 8:17 PM (1/4)

"failure to do so will cost them much bad publicity" — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (2/3)

Were I leading prosecution — Garry Anderson, December 18, 2001 @ 1:53 AM (1/1)

and one other important point: the bank charges them a fee to cash the cheque. — spot, December 18, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)

An icing is no more a pudding than you are want of the Shakespearean "Brain" - Quo Vadis??? — IntemetAdvocate, December 17, 2001 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

were help in my appication? — clrako, December 17, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (1/6)

what??? — mBuku, December 17, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (1/5)

You'll have to wait more than 13 minutes to reply to yourself, you imposter! — spot, December 18, 2001 @ 5:36 AM (1/4)

what??? — mBuku, December 18, 2001 @ 1:04 PM (1/3)

hmmm — spot, December 18, 2001 @ 8:25 PM (1/2)

what??? — mBuku, December 18, 2001 @ 10:42 PM (1/1)

mBingo ,I think you heve my number ,every thing is moderate — drako, December 19, 2001 @ 7:06 AM (0/0)

sex.info awarded to a trademark squatter — Anion, December 17, 2001 @ 11:57 AM (1/1)

I wouldn't be surprised if Afilias are planning to retrieve it — spot, December 17, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)

I see Afilias has managed to con its way into helping run the Australian cctlds — spot, December 17, 2001 @ 9:38 AM (2/7)

Yes, when I read that news which contained the comment that — antipodes, December 17, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/2)

Of course Afilias got the job on merit — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 7:47 PM (1/1)

I have only had a few dealings with RegistrarsAsia. I gave — antipodes, December 17, 2001 @ 8:44 PM (0/0)

Another quote: — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 10:13 AM (1/3)

Backward handshakes — spot, December 17, 2001 @ 10:37 AM (2/2)

You are too kind to them — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)
To coin a phrase - "The Y2K principle" ... — Proof Of Concept, December 17, 2001 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)

Neulevel's New System... — IncompetentAfilias, December 17, 2001 @ 4:35 AM (3/11)

I think there were few genuine "unique" cueue registrars in — antipodes, December 17, 2001 @ 7:36 AM (1/2)

you speak with the voice of sanity — richard_henderson, December 17, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (1/1)

thanks mate - good to have you back on the board - we need — antipodes, December 17, 2001 @ 8:13 PM (0/0)

Otherwise no one is learning from these new TLD implementations! — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 6:20 AM (1/1)

In a Perfect World... — IncompetentAfilias, December 17, 2001 @ 7:35 AM (0/0)

Proof-of-Concept and ICANN should act — richard_henderson, December 17, 2001 @ 6:15 AM (2/5)

Good luck — spot, December 17, 2001 @ 7:01 AM (0/0)
take the lessons that have been learned — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 6:25 AM (1/3)

you said it all along — richard_henderson, December 17, 2001 @ 6:42 AM (1/2)

apparently corrupt from top to bottom - with few exceptions — antipodes, December 17, 2001 @ 7:57 AM (1/1)

new landrush: will it be a wasted opportunity? — onmove, December 17, 2001 @ 2:41 PM (0/0)

Mustard Seed - 007Names - some questions — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (1/2)

Did 007Names system discourage info pre-reg? — Srana, December 16, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (1/1)

I have the same memories of 007Names - one of the more — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)

I wonder whether when the challenged .info Sunrise names are — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

6/12/01 press release, Hal and Roland have a sense of humour — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 4:47 PM (0/0)

Neulevel abolishes lottery, goes for round robin in March next year — mole, December 16, 2001 @ 1:39 PM (1/2)

And their solution to their self inflicted lottery problem enables more preregistrations. How clever — spot, December 16, 2001 @ 3:39 PM (1/1)

yep, all these test bed foul ups make money for the insiders — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 4:50 PM (0/0)

Country Trademark Database — Garry Anderson, December 16, 2001 @ 4:41 AM (2/6)

Great resource! Truely amazing how many generic words have been registered -- elom — mole, December 16, 2001 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)
Very useful information — spot, December 16, 2001 @ 5:28 AM (1/4)

I would love to see the dates for YesNic's Korean TM — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 1:55 PM (1/3)

Very convenient for Yesnic that you can't check Korean TMs online — spot, December 16, 2001 @ 3:27 PM (2/2)

Sorry - my fault that you missed it — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)
I don't know which is the worse case of insider trading - — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 5:14 PM (0/0)

From now on, you will know me as Mike 'Lil Dick 1960s man' Hou — 1ntemetAdvocate, December 16, 2001 @ 2:22 AM (2/4)

IMPORTANT ADDENDUM: The grammatically correct form of this is Mike 'Li'l' Dick' Hou (1960's man) — 1ntemetAdvocate, December 17, 2001 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
Lol. I can't work out whether that's an insult to Australian politicians or InternetAdvocate eom — spot, December 16, 2001 @ 5:30 AM (1/2)

Mike Lil Dick 1960s an appropriate handle for all no-hopers!! — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 2:24 PM (1/1)

Im a friend of Mike and you should be sorry - hes in hospital at the moment — mBuku, December 17, 2001 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)

FYI: The real ICANN Moderator hasn't posted since monday - all "facially similar" posts are from IA! — ICANN Moderator, December 14, 2001 @ 5:34 PM (2/13)

Liar! Liar! Pants on fire - I'm so self-obsessed I'll do anything! Long live ME- Long live MIKE HOU! — 1nternetAdvocate, December 15, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (1/1)

Haha! Youre a fool! I used a little L not "1"!!! Got ya! I'm the HERO - I AM MIKE "Mini Prick" HOU! — IntemetAdvocate, December 15, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

I'm bored — rachelmacgregor, December 14, 2001 @ 8:13 PM (2/10)

You wouldnt be bored if you were doing the "Mikey Hou" tango! Hey! Lets play spot the prick! — IntemetAdvocate, December 15, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)
Rach, Garry, anyone - what are the chances of — antipodes, December 14, 2001 @ 8:55 PM (1/8)

It would be abuse of trademark — Garry Anderson, December 15, 2001 @ 2:27 AM (2/7)

sex.info was awarded because of a word/picture mark! — EasyTech, December 16, 2001 @ 1:58 AM (1/4)

Awarding domain names for image TMs is an ABOMINATION!!!!! — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 2:08 PM (1/3)

Yes but the authorities don't like Garry's idea of .reg — spot, December 16, 2001 @ 4:00 PM (2/2)

Idea is self-evident - not mine — Garry Anderson, December 17, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)
Garry's idea makes good sense to every one other than the — antipodes, December 16, 2001 @ 6:13 PM (0/0)

Thats what I think - but I guess the best names at Landrush — antipodes, December 15, 2001 @ 7:03 AM (1/1)

The only fair way now they messed up - on purpose — Garry Anderson, December 15, 2001 @ 8:57 AM (0/0)

letter from Karl Auberach - Why won't ICANN management let him see the books — Anion, December 14, 2001 @ 5:09 AM (1/4)

Who Cares ... — GettingScrewed, December 14, 2001 @ 7:04 AM (2/3)

I care — EasyTech, December 14, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)
different ways of losing — RayF, December 14, 2001 @ 7:55 AM (1/1)

Good points, Anion, GS and RayF. — InternetAdvocate, December 14, 2001 @ 9:03 AM (0/0)

What language are you talking IntemetAdvocate — drako, December 13, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (2/4)

Uh, Draino! I am Not "I n t e m e t A d v o c a t e". — InternetAdvocate, December 14, 2001 @ 10:45 AM (0/0)
I will answer you despite your ad homs included in your post. — InternetAdvocate, December 14, 2001 @ 9:57 AM (1/2)

New words? — InternetAdvocate, December 14, 2001 @ 10:39 AM (1/1)

IntemetIntillectual would be a better name for you — drako, December 14, 2001 @ 8:03 PM (0/0)

Repost ........... — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

I NEVER BELIEVED ANTIPODES'S APOLOGIES. I WAS RIGHT. — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:41 PM (1/9)

An end to these worthless posts — spot, December 13, 2001 @ 5:13 PM (1/8)

I have the right to self-defense. — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 5:20 PM (2/7)

The type of response — Garry Anderson, December 13, 2001 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)
You're single 'right to self-defense' is infringing on the many rights of others to use this forum — spot, December 13, 2001 @ 5:25 PM (2/5)

Your, not you're. Important to use correct grammar. — InternetAdvocate, December 14, 2001 @ 8:57 AM (0/0)
Ad homs infringe on my and others' rights to use this forum [eom] — InternetAdvocate, December 14, 2001 @ 8:53 AM (1/3)

TWAT — 1ntemetAdvocate, December 17, 2001 @ 8:34 AM (1/2)

TWAT — antipodes, December 17, 2001 @ 10:06 AM (1/1)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZz — IntemetAdvocate, December 17, 2001 @ 4:16 PM (0/0)

Seems like NeuLevel is ready to release all Group 2 and 3 names — peeved, December 13, 2001 @ 9:51 AM (0/0)

Is "dan minc" a member of this forum? — lCANN Moderator, December 13, 2001 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)

IA Classics Vol.2 Do you want to play Rope a Dope again IA? — antipodes, December 12, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (1/1)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 5:00 PM (0/0)

My answer to Drako. His subthread below is now read-only ... — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:39 AM (3/8)

You are correct - however — Garry Anderson, December 13, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (1/1)

I'm replying to Drako, but his thread became read-only ... — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:58 PM (0/0)

yeah yeah, all the world's out of step except you - go on — antipodes, December 12, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (2/2)

Antipodes shows his ignorance again. — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)
Problem John? — lCANN Moderator, December 13, 2001 @ 10:06 AM (0/0)

I am new to this board and new to English, but in any — drako, December 12, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (2/2)

Drako admits to being new to English, then tries to correct me. ROFLOL — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)
Drako should stop talking to his mirror — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)

A question for legal eagles — spot, December 12, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (4/17)

The answer is in the registration agreement... — arbitrage, December 12, 2001 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)
WIPO Dispute Decisions Contestable In U.S. Courts — Garry Anderson, December 12, 2001 @ 10:43 PM (1/1)

I sure HOPE so — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:48 PM (0/0)

wherever they filed it..... — Anion, December 12, 2001 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
I welcome any lawyers to critique my answer herewithin ... — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:34 AM (2/12)

bullshit - you don't welcome critique of any kind - you are — antipodes, December 12, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (2/7)

Problem John? — lCANN Moderator, December 13, 2001 @ 10:05 AM (0/0)
Calm down John — Garry Anderson, December 12, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (2/5)

Antipodes has some kind of problem. — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)
thanks for your concern Garry - I think it is an Australian — antipodes, December 13, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (1/3)

Sorry if I come over as "know it all" — Garry Anderson, December 13, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)

You don't come over as a "know it all" Garry, but some one — antipodes, December 13, 2001 @ 6:16 AM (1/1)

Antipodes acts as KNOW-IT-ALL, then gets mad at others' CORRECT statements. ROFLMAOLOL — InterNetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)

So where does that leave domain disputes? — spot, December 12, 2001 @ 10:39 AM (1/3)

Either ICANN/UDRP or WIPO determines domain disputes. — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:45 AM (1/2)

I thought gTLD domains could be challenged in court OR by UDRP — spot, December 12, 2001 @ 10:57 AM (1/1)

Any Domain you register under these GTLDs are subject to ICANN's dispute resolution policy. — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 11:58 AM (0/0)

What Happen to all? — SanjeevGoyal, December 11, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (1/2)

People realise what board is for — Garry Anderson, December 11, 2001 @ 7:34 PM (1/1)

Garry Anderson's post is another validation of why I praised him previously. — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:15 AM (0/0)

IA Classics Vol 2. "The world benefits at the expense of — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (2/12)

Antipodes's lefty liberal twisting of the facts again. — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:07 AM (1/3)

oh dear - I have upset you again and let you prove with your — antipodes, December 12, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (1/2)

Problem John? — lCANN Moderator, December 13, 2001 @ 10:07 AM (1/1)

Antipodes still talking to his mirror. [end] — InternetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)

America gave the world Homer Simpson (eom) — rachelmacgregor, December 10, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (2/7)

scottland gave us scotty eom — psbyowner, December 11, 2001 @ 7:17 AM (1/1)

Aye, my man, but tha's "Scotland" (pron: "Scortlarn") [EOM] — Spock, December 11, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (0/0)

America also gave us "The Cat in the Hat"... — rachelmacgregor, December 10, 2001 @ 10:20 PM (1/4)

But then again, America also gave us Jon-Boy Walton... — rachelmacgregor, December 10, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (2/3)

John-Boy Walton aka Richard Thomas now hosts "It's A Miracle" TV show on PAX-TV [www.pax.tv] — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:51 AM (0/0)
...and Macdonalds... — rachelmacgregor, December 10, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (1/1)

Welcome to Dismal Land, urrr, DisneyLand. — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

antipodes — 410, December 10, 2001 @ 11:23 AM (1/2)

410 - I don't like the direction that the forum has taken — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

ROFLMAOLOL. Rudolph ICANN Moderator & Antipodes pushed that direction. They can stop it too. [end] — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)

ICANN IGNORES THIS FORUM FOR A VERY GOOD REASON — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:59 AM (1/4)

OK Internet Advocate. An end to this. — spot, December 10, 2001 @ 10:57 AM (1/3)

A big difference between disagreeing with me & adhom attacks on me. — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 9:42 AM (1/2)

adhom attacks , who races around calling every body a — drako, December 12, 2001 @ 9:45 PM (1/1)

You are spamming. And 2 persons don't equal everybody. — InternetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:30 PM (0/0)

Thanks to Hiltonian, Henderson, Dan Tobias & Garry Anderson for all your contributions — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:50 AM (1/10)

kissy kissy smooch smooch - why you tryin to get up close — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 4:12 PM (2/9)

Praise or correction? Which do you prefer, Antipodes. Make up your mind! — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 9:35 AM (2/6)

IA - you're not qualified to correct any one on this forum — antipodes, December 12, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (1/2)

I am more qualified than you will ever be. And I mentioned praising others [not you]. — InternetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:35 PM (1/1)

Antipodes hypocritically attacks me for praising and for criticizing posters — InternetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)

Psbyowner & Onmove agree with me — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 9:38 AM (1/2)

honey, if you dig long enough, I am sure you will find that — antipodes, December 12, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/1)

You are the 1 needing help. I only mentioned those 2 agree with me because you say nobody agrees — InternetAdvocate, December 13, 2001 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)

He is looking for much needed support — Garry Anderson, December 10, 2001 @ 7:41 PM (1/1)

At last.. — onmove, December 11, 2001 @ 10:17 AM (0/0)

To the few dorks who appear to be dozens [due to their multiple personalities disorder] — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:32 AM (1/1)

Problem Mike? — lCANN Moderator, December 13, 2001 @ 10:09 AM (0/0)

Afilias Slogans Vol. 1 — hiltonian, December 10, 2001 @ 3:52 AM (1/1)

Bravo — InterNetAdvocate, December 12, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (0/0)

IA Classics Vol.1 "John Smith am I" (or "I am John Smith") — antipodes, December 9, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (3/8)

That's much better than Co-ops' new TLD: .coop [sounds like chicken home] — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:02 AM (1/1)

Intemetadvocate you have fallen into the trap for speakers — drako, December 10, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)

LOL.......................Oh dear — spot, December 10, 2001 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)
Rolf! — ICANN Moderator, December 10, 2001 @ 12:20 AM (1/4)

yes, IA apparently has an ego in inverse proportion to the — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 8:04 AM (3/3)

ANTIPODES LIES ABOUT NOT BAITING ME. PROVES HE'S A HOMOSEXUAL CHASING HETERO — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)
I NEVER BELIEVED ANTIPODES'S APOLOGIES. I WAS RIGHT. — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:40 AM (0/0)
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:03 AM (0/0)

Will Govinda delete her Hawaii.info, given Afilias's announcement yesterday? — mole, December 9, 2001 @ 4:24 AM (3/8)

Govinda should lose his Hawaii name unless he is American or — drako, December 9, 2001 @ 5:13 PM (1/5)

First your English sucks, second your ability to distinguish gender sucks, third your attitude sucks — mole, December 10, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/4)

whether or not we are having our legs pulled, I've learned — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 6:34 AM (1/3)

whether or not we are having our legs pulled, — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:00 AM (1/2)

as always, your posts contain a lot of tripe, perhaps none — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 9:14 AM (1/1)

BABIES BEING TORTURED TO DEATH. ANTIPODES THINKS THAT'S TRIPE. — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (0/0)

No, its designed to permit squatters to replace initial bogus TM with their now-kosher Nigerian TMs — ICANN Moderator, December 9, 2001 @ 1:05 PM (0/0)
Nah ..... I doubt it — Anion, December 9, 2001 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)

It's a shame. — 410, December 8, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (2/2)

come on 410 - lighten up - or people in glass houses.... — antipodes, December 10, 2001 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)
Ditto. Thanks! [end] — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 8:53 AM (0/0)

In the light of recent posts here... — NIC_INFO, December 8, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/1)

How dare you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! —Name, December 8, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)

Verisign Can't Even Provide URL Forwarding For .INFO, 3 Weeks After Charging Me — GettingScrewed, December 8, 2001 @ 10:59 AM (0/0)

.NAME, Same Pay-For-Request Type Lottery. Speculators Can Have An Impact Here ... — GettingScrewed, December 7, 2001 @ 8:06 AM (1/4)

.NAME - I can't see speculators caring about it... — IncompetentAfilias, December 7, 2001 @ 2:02 PM (1/3)

.NAME — dtobias, December 8, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (2/2)

I agree 3-letter TLD's better. Change .name to .nom and change .museum to .mue for museums. — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
I Agree, But ... — GettingScrewed, December 8, 2001 @ 3:55 AM (0/0)

Afilias and Sunrise challenges — challenge, December 7, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (2/2)

portfolio.info generic? — geodiego, December 7, 2001 @ 8:17 AM (0/0)
trademark information and landrush registrations — onmove, December 7, 2001 @ 6:32 AM (0/0)

I got media.biz !!! — mole, December 7, 2001 @ 3:02 AM (1/12)

I got show.biz!!! — Onion, December 7, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (1/11)

my dog has fleas — antipodes, December 7, 2001 @ 8:10 PM (1/10)

InternetAdvocate has them too! — Onion, December 7, 2001 @ 10:04 PM (2/9)

Onion should know. He's the master of fleadom. — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 8:40 AM (0/0)
mole aka mediacat., this means media celebrity I think, likes — drako, December 8, 2001 @ 8:15 AM (1/7)

Your English sucks!!! — mole, December 8, 2001 @ 4:43 PM (2/6)

Watch out Mole. You could be attacked for saying that, just as I was. — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 8:46 AM (0/0)
Is this the American way? I thought the internet was for — drako, December 9, 2001 @ 7:44 AM (1/4)

No. This is the Asian way. And stop whinging about other people -- elom — mole, December 9, 2001 @ 3:50 PM (1/3)

You did not find the politeness checker — drako, December 9, 2001 @ 3:56 PM (1/2)

If you have nothing to say about the new tlds, I suggest you take a hike, whinger!---elom — mole, December 10, 2001 @ 12:37 AM (1/1)

there are none so blind as those who can not see — Drako, December 10, 2001 @ 6:43 AM (0/0)

Email forum@icann.org to stop ICANN Moderator's Identity Theft — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 5:08 PM (1/2)

Why would another man try to be you who degrades himself in — drako, December 8, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/1)

I don't know. Maybe ICANN Moderator is psycho sick. — InternetAdvocate, December 10, 2001 @ 8:37 AM (0/0)

Mole's log #369746 - I give up. Neulevel is playing the Chinese waiting game to wear watchers down — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (1/2)

do not give up hope! — housecat, December 6, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)

Thanks housecat, for the moral support. — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)

We Need Good Monitor — SanjeevGoyal, December 5, 2001 @ 10:28 PM (1/2)

Yes, I hear the Java islands have lots of monitor lizards --- elom — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (1/1)

You need to be out of board. — SanjeevGoyal, December 6, 2001 @ 1:32 PM (0/0)

ASIANS wake up UDRP Office here — SanjeevGoyal, December 5, 2001 @ 10:27 PM (1/2)

Asians, Americans, Austrains, Talibans ('Talebans' in Asia) who cares? — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (1/1)

Mole you are Unlucky — SanjeevGoyal, December 6, 2001 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)

eResolution says ICANNs UDRP is Corrupt — Garry Anderson, December 5, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (1/5)

Yes, I saw one article of this effect on Yahoo. — SanjeevGoyal, December 5, 2001 @ 9:52 PM (1/4)

UDRP is not corrupt, you just need to know how to play the game — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (2/3)

You surely jest — Garry Anderson, December 7, 2001 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)
No, UDRP is corrupt — spot, December 6, 2001 @ 8:14 AM (1/1)

Quote: "it should at least be admitted that UDRP is corrupt" — Garry Anderson, December 7, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)

This board is going to the Dogs — psbyowner, December 5, 2001 @ 4:29 AM (1/1)

ICANN is going down the dogs — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)

I hope you're all very happy... — dtobias, December 5, 2001 @ 4:06 AM (3/4)

Happy for what??? You know what this board is don't you? Just a front to show ICANN is public aware. — mole, December 6, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)
ICANN would ignore us anyways — Anion, December 5, 2001 @ 8:52 AM (1/1)

ICANN Moderator posts as IntemetAdvocate [m looks like r n] to pretend he's me. — InternetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)

point taken - I will stop baiting IA - apologies all round — antipodes, December 5, 2001 @ 6:19 AM (0/0)

Antipodes, stop lying about me NOW damn idiot moron retard. — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 9:08 AM (1/1)

I'm not InteMetAdvocate. Antipodes is guilty of evil defamation. — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:47 PM (0/0)

If ICANN keeps dot-biz as is, then change dot-museum to dot-mue for consistency — InterNetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 3:58 AM (1/2)

IA - you are an attention seeking git! I am sick of your — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 8:25 AM (1/1)

I ignore your ad hom lies about me — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)

If dot-museum is so great, then change dot-biz to dot-business ... — InterNetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 3:56 AM (1/3)

ADDENDUM ... — InterNetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 4:17 AM (1/2)

IA, you are rabid, schizoid. You deserve f*cking and your — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 8:35 AM (1/1)

I ignore your ad hom lies about me — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)

My reply to Spot's http://forum.icann.org3C0848D6000019B9.html — InterNetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 3:38 AM (1/5)

You have LOST THE PLOT badly! How many PARANOID messages have you posted today? — spot, December 4, 2001 @ 5:03 AM (2/4)

Spot adhoms me for answering his questions. — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:41 PM (0/0)
I propose a new extension for the likes of IA - dot.TWAT — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (2/2)

New TLD for Antipodes: dot-hypocrite ... — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)
New TLD for Antipodes: dot-retard — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)

A Public Service Announcement for folks with English-as-a-Second-Language — InterNetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (1/2)

IA - I bet your Mom now regrets not spanking you! - eom — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 9:11 AM (1/1)

Wow! You are smarter than Einstein — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)

Now do you believe me? I'm sorry about the multiple posts — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:47 AM (1/10)

What the hell are you doing? You've pushed some important posts out of the current arena — spot, December 4, 2001 @ 2:36 AM (2/9)

Blaming me rather than ICANN Moderator's identity theft against me = blaming America for WTC attacks — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 2:46 AM (1/2)

IA - you are infuriating. You are correct, provocative — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 8:46 AM (1/1)

American foreign policy is not to blame for WTC Attacks. — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

I have the right of self-defense: to expose identity theft. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (1/5)

Antipodes was fooled by the identity theft — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 2:51 AM (2/4)

there you go, doing it again - you are in deep denial - all — antipodes, December 4, 2001 @ 8:53 AM (1/1)

I ignore your lies about me — InterNetAdvocate, December 6, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)

Okay, you've made your point! Now go flood Neulevel instead. Maybe that will flush out those ... — mole, December 4, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (1/1)

ROFLOL. — InterNetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)

ICANN Moderator posts as IntemetAdvocate [m looks like r n] to pretend he's me. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:25 AM (0/0)

ICANN Moderator posts as IntemetAdvocate [m looks like r n] to pretend he's me. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)

ICANN Moderator posts as IntemetAdvocate [m looks like r n] to pretend he's me. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)

Mole's log #369745 - Registry Reserve names pending legal review??? I thought Smiley lost???? — mole, December 3, 2001 @ 6:43 AM (0/0)

The so-called original dot-biz registry now offers dot-com2 domains. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)

CHANGE .museum TO .muse OR .mue for museums; Then ... — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 1:25 AM (2/9)

"Attention-Getting Behavior"... — psbyowner, December 3, 2001 @ 4:48 PM (1/1)

LOL. You showed how easy it is to accidentally type museum erroneously — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)

Duh! .mue for museums? What a dumbass idea Internet Advocate! — spot, December 3, 2001 @ 1:45 AM (1/6)

Duhhh, Spot is spot wrong! Here's why .mue is NOT a dumbass idea. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 2:14 AM (1/5)

InternetAdvocate forgets regular dose, becomes angry... and .mue IS a dumbass idea: — ICANN Moderator, December 3, 2001 @ 3:20 AM (1/4)

InternetAdvocate, IntemnetAdvocate - whatever you want to — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 8:52 AM (1/3)

Dont forget the Onion! — Onion, December 3, 2001 @ 11:37 AM (1/2)

IA - there you go - Onion has come on board too. None of us — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 1:35 PM (1/1)

Spot and Hiltonian disagree with you about ... — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)

Ineligible Sunrise name Swingers.info is for sale for £500 — rachelmacgregor, December 2, 2001 @ 3:30 PM (1/1)

I'm sure the whole of the Afilias board would like that one. — spot, December 3, 2001 @ 1:58 AM (0/0)

Question about TM law/ Sunrise — spot, December 2, 2001 @ 2:00 PM (2/13)

Sure, why not? — arbitrage, December 2, 2001 @ 3:45 PM (1/7)

You must be — Garry Anderson, December 2, 2001 @ 8:05 PM (2/6)

Two separate issues here... — arbitrage, December 2, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (1/1)

To expand (revised) — Garry Anderson, December 3, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)

...but the domain is not the trade mark. They can't use TM laws against a domain (or can they?) — spot, December 2, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (1/3)

They abuse TM laws against a domain — Garry Anderson, December 2, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (1/2)

It's a hell of a loophole — spot, December 2, 2001 @ 10:32 PM (1/1)

Reselling of Sunrise domains — Garry Anderson, December 3, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

This is why I said — Garry Anderson, December 2, 2001 @ 3:41 PM (2/4)

Unfair competition with trademarks & domain names. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (1/1)

Directory Services — Garry Anderson, December 3, 2001 @ 9:00 AM (0/0)

More about sunrise and TMs — spot, December 2, 2001 @ 7:47 PM (1/1)

Abuse of Trademarks — Garry Anderson, December 2, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (0/0)

A case study in both Cybersquatting and Sunrise Cheating — peeved, December 2, 2001 @ 12:33 AM (2/11)

What went Wrong in this ??? — sanjeevgoyal, December 2, 2001 @ 11:12 AM (2/3)

In general about Canadian TradeMarks — peeved, December 2, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
If they haven't got their TM yet, they shouldn't be able to claim the name in Sunrise. — spot, December 2, 2001 @ 1:52 PM (1/1)

Spot is Spot On right — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)

They have 1200 names! — spot, December 2, 2001 @ 1:56 AM (1/6)

I knew they had quite a few but this is too much... — peeved, December 2, 2001 @ 2:19 AM (1/5)

so successful, I tried to find a corporate link between them — antipodes, December 2, 2001 @ 8:29 AM (2/4)

Antipodes & Spot are mad at Sunrise Cheating But they LOVE identity theft. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/2)

InternetAdvocate/IntemnetAdvocate - OK - you have taken this — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:12 AM (1/1)

ICANN Moderator is InteMetAdvocate using m to look like rn to fool you into thinking he's me. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

I had the same suspicions — peeved, December 2, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)

Mole's log #36974 - Still no joy from Neulevel — spot, December 1, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (1/1)

well done spot - eom — antipodes, December 2, 2001 @ 8:31 AM (0/0)

Maybe this forum is having the "desired" effect! — ICANN Moderator, December 1, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (3/7)

Man, I gotta agree with ICANN Moderator - he da man! MOE... I mean.. EOM! — Moe, December 1, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)
You've convinced me. I shall apply to run the .muse registry immediately. — spot, December 1, 2001 @ 2:07 PM (2/3)

Spot is spot wrong this time. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 2:19 AM (1/1)

News Flash: Spot finally stops playing his game — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (0/0)

Ha ha - very aMUSing! — ICANN Moderator, December 1, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)

the posts here are getting funnier and funnier - eom — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:01 AM (1/1)

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)

Does the term "Insider Trading" come to mind? eom — vera-city, December 1, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (4/11)

Does the term "Identity Theft" come to mind? — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/2)

IA - I will beg you again, stop this SCAM NOW! It is no — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:18 AM (1/1)

Antipodes, stop lying about me NOW damn idiot moron retard. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)

Yes, my man, it does. Verily it does, my good man. Boy, do they hate me! — IntemetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 2:23 PM (1/4)

Rudolph ICANN Moderator uses M to look like RN to fool you into thinking he's me. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (1/3)

InternetAdvocate/IntemnetAdvocate - you are a sick puppy eom — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:22 AM (2/2)

ICANN Moderator FOOLS gullible Antipodes again by posting as IntemetAdvocate [m looks like r n] — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)
ICANN Moderator posts as IntemetAdvocate [m looks like rn] to fool you into thinking he's me — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

that would depend Vera on what I am thinking about. What — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:03 AM (1/1)

On? — vera-city, December 1, 2001 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

Yes, months ago. — ICANN Moderator, December 1, 2001 @ 9:25 AM (0/0)

InternetAdvocate's idea of a .mus TLD for music and museums a weird and dumbass idea — spot, December 1, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (1/25)

ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (1/24)

IA - did the bandits steal you chickentrainer.info and — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:09 AM (2/23)

ZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (1/2)

geez, that's cute - the output of a true intellectual — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:26 AM (1/1)

You are so smart — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)

mole, are you posting as IA tonight? eom — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:11 AM (2/19)

Antipodes is a MORON according to ICANN Moderator's logic: He posted a reply to himself — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (1/2)

thank you - high praise from one as esteemed as yourself eom — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:31 AM (1/1)

ICANN Moderator's logic was calling you a Moron. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (0/0)

Pardon?????? ---elom — mole, December 1, 2001 @ 10:38 AM (1/15)

yeah, well, that just the sort of sneaky response I expected — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:47 AM (1/14)

mole==IA -> can't be: when has mole cried "Teacher teacher! Nobody likes me! Make them stop!" — ICANN Moderator, December 1, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (2/13)

Rudolph ICANN Moderator says THEFT VICTIMS are crybabies. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)
Harry Potter? — spot, December 1, 2001 @ 2:20 PM (2/11)

Either that or... — spot, December 1, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (1/2)

Spot is a MORON according to ICANN Moderator's logic: He posted a reply to himself — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (1/1)

ICANN Moderator's logic was calling Spot a Moron. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (0/0)

I just love the little guy! — IntemetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 2:26 PM (2/7)

ICANN Moderator posted as InteMet Advocate M LOOKS LIKE RN [noncapitalized] — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
BTW: I also love those red-arsed monkeys... — IntemetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (2/5)

Rudolph InteMetAdvocate is a red arsed monkey sucking his e-microscopic dick — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (1/2)

Intemnet/InternetAdvocate - I am sick of your saying — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:48 AM (1/1)

I'm sick of ICANN Moderator stalking me. That's why I wondered if he's a small-dicked homosexual — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

DONT LISTEN TO THIS - HE IS A FRAUD: HE DOESNT HAVE SHARES IN ENRON - HE'S NO PATRIOT! — IntemetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 2:35 PM (1/1)

Rudolph the RedAssed Rainsmear posted as InteMetAdvocate M looks like RN [uncapitalized] — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:05 AM (0/0)

Revenge is a dish best served cold. — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 2:02 AM (2/8)

IA - have you rearranged the letters of your handle lately? — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:36 AM (1/1)

ZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

Right again: Here he goes again with his "Teacher! Teacher! Everyone hates me! Do I really stink?" — ICANN Moderator, December 1, 2001 @ 3:14 AM (1/5)

Go away Crybaby AKA ICANN Moderator AKA Rudolph RedAssed Rainsmear. — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 3:50 AM (1/4)

I still think your funniest post IA was the one that got us — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:31 AM (1/3)

ZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (1/2)

WOW — antipodes, December 3, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (1/1)

You are so smart. — InternetAdvocate, December 4, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (0/0)

The Dot-Info Bandits Strike Again. Waaaaah! — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 5:12 AM (3/10)

BestRegistar.com agrees with me. A bandit did strike! — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)
however IA secures turkey.info and chickensexer.info - eom — antipodes, November 30, 2001 @ 9:22 AM (2/2)

Antipodes is jealous. Down boy! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)
Antipodes sure has a fixation on chickensexing. Wonder why? — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)

Internet Advocate - you are still a TWAT - I will post this — antipodes, November 30, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (2/5)

Antipodes's adhom lies about me prove he lost the rational debate again as usual. [end] — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:21 AM (0/0)
Carefull! InternetAdvocate will start up his "teacher teacher! everyone hates me" crap again! — ICANN Moderator, November 30, 2001 @ 2:07 PM (1/3)

ICANN Moderator AKA Rudolph the RedAssed Rainsmear, strikes again. — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (1/2)

InternetAdvocate or IntemnetAdvocate - whatever you want to — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 10:41 AM (1/1)

Antipodes wants to educate me from his personal tragic experience. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)

IMPORTANT NOTICE about English spelling: — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 3:12 AM (1/21)

IMPORTANT ADDENDUM — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 3:19 AM (3/20)

A PSA for ESL ... — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 3:56 AM (0/0)
Very good. Next week we're going to work on colors. — spot, November 30, 2001 @ 3:38 AM (1/10)

Like Isaac Newton's Theory of Color ... — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 3:49 AM (1/9)

You mean his theory of COLOUR? — Onion, November 30, 2001 @ 4:31 AM (1/8)

Americans spell it Color, Brits spell it Colour. Both are Correct. — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 4:45 AM (2/7)

At least the .museum thread actually had relevance to this forum (however ABSURD) unlike this one — spot, November 30, 2001 @ 1:29 PM (2/4)

Spot says .museum thread is absurd. — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:48 AM (0/0)
This thread about English ALSO has relevance to this forum. — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:15 AM (1/2)

what a pompus little bitch you are InternetAdvocate - if you — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 9:59 AM (1/1)

Funny how idiots are so jealous of geniuses — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

and Uncle Newt was a Brit! (fdm) — Onion, November 30, 2001 @ 4:54 AM (1/1)

ZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 6:31 AM (0/0)

Are you serious about suggesting there should be a .mus specifically for museums and music sites — spot, November 30, 2001 @ 3:21 AM (1/7)

Spot Posted this in the WRONG THREAD. — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 3:36 AM (1/6)

Fred? Shmed! .museum IS logical for museums — Onion, November 30, 2001 @ 4:42 AM (1/5)

Wrong thread. I don't answer those posts in this thread. — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 6:33 AM (1/4)

you are such a bitch and as mad as the backward elom - eom — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/3)

Your adhom bitch attack shows that you lost the argument.[end] — InternetAdvocate, December 1, 2001 @ 1:10 AM (1/2)

"Adhom bitch"? - Thats even richer coming from the master of the straw men - InternetAdvocate! — ICANN Moderator, December 1, 2001 @ 9:31 AM (1/1)

ICANN Moderator is the master of masterbation on men & on strawmen. — InternetAdvocate, December 3, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)

Keep warm this winter — Elvis, November 29, 2001 @ 9:42 PM (1/3)

thanks for the laugh Elvis - come to Queensland where it's — antipodes, November 30, 2001 @ 9:10 AM (1/2)

Queensland - Beautiful one day, cleared (slashed & burnt) the next. — ICANN Moderator, November 30, 2001 @ 2:06 PM (1/1)

yes, the farming lobby continue to try to make the state — antipodes, November 30, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)

.INFO 1 & 2 Letter Domains Available _Briefly_.... now deleted! — IncompetentAfilias, November 29, 2001 @ 8:44 PM (1/2)

What's the deal here? — peeved, November 30, 2001 @ 1:58 AM (1/1)

Afilias should release these during LandRush II — IncompetentAfilias, November 30, 2001 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)

Since Afilias have been here lately, will they tell us what GOVINDA LEOPOLD will do with Hawaii.info — spot, November 29, 2001 @ 7:28 PM (1/1)

4 months and she's STILL cybersquatting on Hawaii.info — rachelmacgregor, November 29, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)

Mole's log #36973 - A waiting game by Neulevel to wear down Smiley? — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 2:56 PM (1/3)

waiting....waiting....I received this email from Register.com yesterday: — housecat, November 29, 2001 @ 4:41 PM (1/2)

So did I. I think I competed against myself. Those names are worth a jot to anyone else -- elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 4:49 PM (1/1)

same here...I think you are right ...the release will be very close to the holiday — housecat, November 29, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)

generic names ......trademarks ......rules worldwide......info.......biz.......future.tld — trademark, November 29, 2001 @ 11:59 AM (2/12)

you can trademark every word in the dictionary — EasyTech, November 29, 2001 @ 3:28 PM (2/6)

you can trademark every generic word ? not true.....maybe in your country — trademark, November 29, 2001 @ 6:07 PM (1/4)

don't talk so much crap — EasyTech, November 29, 2001 @ 6:24 PM (1/3)

it's crap for you if chances are not equal — trademark, November 29, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (2/2)

We talked about TMs — EasyTech, November 30, 2001 @ 2:55 PM (0/0)
Btw. — EasyTech, November 30, 2001 @ 2:54 PM (0/0)

Yep, including sex.shop (check USPTO Tess) --- elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)

There is no doubt... — Garry Anderson, November 29, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (1/4)

There is no doubt... — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 2:24 PM (1/3)

Yes you can — Garry Anderson, November 29, 2001 @ 3:47 PM (1/2)

uhmm.. Garry... could you check media.info for me? — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:55 PM (1/1)

I would if I could — Garry Anderson, November 29, 2001 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)

Travel.info ... WIPO What is this ? — SanjeevGoyal, November 29, 2001 @ 11:48 AM (0/0)

Business.info — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 11:29 AM (5/31)

Could Afilias successfully challenge Business.info? — IncompetentAfilias, November 29, 2001 @ 6:50 PM (1/1)

Nothing to do with generic. Also don't forget about Afilias' GOVINDA LEOPOLD, who STOLE Hawaii.info — spot, November 29, 2001 @ 7:21 PM (0/0)

Please will you answer a few questions? — Garry Anderson, November 29, 2001 @ 1:13 PM (1/8)

I admire you Garry — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 2:08 PM (1/7)

Moral of the story for future gTLDs like .inc .... — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 2:37 PM (1/6)

Can you get some for me ? — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (1/5)

You obviously don't know anything — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:24 PM (1/4)

Means You Accept your mistake — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 3:27 PM (1/3)

Not exactly. I hate spamming laywers thats all, just my opinion --- elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:32 PM (1/2)

frustration — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 3:33 PM (1/1)

Lost for words? Figures --- elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)

ADD IN ABOVE > Business.info — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (1/7)

is there a online database? eom — EasyTech, November 29, 2001 @ 3:19 PM (1/6)

IT IS PREPARING — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 3:37 PM (1/5)

Preparing for what? In development.... elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:40 PM (1/4)

web Interface .. — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 3:41 PM (1/3)

*smile* you didn't get it. Never mind *smile* — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:42 PM (1/2)

* frustrated smile on your face * — arbitrator, November 29, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)

whahahahhahahaaa... you must think this trademark thing is all a game to be manipulated --elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (0/0)

Your client may lose the name... — arbitrage, November 29, 2001 @ 11:56 AM (1/2)

Sorry — arbitartor, November 29, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/1)

Lawyers are now playing the game with clever tricks ...hmmmm ----elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)

TM on BUSINESS - shall we laugh?? — helumuc, November 29, 2001 @ 11:56 AM (2/8)

don't you get it? — EasyTech, November 29, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)
People have been playing the trademark system for years, the world is no longer assumed ethical.. — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 2:46 PM (1/6)

Trade Mark for Business.info — wmd, November 29, 2001 @ 4:05 PM (1/5)

I have no interest in business.info, I just hate spamming lawyers who compound the fiasco -- elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 4:40 PM (2/4)

why would you have an interest in business.info when you own — antipodes, December 1, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)
btw... stop cloaking, arbitrator. I recommend grammar check software before you post---elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 4:46 PM (1/2)

and spelling check software for moi *evil grin* --- elom — mole, November 29, 2001 @ 4:47 PM (1/1)

I am not a front or cloaking for anybody — wmd, November 30, 2001 @ 6:25 AM (0/0)

Mole's log #36972 - It's another day of silence from Neulevel paper ball draw — mole, November 28, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

TLD's Are Great EXCEPT — CoWMaN, November 28, 2001 @ 1:49 PM (2/11)

.museum — dtobias, November 28, 2001 @ 3:00 PM (4/9)

thanks for some common sense Dan - Merry Christmas - eom — antipodes, November 30, 2001 @ 10:26 PM (0/0)
CHANGE .museum TO .muse OR .mue for museums; & .mus for music websites. [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)
CHANGE .museum TO .muse OR .mus — InternetAdvocate, November 29, 2001 @ 2:56 AM (3/5)

Combining museum and music [into a singular TLD] makes sense. — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 2:30 AM (0/0)
That's the dumbest idea I've heard for a long time eom — spot, November 29, 2001 @ 5:09 PM (1/1)

Only ignorants say that's a dumb idea ... — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)

What a dumbass idea InternetAdvocate! A TLD for museums and music? What are YOU smoking? — Onion, November 29, 2001 @ 10:38 AM (1/1)

No more dumb than .com for several categories ... — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)

The Great Experiment — S. Hudgens, November 28, 2001 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

TLD's — S. Hudgens, November 28, 2001 @ 2:55 PM (0/0)

URGENT: What is Happenning After the Challenge is Granted? — alaxei_kuzmanov, November 28, 2001 @ 1:47 PM (2/7)

Question... — geodiego, November 28, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (1/2)

trademark required — alaxei_kuzmanov, November 29, 2001 @ 4:23 PM (1/1)

Solution — trademarked, November 30, 2001 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)

I KNOW THE ANSWER — sanjeevgoyal, November 28, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (1/3)

Thank you. Does it mean I will loose the name? — alaxei_kuzmanov, November 28, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (2/2)

Afraid that your domain name will be loosened? Or lost? — InternetAdvocate, November 30, 2001 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)
Of course not! Afilias doesn't have the manpower to undo things --- elom — mole, November 28, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)

really good .info names approved - registered in sunriseperiod — trademark, November 27, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (3/31)

These names were challenged and transferred to AirSpeed — arbitrage, November 28, 2001 @ 1:58 AM (0/0)
he'll lose 'em — DaveKing2, November 28, 2001 @ 1:51 AM (2/7)

Still will be frauds — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 11:23 AM (2/4)

Are multinationals like Dupont now happy to openly commit fraud? — spot, November 28, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (1/1)

Why Governments help — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)

hmm ... — DaveKing2, November 28, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (1/1)

Ambiguity — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)

You seem to believe everything Afilias says, Dave — arbitrage, November 28, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)

Alas, their track history has taught me otherwise! — DaveKing2, November 28, 2001 @ 3:50 AM (0/0)

can anybody explain — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (1/21)

I can explain how you're wrong. Time to tee off.. — Watchman, November 28, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (3/20)

WARNING - Why Watchman defends Afilias — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (2/11)

Garry squats on WIPO — Watchman, November 28, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (3/5)

Watchman - prove you are not a smeghead — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
Problem — 410, November 28, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)
Disagree, and don't like the attitude — spot, November 28, 2001 @ 9:05 PM (1/2)

nope — Watchman, November 28, 2001 @ 9:54 PM (1/1)

No UDRP for .uk domains — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

Garry's pretzel logic — Watchman, November 28, 2001 @ 8:11 PM (1/4)

Evidence seems compelling. — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (2/3)

Not Me! — DaveKing2, November 29, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)
Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha-ha! — Watchman, November 29, 2001 @ 4:05 AM (1/1)

Anybody who supports Afilias — Garry Anderson, November 29, 2001 @ 9:16 AM (0/0)

Golf is not you game - lame brain.. — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 7:14 PM (2/4)

OK...here is your proof — Watchman, November 28, 2001 @ 9:16 PM (1/1)

Tell me something I don't know — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 11:19 PM (0/0)

Apples and oranges and UDRP — Watchman, November 28, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (1/1)

Apple and UDRP — Garry Anderson, November 29, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)

Generic Names... — onmove, November 28, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (2/2)

No offense taken Amar! :) EOM — DaveKing2, November 29, 2001 @ 6:43 AM (0/0)
Trademarks have to disown generic words... — Garry Anderson, November 28, 2001 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)

Mole's log #36971 : Checked the .biz whois for the 867th time, still no movement paper ball draws — mole, November 27, 2001 @ 4:34 PM (1/1)

renewal date — RayF, November 27, 2001 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)

theinternetchallenge.com — PAWEL, November 26, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (2/15)

silenced, Vint......... — richard_henderson, November 26, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (5/13)

Support for the internetchallenge.com — psbyowner, November 27, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (1/1)

Right or wrong doesn't matter much anymore. — vera-city, November 27, 2001 @ 7:31 PM (0/0)

I have a question Mr. Henderson — helumuc, November 27, 2001 @ 3:02 PM (2/6)

Do you think its legal to misrepresent your trademark rights? Do you think ... — mole, November 27, 2001 @ 4:52 PM (2/4)

desperate times call for desperate measures — antipodes, November 27, 2001 @ 8:51 PM (1/1)

The US DOC are ultimately responsible — Garry Anderson, November 27, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)

Oh - have i said anything against theinternetchallenge.com??? — helumuc, November 27, 2001 @ 5:38 PM (1/1)

helumac, it's okay. Not everyone is born equal. Good luck! --- elom — mole, November 28, 2001 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)

Blames of a fraudster — EasyTech, November 27, 2001 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)

Let's start "TheInternetChallenge.Com" Legal relief fund. — vera-city, November 27, 2001 @ 5:18 AM (0/0)
In defense of Vint Cerf......He is one of the good guys — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 27, 2001 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)
You did a great initiative Richard. When the bully boys come chasing, you know they have something. — mole, November 27, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (1/1)

Richard's work is commendable...... — onmove, November 27, 2001 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)

WIPO took it for internetchallenge.com perhaps? — Garry Anderson, November 26, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

.aero — ehasbrouck, November 26, 2001 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)

.BIZ News Headlines — Jim Fleming, November 26, 2001 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)

has anyone seen a .info registration through Cydian? — antipodes, November 26, 2001 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

Afilias closes Sunrise Challenge loopholes. Good news for clearing out squatters. — Watchman, November 26, 2001 @ 5:41 PM (3/8)

The problem with December 26 is... — arbitrage, November 28, 2001 @ 2:05 AM (0/0)
Afilias is likely to want an orderly return — vera-city, November 27, 2001 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
I expect Afilias will be pretty thorough in their sunrise challenges- — spot, November 26, 2001 @ 9:58 PM (3/5)

I disagree — Anion, November 26, 2001 @ 10:48 PM (2/2)

You mean kauai.info, not kaui.info, dude — Watchman, November 27, 2001 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
They will probably let Yesnic names go through the cracks, hard to check Korean tm --elom — mole, November 27, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

I agree — Garry Anderson, November 26, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)
...Whether they take back HAWAII.INFO which was STOLEN by Afilias' GOVINDA LEOPOLD, I do not know — spot, November 26, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

GettingScrewed - Verisign Still Sucks, Can't Even Perform With URL Forwarding ... — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 4:15 PM (1/1)

Same shit with namebargain/register.com eom — EasyTech, November 28, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)

.BIZ is Failed > .info will hit. — mitsuindia, November 26, 2001 @ 6:01 AM (1/1)

Motherhood statements get attention, but ... — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 6:24 AM (0/0)

My 2 .biz names have both DISAPPEARED from the WHOIS — richard_henderson, November 26, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (1/20)

Experiencing the same thing.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 12:24 AM (1/19)

Complete shambles — richard_henderson, November 26, 2001 @ 1:24 AM (2/18)

Near-Military Reliability? — dtobias, November 26, 2001 @ 5:23 AM (0/0)
What happened???? Every .biz name on the face of this earth is GONE! — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 2:47 AM (2/16)

Are that names from Melbourneit ? — aferreira, November 26, 2001 @ 8:31 AM (1/1)

Aferreira, no worries, they are all back now from all registrars, phew --elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 8:58 AM (0/0)

Hey Mole, I Notice ... — GettingScrewed, November 26, 2001 @ 4:18 AM (1/13)

Greg, you got thrown out for flamming other people, not about your opinions on New.net — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 4:27 AM (3/12)

Mole...where are the legion of New.net supporters backing you......(thought so) — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 4:43 AM (1/1)

You bored or something Greg? Go harass someone else -- elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 4:49 AM (0/0)

Ah, Mole...how pathetic......I have only one i.d on ICANN: Gregory W. Krajewski...EOM — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 4:33 AM (2/8)

I have to say it again — EasyTech, November 26, 2001 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)
And I have 40 over .biz names in ICANN namespace that just disappeared, so dweeb---elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 4:53 AM (1/6)

44!!!.....Whoah....to go with probably over 100 n.n domains in 3/5/02.....Ouch...Seriously though... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 4:56 AM (1/5)

What you smoking Greg, I flammed first??? No, I have 4 New.net domains - elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 5:02 AM (2/4)

Yeah.....Or are you hopped up on n.n to forget your post up top....(and remember..I am not G.S) — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (0/0)
5 actually, I just bought a .inc one yesterday -- (end subject terminate) — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 5:04 AM (1/2)

End Subject Terminate??? Is that New.net lingo....That has no significance here... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 5:07 AM (1/1)

YAWN. Now where are the missing .biz names????? - elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 5:16 AM (0/0)

Correction, not "fat cronies", but "corrupt cronies" --- elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)

Cast your mind back to the .info launch. I still think it was highly suspicious. — spot, November 25, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (1/3)

Simple.... — geodiego, November 26, 2001 @ 5:50 AM (1/2)

Yes, but — spot, November 26, 2001 @ 10:52 AM (1/1)

has anyone seen a .info registration through Cydian? — antipodes, November 26, 2001 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

Why is Neulevel taking so long to process G2 and G3??? — mole, November 25, 2001 @ 3:45 AM (1/2)

timescale? — richard_henderson, November 25, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/1)

No timescale so far. I think the registries are frightened to give any deadlines any more --- elom — mole, November 25, 2001 @ 1:59 PM (0/0)

.BIZ gets a big boost — Garry Anderson, November 25, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (2/13)

PR does not a valuable domain name make... — psbyowner, November 25, 2001 @ 4:45 PM (1/1)

It is not PR — Garry Anderson, November 25, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)

Yes, .biz grows on you over time. One day soon, it will be the definite badge for business firms — mole, November 25, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (3/10)

I have a couple of .biz generics and they aren't growing on me all the time. — spot, November 25, 2001 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)
one of your sillier posts mole - what are you smoking? eom — antipodes, November 25, 2001 @ 9:05 AM (2/6)

.BIZ = .FIZ dot biz is a joke to suffer the fate of .tv...EOM — psbyowner, November 25, 2001 @ 4:34 PM (2/4)

.biz is NOT .tv, .tv is Tuvali a sinking island, .biz is BUSINESS. Period. ---elom — mole, November 26, 2001 @ 2:53 AM (1/1)

.tv=Tuvalu, .bz=Belize & .biz=sleeze/hardsell/business [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 29, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)

I use to think that too....but I now think there is some room for .biz — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 26, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (1/1)

Biker.biz & Bikers.biz sound kinda cute... — InternetAdvocate, November 29, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Marlboro. "Imagination is better than knowledge" - Albert Einstein -- elom — mole, November 25, 2001 @ 10:14 AM (0/0)

what are you smoking Mole - I want some - eom — antipodes, November 25, 2001 @ 8:59 AM (1/1)

No more smoking after all this .info and .biz fiasco ends! --elom — mole, November 25, 2001 @ 2:01 PM (0/0)

Did anyone else lose their credit around the end of October, beginning of November? — sfeibish, November 24, 2001 @ 8:53 PM (1/1)

Find a new bank/Creditcard company (EOM) — Anion, November 24, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)

Domain Name: SHIT.INFO Trademark Name: Shit Lover ... figures ..wwhahahahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa — mole, November 24, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)

BullShit.info — mole, November 24, 2001 @ 4:10 PM (0/0)

Something VERY fishy with challenged INFO names — peeved, November 23, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (4/15)

I posted the same about retirement.info last Wednesday... — arbitrage, November 24, 2001 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)
Hey, does this mean if I use the WIPO challenge now without having a trademark, I can get a name?--> — mole, November 24, 2001 @ 1:24 AM (2/11)

Both of these Names have been Challenged by subsequent challengers ... — DaveKing2, November 24, 2001 @ 2:04 AM (2/8)

That doesn't change a thing — peeved, November 24, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (3/6)

Lack of Planning — Garry Anderson, November 24, 2001 @ 11:13 AM (0/0)
Yes ... — DaveKing2, November 24, 2001 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)
No, many challenged domains are re-registered with TM's — arbitrage, November 24, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (1/3)

Some of them are just plain stupid! — DaveKing2, November 24, 2001 @ 4:17 AM (1/2)

No more stupid than the Sunrise fraudsters — arbitrage, November 24, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)

lower profile names will go unnoticed — Anion, November 24, 2001 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)

Thanks for clarifying, Dave -- elom — mole, November 24, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

I think they must be doing this on purpose — peeved, November 24, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (1/1)

Damned right- it's all part of the same BULLSHIT culture- more uncertainty=more profit (CORRUPTION) — spot, November 25, 2001 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)

Looks like corruption - please state source — Garry Anderson, November 24, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)
Afilias is incompotent — Anion, November 24, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)

.biz pending names, wait wait wait ............. hurry up Neulevel! -- elom — mole, November 23, 2001 @ 1:48 PM (0/0)

A Question Seeking an Intelligent Answer — 410, November 23, 2001 @ 11:40 AM (2/3)

Relax: Only 2 Topics about New.net in the last 4 days... — EasyTech, November 23, 2001 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)
What makes you think — Spock, November 23, 2001 @ 12:13 AM (1/1)

Shees abeit to bleuow!... — psbyowner, November 23, 2001 @ 5:54 PM (0/0)

"Proof Of Concept" — Proof Of Concept, November 23, 2001 @ 6:04 AM (1/3)

LoL — EasyTech, November 23, 2001 @ 9:37 AM (2/2)

Ignore the Proof-of-Concept status ... — InternetAdvocate, November 26, 2001 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)
WARNING... — InternetAdvocate, November 26, 2001 @ 2:30 AM (0/0)

To explain all the New.net posts...Wouldn't you want supporters if you bought a lot of these domains — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 23, 2001 @ 2:48 AM (2/2)

new.net = naming centric internet — Anion, November 23, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)
I have to say it again... — EasyTech, November 23, 2001 @ 9:36 AM (0/0)

Microsoft and New.net — spot, November 22, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (2/2)

Because they team up with RealNames (and xtns) LoL) eom — EasyTech, November 23, 2001 @ 9:29 AM (0/0)
Because Microsoft and ICANN have an agreement.. — Slicer, November 23, 2001 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)

new.net approaches an audeince of 75 million (eom) — Anion, November 22, 2001 @ 7:09 PM (2/17)

What does that 75million mean anyways??? — peeved, November 22, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)
The problem — cambler, November 22, 2001 @ 9:18 PM (3/15)

yes and no — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)
new.net is waiting for the accessability to increase — Anion, November 22, 2001 @ 10:05 PM (3/12)

God No, Don't Team Up With New.net... — GettingScrewed, November 24, 2001 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)
.KIDS didn't wait for eternity — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (1/3)

Working with new.net will empower IOD — Anion, November 22, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (1/2)

IOD Should Stay Away From New.net — GettingScrewed, November 24, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/1)

Are you blind? — EasyTech, November 25, 2001 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)

number increases? — cambler, November 22, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (2/6)

Economics Interactive Tutorial: Elasticity — Jim Fleming, November 22, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (1/1)

WRONG!!! — spot, November 23, 2001 @ 7:05 PM (0/0)

75 million is just the tip of the iceberg — Anion, November 22, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (1/3)

What kind of consumer are you Anion??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 23, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (2/2)

Sure — Anion, November 23, 2001 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
Ask yourself the same questions Gregory as NameSlinger and IOD customer! — EasyTech, November 23, 2001 @ 9:24 AM (0/0)

.BIZ is $5.30 per year for Registry #2 — Jim Fleming, November 22, 2001 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)

New York's MTA using .info domain — dtobias, November 22, 2001 @ 4:35 PM (4/12)

great news...I have some confidence in .info EOM — psbyowner, November 23, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
Not So Fast....COM Still Dominates...take a look where MTAINFO.COM goes... — Ron_Bennett, November 23, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (3/3)

Non-Sequitirs — dtobias, November 23, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)
mta.com, mtainfo.com — dtobias, November 23, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)
Sure it will take time — EasyTech, November 23, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (0/0)

Others too.. — challenge, November 22, 2001 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)
Awesome! Dot info is a very strong brand...(with the right domain) EOM — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 22, 2001 @ 4:51 PM (3/5)

TLD ranking from a TLD expert (not me) — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)
That's seldon: we have the same opinion... — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)
Good news! — onmove, November 22, 2001 @ 5:38 PM (1/2)

It will take time — Anion, November 22, 2001 @ 6:16 PM (1/1)

Maybe.. — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)

Any word on when or how Afilias' challenged domains will get back into the general pool?? EOM — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 22, 2001 @ 3:52 AM (2/2)

challenged names. — onmove, November 22, 2001 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)
At some point .INFO will progress beyond the Proof-of-Concept — Jim Fleming, November 22, 2001 @ 4:56 AM (0/0)

Anyone find any gems in .biz??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 22, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (1/4)

Don't forget -e.BIZ Names — Jim Fleming, November 22, 2001 @ 3:38 AM (1/3)

I think they already have been forgotten Jim......My biz is viewable by everyone (for the most part) — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 22, 2001 @ 3:50 AM (2/2)

False information again: Jimmiboy hasn't any alt dot biz names... — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 11:03 AM (0/0)
There is only one .BIZ name space... — Jim Fleming, November 22, 2001 @ 4:54 AM (0/0)

.aero draft posted for approval in 7 days — ehasbrouck, November 21, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)

What does "proof of concept" really mean? — anion, November 21, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (2/3)

http://www.dot-biz.com/Registry/Proof-Of-Concept — Jim Fleming, November 22, 2001 @ 2:41 AM (0/0)
It's 'spin'. It lets ICANN sit on the fence for years, keeping themselves in jobs and in control-eom — spot , November 21, 2001 @ 11:42 PM (1/1)

Proof-of-Concept EXPLAINED... — InternetAdvocate, November 26, 2001 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)

Is There Any Way To Make Formal Complaints About Registrars ... — GettingScrewed, November 21, 2001 @ 8:16 PM (4/13)

Registrars — Elvis, November 22, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)
This is the way society is moving. You watch it carefully, the limits will be very noticable — spot, November 21, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (2/9)

from what country are you posting spot? I live in Australia — antipodes, November 22, 2001 @ 7:10 AM (2/4)

I'm posting from the UK — spot, November 22, 2001 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)
Isn't it Mother England? — Monty Cello, November 22, 2001 @ 7:49 AM (1/2)

Clarification... — Monty Cello, November 22, 2001 @ 7:52 AM (1/1)

Deregulation & Privatization — InternetAdvocate, November 26, 2001 @ 2:23 AM (0/0)

Are you trying to imply that this is not free choice in its purest form? — Monty Cello, November 22, 2001 @ 7:10 AM (1/3)

Monty - your IQ drops 20 points when you wear your cap — antipodes, November 22, 2001 @ 7:19 AM (1/2)

I hadn't really thought about it before, but I suppose — Monty Cello, November 22, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (1/1)

the image you describe makes me shivver - don't imagine it — antipodes, November 22, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)

I suppose you must have....... — onmove, November 21, 2001 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)
ICANN doesn't care — Anion, November 21, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

.BIZ Open Forum Now Available — Jim Fleming, November 21, 2001 @ 8:46 AM (0/0)

.INFO Sunrise Scam II - Domain TM Laundering — arbitrage, November 21, 2001 @ 3:03 AM (2/6)

Don't Worry ... — DaveKing2, November 24, 2001 @ 2:10 AM (1/2)

And if they aren't challenged by Afilias? — arbitrage, November 24, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (1/1)

Trust Afilias, ICANN or WIPO? — Garry Anderson, November 25, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

By those more devious than owners of 'science.info' — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (1/2)

Have they changed their story now? — spot, November 21, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (1/1)

Excuses — Garry Anderson, November 22, 2001 @ 1:36 PM (0/0)

ICANN's Lynn: No new domains anytime soon — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (4/24)

Darwinian Natural Selection — psbyowner, November 23, 2001 @ 6:32 PM (1/3)

Memorability matters most — Garry Anderson, November 23, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/2)

It depends on the situation — psbyowner, November 24, 2001 @ 6:45 PM (1/1)

Wrong comparison — Garry Anderson, November 25, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

this should help new.net — Anion, November 21, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)

New.net Is A Joke ... Funny Haha — GettingScrewed, November 22, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

Wall Street TLD trend analysis — RayF, November 21, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (1/2)

300,000 decline in com/net/org — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 7:13 PM (1/1)

finite population — RayF, November 21, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

Good-We don't need more domains — psbyowner, November 21, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (5/14)

If IOD wasn't running .web, think ICANN would have approved — vera-city, November 21, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (1/1)

In my opinion... — Garry Anderson, November 22, 2001 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)

For my fiscal self interest - I agree. However... — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)
Good - we don't need more burger joints — cambler, November 21, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (3/5)

True ... — GettingScrewed, November 22, 2001 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)
It's not the same and you know it.. — challenge, November 21, 2001 @ 8:14 PM (2/2)

Expanding your analogy — Garry Anderson, November 22, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
Sorry — cambler, November 21, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)

Demand should not prohibit new competition — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)

Sounds logical. — onmove, November 21, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (2/2)

Market awareness — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)
Detrimental? — cambler, November 21, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)

hell, we hardly need the internet ! — stuart, November 21, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (1/1)

What no Internet! - what will I do with myself..... ;-) — Garry Anderson, November 21, 2001 @ 7:35 PM (0/0)

To chrismoran -- the 3 emails from Neulevel.biz — mole, November 20, 2001 @ 4:32 PM (1/6)

Neulevel emails — chrismoran, November 20, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (2/5)

Thanks chris, I understand now that you receive those 3 emails if you have an IP claim only --eom — mole, November 22, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)
Many .biz domains showing up with "Registry Registrar" contact details... — arbitrage, November 21, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (2/3)

Anyone care to guess? — Elvis, November 21, 2001 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)
Mine name began with A too, eom — chrismoran, November 21, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)

Registry Registrar names now 'Pending'. Eggs hatching soon? — mole, November 22, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

Interesting article on new.net and ICANN — Anion, November 20, 2001 @ 4:05 PM (1/10)

Yeah, that's something for the uninformed — EasyTech, November 20, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (3/9)

New.net Is A Joke ...<--facts please Are you a joke? — EasyTech, November 24, 2001 @ 11:01 AM (0/0)
New.net Is A Joke, Funny Haha — GettingScrewed, November 21, 2001 @ 2:29 PM (1/1)

New.net Is A Joke ...<--facts please Are you a joke? — EasyTech, November 24, 2001 @ 11:02 AM (0/0)

A spade is a spade any way you look at it: New.net IS running on a "alternate system" EOM — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 21, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (1/5)

IOD is running on nothing eom — EasyTech, November 21, 2001 @ 11:35 AM (1/4)

Unsubstantiated. . . — 410, November 21, 2001 @ 3:34 PM (1/3)

explanation — EasyTech, November 21, 2001 @ 7:51 PM (1/2)

New.net Is A Joke ... — GettingScrewed, November 22, 2001 @ 1:13 PM (1/1)

New.net Is A Joke ...<--facts please Are you a joke? — EasyTech, November 22, 2001 @ 10:30 PM (0/0)

.BIZ Update — Jim Fleming, November 19, 2001 @ 6:41 PM (1/1)

You are very sick Jim - eom - . — andrew24, November 19, 2001 @ 7:17 PM (0/0)

Time taken to terminate stolen .info names puts deposits at risk — sfeibish, November 19, 2001 @ 4:48 PM (2/2)

What are the other fallouts? eom — vera-city, November 20, 2001 @ 5:21 AM (0/0)
Has any one received refund of deposit from Catalog.com and Register.com — onmove, November 19, 2001 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)

Today's the 19th. Anyone got any names yet? Please share .info, thanks! — mole, November 19, 2001 @ 2:35 PM (1/7)

Received an email this morning — chrismoran, November 19, 2001 @ 4:07 PM (1/6)

I got 7 out of 10 of my group 3 names on Friday. This STOP thingy seems fishy ---> — mole, November 19, 2001 @ 4:19 PM (1/5)

email was from Neulevel and there was no URL link, eom — chrismoran, November 19, 2001 @ 4:27 PM (1/4)

Figures, if its from Neulevel, it ia a way of saying, read our rules.. — mole, November 19, 2001 @ 5:36 PM (1/3)

I think the time is nearing for release.... — mole, November 19, 2001 @ 5:37 PM (1/2)

none of my group 3 names has resolved yet — housecat, November 19, 2001 @ 5:49 PM (1/1)

I use Melbourneit, seems like they have a handle on the .biz side of things — mole, November 20, 2001 @ 3:14 AM (0/0)

Does anyone know where the .biz "STOP" website is ? eom — chrismoran, November 19, 2001 @ 2:04 PM (1/1)

Here, but what the in the world would anyone want to stop .biz? ----> — mole, November 19, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)

"Spectral Web, Inc.'s Comments Regarding Image Online Design, Inc." — Spectral Web, Inc., November 18, 2001 @ 9:49 PM (0/0)

ICANN are infringing on World Golf Championship Trademark! — DaveKing2, November 18, 2001 @ 6:41 AM (1/1)

Must say, the WGC logo looks much better, more dynamic looking organization --elom — mole, November 18, 2001 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)

what does EOM mean? — Anion, November 17, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (3/3)

It's a substandard replacement for this :) — Slicer, November 20, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (0/0)
It saves you clicking on the message, if there's nothing more to it.-eom — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (0/0)
End of Message. EOM — onmove, November 17, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

Verisign Still Sucks, Can't Even Perform With URL Forwarding ... — GettingScrewed, November 17, 2001 @ 7:42 PM (1/1)

If they were on the ball, it would only take a second. Looks as though it's not automated -eom — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 10:48 PM (0/0)

Check out the new .biz whois for ip claims ... whahahhahaha--> — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 4:16 PM (0/0)

Please tell me, what is September 2002 about — Garry Anderson, November 17, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (0/0)

Harrypotter.movie, now playing at New.net --- elom — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (1/3)

I am sure Movie Companies will enjoy free publicity — Garry Anderson, November 17, 2001 @ 3:36 PM (1/2)

They make me sick. The endless greed and selfishness know no limits-now stealing children's dreams — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 3:57 PM (1/1)

Corporate Greed — Garry Anderson, November 18, 2001 @ 11:33 AM (0/0)

Afilias announces new mark up language TML — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 10:07 AM (1/2)

see if this works — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 10:30 AM (1/1)

Nope - it fails with the following errors: — ICANN Moderator, November 20, 2001 @ 10:54 AM (0/0)

Isn't neulevel supposed to be releasing the group 2 results today, or has that been delayed? — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 7:00 AM (2/4)

.biz names are being released NOW for Group 3 at least -- elom — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (2/2)

how do you know group 3 names are being released now? — housecat, November 18, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
Come on come on... 7 out of 10 ... come to momma you 3 babies --- elom — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

It says 19th of this month on the Neulevel site. Today's the 17th -- elom — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (0/0)

Let the SCAMS begin..... — peeved, November 17, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/1)

Yeah, I received one as well. They WISH their 2 bit .info.com subdomains had any value. — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 6:58 AM (0/0)

Why draft ".aero" agreement should NOT be approved — ehasbrouck, November 16, 2001 @ 11:23 PM (0/0)

interesting article regarding ICANN — Anion, November 16, 2001 @ 10:30 PM (1/3)

ICANN has well exceeded its narrow technical mandate — Garry Anderson, November 17, 2001 @ 10:02 AM (1/2)

Restricted tlds for TMs — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 10:21 AM (1/1)

Passing Off as TM — Garry Anderson, November 17, 2001 @ 11:11 AM (0/0)

The true state of e-commerce (excerpt from an IW article) — challenge, November 16, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (0/0)

Why .biz ? A view into the end of the beginning of the Internet ------ — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 3:20 AM (0/0)

Destroy microsoft monopoly — Elvis, November 16, 2001 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)

Freedom for the internet. Stop microsoft control. — Elvis, November 16, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)

Stop microsoft — Elvis, November 16, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

Microsoft suck — Elvis, November 16, 2001 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)

.biz will follow .net into nowhereland — Anion, November 15, 2001 @ 6:18 PM (1/21)

You're Right, And ... — GettingScrewed, November 15, 2001 @ 7:29 PM (2/20)

I think .biz will match the impact of .tv and that GettingScrewed — antipodes, November 16, 2001 @ 6:38 AM (1/18)

.biz the bastard son of .com... — psbyowner, November 16, 2001 @ 6:37 PM (3/17)

.info is better than .org. .org is an arse if you're running a business. .info is very versatile — spot, November 16, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (1/1)

.uk domains more popular than .com among UK companies? — hiltonian, November 20, 2001 @ 9:21 AM (0/0)

It's almost a zero-sum game, what others win .COM loses.... — challenge, November 16, 2001 @ 7:29 PM (1/1)

you got it - position, position, position, traffic, traffic, traffic — antipodes, November 17, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)

.biz the bastard son of speculators who know two hoots about professional business -- eom — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 6:40 PM (2/12)

Mole Wouldn't Know About Business ... — GettingScrewed, November 16, 2001 @ 9:05 PM (1/1)

Mind your .biz, Greg ...grrrr — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)

Mole-you obviously work for a government agency... — psbyowner, November 16, 2001 @ 6:58 PM (1/9)

My only interest in domains is to develop them. My only interest in .gov is USPTO --eom — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (1/8)

cool good luck: more development the better eom — psbyowner, November 16, 2001 @ 8:19 PM (1/7)

Drill drill .... hammer hammer.... knock knock.... saw saw....biz biz ...thanks psb! — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 8:31 PM (1/6)

hee hee elom..oops i mean emo — psbyowner, November 16, 2001 @ 11:19 PM (1/5)

What is all this elom malarky? — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 7:05 AM (1/4)

No, elom is mole in reverse duh -- elom — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 8:09 AM (2/3)

groovy...eom — psbyowner, November 17, 2001 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)
Oh, I see - Tops! — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 9:42 AM (1/1)

Foow! — mole, November 17, 2001 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

Most speculators forget there is a highly lucrative b2b market out there -- elom — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)

Generic .info names starting to generate limited traffic... — psbyowner, November 15, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (2/6)

Domain name value — dtobias, November 16, 2001 @ 3:22 PM (1/1)

This I understand.... — psbyowner, November 16, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

Yes I noticed it too — Elvis, November 15, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (1/3)

Most speculators forget there is a highly lucrative b2b market out there -- elom — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (1/2)

Please explain... — psbyowner, November 16, 2001 @ 6:32 PM (1/1)

I'm in the b2b world, but I think I'll let Trouthead explain... — mole, November 16, 2001 @ 7:28 PM (0/0)

Do you want 100% visibility for your .pro domain? — EasyTech, November 15, 2001 @ 1:58 PM (2/3)

Root support — EasyTech, November 15, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (1/1)

Thank you for that one, Jim Fleming — spot, November 15, 2001 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)

nic.PRO — EasyTech, November 15, 2001 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)

ICANN and its registrars needs a consumer watchdog — mole, November 15, 2001 @ 1:08 PM (1/6)

Well, never mind. At least we have food on the table and rooves over our heads. — spot, November 15, 2001 @ 2:28 PM (1/5)

hoofs all over our head, you mean --- elom — mole, November 15, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (1/4)

Is eating.info for sale? — pi, November 15, 2001 @ 3:43 PM (1/3)

why? are you hungry? -- elom — mole, November 15, 2001 @ 3:44 PM (1/2)

No, just exercising.info my rights, James... — pi, November 15, 2001 @ 4:09 PM (1/1)

Just call me Bond, I don't care -- elom — mole, November 15, 2001 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)

It looks like bogus TM .info registrations are getting approved — Elvis, November 15, 2001 @ 10:41 AM (2/4)

Elvis, which ones are you aware of? eom — antipodes, November 15, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/1)

Check these out — Elvis, November 15, 2001 @ 6:46 PM (0/0)

GRRRRR!!! Afilias and Registrars are as useful as a chocolate teapot. — Elvis, November 15, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (1/1)

You think you've got problems??? Netsol still hasn't done anything to get my name back! idiots!! — mole, November 15, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)

Problem, Jim? — spot, November 15, 2001 @ 8:52 AM (1/2)

ATTENTION: ICANN LEGAL STAFF — InternetAdvocate, November 15, 2001 @ 4:14 AM (2/5)

ADDENDUM — InternetAdvocate, November 15, 2001 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)

The longer Rudolph posts drivel as ICANN Moderator, the longer yall get a break from NIC_INFO's spam — InternetAdvocate, November 15, 2001 @ 3:44 AM (0/0)

New.net: Circular Reasoning 101 — Gregory W Krajewski, November 14, 2001 @ 7:23 PM (2/2)

. — EasyTech, November 15, 2001 @ 8:28 AM (0/0)
misunderstanding — Anion, November 14, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)

YESNIC and 1st domain.net - will ICANN condone their behaviour — Anion, November 14, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

Is ICANN really a "public benefit" corporation? — Anion, November 14, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (1/7)

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha haaaaaa! It must be a "means-tested benefit"! — ICANN Moderator, November 14, 2001 @ 1:18 AM (1/6)

muahahahahahahahahahahahaahahhahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (1/5)

infectious? - nausiating! eom — antipodes, November 14, 2001 @ 6:27 AM (1/4)

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah. I always — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 1:06 AM (1/3)

http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/icann/mdr2001/archive/pres/hernand.html — EasyTech, November 13, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (2/31)

At This Point, New.net Is Screwing Themselves, And Their Customers — GettingScrewed, November 14, 2001 @ 1:05 PM (4/22)

New.net is worthless crap: nothing from nothing means nothing — psbyowner, November 15, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (1/3)

Nothing from nothing means nothing? — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (1/2)

Screw you. — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)
Typical, you ignorant... — EasyTech, November 14, 2001 @ 2:53 PM (3/10)

U D Man! I B ignoorantee por chure. Yeeeee Haaaaaw! Now gimme a — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (1/2)
Well, What Do We Have Here? Ah Yes, The New.net Groupies ... — GettingScrewed, November 14, 2001 @ 3:37 PM (2/4)

What's the truth? — EasyTech, November 14, 2001 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
muahahhahahaha... the sex.biz and sex.info groupies are here.... — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 4:07 PM (1/2)

When Pets.com Went Bankrupt ... — GettingScrewed, November 14, 2001 @ 4:23 PM (1/1)

p--e--t--s.com was probably the only domain available to you to register, point made ---eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 4:36 PM (0/0)

psst.... GettingScrewed is izopod, Easy. ips and grammatical style check --eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 3:31 PM (1/1)

Thanks moley — EasyTech, November 14, 2001 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)

A good example of shallow, retro thinking -- eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (1/3)

We have reason to believe that Mole is actually.. — pi, November 14, 2001 @ 7:18 PM (2/2)

Pardon? -- elom — mole, November 15, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
If you had done your homework, you would know this not to be the case - eom — spot, November 14, 2001 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)

Hi Gregory, New.net grows faster than the USG root! :-P — EasyTech, November 13, 2001 @ 10:14 PM (2/7)

new.net's prolific growth is impressive — Anion, November 14, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (1/4)

Don't forget new.net has A LOT of enemies. — spot, November 14, 2001 @ 6:39 AM (1/3)

What about .info and .biz names? I see mounting interest already. Deal with it --eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 7:20 AM (1/2)

Yes, interest appears to be rapidly increasing in these, but I think most new.net advocates' problem — spot, November 14, 2001 @ 8:58 AM (1/1)

Woof! This is New.Net. This is the New.internet. Would you rather settle for ICANN.museum?--eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 1:25 PM (0/0)

You can't compare New.net and the USG root....It's stupid to try... — Gregory W Krajewski, November 13, 2001 @ 11:14 PM (1/1)

Yeah, don't compare New.Net to .ca and .fm and .tj and .ws. and .tv and..... — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 5:53 AM (0/0)

Anyone have a clue when the frozen .biz names will be released? -- eom — mole, November 13, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (2/3)

&gt — spot, November 17, 2001 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)
no idea how long this will take - but the wait will be worth it — housecat, November 13, 2001 @ 7:59 PM (1/1)

Yea, I've already got interest on 2 of my .biz names, but my names are not for sale ---eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 5:43 AM (0/0)

Is "dan minc" a member of this forum? — ICANN Moderator, November 13, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (1/6)

what's the matter Jim -did he beat you to it? eom — antipodes, November 13, 2001 @ 7:09 AM (1/5)

I'm no Jim, sonny! — ICANN Moderator, November 13, 2001 @ 11:50 AM (1/4)

yes, we have some turkeys at this forum, but I doubt even — antipodes, November 13, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (1/3)

Plumbing — ICANN Moderator, November 14, 2001 @ 1:33 AM (1/2)

Plumbing for dollars — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 1:15 AM (1/1)

Problem, Mike? — ICANN Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 6:06 AM (0/0)

The Fox is Guarding the Henhouse Don't Expect Any Eggs — icanncant, November 12, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (2/3)

Many regulatory bodies often recruit from the industry — vera-city, November 13, 2001 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)
Thanks for an excellent post... maybe the Farmer is about to get a wake up call — richard_henderson, November 13, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)

RICO? — vera-city, November 15, 2001 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)

muahahahahhahaha...Kendal Dawson returns ... The ICANN Movie Part 3 — mole, November 12, 2001 @ 11:16 AM (4/7)

HERE IS THE LINK to that ICANN MOVIE ... — InternetAdvocate, November 13, 2001 @ 3:25 AM (1/3)

hmmm... is the InternetAdvocate Kendal Dawson ? -- eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (1/2)

Don't Know Dat! But I be Intemet Advocate mocking Internet Advocate — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 1:19 AM (1/1)

Problem, Mike? — ICANN Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 6:10 AM (0/0)

On the money funny. eom — vera-city, November 13, 2001 @ 2:48 AM (0/0)
Now THAT'S good satire! (eom) — richard_henderson, November 12, 2001 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)
Very good. Very funny and apt. Especially the sketch about the Sunrise scam artists. eom — spot, November 12, 2001 @ 3:04 PM (0/0)

I did win! — George Bush, November 12, 2001 @ 4:51 AM (2/19)

Bush REALLY DID win. Dimple chads are abstentions, not votes. — InternetAdvocate, November 13, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

TYPO correction... — InternetAdvocate, November 13, 2001 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)

voter error elects GW Bush and John Howard — antipodes, November 12, 2001 @ 6:15 AM (2/16)

Voter error let Gore get close to winning. — InternetAdvocate, November 13, 2001 @ 12:42 AM (2/14)

IA - if you had hadn't flunked grade school, you wouldn't — antipodes, November 13, 2001 @ 7:01 AM (2/3)

Antipodes flunked grade school, then lashes out at geniuses. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, November 14, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)
Masters doesn't mean much these days. — spot, November 13, 2001 @ 8:22 AM (1/1)

Means more than flunking out of grad school, as Gore sure did. LOL — InternetAdvocate, November 14, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

IA - it's brains like yours that have made America what it — antipodes, November 13, 2001 @ 6:39 AM (2/9)

Thanks for the complement. America needs more geniuses like me — InternetAdvocate, November 14, 2001 @ 12:26 AM (1/1)

Yes, and thank you too.. the world needs us --- eom — mole, November 14, 2001 @ 4:39 PM (0/0)

Awww! Geez, kinda no fair — IntemetAdvocate, November 13, 2001 @ 8:15 AM (1/6)

Rudolph Rednosed hairbrained donkey calls self InteMet Advocate to trick y'all into thinking he's me — InternetAdvocate, November 14, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (1/5)

Rudolph ICANN moderator is really MuddieratorAss & MuddiestAssToo. — InternetAdvocate, November 14, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (1/4)

Blow yourself. — ICANN_Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (1/3)

GROW UP!!! — InternetAdvocate, November 15, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (1/2)

Problem, Mike? Got a blowing obsession? Does it come with the self-mutilation? — ICANN Moderator, November 15, 2001 @ 6:15 AM (1/1)

I'm sorry. I forgot that my head was up my asshole when i started thinking and writing. — lCANN_Moderator, November 16, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)

that was last time - This time I won by appealing to the fears of the dumbass voters! — John Howard, November 12, 2001 @ 6:52 AM (0/0)

Neulevel's .BIZ Not Exciting Speculators, That's For Sure — GettingScrewed, November 11, 2001 @ 7:59 PM (3/3)

Why do you think that Afternic doesn't have a section for .biz? — mole, November 12, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
hmmmm......!!!! — challenge, November 11, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
.EU is supposed to be on its way. I'm not sure how that will be classified. It's not quite a gtld, — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 8:09 PM (0/0)

3M Failed Reverse Domain Hijack: Defendent shown not to have used and therefore misused name — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 3:26 PM (2/4)

This presents an interesting development. — spot, November 12, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)
good, informative post. A question? — onmove, November 11, 2001 @ 5:55 PM (1/2)

I have wondered about this myself before, after all lawyers seem to do little more than present — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 8:00 PM (1/1)

That depends where you are or chose to conduct your action. — ICANN Moderator, November 12, 2001 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)

Smirp! — James Fleming, November 11, 2001 @ 1:12 PM (1/1)

This type of post only sends out one message — Garry Anderson, November 11, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)

Bitch Bitch Moan Moan, Moan Moan Bitch Bitch — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (2/18)

Hey, I'm starting to like this guy! — Slicer, November 11, 2001 @ 6:24 AM (1/3)

Huh????? — mole, November 11, 2001 @ 6:58 AM (1/2)

Au contraire, mon ami — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 8:51 AM (1/1)

Dang! — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)

scam scam cheat cheat, cheat cheat scam scam — rachelmacgregor, November 11, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (1/13)

Money Money Money Money — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (3/12)

Look, I am NOT Jim Flemming GODDAMIT — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 3:30 AM (0/0)
Why don't you take some of that and WIPO those fraudsters, bring lots of cash -- eom — mole, November 11, 2001 @ 3:11 AM (0/0)
At the end of your pathetic life, you will look back on a substanceless waste of time. — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (2/9)

Oh wait ... — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 3:03 AM (1/3)

Sorry, man. I feel bad now. — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (1/2)

That's OK I forgive you — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 3:12 AM (1/1)

Been drinking again, Jim? -- eom — mole, November 11, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (0/0)

Amen to that, spot. — ICANN Moderator, November 11, 2001 @ 2:43 AM (1/4)

You should know Better! — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 3:07 AM (2/3)

Jim, is that you? -- eom — mole, November 11, 2001 @ 3:12 AM (0/0)
OK, which one of you is Jim Fleming? — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 3:11 AM (1/1)

OK YOU GOT ME!!! — EricMoodie, November 11, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (0/0)

Response to new.net thread - tired of waiting — Anion, November 10, 2001 @ 11:33 PM (2/2)

What are you waiting for??? — Gregory W Krajewski, November 11, 2001 @ 3:42 AM (0/0)
The problem is both new.net and icann are opposite extremes, and balance is required. — spot, November 11, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)

Govinda Leopold : get your arse off those domains! — rachelmacgregor, November 10, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/1)

a call for ICANN to break its rules and announce inside its — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

Joker.com — onmove, November 10, 2001 @ 8:01 PM (3/3)

I find Joker to be OK but look out for UKReg.com — Elvis, November 14, 2001 @ 9:44 AM (0/0)
DomainDiscover ripoff ... — InternetAdvocate, November 10, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
Jokers alright... — rachelmacgregor, November 10, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)

Honest Question: How many open TLDs do we need??? — Gregory W Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 4:35 PM (4/14)

What is important — Garry Anderson, November 11, 2001 @ 11:02 AM (1/1)

Comment.... — Gregory W Krajewski, November 11, 2001 @ 7:07 PM (0/0)

Funny how you came around! — challenge, November 10, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)
Whomever Controls The Three General Purpose TLDs, Will Have Potential ... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 5:36 PM (2/8)

Quibble and Bits — InternetAdvocate, November 10, 2001 @ 11:42 PM (1/2)

MountRushmore.info will provide the consumer exactly what they expected... — Gregory W Krajewski, November 11, 2001 @ 3:35 AM (1/1)

What's the consensus on MountRushmore.us? — vera-city, November 11, 2001 @ 5:28 AM (0/0)

Wanna.bet? MountRushmore.travel--- case dismissed. — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (3/4)

MountRushmore.info is better than MountRushmore.travel ... — InternetAdvocate, November 10, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)
Hey Mole ... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (1/1)

I've got more .info and .biz domains that the hair on your arse, YOU grow up -- eom — mole, November 11, 2001 @ 2:58 AM (0/0)

Yeah, You Keep Dreamin'... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)

Welcome to the "It Grows On You" club, Greg. I hated dotbiz, then one day I work up .... — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 4:47 PM (1/1)

The TLDs that indicate sense and relevance in a senseless TLD world -- eom — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 4:50 PM (0/0)

Cyber Squat — Dusseldorf_Dude, November 10, 2001 @ 3:32 PM (4/6)

Isn't that what they wanted you to think? — Garry Anderson, November 11, 2001 @ 10:41 AM (0/0)
I wouldn't satart crying yet. You'll only need 1 good generic to cover your costs, and Afilias... — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (1/1)

That would be like confessing infidelity to a hooker. eom — vera-city, November 13, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)

If It Makes You Feel Any Better ... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 7:46 PM (0/0)
Yes, you are a extremely naughty boy ! ... but Dusseldorf has great Altz (beer) ---eom — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (1/1)

Ja, I feel like drowning myself in it right as I speak! — Dusseldorf_Dude, November 10, 2001 @ 3:44 PM (0/0)

Don't judge a book by its cover... — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 2:20 PM (1/3)

Mole....America prides itself on it's customer service.....but... — Gregory W Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 4:01 PM (1/2)

Customer service in the UK — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 7:37 PM (1/1)

Call centres — ICANN Moderator, November 11, 2001 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)

How dare Afilias sell these domain names for a THIRD time? — richard_henderson, November 10, 2001 @ 11:29 AM (2/7)

How will Afilias deal with challenged names? — DomeBase, November 10, 2001 @ 4:16 PM (1/3)

One more option — challenge, November 10, 2001 @ 8:52 PM (1/2)

1 ticket per person? What if I come in for the same name as many persons? -- eom — mole, November 11, 2001 @ 2:44 AM (1/1)

Sure you can — challenge, November 11, 2001 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)

Also, how dare Afilias sell its own reserved net.info to the public at Greatdomains.com for $99,000? — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (1/2)

I take that back. Someone has to pay for the TV commercial airtime --eom — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 12:26 AM (1/1)

The landrushers have already paid for it. And those bogus TM squatters whose domains will be resold. — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)

Victory to gullibility and mediocracy! (Bad luck, Antipodes!) — ICANN Moderator, November 10, 2001 @ 11:18 AM (2/7)

OK - Little Dick (1960s man) John Howard gets a third term - I — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (1/1)

That dirty fink... — ICANN Moderator, November 11, 2001 @ 2:33 AM (0/0)

There is only 1% of undestroyed Australia left??? What happened? — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 11:25 AM (1/4)

You mean "why didnt Johnnie's ilk get rid of the last 1%?" ? — ICANN Moderator, November 10, 2001 @ 1:25 PM (2/3)

your summed it up well - all say a prayer for Oz — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)
Of leaders and puppets — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 7:05 PM (1/1)

Usually (the successful ones at least!) — ICANN Moderator, November 11, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)

Direct Challenge to Joker.com — richard_henderson, November 10, 2001 @ 11:07 AM (1/2)

Will Joker.com please explain... and Afilias too... — richard_henderson, November 10, 2001 @ 11:15 AM (1/1)

It could be another part of the same bullshit- confusion strategy. Register hundreds of names for — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 7:01 PM (0/0)

Have you ever worked so hard for a "cause" only to realize everyone around you doesn't "see" it.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 6:19 AM (2/3)

I see what you're saying — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 7:47 PM (1/1)

Well Said! — Gregory W Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)

Know what you mean — Garry Anderson, November 10, 2001 @ 11:30 AM (0/0)

Afilias to challenge more than 10,000 names in December. — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 5:04 AM (3/6)

Roland La Plante selective challenge — Garry Anderson, November 10, 2001 @ 11:10 AM (0/0)
thanks for the link mole - good press for those of us planning — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 7:09 AM (0/0)
Yes, some very positive feedback on the desirability of .info as well. eom — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 5:55 AM (1/3)

Dot info will be a major player in less than a year... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 6:30 AM (1/2)

Greg, mountrushmore.info didn't resolve — sfeibish, November 10, 2001 @ 2:31 PM (1/1)

Sorry....forgot to tell you that it's not up yet.....I gave it as an example.. — Gregory W Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 4:06 PM (0/0)

Richard - your chronicle of Afilias Ltd. insider TM fraud — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (1/3)

They're all in it together - Afilias, ICANN, the DoC. CORRUPTION at its most blatent.. — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 1:49 AM (1/2)

Just hold on! ICANN will introduce Data Escrow! — Monty Cello, November 10, 2001 @ 2:00 AM (1/1)

Link for last post. — Monty Cello, November 10, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)

New.net is 2 yeasrs away from universiallity — Anion, November 10, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (3/10)

New.net ... Turning Out To Be A Joke .... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (2/6)

Thank your lucky stars that was a company called New.net, who had the guts to stand up to ICANN.. — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 4:06 PM (1/2)

You're Fooling Yourself ... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 6:05 PM (1/1)

I think .movie is a good thing for New.net customers... — SNAFU, November 10, 2001 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)

Everything is turning out to be a joke, including .com. The internet is changing very rapidly -- eom — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (1/2)

.INFO No Joke ... — GettingScrewed, November 10, 2001 @ 2:15 PM (1/1)

Yes. .info is a fantastic catch. So is .biz for b2b outfits -- eom — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)

Anion.....how? — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (1/1)

New.net will have to conquer whatever alone.....You need community support.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 10, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)

How do you arrive at that conclusion? ICANN don't seem to be losing their grip. — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)

Regland and Cydian - were we scammed as part of the corrupt — antipodes, November 9, 2001 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)

When your own Directors condemn you... — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/1)

Robert Connelly should be questioned by DOC — Garry Anderson, November 10, 2001 @ 10:43 AM (0/0)

Joker.com still recommended by Afilias...? — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (1/11)

Joker.com --- one of the best — IncompetentAfilias, November 10, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (2/10)

What Joker.com should do to prove their "honesty" — richard_henderson, November 10, 2001 @ 8:18 AM (1/4)

can't change anything unless there's a challenge — DaveKing2, November 10, 2001 @ 8:28 AM (1/3)

Why I still feel sceptical about many of Joker's 333 names (many great generics) — richard_henderson, November 10, 2001 @ 10:05 AM (1/2)

Common Sense — Garry Anderson, November 10, 2001 @ 10:35 AM (1/1)

Common Sense says these Generics probably have FAKE trademarks! Take a look... — richard_henderson, November 10, 2001 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)

I concur — DaveKing2, November 10, 2001 @ 2:00 AM (1/4)

More on Joker.com — IncompetentAfilias, November 10, 2001 @ 5:51 AM (1/3)

so, Joker charged nothing to preregister, but others like — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (1/2)

Yup — DaveKing2, November 10, 2001 @ 8:18 AM (1/1)

thanks Dave - from memory it was eNom with whom Freeregistration — antipodes, November 10, 2001 @ 10:57 AM (0/0)

Why were non-qualifying names "Registrar Reserved" by Afilias for their friends? — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 9:04 PM (1/4)

Afilias and ICANN are corrupt — Anion, November 9, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (1/3)

Agreed. Any ideas? — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)

US DOC do nothing — Garry Anderson, November 10, 2001 @ 10:26 AM (1/1)

Yes, I read your amusing chirp about the Dept of Chickens the other day! Cheep. Cheep :-) eom — spot, November 10, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)

Will YESNIC be banned, if WIPO reject their 261 Sunrise "Trademarks"? — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 8:51 PM (1/1)

Nah.... — Anion, November 9, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)

Will Wooho registrars lose their accreditation? — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

Rotten to the core — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (1/1)

How deep? — Garry Anderson, November 10, 2001 @ 10:18 AM (0/0)

Afilias responsible for more than half all known Sunrise frauds — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)

Afilias Director GOVINDA LEOPOLD continues to cybersquat on faked HAWAII.info — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

Will Globedom registrars lose their accreditation? — richard_henderson, November 9, 2001 @ 7:58 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen — hiltonian, November 9, 2001 @ 10:13 AM (2/3)

Did you know... — ICANN Moderator, November 9, 2001 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)
You mean Hal Lubsen who took $thousands to make fake applications for Lorenz? — rachelmacgregor, November 9, 2001 @ 10:49 AM (1/1)

Hal Lubsen is not the only Afilias director to be dishonest. GOVINDA LEOPOLD openly commits FRAUD — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)

Jim Fleming (The real one) has got his own discussion forum and it's EMPTY!!! — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)

I'm outa here! — James Fleming, November 9, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/1)

Good riddance? — InternetAdvocate, November 9, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

Snap Poll --- Who here is tired of Jim/James Fleming spamming his moneygrubbing schemes here? [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 8, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (2/4)

Me - Most of the time it's a pain, but sometimes it makes me roar with laughter at its madness — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
Click Configuration [at top of forum] to change your Settings to Block Fleming's Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 8, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (1/2)

I've done just that and it's absolutely great (highly recommended) — peeved, November 9, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (1/1)

Jim Fleming- Poof of concept, .jiz — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)

Ignore Proof-of-Concept status of .info & .biz TLD's, and pretend those are in Implementation Phase, — InternetAdvocate, November 8, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (1/3)

I think your "misunderstanding" what "Proof-of-Concept" means.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 9, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (2/2)

Rollout as Proof-of-Concept — Garry Anderson, November 9, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)
I was using Fleming's use of the term Proof-of-Concept ... — InternetAdvocate, November 9, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

I Like It When ... — GettingScrewed, November 8, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)

How long will domain names be used to organise the Internet? — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (4/9)

Dont forget the political lobby of the registrars... — psbyowner, November 9, 2001 @ 4:16 PM (0/0)
Between 2 and 7 years — Monty Cello, November 9, 2001 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)
Eh? your missing something — Garry Anderson, November 9, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (1/4)

Yes, I have considered these shortcomings. — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (2/3)

Keywords, TM/IP claims, and TLD's ... — InternetAdvocate, November 9, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
IMO Realnames = Realcrooks — Garry Anderson, November 9, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (1/1)

Does anyone here disagree? — ICANN Moderator, November 9, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (0/0)

A question to answer your question: How long have we had phone #'s???? — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 8, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (1/1)

Yeah, I think domains are here to stay. Also Realnames' keywords don't let you have emails. — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

Oh Jim, you have had a fair shake, but the time has come for — antipodes, November 8, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (1/1)

click Configuration [at top of forum] to change your Settings to Block Fleming's Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 8, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (0/0)

what happened to Regland and the Landrush preregistrations — antipodes, November 8, 2001 @ 8:25 PM (4/7)

Cydian think they did well! — Srana, November 9, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (1/1)

thanks Srana. I bought 6 Landrush prereges with CYDIAN — antipodes, November 9, 2001 @ 6:06 AM (0/0)

The Domainzoo/Regland Mystery! — Srana, November 9, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)
Regland went out of buisness ! — landofop, November 8, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (1/2)

that's what I had heard, but didn't another registrar take — antipodes, November 8, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (1/1)

7 info names submitted — landofop, November 9, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

.INFO is Moving Beyond the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)

.INFO TLD Server Search Results — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)

Does anyone know what the deal is with DomainBank? — fred48, November 8, 2001 @ 7:18 PM (2/6)

Incompetent technical support, but in their favor they have refunded charges for unsuccessful prereg — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (1/4)

Refunds are nice — fred48, November 8, 2001 @ 8:02 PM (1/3)

What Name Are You Looking For ? — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (1/2)

Don't you have any sense of decency? — fred48, November 8, 2001 @ 8:21 PM (1/1)

Where are the names? — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 8:25 PM (0/0)

.INFO Registry #1 is at http://www.name-space.com — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 7:27 PM (0/0)

there are (4) biz domain names for sale on ebay already — housecat, November 8, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (1/2)

http://www.dot-biz.com/ForSale/ — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 6:13 PM (1/1)

Go sell your CRAP elsewhere ----- why are you still on this Forum!! arg — IncompetentAfilias, November 8, 2001 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)

"ICANN represents that it has no authority to implement new TLDs" — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)

0:212 .BIZ TLD Cluster Update — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 4:10 PM (1/2)

.biz sucks and so does new.net and . web EOM — psbyowner, November 8, 2001 @ 4:40 PM (1/1)

Have you Sent a Proof-of-Concept Report ? — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

Annual .BIZ Bash ? — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 3:20 PM (2/8)

Is .WEB Throwing a Party in LA ? — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)
How about Annual .biz Bashing.... — psbyowner, November 8, 2001 @ 4:49 PM (2/6)

I agree new.net, .tv,.to are a waste of space. Give .web a chance.. .biz names could have some value — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 7:51 PM (2/3)

ditto. Most speculators forget the b2b side of the universe. Anyway, .biz domains cannot be ... — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 5:22 AM (1/1)

I see good value in New.net generic names for site branding purposes eg Business.Inc — mole, November 10, 2001 @ 5:25 AM (0/0)

.WEB has a chance — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 8:14 PM (0/0)

In addition — psbyowner, November 8, 2001 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

I am with you spot and psbyowner. I feel there are some — antipodes, November 8, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

.BIZ is Growing - Are Any .BIZ Specific Search Engines Up ? — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 11:42 AM (2/3)

LOL ....your dreamin EOM — psbyowner, November 8, 2001 @ 5:17 PM (0/0)
What would be the point of that? Don't you prefer to search by product, than packaging? — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

.BIZ of Feather Flock Together — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)

.info loses its glue? — James Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (0/0)

Public Announcement — Neulevel, November 8, 2001 @ 5:47 AM (1/3)

If it weren't for the IPv8 and IN-ADDR references, you may have had me fooled there, Jim — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 6:35 AM (1/2)

That Neulevel post is by Randolph Carpenter ... — InternetAdvocate, November 8, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (1/1)

That depends on how many split personalities Jim Fleming actually has. — spot, November 9, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)

>BIZ working ok — mitsuindia, November 8, 2001 @ 4:11 AM (1/2)

Incredible, considering their server is only a 486 — Elvis, November 8, 2001 @ 9:24 AM (1/1)

That means Afilias must be using an 8088! — James Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 10:21 AM (0/0)

Oh no !!! — mole, November 8, 2001 @ 3:32 AM (1/1)

Hopeless... absolutely hopeless. — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

Neulevel screwups -- no whois, no nothing — Watchman, November 7, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (1/2)

Typical. Couldn't organise their way out of a wet paper bag. — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/1)

Still nothing................................................................. blood, stone... — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)

.biz WHOIS to be updated 6pm and 6am EST (Midnight and noon GMT) — richard_henderson, November 7, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

Has anyone managed to register a .biz since it allegedly went live? Has the database been updated? — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:33 PM (3/8)

I managed to succesfulling register online about 10 names with idregister.com — mole, November 8, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (1/1)

Yep, I've been checking for availability on register.com, then buying from a cheaper registrar. — spot, November 8, 2001 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)

People have been registering .BIZ names for over 7 years. — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 7:03 PM (1/4)

To Jim Fleming, go away you psycho.... — peeved, November 7, 2001 @ 7:15 PM (1/3)

Did you get Monkey.BIZ ? — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 7:53 PM (1/2)

Couldn't since you had an IP claim against it... — peeved, November 7, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (1/1)

(^_^) — mole, November 8, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)

Here is what I gathered — peeved, November 7, 2001 @ 6:46 PM (0/0)

Lame Delegations Will Not Be Permitted Beyond the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 5:53 PM (2/9)

ICANN look for lameness when they evaluate registries. Bogus sunrise periods, illegal lotteries etc — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
Not in .Web — cambler, November 7, 2001 @ 6:13 PM (2/7)

Well. . . — 410, November 7, 2001 @ 9:49 PM (0/0)
.WEB is run by professionals, not amateurs... — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 6:16 PM (1/5)

Ha ha, what a great testament to the .WEB clan — peeved, November 7, 2001 @ 6:27 PM (1/4)

IOD and .WEB — S. Hudgens, November 7, 2001 @ 7:14 PM (1/3)

ICANN's Mission is Largely Over — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 7:42 PM (1/2)

ICANN is a QUANGO — Garry Anderson, November 8, 2001 @ 8:58 AM (1/1)

"ICANN represents that it has no authority to implement new TLDs" — Jim Fleming, November 8, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (0/0)

It would be helpful if there had been a list of conflicted .biz names — richard_henderson, November 7, 2001 @ 5:35 PM (2/2)

It's all part of the same bullshit culture — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)
Serious People Register With BOTH Registries — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)

.BIZ WHOIS — peeved, November 7, 2001 @ 5:21 PM (1/1)

whois and the DNS are Completely Separate Servers — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

group 2 or group 3 - where could they be — housecat, November 7, 2001 @ 4:27 PM (1/5)

Both IPv4 .BIZ Registries are Operational — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 4:38 PM (1/4)

a point in every direction - is no point at all — housecat, November 7, 2001 @ 4:53 PM (1/3)

http://www.namecheap.com $8.88 per year — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 5:01 PM (1/2)

http://www.pinstruck.com — housecat, November 7, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/1)

http://www.pin.struck — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

0:212 .BIZ IPv8 Address Space Management (ASM) — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 2:59 PM (0/0)

0:212 .BIZ.FAQ --- .BIZ Registry #2 is $5.30 per year — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)

Updating a .biz registration — dtobias, November 7, 2001 @ 1:11 PM (2/3)

Teething problems... it takes a while to get the bugs out, we are all beta testers you know? --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 1:39 PM (0/0)
.BIZ is still in the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 1:38 PM (1/1)

Uh oh ... Jim has woken up :lol: --- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

I must say the Neulevel.biz site does a great job of creating the right image for the .biz extension — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)

If you find Neulevel to be as bad as Afiliass... — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 11:53 AM (1/1)

Where are my "frozen" names??? mutter mutter --- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

Sit back, relax and just wait ......................................... — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)

Biz = Trouthead Replica — Elvis, November 7, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (4/4)

Elvis - good to see your post - I like the analogy - eom — antipodes, November 8, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)
Since everyones asleep, visit Limehills Post Office! — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 11:36 AM (0/0)
Trying to fing the golden domain = TroutFishing in America — rachelmacgregor, November 7, 2001 @ 10:50 AM (0/0)
? — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 9:37 AM (0/0)

Snap Poll --- Who here is NOT just trying to make a quick buck? — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 7:56 AM (4/9)

Quick buck? — dtobias, November 7, 2001 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)
OK then, riddle me this all you domain-namers! — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 11:23 AM (3/5)

Go Away, — GettingScrewed, November 8, 2001 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)
Tired story — RayF, November 7, 2001 @ 1:58 PM (0/0)
Misleading people — Garry Anderson, November 7, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (2/2)

Quite — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)
Eyes wide shut... — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 1:45 PM (0/0)

Who here is trying to make a fraudulant buck? — Garry Anderson, November 7, 2001 @ 11:09 AM (0/0)
You are right, I am trying to make a quick buck in 2 years time -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 9:42 AM (0/0)

The bludy whois doesn't show taken names in real time !!! --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)

whahahahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaa ... media.biz is "frozen" — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (1/1)

Catch-22 - I can tell you if a name is not available in "real time", but... — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (0/0)

Netsol appears to be up ! .biz -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:53 AM (2/3)

AVOID Netsol - Many of their customers still have .INFO names stuck in limbo AFTER 4 WEEKS!! — Ron_Bennett, November 7, 2001 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)
Oops ...You will receive an e-mail confirming your order in approximately 24 hours ..uh oh --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 7:00 AM (1/1)

Laf, money you can't use to register with tonight ;) eom — IncompetentAfilias, November 7, 2001 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)

I thank my lucky stars, which deserted me temporarily when I — antipodes, November 7, 2001 @ 6:30 AM (2/5)

Well, I'm not really taking this one seriously. I had a lot of cash rolling on .info, — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:35 AM (2/3)

like you spot, .info cost me a bundle, although I didn't buy — antipodes, November 7, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)
Yes, .info has more popular appeal. .biz is a restricted tld for business applications---eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:38 AM (1/1)

I think you'll find that both are pretty useless... — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 7:09 AM (0/0)

I'm a b2b outfit antipodes, suits me fine -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:32 AM (0/0)

.BIZ Delayed!!! Will open at 11:00 GMT (06:00 EST) -- dang! — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:24 AM (1/5)

where does it say that? — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:27 AM (1/4)

In my control panel at idregister.com -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:28 AM (1/3)

In that case I think I'll get 40 winks. — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:31 AM (2/2)

Wake up spot, wake up, game over *evil grin* -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 10:03 AM (0/0)
Thanks spot, I'll just surf the next 3 hrs away. You never know ... eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:33 AM (0/0)

whois server bogged down to a standstill despite it not yielding any information! — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 5:51 AM (1/3)

Up again --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:56 AM (1/2)

Mole, any idea when registrations go live? — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:19 AM (1/1)

No. My Israeli registrar says to look of realtime updates in my CP --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)

Rofl, Queues you don't pay until 'successful registration' have overmaxed my creditcard by $2000+ — IncompetentAfilias, November 7, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (0/0)

.biz - another .info disaster... — James Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 5:44 AM (1/5)

Yeah, all the good names are in 'register reserve' mode, just pickings at the fringes available -eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:51 AM (1/4)

how do you know they are if we cant see any records? — spot , November 7, 2001 @ 5:54 AM (1/3)

You can't see Group 2 or Group 3 records, dang, so you just have to figure not so popular names -eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:57 AM (1/2)

When it goes live, you should be able to register names and get refused immediately if group 2 or 3? — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 6:02 AM (1/1)

I really hope so, that's the only way for this thing to work now ...eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 6:22 AM (0/0)

whois and the DNS are Completely Separate Servers — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 5:43 AM (0/0)

The .biz whois doesn't seem to be showing anything. Hiltonian.biz for example is not showing as — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 5:36 AM (1/7)

Hiltonian.biz was showing 1 hr ago in the whois ...strange --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:41 AM (2/6)

I think there must be a cock up- no records showing — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 5:42 AM (1/2)

You are right... everything just disappeared ! No names at all in whois--eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (1/1)

Previous names up again -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:56 AM (0/0)

Like threading a mine-field in a swamp...ooh, my heart ......... eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:42 AM (1/2)

Are you waiting on some good names, or do you just fancy seeing what cherries are left for picking? — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 5:44 AM (1/1)

I have 11 core names in Group 3, and will be picking my fringe names which I hope has no pre-reg eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (0/0)

Any registrars open for .biz yet? My checks indicate none, although I saw .biz on Netsol briefly.eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 4:17 AM (1/9)

Neulevel.biz has a new home page ... its on... but I can't find a registrar--eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 4:35 AM (1/8)

Sheesh !... need to do border picking then — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 4:55 AM (1/7)

.BIZ Delayed!!! Will open at about 05:15 GMT, what's that in EST? --eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:09 AM (1/6)

ah look up above these posts....it will give you the GMT time... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 7, 2001 @ 5:11 AM (1/5)

Thanks... I submitted one to Register.com for $66 bucks! Seem like its on a queue, not real-time-eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:19 AM (1/4)

How is anyone going to know what is a group 2 and group 3 name if it doesn't show on whois??? — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:31 AM (1/3)

whahahahahaaaa hiltonian.biz is still available at Register.com... gotta be careful with signups eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:35 AM (1/2)

Everything is showing as available at Register.com (as far as I can tell) — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 5:41 AM (1/1)

Yup, I got suckered for $66 bucks, I can get them at $29 elsewhere---eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 5:43 AM (0/0)

Anybody having problems accessing the whois.biz server?--eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 2:53 AM (2/2)

It's back up now — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 3:50 AM (0/0)
http://www.opensrs.org/archives/discuss-list/0111/0264.html — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 3:35 AM (0/0)

WARNING: .BIZ and .INFO Domains May Not Resolve Properly... — Ron_Bennett, November 7, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (3/3)

.INFO TLD Server Search Results — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 4:12 AM (0/0)
Is the whois.biz server down? Has it been unglued? -- eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 2:46 AM (0/0)
Serious .BIZ Owners — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (0/0)

Can anyone (apart from Fleming) suggest a reliable registrar who is queuing .biz applications? — spot, November 6, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (1/2)

Check http://www.DOT-BIZ.com/Whois ? — Jim Fleming, November 7, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/1)

I knew you wouldn't be able to resist. — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)

applied for names not to be distributed tonight — Anion, November 6, 2001 @ 6:21 PM (2/2)

Does this mean the have already been assigned, and locked?--eom — mole, November 7, 2001 @ 2:50 AM (0/0)
Are you referring to .BIZ names or .US names ? — Jim Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)

AFFILIAS NEEDS TO EXTEND TIME LINE — landofop, November 6, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (2/3)

Time Line Way Too Short It Seems — DaveKing2, November 7, 2001 @ 2:50 AM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL - CASE 1-SOESA UNRESOLVED - .INFO NAMES STILL NOT IN ACCOUNT — Ron_Bennett, November 6, 2001 @ 1:53 PM (2/2)

Netsol sucks big time. No wonder Verisign shares went down 20% ---eom — mole, November 6, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)
Maybe try another Registrar ? — Jim Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)

.INFO TLD Clusters — Jim Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)

Start by Protecting Your -BIZ.COM Name — Jim Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)

George Bush was a HERO. We should let market forces determine registration outcomes. — Moshe Leibenstein, November 6, 2001 @ 3:07 AM (1/15)

POST YOUR BULLSHIT ON A DIFFERENT FORUM, YOU ASSHOLE — spot, November 6, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (2/14)

............ — 410, November 6, 2001 @ 8:10 AM (0/0)
So Spot = Jason Morrison ( jasonmorrisonuk@hotmail.com ) — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 6, 2001 @ 3:33 AM (1/12)

I think you misunderstand — spot, November 6, 2001 @ 3:46 AM (2/11)

Politics — S. Hudgens, November 6, 2001 @ 3:36 PM (1/4)

last word — spot, November 6, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (1/3)

Spot is not spotless in criticism ... — InternetAdvocate, November 6, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (1/2)

My criticism is not spotless and I welcome a spot of criticism. — spot, November 7, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (1/1)

Lies! — Moshe Leibenstein, November 7, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

spot and Gregory - I think we have been sucked into another — antipodes, November 6, 2001 @ 7:44 AM (2/5)

John Byth, alias Antipodes, is very Blythe, urr, blithe about dullardness. — InternetAdvocate, November 7, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
Not by Uncle Jiminy! — James Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 8:03 AM (2/3)

I am getting a bad feelin Jimmy that you are postin from a — antipodes, November 6, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (1/1)

Thats because - as I said before - — James Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 10:34 AM (0/0)

Why should I post under different usernames like you or Greg. Karyewsky? — EasyTech, November 6, 2001 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)

registrar says no DNS changes for Land Rush for 60 days ?? — DomeBase, November 5, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (1/3)

DNS can be changed but no transfer of ownership for 60 days — richard_henderson, November 5, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (1/2)

Yes, this is to prevent people doing chargebacks on their credit cards — DaveKing2, November 6, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (1/1)

Good point, didn't think of that reason, but makes lots of sense..eom — mole, November 6, 2001 @ 1:46 PM (0/0)

.INFO Sunrise Challenge Decisions Posted — arbitrage, November 5, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

A case for refund of pre-registration fees. — onmove, November 5, 2001 @ 3:12 PM (1/7)

IMO - it was all part of the fraud — Garry Anderson, November 5, 2001 @ 3:26 PM (1/6)

Was it reasonable for a registrar to charge — vera-city, November 5, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (2/5)

Not fraud? — Garry Anderson, November 5, 2001 @ 7:40 PM (1/2)

your right on that — vera-city, November 5, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (1/1)

Yep - fraud — Garry Anderson, November 6, 2001 @ 10:38 AM (0/0)

Who rules? — vera-city, November 5, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (1/1)

I nearly understood what you meant there. — Garry Anderson, November 5, 2001 @ 8:18 PM (0/0)

when the biz registry goes live Nov. 7th — housecat, November 5, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (2/10)

Yup, Neulevel will release all the successful mult-app names about 5 hrs before Nov 7 00.00 EST..eom — mole, November 5, 2001 @ 4:41 PM (1/4)

release of multi-app names — housecat, November 5, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (2/3)

Tools are available to check your .BIZ names — Jim Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)
Elementary, my dear housecat. Read on ... — mole, November 5, 2001 @ 5:48 PM (1/1)

thank you mole — housecat, November 5, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)

See DOT.BIZ — Jim Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 2:53 PM (1/4)

not interested in that dot-biz.com — housecat, November 5, 2001 @ 3:23 PM (3/3)

.BIZ Registry #2 is not fully operational yet — Jim Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
.BIZ Registry #1 is $14.95 per year — Jim Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)
-BIZ.COM names are only $8.85 per year — Jim Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 4:54 PM (0/0)

bogus trademark through sunrise now approved - unbelievable — trademark, November 5, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (2/5)

Vienna.info successfully challenged, but is the new owner legitimate? — richard_henderson, November 5, 2001 @ 10:38 PM (1/3)

More information — richard_henderson, November 5, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/2)

It's all part of the same bullshit culture — spot, November 6, 2001 @ 3:12 AM (1/1)

I am with you spot - you summed it up pretty good - eom — antipodes, November 6, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (0/0)

Globally - In Greed we Trust! — James Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)

In damnation of a really bad registrar... — jman, November 5, 2001 @ 6:39 AM (2/20)

Look on the bright side! At least those Interland crooks didnt get to steal your money! — James Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 8:26 AM (0/0)
jman, I regret that you are one of thousands who encountered — antipodes, November 5, 2001 @ 8:17 AM (1/18)

...power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. — vera-city, November 5, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (1/17)

...and global powers are globally corrupt! — James Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 1:32 PM (1/16)

thats a bit rich! — Daniel Proebust, November 5, 2001 @ 1:41 PM (2/15)

Daniel is a MORON. Here's proof. — InternetAdvocate, November 7, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (1/2)

i like Bush — Daniel Proebust, November 7, 2001 @ 1:03 AM (1/1)

Daniel continues to prove his idiocy... — InternetAdvocate, November 7, 2001 @ 1:21 AM (0/0)

George Bush is a TWAT and virtually everyone outside the US knows it. — spot, November 5, 2001 @ 10:41 PM (2/11)

um — 410, November 6, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (1/1)

George Bush is SMART; and EVERY honest non-moron in the world knows it. — InternetAdvocate, November 7, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)

This isn't a political board, but since you brought up George Bush.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 6, 2001 @ 3:20 AM (1/8)

i agree — Daniel Proebust, November 6, 2001 @ 4:42 AM (2/7)

Daniel really disagrees, but is TRYING to be smart. He failed. LOL. [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 7, 2001 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)
Jimmy - Moshe- you are shit stirring - I like it - eom — antipodes, November 6, 2001 @ 8:01 AM (1/5)

You got me all wrong, but I cant help agreeing with the sentiment! — James Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 8:16 AM (2/4)

Jim, I thought about going to war with Gregory on some of — antipodes, November 6, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)

You'd think Greg worked for the State Department - — James Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)

Enough — Garry Anderson, November 6, 2001 @ 10:25 AM (1/1)

Enough MANURE from Garry, ALREADY! — InternetAdvocate, November 7, 2001 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

Welcome to The "Inclusive Name Space" ??? — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/2)

LoL ---- Jim Flem warned for spam on MANY other forums.... see his link in the previous message — IncompetentAfilias, November 5, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (1/1)

ROLF! Well, tie me kangaroo down mate, you got me bang2rights, guv'nor! — James Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 8:45 AM (0/0)

In praise of a really good registrar — richard_henderson, November 4, 2001 @ 7:18 PM (1/2)

Soulds like a registry I will do business with in the future....Thanks for the info... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 4, 2001 @ 7:48 PM (1/1)

Proof-of-Concept Allows the "Best of Breed" to Rise to the Top — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen in violation of his own Registry - Registrar Agreement — richard_henderson, November 4, 2001 @ 6:23 PM (1/1)

you just wait — Daniel Proebust, November 5, 2001 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)

ICANN Warm Up - Los Angeles - Santa Monica Pier - Nov. 8th - Nov. 10th — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)

.BIZ - "OPEN FOR BUSINESS NOVEMBER 7, 2001." — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 3:04 PM (1/4)

Is Neulevel's .biz running on IPv6? I understand its on an enhanced security platform..eom — mole, November 4, 2001 @ 3:28 PM (1/3)

IPv4 .BIZ server search results — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 4:05 PM (1/2)

That means Neulevel's .biz runs on IPv4 then? --eom — mole, November 4, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (1/1)

.BIZ is still in the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)

.INFO Proof of Concept Reports — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 2:26 PM (1/7)

Afilias obliged to report its own misdemeanours — richard_henderson, November 4, 2001 @ 4:21 PM (1/6)

Sanctions Program — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 4:36 PM (1/5)

Sanctions are NOT good enough — Garry Anderson, November 5, 2001 @ 9:39 AM (1/4)

Whoa! In Greed we trust! — James Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 11:02 AM (1/3)

Free trade — Garry Anderson, November 5, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (1/2)

One gets all the justice one can afford. — vera-city, November 5, 2001 @ 4:59 PM (1/1)

The first law of entrepreneurs! Follow these tips! — James Fleming, November 6, 2001 @ 3:33 AM (0/0)

the Queensland State Government uptake of .info — antipodes, November 4, 2001 @ 8:34 AM (1/3)

...butt... — James Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 1:54 PM (1/2)

enjoying your posts today Jim - you're right, the Aussie — antipodes, November 4, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (1/1)

Theres still time... — James Fleming, November 5, 2001 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)

Afilias Pricing Schedule from ICANN — James Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 6:00 AM (0/0)

$5.75 for .INFO ? — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 5:08 AM (1/1)

Come fly with me, come fly, come fly away.... — James Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 5:58 AM (0/0)

JF is holidaying in Hawaii, so all I need say is kick the — antipodes, November 4, 2001 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)

What is the Minimum Cost of Registering a .BIZ name ? — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (4/11)

kick Jim Fleming's flaming arse off this forum and Govinda — antipodes, November 4, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)
$9.50 per year ? — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (2/4)

$6.95 per year ? — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 4:49 AM (1/1)

$5.30 ? — Jim Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 5:00 AM (0/0)

GOVINDA LEOPOLD could get the FAKED hawaii.info at Sunrise cheaper — rachelmacgregor, November 4, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (1/1)

the Afilias abuses started when the all-important TM fraud — antipodes, November 4, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)

What is the minimum cost of registering a fake .info name? Ask GOVINDA LEOPOLD... — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)
kick Jim Fleming's flaming arse off this forum and Govinda — antipodes, November 3, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (1/3)

It would be simpler if Jim shagged Leopold up the 'In-addr' then Lubsen and LaPlante. I'm sure he's — spot, November 4, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)

OK! I'm off to Hawaii with Linda LaPlante for some heavy duty butt-bustin! — James Fleming, November 4, 2001 @ 3:37 AM (1/1)

make'm squeal Jimmy, but take your time about it - I like — antipodes, November 4, 2001 @ 3:55 AM (0/0)

Keeping up with Jim Fleming — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (2/5)

Or click Configuration [at top of forum] to change your Settings to Block Fleming's Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
Puttin' on your head-kickin' boots? — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 11:20 PM (1/3)

You bet your frickin ass, IA, sweetheart - I'm getting right up Jim's butt — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (2/2)

have always liked your ideas Rach - although I didn't know — antipodes, November 3, 2001 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)
Frickin ass? Sweetheart? Getting right up Jim's butt? ROFLOL... — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)

CLARIFICATION: Proof-of-Concept = Implementation Phase [defacto but not dejure] ... — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (1/2)

On the contrary, Proof-of-Concept Increases the Customer Base — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 11:36 PM (1/1)

Registering FAKE names does too (see GOVINDA LEOPOLD's fake names) — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:54 PM (0/0)

the Johnson&Johnson smart.info case - just L.U.C.K.Y.? — antipodes, November 3, 2001 @ 10:14 PM (1/2)

Question: Aren't dots ignorable for Trademarks as Domain? — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (1/1)

Yes they are — DaveKing2, November 4, 2001 @ 5:35 AM (0/0)

Proof of Concept - Proving that Price is a Huge Factor — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 8:11 PM (1/1)

Govinda Leopold STILL holding onto the fake Trademark name — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)

corporates apparently not above .info Sunrise scamming - — antipodes, November 3, 2001 @ 8:44 AM (6/9)

Take a look ... — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (0/0)
Sunrise is Bull* Propaganda — Garry Anderson, November 3, 2001 @ 11:17 AM (0/0)
If Afilias themselves are cyber-squatting, then how can they tell others NOT to? — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:00 AM (1/1)

the Afilias abuses started when the all important TM fraud — antipodes, November 3, 2001 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)

Not a fake — rinniv, November 3, 2001 @ 10:49 AM (1/2)

what great good fortune Rinni that you have an interest in — antipodes, November 3, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (1/1)

My mistake ... — RinniV, November 4, 2001 @ 4:23 AM (0/0)

Another Sunrise surprise — Srana, November 3, 2001 @ 9:24 AM (0/0)
sunrise or surprise ? — cello, November 3, 2001 @ 9:05 AM (0/0)

0:231 TECH — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 5:11 AM (2/3)

Would GOVINDA LEOPOLD please give back the Fake Trademark name — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)
http://www.dot-biz.com/INFO/Names/TECH/ — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/1)

Will AFILIAS please take Govinda Leopold's name away NOW!!! — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)

Whole new system to replace TLDs - quoted here — James Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 2:31 AM (1/1)

Previous message cites HAWAII.info - GOVINDA LEOPOLD must surrender it!!! — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:14 PM (0/0)

New UDs - replacing TLDs — James Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 2:13 AM (1/1)

You mention Hawaii.info - why does Govinda Leopold hold onto a fake Sunrise name? — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)

Afilias Board Member Govinda Leopold !!!STILL!!! cybersquatting... — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (1/2)

Don't worry, I am working on a plan to take care of this matter. — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 1:37 AM (1/1)

LEOPOLD!!! I'm on your case... — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 3:43 AM (0/0)

DOMAIN BANK still haven't even set up .info names in their cntrol panel! How much longer? — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (1/4)

One thing they did that was good was refund all my unsuccessful registrations... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 3, 2001 @ 5:49 PM (1/3)

...but then, my registration was unsuccessful because of them in the first place — richard_henderson, November 3, 2001 @ 8:16 PM (1/2)

Have you tried www.DOTSTER.com ? — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 8:19 PM (1/1)

Why not try 1stDomainNet - they (and Govinda) hold onto FAKE Trademark names .... — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)

new.net introduces .movie — Anion, November 2, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (3/16)

Question: With dot info out....why would companies want dot movies??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 3, 2001 @ 5:44 PM (2/13)

oh izopod — EasyTech, November 3, 2001 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)
Why not let the marketplace decide ? — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (3/11)

First get rid of cybersquatters : GOVINDA LEOPOLD surrender your fake names — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:20 PM (0/0)
oh izopod — EasyTech, November 3, 2001 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)
The market *has* decided....They don't want one company controlling several TLDs... — Gregory W. Krajewski, November 3, 2001 @ 6:02 PM (3/8)

And what's with nameslinger? You are a big investor there! — EasyTech, November 5, 2001 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)
the truth about izopod — EasyTech, November 4, 2001 @ 4:27 PM (1/4)

They don't — cambler, November 4, 2001 @ 6:40 PM (1/3)

I know... — EasyTech, November 5, 2001 @ 8:24 AM (1/2)

Yes — cambler, November 5, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

wasn't it the DoC... — EasyTech, November 5, 2001 @ 9:03 PM (0/0)

IS, RS and DS has proven to work — Jim Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)

GOVINDA LEOPOLD STILL has not surrendered her FAKE Trademark names EOM — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (0/0)

Firtlook.com in connection with .movie is a great service — EasyTech, November 3, 2001 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)
Yes, they appear to have almost as many invisible domains as their customers. — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (0/0)

will Leopold Govinda and 1st domain.net get off? — Anion, November 2, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (2/4)

Govinda this is despicable abuse of power — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (1/1)

If you can't abuse it, it's not power — Slicer, November 3, 2001 @ 5:56 AM (0/0)

ICANN doesn't do anything except approve new TLDs. Don't expect them to care about frauds — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (1/1)

ICANN has CORRUPTION down to a tee. They dont bother with SPIN and LIES, they just ignore everything — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)

(re: .biz) Call me crazy.... — Dryweave, November 2, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

If I had known this I wouldn't have pre requested names! — psbyowner, November 2, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)

WIPO List Of Decisions Is Posted — chrismoran, November 2, 2001 @ 3:24 PM (2/4)

WIPO decisions concerning Sunrise Challenges — Domebase, November 2, 2001 @ 8:34 PM (1/2)

Transfers seem fraudulant — Garry Anderson, November 2, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/1)

Out of the frying pan, I say... absolutely hopeless. — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 3:41 AM (0/0)

CRIS U R REPLY HERE — sanjeevgoyal, November 2, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)

.WEB Now Appears With IN-ADDR.WEB Entry — Jim Fleming, November 2, 2001 @ 1:20 PM (0/0)

Well, I'm Not That Selfish ... — Jim_Fleming, November 2, 2001 @ 1:01 PM (1/1)

Well, one Jim Fleming was bad enuff... now we have Mr. Underscore....mutter — IncompetentAfilias, November 2, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)

New TLD .jimfleming — James Fleming, November 2, 2001 @ 8:30 AM (1/3)

Is that you izopod? — EasyTech, November 2, 2001 @ 10:45 AM (1/2)

No, my right foot is slightly longer than my left foot. — James Fleming, November 3, 2001 @ 1:40 AM (1/1)

Yes, but your butt still needs kicking - so does GOVINDA LEOPOLD'S — rachelmacgregor, November 3, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)

congratulations Jim Fleming - your spam flood has drowned — antipodes, November 2, 2001 @ 7:25 AM (2/4)

Still here... — S. Hudgens, November 2, 2001 @ 1:58 PM (0/0)
What new TLD are you developing ? — Jim Fleming, November 2, 2001 @ 7:44 AM (1/2)

SHUT UP! — hiltonian, November 2, 2001 @ 9:26 AM (1/1)

7:222 .UP is not in the IPv8 "exclusive root" — Jim Fleming, November 2, 2001 @ 1:41 PM (0/0)

.MUSEUM Search Results — Jim Fleming, November 1, 2001 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)

.KIDS - H.R. 2417, the Dot Kids Name Act of 2001 — Jim Fleming, November 1, 2001 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)

Proof of Concept — Garry Anderson, November 1, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (1/2)

"Proof of Concept during implementation" ? — Jim Fleming, November 1, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (1/1)

Before... before... before — Garry Anderson, November 1, 2001 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)

Who's the most responsive registrar? — DaveKing2, November 1, 2001 @ 5:38 AM (1/1)

Which TLD ? — Jim Fleming, November 1, 2001 @ 6:14 AM (0/0)

THE FUTURE OF ART ? — PAWEL, October 31, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (3/5)

I don't have an answer, but I would love to see Mr Rumney do — antipodes, November 1, 2001 @ 8:16 AM (0/0)
http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_tld.php?record=NS&tld=ART&submit=Submit — Jim Fleming, November 1, 2001 @ 3:11 AM (0/0)
He would have better sold it through Sothebys ;-) — EasyTech, October 31, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (2/2)

He won't even get back what he paid for the Rubik's cubes - eom — spot, November 3, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)
I think he is 'artistically challenged' ;) — Domebase, November 2, 2001 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)

Happy Halloween ! — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:20 PM (4/4)

Oops - I missed this... — richard_henderson, November 3, 2001 @ 4:53 PM (0/0)
Thanks! You too. Now for something really scary.... — DomeBase, October 31, 2001 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
Speech of Acceptance — rachelmacgregor, October 31, 2001 @ 4:07 PM (0/0)
Spooky thanks to you also — Garry Anderson, October 31, 2001 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)

Afternic can and will sell the www.net.nz domain! — www.net.nz, October 31, 2001 @ 11:41 AM (0/0)

New TLD - Proof of Concept — Garry Anderson, October 31, 2001 @ 10:13 AM (1/14)

Already available — EasyTech, October 31, 2001 @ 1:55 PM (1/13)

No it is not — Garry Anderson, October 31, 2001 @ 2:08 PM (1/12)

huh? — EasyTech, October 31, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (2/11)

Viewpoint — Garry Anderson, October 31, 2001 @ 4:07 PM (1/8)

my answer — EasyTech, October 31, 2001 @ 4:35 PM (1/7)

My fault? — Garry Anderson, November 1, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (1/6)

Things are clearer now! — EasyTech, November 1, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (1/5)

Benefit — Garry Anderson, November 1, 2001 @ 1:30 PM (1/4)

okay — EasyTech, November 1, 2001 @ 3:02 PM (1/3)

Analogy — Garry Anderson, November 2, 2001 @ 8:22 AM (1/2)

The IPv8 Exclusive Root — Jim Fleming, November 2, 2001 @ 2:20 PM (1/1)

Protocol is just one factor — Garry Anderson, November 2, 2001 @ 6:34 PM (0/0)

Again, what's your point? — cambler, October 31, 2001 @ 3:55 PM (1/1)

yes — EasyTech, October 31, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL - CASE 1-SOESA UNRESOLVED - .INFO NAMES STILL NOT IN ACCOUNT — Ron_Bennett, October 31, 2001 @ 7:59 AM (2/2)

Netsol cannot solve the problem since they effectively spun your names into no mans land. — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_tld.php?record=NS&tld=INFO — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 1:12 PM (0/0)

.MUSEUM Enters Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 4:52 AM (1/1)

http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_3.php?record=NS&tld=MUSEUM — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 4:58 AM (0/0)

ARE YOU Tired of Fleming's SPAM on THIS FORUM??? — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 4:07 AM (3/8)

freedom of speech: but no one important reads these forums anyway — psbyowner, November 2, 2001 @ 4:59 PM (1/1)

*hands psbyowner the You Now Have a Clue Award* — Slicer, November 3, 2001 @ 5:57 AM (0/0)

Alternatives...IPv4 is full of security holes... have a scary Holloween — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:09 PM (0/0)
No I am not. I find Fleming's post relevant and on topic. — FineE, October 31, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (3/4)

It is SPAM, which part of the following is hard to understand? — challenge, October 31, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)
What about the missing 71,000,000 + New.Net Users ? — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)
The problem — 410, October 31, 2001 @ 5:53 AM (1/1)

thanks challenge and 410 - I'm sick of the spam too - eom — antipodes, November 1, 2001 @ 8:01 AM (0/0)

the rollout of dot fizz... — psbyowner, October 31, 2001 @ 3:46 AM (3/4)

Great opinion! Please think that way until after the first 5 min of the .biz launch. Thanks. — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
dot biz fizz — housecat, October 31, 2001 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
Have you registered with both .BIZ registries ? — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 4:02 AM (1/1)

http://root-dns.org/VueDig/VueDig_3.php?record=NS&tld=BIZ&submit=Submit — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)

Image Online Design's message has never changed.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 31, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/6)

Why was .WEB Excluded ? — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (1/5)

Well. . . — 410, October 31, 2001 @ 1:45 AM (1/4)

What next round ? — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 2:31 AM (1/3)

<sigh> — 410, October 31, 2001 @ 5:10 AM (1/2)

One round every Four Years ? — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 5:13 AM (1/1)

Well. . . — 410, October 31, 2001 @ 5:21 AM (0/0)

"ICANN represents that it has no authority to implement new TLDs" — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 7:04 PM (2/4)

ICANN is USG QUANGO — Garry Anderson, October 31, 2001 @ 9:36 AM (0/0)
ICANN admits that DoC has final authority over TLD's. — InternetAdvocate, October 30, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (2/2)

The U.S. Government controls the U.S. Government's Root Servers — Jim Fleming, October 31, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
Dot-Biz [business] does NOT cause confusion with Dot-Bz [Belize]. Duh! — InternetAdvocate, October 30, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

infiniBAND and IPv6 — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)

Simon ? — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 1:15 PM (2/4)

. — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:36 PM (0/0)
baseless comments — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (1/2)

That comment really got ya, didn't it. lol. — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 2:44 PM (1/1)

That is my last comment to your posts — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)

TLDs found with IN-ADDR.[TLD] Zones — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 1:08 PM (0/0)

.us domain may have sunrise for trademark holders — sfeibish, October 30, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (2/3)

Trademark Domains violate First amendment — Garry Anderson, October 30, 2001 @ 12:58 AM (1/1)

Select Any TLD You Want — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 1:04 PM (0/0)

ADNS operates the EARTH, USA, Z and AMERICA top-level domains. — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (0/0)

The U.S. Government controls the U.S. Government's Root Servers — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (2/2)

NTIA OFFICE LISTING July 2001 — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (0/0)
Recent News from the U.S. Government — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (0/0)

RFC-2001-07-01-000 IPv8 Expansion of Proof of Concept TLD Development — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 11:54 AM (0/0)

CHARTER IN-ADDR.[TLD] ZONES — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 11:40 AM (0/0)

man oh man — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 11:29 AM (3/12)

Reply to Monkey Buddha — Garry Anderson, October 30, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (1/2)

"I would enjoy trouncing your feeble attempt" — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 1:08 PM (1/1)

Dave - pal — Garry Anderson, October 30, 2001 @ 1:18 PM (0/0)

Very valuable post — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 11:58 AM (1/7)

valuable indeed — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (2/6)

Great you can handle google... — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 1:53 PM (1/1)

ok — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

Simon Steinle — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (1/3)

And you wrote THIS? — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (1/2)

no clue — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 2:03 PM (1/1)

no more research on you Simon. I found what I wanted. — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)

4:194 MAN — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 11:43 AM (0/0)

The .WEB pusher — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 9:39 AM (3/39)

Thanks — cambler, October 30, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

Huh? — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

0:253 .WEB is in, all people have to do is develop it. — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 11:46 AM (0/0)
Are you saying. . . — 410, October 30, 2001 @ 11:43 AM (2/35)

Sure they can support their investments, but... — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 4:15 PM (3/28)

EasyTech: So what is your point?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30, 2001 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)
Um... — 410, October 30, 2001 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)
Very poor argument — joinin, October 30, 2001 @ 4:32 PM (1/25)

not only .WEB — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 6:27 PM (2/24)

Wrong Again EasyTech.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 30, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
Great! — cambler, October 30, 2001 @ 8:08 PM (2/22)

so what's your point? — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 10:54 PM (1/1)

My point — cambler, October 30, 2001 @ 11:31 PM (0/0)

More substance please, Mr. Ambler — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 9:23 PM (2/19)

Name.space Failed Because — GettingScrewed, October 31, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (1/4)

Dot-sucks sucks really bad... — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (2/3)

Dot-not, dot-bad, dot-CON much better than dot-sucks [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 2:44 AM (0/0)
.con or .bad? don't call us, we'll call you. NEXT! — Buddha, October 31, 2001 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)

Dot-sucks sucks because it is such crude slang [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

I forgot something — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (3/13)

You forgot something even more important...."your point"....and it is??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 31, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)
umm — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/7)

Point is ... .web sounds pretty basal today what with .biz and .info.. so stop flaming Easy..eom — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:28 PM (3/6)

Thanks mole — EasyTech, October 31, 2001 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)
"basil?" — cambler, October 31, 2001 @ 3:11 PM (1/1)

He means BANAL. LOL. [end] — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 10:20 PM (0/0)

mole: n. A fleshy abnormal mass formed in the uterus — Buddha, October 31, 2001 @ 2:54 PM (1/2)

Greg.. you can run but you can't hide. Post in Afgan next time. — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 4:00 PM (1/1)

greg who? Afghan what? Are you on crack again?<eom> — Buddha, October 31, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

And? — cambler, October 30, 2001 @ 9:52 PM (1/3)

And... .web sounds pretty stupid today, so you missed your chance, move on. — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:30 PM (1/2)

Of Course "Mole" Thinks .WEB Sounds "Pretty Stupid" ... — GettingScrewed, October 31, 2001 @ 4:57 PM (1/1)

Tons, well ar.. sheesh...actually 3.. with media.club pending. well, quality, not quantity ---eom — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)

AMEN! — Buddha, October 30, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/5)

Uh, Buddha? Oxymoron! — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (1/4)

Uh, InternetAdvocate? Moron! — Buddha, October 31, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (2/3)

Uh, Buddha [a.k.a. Dave]? Always moron! — InternetAdvocate, November 3, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)
No respect for religion, you are very insulting — mole, October 31, 2001 @ 2:32 PM (1/1)

insulting? no respect for religion? — Buddha, October 31, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Get Ready to Buy More Tickets....US ccTLD awarded to Neustar! — Ron_Bennett, October 30, 2001 @ 2:33 AM (1/7)

AKA....the TOYS.R.US.....domain ? — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 3:30 AM (1/6)

www.DOTUSA.com — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 3:32 AM (2/5)

Thats the same scam like dotGOD.com and dotSEX.com — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (3/3)

1:86 SEX — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 1:21 PM (0/0)
7:186 GOD — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 1:20 PM (0/0)
1:10 USA (UNITED-STATES) — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

Trying to sell bullshit TLDs with patriotism. Ugh. — Slicer, October 30, 2001 @ 7:38 AM (0/0)

The IANA's File of iTLD Requests — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 2:19 AM (0/0)

Lauren Weinstein, Peter G. Neumann - "Future of the Internet and ICANN" — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 2:10 AM (0/0)

Karl Auerbach - ICANN is a body in serious need of reform — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 2:07 AM (0/0)

Vint Cerf - "I am glad we did not try to open up TLDs wholesale" — Jim Fleming, October 30, 2001 @ 1:59 AM (0/0)

Injunction against .biz domain registrar dropped — domainboy, October 29, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL - CASE 1-SOESA UNRESOLVED - .INFO NAMES STILL NOT IN ACCOUNT — Ron_Bennett, October 29, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (1/2)

If you really have a problem, go talk to the Federal Trade Commission or the DoC. — Slicer, October 29, 2001 @ 9:32 PM (1/1)

Nah...I'll Just Keep Reposting Like Some Others Do...you know who you are :-) — Ron_Bennett, October 30, 2001 @ 2:23 AM (0/0)

NTIA (Not ICANN) Awards IPv4 .EDU to Private Registry — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)

NTIA (Not ICANN) Awards IPv4 .US to Private Registry — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 7:19 PM (0/0)

Do you want to see the WHOLE Internet ? — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (2/7)

**DO NOT ACCEPT A DOWNLOAD FROM THIS MAN!** — Slicer, October 29, 2001 @ 8:22 PM (2/5)

Any reasons for this statement ? — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)
Slicer, I'm starting to like you... — rachelmacgregor, October 30, 2001 @ 7:15 AM (1/3)

Here, if this makes you feel any better: — Slicer, October 30, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (2/2)

No problem! — cambler, October 30, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)
Btw you can see your lovely .WEB domains, too! — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 9:08 AM (0/0)

Plug-In download link 2 — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 5:59 PM (0/0)

.INFO TLD Server Search Results — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 2:00 PM (1/2)

NIC.INFO TLD Server Search Results — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 5:26 PM (1/1)

Again: I'm first: The Original nic.PRO !!! — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 5:38 PM (0/0)

It only takes me a few seconds to sift through the worthwhile postings from Jim Fleming's bollocks, — spot, October 29, 2001 @ 1:19 PM (2/2)

I clicked Configuration [at top of forum] to change my Settings to Block his Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)
I think he just "cuts and paste".....it's the same crap.........Here is what we need to do.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 29, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)

CHARTER IN-ADDR.[TLD] ZONES — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)

Don't let Jim Fleming snow you... — dtobias, October 29, 2001 @ 4:21 AM (4/6)

I clicked Configuration [at top of forum] to change my Settings to Block his Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)
You might want to study "The IPv6 Privacy Problem". — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 1:25 PM (2/2)

...and fleming might want to study my ass — Dryweave, October 31, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
11,400 articles submitted by Jim — Garry Anderson, October 29, 2001 @ 1:52 PM (0/0)

And just in case we haven't danced on his corpse enough... — Slicer, October 29, 2001 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
*WHAM!* You hit the idiot- err, the nail- on the head. — Slicer, October 29, 2001 @ 6:47 AM (0/0)

.INFO at http://www.name-space.com — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 12:58 AM (2/15)

Name.space? What A Joke... — GettingScrewed, October 29, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (2/10)

What .INFO servers are you registered in ? — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
Name.Space has a lot of .INFO TLD servers — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 4:35 PM (1/8)

Sure, Name.space Might Have ... — GettingScrewed, October 29, 2001 @ 5:32 PM (1/7)

www.New.net has over 71,000,000 users — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 5:45 PM (1/6)

That Means ... — GettingScrewed, October 29, 2001 @ 6:35 PM (1/5)

wrong! — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 7:09 PM (1/4)

So You Mean ... — GettingScrewed, October 29, 2001 @ 7:11 PM (1/3)

Logic — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 8:09 PM (1/2)

So What Do You Mean By ... — GettingScrewed, October 29, 2001 @ 11:33 PM (1/1)

Now that I have proven you wrong... — EasyTech, October 30, 2001 @ 8:55 AM (0/0)

IN-ADDR.INFO working in BOTH .INFO registries — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 1:23 PM (1/3)

More important: That gives you 100% visibility, not only 90-95% !!! — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 5:09 PM (2/2)

Yes, Serious People Register With BOTH Registries — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 5:27 PM (0/0)
something missed — EasyTech, October 29, 2001 @ 5:14 PM (0/0)

Proof-of-Concept = Implementation Phase [defacto], so don't let Fleming scare U about your domains. — InternetAdvocate, October 29, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (1/3)

Check the top of the web-site...."proof of concept." — Jim Fleming, October 29, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/2)

Proof of Concept really is Implementation [de facto] ... — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 2:00 AM (1/1)

Proof of Concept is PRIOR to Implementation [de facto] — Garry Anderson, October 31, 2001 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)

Experts are has-beens under pressure... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (1/2)

IA - please cite your sources for your reference to Gould's — antipodes, October 29, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/1)

Reference to Gould — InternetAdvocate, October 31, 2001 @ 2:34 AM (0/0)

Fleming's Game — Slicer, October 28, 2001 @ 7:22 PM (1/3)

now we're really in the shit - Slicer's saying nice things about us — rachelmacgregor, October 28, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (2/2)

I clicked Configuration [at top of forum] to change my Settings to Block his Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 29, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
What aspect of .BIZ are you working on ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 8:01 PM (0/0)

Interested in the REAL Dot Biz? — Slicer, October 28, 2001 @ 6:55 PM (3/8)

What Phase is the NeuLevel .BIZ Registry in ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
Legacy Root Servers — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 7:11 PM (1/1)

For Gods sake stop jibbering! — Elvis, October 28, 2001 @ 10:26 PM (0/0)

Does www.NeuLevel.BIZ have IPv6 Servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 7:05 PM (1/4)

Of course not. And they won't implement it until years from now, when it becomes universal. — Slicer, October 28, 2001 @ 7:17 PM (2/3)

Is that Your Opinion or the Official NeuLevel Position ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)
Do you use IPv6 ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 7:54 PM (1/1)

JIM WE GOT YOUR DAMN POINT ALREADY --- STOP ACTING LIKE AN ANNOYING BOT >>>>ENUF!@ — IncompetentAfilias, October 29, 2001 @ 3:57 AM (0/0)

0:212 BIZ Update — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (1/1)

Server Responses : — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)

Millions of simultaneous registration requests for Neulevel? Wow, this I gotta see. — mole, October 28, 2001 @ 3:57 PM (1/3)

0:212 - BIZ World — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 4:58 PM (1/2)

Boy, you're obsessive — rachelmacgregor, October 28, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (1/1)

What aspect of .BIZ are you working on ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)

Who is running .INFO ? — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (0/0)

what's happening at Afilias - changing the valves again or — antipodes, October 28, 2001 @ 8:57 AM (1/4)

Yes, their whois is down again. No transactions can be made. --- eom — mole, October 28, 2001 @ 9:02 AM (1/3)

suppose it would be too much for the registry - where the — antipodes, October 28, 2001 @ 9:30 AM (1/2)

oops - Afilias got off its knees in the time it took me to — antipodes, October 28, 2001 @ 9:44 AM (1/1)

LOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)

What is Afilias going to do about people changing Sunrise WHOIS ownership etc? — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (2/5)

weird — DaveKing2, October 28, 2001 @ 3:22 AM (2/3)

Can Afilias explain? — richard_henderson, October 28, 2001 @ 1:15 PM (1/1)

Becoming Clearer.... — richard_henderson, October 28, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)

sorry, I meant — DaveKing2, October 28, 2001 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)

Richard, is there a simple answer to this occurance, or does — antipodes, October 28, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)

more thoughts on the expectations of .info sites — antipodes, October 27, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (1/6)

Good Morning to you Antipodes! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27, 2001 @ 10:52 PM (1/5)

Hi Gregory - it seems, and it makes sense, that you, Richard — antipodes, October 28, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (1/4)

www.DOT-NZ.com — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (1/3)

IPv8 — Craig.D, October 28, 2001 @ 5:42 AM (1/2)

IN-ADDR Names Still Available at New.Net — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 6:11 AM (1/1)

Differentiation — Craig.D, October 28, 2001 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)

as a "proof of concept." — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 6:18 PM (1/5)

Jim...Please use New.net to post information....They seem to appreciate your wit, and humor — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27, 2001 @ 8:51 PM (1/4)

I suggest you study how IN-ADDR.ARPA is used. — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (2/3)

IN-ADDR.ARPA — dtobias, October 29, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)
See you're missing the point.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27, 2001 @ 9:18 PM (1/1)

www.IN-ADDR.INFO — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (0/0)

"...of the TLDs selected in November 2000..." — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)

Advanced Whois Performance — andrew24, October 27, 2001 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)

According to Mike Roberts.... — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 1:25 PM (1/8)

If you're sick of Jim Fleming's spam report it to this forum's moderator at mclaughlin@icann.org — cgrady, October 27, 2001 @ 5:55 PM (1/7)

Why do .WEB advocates want to censor things ? — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 6:02 PM (2/6)

I'm not a .web advocate but I wish you'd LISTEN! — rachelmacgregor, October 27, 2001 @ 7:25 PM (1/3)

whahahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahaha — mole, October 27, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (1/2)

Typical Response from a New.net Moderator... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 27, 2001 @ 9:29 PM (1/1)

hmmm... no sense of humor -- eom — mole, October 28, 2001 @ 5:24 AM (0/0)

They don't — cambler, October 27, 2001 @ 6:06 PM (1/1)

Is .WEB a "new TLD" ? — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (0/0)

ICANN Stifling Public's Voice? — Garry Anderson, October 27, 2001 @ 8:54 AM (1/3)

The Public ? — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 1:59 PM (1/2)

The Public — Garry Anderson, October 28, 2001 @ 9:31 AM (1/1)

IPv4 is a Sand-Box — Jim Fleming, October 28, 2001 @ 1:54 PM (0/0)

ZOOM.INFO and MOVIE.INFO ? — sanjeevgoyal, October 27, 2001 @ 5:43 AM (2/9)

WWW.IN-ADDR.INFO — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)
same in case of JOY.info and Scores.info — sanjeevgoyal, October 27, 2001 @ 5:47 AM (1/7)

Who originally bought Scores.info — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 8:00 AM (1/6)

scores.info originally registered to Leo Hillock — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 8:20 AM (1/5)

scores.info Trademark number identical to Leo's other names — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 8:27 AM (1/4)

List of the names Leo Hillock originally got at Sunrise — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 8:31 AM (1/3)

Football.info has also been changed to a new owner — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 11:08 AM (1/2)

Better watch out for Ford.info because that one's ACTIVE too — richard_henderson, October 27, 2001 @ 11:17 AM (1/1)

Like it or not: — vera-city, October 29, 2001 @ 7:39 AM (0/0)

EPP (Extensible Provisioning Protocol) — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 5:19 AM (0/0)

0:201 .COM — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 3:16 AM (1/1)

IPv6 .COM Servers — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

40 New TLDs ?....Why not let the marketplace decide ? — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 3:10 AM (1/1)

Can the Marketplace Decide about whether you keep spamming here?EOM — rachelmacgregor, October 28, 2001 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)

Realistic expectations and a .INFO valuation model — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 3:37 PM (2/29)

.INFO — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)
Quite Right — richard_henderson, October 26, 2001 @ 5:14 PM (2/27)

.info is a boon...... — onmove, October 26, 2001 @ 7:53 PM (3/7)

You just described the use of every TLD on the planet .... — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (0/0)
kindred spirits - I am in agreement with above posters - but — antipodes, October 26, 2001 @ 10:30 PM (1/1)

I have not forgotten about the appalling arse they made on purpose — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

I agree! — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 8:01 PM (1/3)

How many more TLDs would you like to see added to the root? As many as new.net are pushing for? — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (1/2)

How many? — cambler, October 27, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (1/1)

Yes, I agree with the 1 apiece recommendation, and that is my main grumble with new.net — spot, October 27, 2001 @ 3:02 AM (0/0)

The argument for fairness — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 6:23 PM (1/18)

Fairness — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 7:03 PM (1/17)

Logic — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 8:08 PM (1/16)

Overlap — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 8:58 PM (2/15)

I Agree! NO OVERLAP! — Timberstone, October 27, 2001 @ 5:33 AM (0/0)
Overlap — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (1/13)

Yes. — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/12)

Overlap — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 11:28 PM (2/11)

Overlap is irrelevant — cgrady, October 27, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)
Banging heads — cambler, October 27, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (2/9)

urr... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (1/1)

Shows you how long ago I left LA! — cambler, October 29, 2001 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)

Wrong again — challenge, October 27, 2001 @ 4:29 PM (3/6)

Don't belong? — cambler, October 27, 2001 @ 6:08 PM (1/1)

TLDs selected in November 2000 — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

No overlap = monopoly — cgrady, October 27, 2001 @ 5:46 PM (1/2)

Monopolistic... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:04 PM (1/1)

You're right — cambler, October 29, 2001 @ 4:17 AM (0/0)

Where should .WEB people be ? — Jim Fleming, October 27, 2001 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL - CASE 1-SOESA UNRESOLVED - .INFO NAMES STILL NOT IN ACCOUNT — Ron_Bennett, October 26, 2001 @ 3:08 PM (3/4)

Alas! same problem for me... — Helveticus, October 27, 2001 @ 10:49 PM (0/0)
I have one name still lost in space with Netsol, and they don't seem to be able to fix it ...eom — mole, October 27, 2001 @ 7:08 AM (0/0)
We're all in the same boat with you !!!!! — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (1/1)

Same thing happened to GreatDomains too :-( — Ron_Bennett, October 26, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

0:212 BIZ Update — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 3:01 PM (0/0)

Afilias and .INFO — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 2:36 PM (1/15)

Of course they won't — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (1/14)

Afilias — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (3/13)

Business Sense — RayF, October 26, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)
IOD? Ha. Here's their idea of global marketing — Watchman, October 26, 2001 @ 5:49 PM (2/10)

And your point? — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)
And the problem is...? — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (1/8)

IOD not ready for prime time — Watchman, October 26, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (2/7)

Facts, please. — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (1/1)

Facts — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 6:49 PM (0/0)

I'm sorry, you're wrong — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 6:47 PM (2/4)

Seems unlikely... — Watchman, October 29, 2001 @ 7:02 PM (1/1)

The money — cambler, October 29, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)

Scratch at the surfact of IOD ...... — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 8:08 PM (1/1)

The .WEB Community — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 8:48 PM (0/0)

Good idea... — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 3:29 PM (0/0)

"First they came for..." — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)

Send complaints about Jim Flemmings spam to this forum's moderator at mclaughlin@icann.org — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:33 PM (0/0)

From the FAQ for ICANN Public Forum - 4 messages a day maximum — richard_henderson, October 26, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (2/10)

Send your complaints about Jim Flemming's spam to this forum's moderator at mclaughlin@icann.org — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:38 PM (1/2)

And click Configuration [at top of forum] to change your Settings to Block his Spam Posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 29, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)

That's Fleming, not Flemming, to block his posts [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 29, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)

Jim: 26 posts in 24 hours seems a BIT excessive... — richard_henderson, October 26, 2001 @ 7:55 AM (1/6)

Especially — hiltonian, October 26, 2001 @ 11:46 AM (1/5)

It's a confusion strategy. His intention is to disrupt the discussions about Afilias's corruption — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 1:35 PM (1/4)

Afilias is cloning Hitler's brain, and other conspiracy theories — Watchman, October 26, 2001 @ 6:02 PM (2/3)

At least Hitler had a brain.... EOM — rachelmacgregor, October 26, 2001 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
Leave Rachel alone. Rachel has contributed a lot of useful comments to this forum — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 8:11 PM (1/1)

Especially her head-kickin boot lingo [foul words] in some of her posts. — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)

FOUR posts a day is the MAX — richard_henderson, October 26, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (0/0)

toooo much spam - the forum's been successfully hijacked eom — antipodes, October 26, 2001 @ 6:31 AM (0/0)

Moving .BIZ to New.Net — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (1/1)

Send complaints about Jim Flemmings spam to this forum's moderator at mclaughlin@icann.org — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL - CASE 1-SOESA UNRESOLVED - .INFO NAMES STILL NOT IN ACCOUNT — Ron_Bennett, October 26, 2001 @ 2:48 AM (0/0)

http://groups.google.com/groups?group=biz — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

Fleming's .MUSEUM post. ZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (1/3)

Cool, I didn't know you could do THATTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 1:40 AM (1/2)

Well, NOW you KNOWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWW — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:48 AM (1/1)

Heh heh — hiltonian, October 26, 2001 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)

.MUSEUM Proof-of-Concept Reference — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:19 AM (0/0)

I chose to ignore Fleming's post about ".WEB Annual Meeting ?" [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

.WEB Annual Meeting ? — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:14 AM (1/5)

What would be the purpose of such a meeting? - EOM — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (2/4)

Purpose ? — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:40 AM (0/0)
Give me an 'S' , Give me a 'P' , Give me an 'A' , Give me an 'M' . What have you got? — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (2/2)

HA HA HA HA HA ... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
.... you've got ------- J-i-m F-l-e-m-i-n-g (EOM... for Jim? Nay) — IncompetentAfilias, October 26, 2001 @ 4:34 AM (0/0)

FLEMING IS AN AFILIAS BOARD MEMBER'S ALIAS, AND IS POSTING TO DIVERT ATENTION FROM PREVIOUS THREADS — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 1:10 AM (1/8)

I thought Fleming was SPAMMING the Forum with info about his TLD schemes ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/7)

Either way his spam is REALLY annoying and childish - EOM — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:14 AM (1/6)

Let's ignore his posts from now on??? [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:15 AM (1/5)

Jim, please, just stop the spam OK? - EOM — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (2/4)

MAYBE just MAYBE he might do THAT, if we all IGNORE HIS POSTS. [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)
This Public Comment Forum has been established — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/2)

You have every person on this board complaining about your spamming. — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 3:10 AM (1/1)

Send complaints about Jim Flemmings spam to this forum's moderator at mclaughlin@icann.org — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:46 PM (0/0)

Dot-net is better than dot-web ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (3/15)

Some facts..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (1/3)

Net means network. Not necessarily an internet infrastructure company either. — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 2:05 AM (1/2)

Agree to Disagee....Let's try it! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26, 2001 @ 2:46 AM (1/1)

I support placing IOD's Dot-Web into A-root... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)

Agree. — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (3/8)

TLDs — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)
Spot almost spot on ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)
Thanks — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (2/5)

ICANN not a policy or regulatory body? — Garry Anderson, October 26, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (1/3)

How so? — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (1/2)

They make policy and regulate — Garry Anderson, October 27, 2001 @ 8:39 AM (1/1)

Sure — cambler, October 27, 2001 @ 2:58 PM (0/0)

Didn't mean to offend, buddy. — spot, October 26, 2001 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)

Reference — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)

I stand by my original post. — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

http://www-tld.net/ — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

WARNING: The foregoing is pure SPAM. [end] — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

ICANN's Proof of Concept term just a formality. ICANN will give final approval to Afilias & Neulevel — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (1/4)

Correct — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (1/3)

Fleming says I am Correct, but then posts something entirely different than what I posted. ROFLOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:33 AM (1/2)

Why would people lose their names ? — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (1/1)

Why mention Proof-of-Concept Phase at all? — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)

What if ICANN denies IOD's .web ap or significantly delays it??? — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (2/6)

It seems to have been delayed for over 5 years already ... — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 12:33 AM (2/3)

It should be clear now why .WEB was not added. — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (1/1)

A decent argument tagged to SPAM ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)

More reason why IOD should buy web.net domain ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

ICANN Accepted IOD's .WEB Application... — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/1)

I meant Approval of the TLD... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

My Response to Challenge's questions..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (2/27)

You guys (IODits) still don't get it.. — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (3/15)

Know thyself, I tell you again. — cello, October 26, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
Personal attacks...the last resort of the desperate. — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 2:25 AM (1/9)

Those honorable intentions — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 2:59 AM (3/8)

Good Morning! — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 1:30 PM (0/0)
ahem.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 26, 2001 @ 3:36 AM (2/4)

(Off-topic) Real Names and getting personal — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 11:50 AM (2/2)

Getting personal — Garry Anderson, October 26, 2001 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
How noble. — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 1:44 PM (0/0)

True names — Garry Anderson, October 26, 2001 @ 10:50 AM (0/0)

One more thing (my last post on this topic) — challenge, October 26, 2001 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)

Amen... — S. Hudgens, October 26, 2001 @ 1:52 PM (0/0)

unofficial? (long) — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (2/3)

Creation of new TLDs — Garry Anderson, October 26, 2001 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)
IOD's dot-web will offer competition, but ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:46 AM (1/1)

Fine! — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 2:16 AM (0/0)

.BIZ competes against .COM — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (1/10)

Not quite! Only somewhat... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:17 PM (1/9)

I agree — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (1/8)

A 'completely different ball park.' Sticky rather than sleezy! ROFLOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (2/7)

:-) No really ... — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (1/1)

Yes, really ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (0/0)

.WWW vs .WEB — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 12:29 AM (2/4)

No www needed with .web — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (1/1)

Cute... — InternetAdvocate, October 28, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

I say: www should be prefix, not suffix. — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (1/1)

I agree — cgrady, October 26, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)

.biz injuction ends - criminal enterprise to proceed? — Anion, October 25, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)

It all boils down to fairness. — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (1/5)

Because... — cambler, October 25, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (2/4)

We have to agree to disagree — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (1/2)

wrong analogy — cambler, October 25, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/1)

When will .WEB add a Native IPv6 Server ? — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 10:32 PM (0/0)

Exactly — hiltonian, October 25, 2001 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)

Clever words cannot change the facts... — onmove, October 25, 2001 @ 7:10 PM (2/3)

Crusade? Watch out for the PC protestors. LOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)
Scarce Resource Policies — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 7:17 PM (1/1)

But... — hiltonian, October 25, 2001 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)

2,048 TLDs — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (2/21)

Every mainroot IPv4 domain still valid in IPv6 & IPv8 namespaces... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (1/12)

who are you? — cambler, October 25, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (1/11)

I am InternetAdvocate ... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/10)

Really? — cambler, October 25, 2001 @ 11:40 PM (2/9)

.BIZ is still in the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/1)

.BIZ is still in the Proof-of-Concept Phase. So what? Same as Implementation Phase de facto. — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)

Yes ... LOL ... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 11:47 PM (1/6)

Back it up, please — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (3/5)

Here it is ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (1/2)

And? — cambler, October 26, 2001 @ 2:17 AM (1/1)

You May Have to Join the NGI to Find Out — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 3:20 AM (0/0)

http://www.google.com/search?q=karl+denninger+BIZ+leah — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)
Karl's position is well-documented on the net — Jim Fleming, October 26, 2001 @ 1:24 AM (0/0)

Only about 2000 too many — hiltonian, October 25, 2001 @ 5:36 PM (2/7)

IPv16 has 32,768 TLD slots — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 10:19 PM (0/0)
3,500 TLDs now in Use ? — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 5:45 PM (1/5)

Not answering my question — hiltonian, October 25, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (1/4)

No One Knows — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (1/3)

Keep it simple, Jim Fleming!!!!! — richard_henderson, October 25, 2001 @ 7:14 PM (2/2)

Advertising — S. Hudgens, October 25, 2001 @ 8:35 PM (0/0)
The Internet Begins with Address Spaces not Names — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 7:20 PM (0/0)

More, from the Sunrise Fraudster — rachelmacgregor, October 25, 2001 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)

A Sunrise fraudster bares his heart.... — rachelmacgregor, October 25, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

URL for list of all challenged names? — rachelmacgregor, October 25, 2001 @ 3:05 PM (1/3)

here is link — sanjeevgoyal, October 25, 2001 @ 4:01 PM (2/2)

488 out of 5000+Plankenstein+foreign generics+hidden fakes — rachelmacgregor, October 25, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)
Thanks Sanjeev eom — rachelmacgregor, October 25, 2001 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

bad news from Afilias... — jman, October 25, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (4/8)

uh...jman misquoted the article — Watchman, October 25, 2001 @ 3:32 PM (1/1)

with all due respect... — jman, October 26, 2001 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)

Thanks jman. I could not find it. Please give URL or clip if possible. — DomeBase, October 25, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)
Sunrise is Bull* — Garry Anderson, October 25, 2001 @ 1:32 PM (0/0)
They do it like this to save money- more challenges will come from other people this way eom — spot, October 25, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/3)

huh? — Watchman, October 25, 2001 @ 3:35 PM (1/2)

Afilias definitely gets a 'cut' from each successful challenge — DaveKing2, October 26, 2001 @ 10:03 AM (1/1)

Here it is: — DaveKing2, October 27, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

WIPO IS NOT GIVING RULINGS? — sanjeevgoyal, October 25, 2001 @ 4:16 AM (1/2)

WIPO extremely slow — DaveKing2, October 25, 2001 @ 5:16 AM (1/1)

It's all part of the same bullshit culture- It's more profitable for them to have delays. — spot, October 25, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

How can native IPv6 servers talk to IPv4 servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (2/15)

You already know how ... — InternetAdvocate, October 26, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)
.WEB is absolute garbage... — challenge, October 25, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (3/13)

The WorldWide NET — S. Hudgens, October 25, 2001 @ 1:33 PM (2/10)

Why dot-web will be less desirable than dot-net ... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)
Spamers, Dreamers and Boiler-room operators — challenge, October 25, 2001 @ 2:04 PM (1/8)

What a clever person you are! — S. Hudgens, October 25, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (1/7)

You're very welcome — challenge, October 25, 2001 @ 3:04 PM (1/6)

Posts — S. Hudgens, October 25, 2001 @ 4:02 PM (2/5)

Just out of curiosity ? — challenge, October 25, 2001 @ 5:04 PM (1/3)

Objectivity. — S. Hudgens, October 25, 2001 @ 5:34 PM (1/2)

You beat me, Shelby! — richard_henderson, October 25, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (1/1)

.GREENLAND and .ARCTIC ? — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)

Which of these TLDs are you working on ? — Jim Fleming, October 25, 2001 @ 5:01 PM (0/0)

Know thyself.. — cello, October 25, 2001 @ 5:21 AM (0/0)
Ah, I think you have dot web mixed up with dot biz... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 25, 2001 @ 4:43 AM (0/0)

If ICANN denies IOD's .web ap or significantly delays it, then IOD's clients would ... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)

First successful decision on a challenge ? — chrismoran, October 24, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (1/6)

Sorry... no news here, but please let us know if WHOIS shows any change — DomeBase, October 24, 2001 @ 8:50 PM (2/5)

whois has not changed - but I didn't expect it to yet — chrismoran, October 25, 2001 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)
WIPO is not giving rulings. — sanjeevgoyal, October 25, 2001 @ 4:08 AM (1/3)

My challenge requested cancellation as the name was a generic — Chrismoran, October 25, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (1/2)

CRIS — sanjeevgoyal, October 25, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (1/1)

I can tell you this — chrismoran, October 25, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

DNS Root Server System Advisory Committee — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (1/1)

http://www.isi.edu/otdr/ — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)

ICANN Proof-of-Concept Could Mean Selecting the Amateur TLD Registries — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 4:45 PM (4/15)

Every mainroot IPv4 domain still valid in IPv6 & IPv8 namespaces... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)
ICANN's Proof of Concept term just a formality. ICANN will give final approval to Afilias & Neulevel — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (1/1)

ADDENDUM... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)

Jim Fleming is a web.com client? — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (1/1)

Cambler Alert ... — InternetAdvocate, October 25, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)

WinXP — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 4:54 PM (1/9)

IN-ADDR.WEB...Do you use a 2002:<IPv4>:0000 prefix ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 6:12 PM (1/8)

Hhmmmm — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 6:19 PM (1/7)

Are you using IPv6 ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 6:27 PM (2/6)

Alternative Root Servers DEAD - end of story! — Ron_Bennett, October 24, 2001 @ 8:52 PM (1/1)

Do you mean IPv6 Root Servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

NO!! — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 7:44 PM (1/3)

.WEB Claims to be in Full Deployment Without IPv6 Servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 8:21 PM (1/2)

Erm... — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 8:43 PM (1/1)

Fleming, are you a real person, or a script that posts random messages about 'proof of concept'? — spot, October 24, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)

Committee requests information and updates re. TLDs — richard_henderson, October 24, 2001 @ 4:28 PM (0/0)

How Vint Cerf presented the "Proof of Concept" philosophy to the Subcommittee — richard_henderson, October 24, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)

Lobbying the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet — richard_henderson, October 24, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (1/2)

Contact Information — S. Hudgens, October 24, 2001 @ 6:17 PM (1/1)

thanks Richard and Shelby for the contact details - I plan — antipodes, October 24, 2001 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)

Challenge - Image Online Design & .WEB — S. Hudgens, October 24, 2001 @ 2:32 PM (2/11)

I support IOD. — S. Hudgens, October 24, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (1/3)

How many .WEB SLD names are registered ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 7:33 PM (1/2)

Wow... — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (1/1)

Has .WEB completed all of the ICANN Proof-of-Concept Reports ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)

.WEB TLD Server IPv4 Proof-of-Concept Net Search Results — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 2:44 PM (1/6)

Yes, but... — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 3:49 PM (1/5)

People asked for facts....those are facts.... — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 4:04 PM (1/4)

semantics — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (2/3)

If .WEB is in Full Deployment, it does not need ICANN — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)
14 RSCs Surveyed.....How Many of Them Match ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 4:54 PM (1/1)

who cares? — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)

.BIZ TLD Server Search Results — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 1:01 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL - CASE 1-SOESA UNRESOLVED - .INFO NAMES STILL NOT IN ACCOUNT — Ron_Bennett, October 24, 2001 @ 7:25 AM (2/3)

There is one more problem....... — onmove, October 24, 2001 @ 1:54 PM (0/0)
Have you checked the legacy .INFO servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (1/1)

Please explain — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

TLD Search Tools — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 12:28 AM (1/1)

.INFO Search Results - Where is Afilias ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)

Hearing is on H.R. 2417, the Dot Kids Name Act of 2001 — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)

VOTE BELOW: Do we inform Hawaii TM holders they could get Hawaii.info off Leopold? YES or NO- — spot, October 23, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (2/5)

Who will get the .HAWAII TLD ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (1/3)

any TM holder — spot, October 23, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/2)

.HAWAII not .HAWAII.info — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (1/1)

You seem to be on a promotional extravaganza. This is not really the place eom. — spot, October 24, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)

YES - eom — spot, October 23, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

ICANN is Just Doing Proof-of-Concept Testing — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 7:38 PM (0/0)

Afilias causing so many people so much trouble — richard_henderson, October 23, 2001 @ 7:24 PM (1/1)

And what does ICANN do? ........... Nothing — richard_henderson, October 23, 2001 @ 7:27 PM (0/0)

Philipp Grabensee — richard_henderson, October 23, 2001 @ 1:14 PM (3/6)

Clarification — Elmar Knipp, October 24, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (2/2)

180 days? - sounds suspicous — Garry Anderson, October 24, 2001 @ 7:13 PM (0/0)
Thank you — richard_henderson, October 24, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (0/0)

where does it say? — Watchman, October 23, 2001 @ 1:46 PM (1/1)

thanks — richard_henderson, October 23, 2001 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)

Grab Them and See - surely a joke? — Garry Anderson, October 23, 2001 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)

Govinda Leopold's behaviour is unacceptable — richard_henderson, October 23, 2001 @ 1:01 PM (0/0)

ANOTHER Afilias Board member with Questions to Answer! — richard_henderson, October 23, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)

TheInternetChallenge published in German by a "Multiple TM" applicant — richard_henderson, October 22, 2001 @ 11:26 PM (1/1)

This guy is taking the piss. Apart from the obvious liguistic difference, it's virtually identical — spot, October 23, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)

Another honest registrar? — Srana, October 22, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)

Genuine HAWAII Trademark Holder — rachelmacgregor, October 22, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (2/17)

OK LETS HAVE A VOTE. Shall we inform Hawaii TM owners that they can screw Leopold? I vote YES! — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 4:30 PM (1/1)

Yes — Garry Anderson, October 22, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)

NO ONE can trademark Hawaii — psbyowner, October 22, 2001 @ 3:01 PM (1/14)

WRONG -- it's trademarked multiple times — Watchman, October 22, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (1/13)

Generic terms CAN be trademarked — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 4:25 PM (2/12)

True — Garry Anderson, October 22, 2001 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)
So the bottom line is: anything can be trademarked? — vera-city, October 22, 2001 @ 6:29 PM (2/10)

Pretty much..here's the deal — Watchman, October 22, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
Generic terms — onmove, October 22, 2001 @ 7:23 PM (2/8)

Thats Right and — investor, October 22, 2001 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)
I agree, but suggest an exception be made since the fraudster in this case is on the Registry board. — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 8:40 PM (1/6)

Actually Govinda Leopold has an explanation — richard_henderson, October 22, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (2/5)

Hey, maybe FortKnox.info was a "test mistake" too? — vera-city, October 23, 2001 @ 4:52 AM (0/0)
Three weeks later did Govinda make "another" mistake? — richard_henderson, October 22, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (2/3)

Quote from Govinda's own homepage! — richard_henderson, October 22, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)
Leopold is talking out of her arse — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (1/1)

Leoppold's company has a bad reputation — Anion, October 23, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (0/0)

Complaint against ICANN sent to the Department of Commerce — rachelmacgregor, October 22, 2001 @ 2:16 PM (1/1)

I wish you luck — Garry Anderson, October 22, 2001 @ 7:47 PM (0/0)

Complaint against Afilias sent to Department of Commerce — rachelmacgregor, October 22, 2001 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)

Copy of e-mail sent to Secretary Evans at Dept of Commerce — rachelmacgregor, October 22, 2001 @ 1:51 PM (0/0)

.BIZ Names are LIVE ! — Jim Fleming, October 22, 2001 @ 11:08 AM (1/1)

Well, thanks, I'm sure! — hiltonian, October 22, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)

50,000+ .BIZ Domains on Hold --- anyone have a Link to the List? — IncompetentAfilias, October 22, 2001 @ 6:43 AM (0/0)

What else can we do? — cambler, October 22, 2001 @ 3:54 AM (7/51)

It Sounds Like the .WEB IPv4 Proof-of-Concept Testing is Going Well... — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (1/20)

I'm not sure I follow — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 5:51 PM (1/19)

Does .WEB have IPv6 Servers ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (1/18)

Servers — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (2/17)

Regarding 3D and the 2D WEB-centric World — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (2/15)

Recollection — S. Hudgens, October 24, 2001 @ 2:22 AM (1/6)

1D, 2D, 3D — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (1/5)

Last post on this weirdness. — S. Hudgens, October 24, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (1/4)

"let us concentrate on issues that affect us all" — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 2:56 PM (1/3)

Your comments — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 3:35 PM (1/2)

"let us concentrate on issues that affect us all" — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)

If you don't know that, why are you posting here? EOM — hiltonian, October 24, 2001 @ 3:56 PM (0/0)

I've read it — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 10:04 PM (1/7)

OK, You have read it, did you learn anything from it ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 10:43 PM (2/6)

Because. . . — World Thoughts, October 23, 2001 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)
Jim, I suggest you "beam" yourself back to the New.net ship....... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 23, 2001 @ 11:20 PM (1/4)

.BIZ is still in the Proof-of-Concept Phase — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (1/3)

Yes, and... — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (1/2)

What Phase is .WEB in ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 3:19 AM (1/1)

phase — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)

Do you Mean Deployed or Implemented ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)

Did IOD get WEB.INFO ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)

No, it was taken by Afilias — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 1:52 AM (0/0)

Clarify ... — InternetAdvocate, October 23, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (1/1)

Yes, correct — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)

New.Net Has Raised the Bar — Jim Fleming, October 22, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (2/20)

New.net has raised the bar???? Give me a break!!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 23, 2001 @ 3:22 AM (1/17)

Get a life! New.net is the best alternative solution to all this crooked mess...eom — mole, October 23, 2001 @ 9:40 AM (3/16)

New.net Is Getting To Be A Joke ... — GettingScrewed, October 23, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (1/1)

Yeah, except there's no punch line (unless you are the 1% who has a plug in) eom — spot, October 23, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)

I agree with Greg — Garry Anderson, October 23, 2001 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)
New.Net is working on .MOVIE — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 3:30 PM (1/12)

New.Net — S. Hudgens, October 23, 2001 @ 3:57 PM (1/11)

Do you think ICANN has 100% Visibility ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 5:07 PM (1/10)

ICANN — S. Hudgens, October 23, 2001 @ 6:23 PM (1/9)

"visibility" is all that matters ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (1/8)

Yes. — S. Hudgens, October 23, 2001 @ 9:16 PM (1/7)

There is More to the DNS than Web Sites — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 9:20 PM (1/6)

Wow. — S. Hudgens, October 24, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (1/5)

It all boils down to fairness. — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 2:05 AM (1/4)

well.. — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (1/3)

Are You Sure Your Comments Are Correct ? — Jim Fleming, October 24, 2001 @ 3:16 AM (2/2)

Jim, The Enterprise just called - You're due back from your 'away' mission... — IncompetentAfilias, October 24, 2001 @ 4:40 AM (0/0)
comments — cambler, October 24, 2001 @ 4:00 AM (0/0)

good ideas... — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (1/1)

Alternate Root or No Root ? — Jim Fleming, October 23, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (0/0)

E6.2 - You have blown it ;-) — Garry Anderson, October 22, 2001 @ 8:50 PM (1/1)

Sure — cambler, October 22, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

0:253 WEB — Jim Fleming, October 22, 2001 @ 11:57 AM (0/0)
Links? — IncompetentAfilias, October 22, 2001 @ 6:39 AM (1/1)

Link — S. Hudgens, October 22, 2001 @ 1:16 PM (0/0)

http://www.fbi.gov/interagency/ifcc/ifccoverview.htm — antipodes, October 21, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (1/2)

If there is a Landrush 2, I guarantee people with previous prereg's won't get any priority. — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 1:37 AM (1/1)

Yep, Afilias gets the gold mine, Landrushers get the shaft — antipodes, October 22, 2001 @ 2:48 AM (0/0)

let's go to the Afilias fiasco/abomination/scam party!!!! — antipodes, October 21, 2001 @ 9:15 PM (1/2)

How to get tickets — richard_henderson, October 22, 2001 @ 11:42 AM (1/1)

I think we should organise something for that night - may be — antipodes, October 22, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (0/0)

Afilias Presents U2 and No Doubt at the ICANN meeting! — icanncant, October 21, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (4/11)

NEWSFLASH: ICANN plans to issue ANOTHER new TLD ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)
Afilias PreVents me&U2 from Receiving Justice; No Doubt of That At All, at the ICANN meetings! — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)
Afilias Board member preventing American State from being used — rachelmacgregor, October 21, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (1/6)

An idea to drop Afilias/ Govinda Leopold in the shit — spot, October 21, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (1/5)

Hawaii authorities — Garry Anderson, October 21, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (1/4)

Leopold must be stopped. If we can stop her by informing people with a Hawaii tm, we should. — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (1/3)

"more deserved of the name" ? — Garry Anderson, October 22, 2001 @ 11:19 AM (1/2)

Leopold must be stopped — spot, October 22, 2001 @ 11:45 AM (1/1)

They all should be stopped — Garry Anderson, October 22, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)

What a Joke — icanncant, October 21, 2001 @ 7:59 PM (1/1)

Re: What a Joke — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)

challenged names ??? — PAWEL, October 21, 2001 @ 7:41 PM (2/2)

after the WIPO challenge - watch the Afilias site for their — antipodes, October 21, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)
I already know the answer EOM — PAWEL, October 21, 2001 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

Does Afilias answer any e-mails ? — PAWEL, October 21, 2001 @ 7:38 PM (1/1)

Can't. — S. Hudgens, October 21, 2001 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)

.info / .net ? — PAWEL, October 21, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)

Image Online Design: It's place in internet history [something that will never be overlooked] — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 21, 2001 @ 5:29 PM (1/6)

Didn't Afilias, that esteemed protector of intellectual property, — vera-city, October 21, 2001 @ 6:26 PM (1/5)

Acknowledge and respect common law trademark rights? — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (1/4)

Image Online Design's application THREAD CONTINUED from earlier... — InternetAdvocate, October 23, 2001 @ 2:13 AM (1/3)

IOD subthread CONTINUED ... — InternetAdvocate, October 23, 2001 @ 2:25 AM (1/2)

and so... — cambler, October 23, 2001 @ 4:31 AM (1/1)

Exactly. — cello, October 24, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

Who is attending the ICANN meetings? — badregistrars, October 21, 2001 @ 2:06 PM (0/0)

If ICANN is accountable to the US Government, to which office are complaints to be sent? — spot, October 21, 2001 @ 2:06 AM (1/2)

both accountable and acceptable to — cello, October 21, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (1/1)

Department of Commerce ... Here's the email address — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)

Appeal for a Lawyer who will challenge Afilias - a matter of honor — rachelmacgregor, October 20, 2001 @ 9:54 PM (2/2)

Please contact: Swindle and Fleece — vera-city, October 21, 2001 @ 5:08 PM (0/0)
Contact: Dewey,Cheatem and Howe — vera-city, October 21, 2001 @ 4:58 PM (0/0)

Reversed Domain Hijacking: The rules — spot, October 19, 2001 @ 7:29 PM (2/27)

What flipping rules? — Garry Anderson, October 20, 2001 @ 4:57 PM (0/0)
answers — DaveKing2, October 19, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (2/25)

landrush registrations — onmove, October 20, 2001 @ 8:05 PM (1/19)

I don't see it... — cambler, October 20, 2001 @ 9:05 PM (1/18)

Please consider this....... — onmove, October 20, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/17)

I don't think so — cambler, October 20, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (1/16)

What gives people the right to own the Internet? — rachelmacgregor, October 20, 2001 @ 10:20 PM (3/15)

Agreed! — DaveKing2, October 21, 2001 @ 5:52 AM (2/2)

All common dictionary words shouldn't have been claimable in the Sunrise process at all ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
Bruce Springsteen - new TLD — Garry Anderson, October 21, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)

Good points... — InternetAdvocate, October 20, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
Big Business has no right to annex the Internet — rachelmacgregor, October 20, 2001 @ 10:54 PM (2/10)

Re: Big Business has no right to annex the Internet. — InternetAdvocate, October 20, 2001 @ 11:46 PM (0/0)
"The Internet Parliament" to govern ICANN — rachelmacgregor, October 20, 2001 @ 11:07 PM (2/8)

Won't work — cambler, October 20, 2001 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)
Your 'Internet Parliament' idea is dangerous ... — InternetAdvocate, October 20, 2001 @ 11:33 PM (1/6)

Ending ICANN's Autonomy — rachelmacgregor, October 21, 2001 @ 12:00 AM (3/5)

Rebuttals Galore... — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
dubious — richard_henderson, October 21, 2001 @ 11:00 AM (0/0)
If you want some control of ICANN — Garry Anderson, October 21, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (1/2)

Really? — cambler, October 21, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)

No - I just made it up ;-) — Garry Anderson, October 21, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (0/0)

This is mostly based on Trade Marks... — psbyowner, October 20, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (2/4)

If ICANN is accountable to the US Government, to which office are complaints to be sent? — spot, October 21, 2001 @ 2:04 AM (0/0)
Duh. Precedents. — InternetAdvocate, October 20, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/2)

thanks for the correction — psbyowner, October 21, 2001 @ 3:50 PM (1/1)

You're welcome, ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)

New UK SLDs; ICANN meeting — hiltonian, October 19, 2001 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)

Neulevel quietly grants me a .BIZ name... — dtobias, October 19, 2001 @ 4:02 PM (1/1)

Wow!! I got one too! — hiltonian, October 19, 2001 @ 6:41 PM (0/0)

"Generating Disputes For Profit" Where will it end??? — Timberstone, October 19, 2001 @ 3:40 PM (1/2)

Conflicts — dtobias, October 19, 2001 @ 3:58 PM (1/1)

Re:Reply — Timberstone, October 19, 2001 @ 7:07 PM (0/0)

Guess what ICANN is doing next? — anthony 2nd, October 19, 2001 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

ICANN - The Movie — DaveKing2, October 19, 2001 @ 1:59 PM (0/0)

Did anyone actually Compile Registrars 'Performance' during Landrush? — IncompetentAfilias, October 19, 2001 @ 6:03 AM (0/0)

Noble Cause — arbitrator, October 19, 2001 @ 4:20 AM (0/0)

.BIZ delays real-time Registration Start-date to: Wednesday, Nov. 7th (what smoooth launches!) — IncompetentAfilias, October 19, 2001 @ 4:15 AM (0/0)

Check your Nameit/ Aitdomains Registrations — Srana, October 18, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)

will Afilias condone fraud ? — Anion, October 18, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (1/8)

I have tried to get Roland LaPlante to confirm that Afilias — antipodes, October 18, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (1/7)

Afilias will challenge a significant number — Watchman, October 19, 2001 @ 2:00 PM (1/6)

read between the lines - the Afilias Ltd. way I suppose — antipodes, October 19, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (1/5)

will you apologize if proven wrong? — Watchman, October 19, 2001 @ 9:08 PM (1/4)

I apologise now Watchman for my bad language, but almost — antipodes, October 19, 2001 @ 9:50 PM (1/3)

where I'm coming from — Watchman, October 19, 2001 @ 10:19 PM (2/2)

Afilias didnt make start up 'mistakes'. SUNRISE=BULL* PROPAGANDA- a planned scam to get more money. — spot, October 19, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
Richard Henderson's theinternetchallenge.com site has been — antipodes, October 19, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)

Question for Govinda Leopold, Afilias Board member... 3 ... — richard_henderson, October 18, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (1/1)

Perhaps you should mail her too? — Anion, October 19, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (0/0)

Question to Mickey Beyer of Speednames .... 3 .... — richard_henderson, October 18, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (1/1)

Again... — cambler, October 18, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)

Challenge to Vint Cerf ... 3 — richard_henderson, October 18, 2001 @ 7:42 PM (1/5)

Dr. Cerf — cambler, October 18, 2001 @ 7:49 PM (2/4)

he may reply to you, but he has never replied to my many mails. — antipodes, October 18, 2001 @ 8:31 PM (0/0)
Time for Vint to "face the questions" or skulk in ignominious silence — richard_henderson, October 18, 2001 @ 7:58 PM (1/2)

Sure... — cambler, October 18, 2001 @ 8:21 PM (1/1)

What the flip do they do for their money? — Garry Anderson, October 19, 2001 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

How Afilias intends to redeem itself from this mess — mole, October 18, 2001 @ 7:03 PM (1/1)

When you got 'em by the balls, the heart and mind will follow. — vera-city, October 18, 2001 @ 7:22 PM (0/0)

annoucement from Afilias concerning sale of Sunrise names — DomeBase, October 18, 2001 @ 4:13 PM (4/11)

couldn't find it DomeBase - but it is good news if Afilias — antipodes, October 18, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (1/4)

did you try link at bottom of my message? does that work? — DomeBase, October 18, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (1/3)

No luck with link Domebase — Srana, October 18, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (1/2)

Ah, does not work from my home computer but did from work... — DomeBase, October 18, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (1/1)

here is another link that probably works for all... same topic — DomeBase, October 19, 2001 @ 4:01 PM (0/0)

Why would business want to sell TM? — Garry Anderson, October 18, 2001 @ 6:49 PM (1/1)

I agree Garry — DomeBase, October 18, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)

So Screw The Legit Sunrise Registrants? — GettingScrewed, October 18, 2001 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)
Why did Awfullsillyass "sell" them to begin with? — vera-city, October 18, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (1/2)

Excellent question from vera-city — richard_henderson, October 18, 2001 @ 6:08 PM (1/1)

Most excellent response. Thank you Richard. — vera-city, October 18, 2001 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)

FREE TM SEARCH — arbitrator, October 18, 2001 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)

ARNI lies, just like ICANN. Read more about it here... — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)

Image Online Design's application will be approved next year.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 17, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (4/31)

'Next Round': 2005 I predict or 2008. — psbyowner, October 19, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

If you don't need them... — cambler, October 19, 2001 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)

Laf'ing at all your _UNBIASED_ opinions on .WEB... you all own .WEB domains or work for 'em :P eom — IncompetentAfilias, October 18, 2001 @ 8:01 PM (1/13)

No... — cambler, October 18, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (2/12)

- Mr. Cambler - — IncompetentAfilias, October 19, 2001 @ 1:18 AM (2/10)

I am making predictions on Image Online Design's future based on fact..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 19, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (2/7)

Opportunist — S. Hudgens, October 19, 2001 @ 1:45 PM (1/4)

No — IncompetentAfilias, October 19, 2001 @ 6:16 PM (1/3)

You're right — cambler, October 19, 2001 @ 6:24 PM (1/2)

Re: Perfect World — IncompetentAfilias, October 20, 2001 @ 7:38 AM (1/1)

dropped domains — cambler, October 20, 2001 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)

Agreed, New.Net supporters are the real weasels... bar 'em at the doors! ;) eom — IncompetentAfilias, October 19, 2001 @ 3:58 AM (1/1)

Master of all domains... and that includes yours ...whahahhahahaaaaaaaaaaaaeom — mole, October 19, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (0/0)

That's "Ambler" :-) — cambler, October 19, 2001 @ 1:35 AM (1/1)

Thanks for the reply... Agreed it's probably hard to work out the bugs without Customers heh.....eom — IncompetentAfilias, October 19, 2001 @ 4:01 AM (0/0)

welcome Cambler — DomeBase, October 18, 2001 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)

I couldn't agree more! — kodo, October 18, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (0/0)
Well, You May Be Right , But ... — GettingScrewed, October 18, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (3/13)

Another suggestion about IOD — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)
I think the board knows...Nonetheless good point!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 18, 2001 @ 2:26 AM (1/2)

Sorry, But The Directors Are Really In The Dark About The .INFO Debacle ... — GettingScrewed, October 18, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)

well it's time ICANN's directors addressed the issues that — antipodes, October 18, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (0/0)

IOD — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (1/8)

web.com?!? — S. Hudgens, October 18, 2001 @ 1:28 PM (1/7)

Using web.com — cambler, October 18, 2001 @ 5:55 PM (1/6)

Using web.com — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (1/5)

I still don't get it — cambler, October 19, 2001 @ 5:02 AM (1/4)

Try this... — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (1/3)

Sure... — cambler, October 20, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (1/2)

Here's the value ... — InternetAdvocate, October 21, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/1)

No value at all — cambler, October 22, 2001 @ 3:20 AM (0/0)

Can Afternic sell the www.net.nz domain? — lCANN, October 17, 2001 @ 6:54 PM (1/3)

I think ... — DOTNZ, October 18, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (2/2)

Mr ICANN — hiltonian, October 18, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
Dot-NZ Domain Registry can sell net.nz SLD. — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)

Image Online Design — S. Hudgens, October 17, 2001 @ 3:31 PM (6/36)

IOD should buy web.net's domain name ... — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 4:18 AM (1/4)

Duh. — S. Hudgens, October 19, 2001 @ 1:50 PM (1/3)

No Duh! — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (1/2)

Response. — S. Hudgens, October 20, 2001 @ 2:59 AM (1/1)

Rebuttal ... — InternetAdvocate, October 22, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)

IOD should buy web.com ... — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/10)

Are you on drugs? — kodo, October 18, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (2/9)

You think New.Net is on drugs too? — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 3:45 AM (1/7)

I don't see it — cambler, October 19, 2001 @ 4:59 AM (1/6)

LOL. — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (1/5)

I think you miss my point — cambler, October 20, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (1/4)

I understood your point ... — InternetAdvocate, October 22, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (2/3)

Oops. — InternetAdvocate, October 22, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)
I admit that web.net is a much better deal than web.com — InternetAdvocate, October 22, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)

No, thanks — cambler, October 22, 2001 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)

COMPETITION with .com? — Garry Anderson, October 18, 2001 @ 8:24 AM (0/0)

keep in mind what business ICANN is in..... .com — stuart, October 17, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)
ummm... I wanted media.web but its taken, can I get it if IOD become the .web registrar? eom — mole, October 17, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (3/10)

Me too — cambler, October 18, 2001 @ 6:57 AM (0/0)
Well I wanted rockport.info — kodo, October 18, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (2/7)

City names — Garry Anderson, October 18, 2001 @ 8:30 AM (0/0)
Question is, do I have a fair chance to media.web if IOD becomes the .web ICANN registrar? — mole, October 18, 2001 @ 3:41 AM (1/5)

Fair chance? — S. Hudgens, October 18, 2001 @ 1:22 PM (1/4)

Touche! This is the very reason why 20,000 premium secured .web domains is premafreezing IOD..eom — mole, October 18, 2001 @ 6:55 PM (1/3)

IOD is the .WEB choice! — S. Hudgens, October 18, 2001 @ 7:52 PM (1/2)

My dear Mr. Hudgens, — mole, October 18, 2001 @ 8:10 PM (1/1)

I know... — S. Hudgens, October 18, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)

Why didn't you register it before someone else did? — S. Hudgens, October 17, 2001 @ 6:53 PM (0/0)

Afilias : "This sham of a company" — rachelmacgregor, October 17, 2001 @ 4:26 PM (0/0)
ICANN will use the .info and .biz failures to justify inaction — Anion, October 17, 2001 @ 3:43 PM (2/6)

IOD can and will do it! — S. Hudgens, October 17, 2001 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)
I agree... this is the end of new tld launches except what's owed — mole, October 17, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (1/4)

Political Pressure — S. Hudgens, October 17, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (1/3)

DoC is Department of Chickens — Garry Anderson, October 17, 2001 @ 6:07 PM (1/2)

DoC is Department of Corruptoids — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (1/1)

And thank you for your support — Garry Anderson, October 18, 2001 @ 8:40 AM (0/0)

Attempted "Reverse Hijacking" - Need Advice — DomainSpeculator, October 17, 2001 @ 2:52 AM (8/10)

Similar Circumstances — geodiego, October 19, 2001 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)
Their tm is likely ******* Capital - therefore — Garry Anderson, October 17, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
tm is not enough — Anion, October 17, 2001 @ 3:39 PM (0/0)
Congratulations ... Get A Domain Name Lawyer ... — GettingScrewed, October 17, 2001 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)
ICANN 101: .COM Equals Carte Blanche to All Other TLDs... — Ron_Bennett, October 17, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (1/1)

You wish ... eom — mole, October 17, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

Ask them for trademark proof, words are cheap ...eom — mole, October 17, 2001 @ 4:28 AM (1/1)

My hunch is they most probably have the TM..eom — DomainSpeculator, October 17, 2001 @ 4:41 AM (0/0)

Please email me regarding this issue. eom. — gckorn, October 17, 2001 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)
Have you confirmed that they have a trademark on the name? — DomeBase, October 17, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)

Colliding dot-biz domains ... — Internet Advocate, October 17, 2001 @ 2:10 AM (1/4)

Do you think ICANN care a fig? — Garry Anderson, October 17, 2001 @ 5:25 PM (2/3)

ICANN cares as much as ORSC does... — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (1/1)

Impropriety — Garry Anderson, October 18, 2001 @ 8:04 AM (0/0)

Why should they? Did they help us when we needed it? eom — mole, October 17, 2001 @ 6:06 PM (0/0)

DotWeb — Elvis, October 16, 2001 @ 11:44 PM (1/3)

Don't be so sure young padwan learner — kodo, October 18, 2001 @ 2:38 AM (1/2)

IOD and .WEB — S. Hudgens, October 18, 2001 @ 2:36 PM (1/1)

Whatchu talkin bout Willis? — InternetAdvocate, October 19, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 07 ... — richard_henderson, October 16, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 06 ... — richard_henderson, October 16, 2001 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 05 ... — richard_henderson, October 16, 2001 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 04 ... — richard_henderson, October 16, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)

Afilias 'Whois' Not Working, Again — GettingScrewed, October 16, 2001 @ 7:29 PM (1/2)

Afilias consortium is doing its best to drive the Internet — antipodes, October 16, 2001 @ 9:23 PM (1/1)

Is that Afilias consortium? or Afilias cartel? <eom> — kodo, October 18, 2001 @ 2:33 AM (0/0)

Really good article — hiltonian, October 16, 2001 @ 7:22 PM (2/8)

.COM is all that matters...thus the new TLDs were doomed to fail... — Ron_Bennett, October 16, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (2/6)

ICANN mismanagement — Garry Anderson, October 17, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)
Is TLD Review Task Force paying attention? — Ray_F, October 17, 2001 @ 3:48 AM (1/4)

There is NO domain shortage in .COM... — Ron_Bennett, October 17, 2001 @ 10:19 AM (2/3)

Many dot-com domains have dropped 80% to 90% in price... — InternetAdvocate, October 18, 2001 @ 1:21 AM (1/1)

Seen UK car number plates sold for more — Garry Anderson, October 18, 2001 @ 1:32 PM (0/0)

How to define supply — Ray_F, October 17, 2001 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

a very persuasive article - quite depressing if the charges — antipodes, October 16, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (0/0)

The new .USA domain names at http://dotusa.com — Janice, October 16, 2001 @ 3:02 AM (3/5)

Scam? Hoping people will confuse with general rollout of .us names?? — SNAFU, October 16, 2001 @ 7:07 PM (0/0)
ICANN may allow .USA in 2002 — Garry Anderson, October 16, 2001 @ 8:45 AM (2/2)

Alt Roots — Elvis, October 16, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
Have requests even been filed yet? — Janice, October 16, 2001 @ 4:47 PM (0/0)

Alt Root — InternetAdvocate, October 16, 2001 @ 4:35 AM (0/0)

Don't blame Afilias for not checking trademarks at submission time... — InternetAdvocate, October 16, 2001 @ 1:26 AM (3/9)

Wrong — Vera-City, October 16, 2001 @ 7:29 PM (1/4)

Not wrong. — InternetAdvocate, October 17, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/3)

Agree plus — vera-city, October 17, 2001 @ 3:48 AM (1/2)

Accepting money under false pretences? — rachelmacgregor, October 17, 2001 @ 6:40 AM (1/1)

Bad Faith? — vera-city, October 17, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)

What was point of Sunrise? — Garry Anderson, October 16, 2001 @ 8:05 AM (1/2)

The point of Sunrise ... — Internet Advocate, October 17, 2001 @ 1:40 AM (1/1)

I understood — Garry Anderson, October 17, 2001 @ 7:59 AM (0/0)

Afilias Dot-Info Parody ... — InternetAdvocate, October 16, 2001 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 03... — richard_henderson, October 15, 2001 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 02... — richard_henderson, October 15, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (1/1)

And the same person in a second e-mail... — richard_henderson, October 15, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)

Afilias Victim 01... — richard_henderson, October 15, 2001 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)

Still Waiting For Invoices From Some Registrars For .INFO Domains ... — GettingScrewed, October 15, 2001 @ 9:02 PM (1/1)

... but here it is a problem with some registrars! — Helveticus, October 16, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (0/0)

Neulevel doesn't have my domain name apps from Verisign — benclarkiii, October 15, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (2/6)

VeriSign submitted my .biz applications; but didn't receive "proceed or cancel" emails from Neulevel — sfeibish, October 15, 2001 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
Same Here...VeriSign/Network Solutions did NOT submit Applications — Ron_Bennett, October 15, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (1/4)

I paid for 50 bids on media.biz at Network Solutions and don't know what happened to them ! — mole, October 15, 2001 @ 3:33 AM (2/3)

I paid for 2,000 bids on show.biz at DomainDiscover ... — InternetAdvocate, October 16, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)

You were ripped off mate — Elvis, October 16, 2001 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)

I do know that MelbourneIT submitted my .biz bids though.. but with Smiley's case, what's the use? — mole, October 15, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Isn't it extraordinary ..... — richard_henderson, October 14, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (2/2)

if I were a board member and I thought I or my organization might get sued, I'd say nothing also — sfeibish, October 15, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)
People of Honour — Garry Anderson, October 15, 2001 @ 7:20 AM (0/0)

Question for Govinda Leopold, Afilias Board member ... 2 ... — richard_henderson, October 14, 2001 @ 10:03 PM (0/0)

Question to Mickey Beyer of Speednames... 2 ... — richard_henderson, October 14, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

Challenge to Vint Cerf 2... — richard_henderson, October 14, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

Afilias - the leather bound, steam driven registry is out of — antipodes, October 14, 2001 @ 7:49 AM (0/0)

Afilias doesn't work. NeuLevel is Illegal. — kodo, October 14, 2001 @ 4:19 AM (3/15)

My Prediction: Image Online Design will get ICANN approval for dot web next year — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14, 2001 @ 5:46 PM (3/10)

hypenated key words and search engine rankings — antipodes, October 14, 2001 @ 10:33 PM (1/2)

A hypenated domain can get you higher Google ranking.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/1)

I understand the value of good meta-tags — antipodes, October 15, 2001 @ 1:21 AM (0/0)

Didn't Afilias also apply for the .web registry? — vera-city, October 14, 2001 @ 8:37 PM (1/1)

The problem is with privately owned registries is: — vera-city, October 15, 2001 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)

... but many dot web domain names already taken — Helveticus, October 14, 2001 @ 6:54 PM (3/4)

Good point, Helv...Who cares about .web all names are taken eom — psbyowner, October 15, 2001 @ 6:41 PM (1/1)

Ah, I would emphatically disagree with you that "All the dot web names are gone" — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 15, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

Image Online Design's Registry [explained] — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 14, 2001 @ 11:46 PM (0/0)
names already taken — kodo, October 14, 2001 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)

My .info names are and have been working fine since activated eom — psbyowner, October 14, 2001 @ 5:08 PM (2/2)

What did you do? File a bogus trademark claim? — kodo, October 14, 2001 @ 7:51 PM (0/0)
Mine too, maybe I just got lucky — hiltonian, October 14, 2001 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)

New.net rocks. — mole, October 14, 2001 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)

Afilias "Whois" Not Working, Again ... — GettingScrewed, October 14, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (1/3)

One Hour Later, Still Not Working — GettingScrewed, October 14, 2001 @ 1:49 AM (1/2)

doubt whether they could organise a cueue at a brothel eom — antipodes, October 14, 2001 @ 2:05 AM (1/1)

Let see how the guys do a http://www.whois.biz ... only neulevel.biz is available, dang ... eom — mole, October 14, 2001 @ 5:38 AM (0/0)

TISCOVER - articel in an austrian newspaper — Lachmann, October 13, 2001 @ 2:20 PM (3/6)

Re: "articel in an austrian newspaper" ... — InternetAdvocate, October 14, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)
Quite informative — Helveticus, October 13, 2001 @ 7:26 PM (1/2)

The difficulty...... and why Lubsen must resign — rachelmacgregor, October 13, 2001 @ 7:43 PM (1/1)

More will happen when — vera-city, October 13, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)

Austrian article translated by Babelfish... "enjoy"! — rachelmacgregor, October 13, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)

Cyperpiraterie ... wahhahahhahahhahahhaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa — mole, October 13, 2001 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)

ICB Toll Free article — Garry Anderson, October 13, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (0/0)

did Afilias charge registrars to cueue preregistrations? — antipodes, October 13, 2001 @ 5:47 AM (0/0)

DomeBase.com revised with new proposal for fairness to Land Rushers — DomeBase, October 13, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (0/0)

L.A. judge bars lottery for '.biz' — Garry Anderson, October 12, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (1/1)

NeuLevel Says only 20% are affected - Total BS - Percentage is Much Higher! — Ron_Bennett, October 13, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)

Thank You ICANN for Making .COM Domains More Valuable - Thanks again :-) — Ron_Bennett, October 12, 2001 @ 10:47 PM (0/0)

Olympic Sex! — rachelmacgregor, October 12, 2001 @ 10:27 PM (3/7)

IOC's pre-emptive strike against any pornos piggybacking on Olympics... — InternetAdvocate, October 14, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
New Olympic sport? — Anion, October 13, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (1/1)

New Olympic sport? LOL... — InternetAdvocate, October 14, 2001 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)

i'll roote for Scotland Rachel while you root for Scotland — antipodes, October 12, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (1/3)

and the world's leading companies are not above a little — antipodes, October 12, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (2/2)

FANS.info — vera-city, October 13, 2001 @ 5:26 AM (0/0)
ALUMINA.info — vera-city, October 13, 2001 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)

Landrush I/II financial standing going with prereg refunds — antipodes, October 12, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)

.info cybersquatting in the Sydney Morning Herald — antipodes, October 12, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)

BBC News — Garry Anderson, October 12, 2001 @ 6:21 PM (5/13)

Non-Proof of Concept — vera-city, October 13, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
CNET article also — DomeBase, October 13, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/1)

good one Bob - like you, I had no axe to grind until it — antipodes, October 13, 2001 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

Why nobody of honour in authority? — Garry Anderson, October 12, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)
laPlante SUCH a fricking spin-trickster — rachelmacgregor, October 12, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (2/5)

Roland's insane delusions — rachelmacgregor, October 12, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)
Truly a Ship of Fools. — vera-city, October 12, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (1/3)

registrars gaged by registry-registrar license agreements — antipodes, October 12, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (1/2)

This is one reason we could get action from enlisting Registrar support — DomeBase, October 13, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (1/1)

good proposal Bob - seems to address the important elements — antipodes, October 13, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (0/0)

Spin, lies and incompetence (IMHO) — hiltonian, October 12, 2001 @ 7:17 PM (1/2)

Not checking trademarks at submission time ... — InternetAdvocate, October 16, 2001 @ 1:42 AM (1/1)

Was there any money in it to make checks at submission time? — vera-city, October 16, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Afilias "Whois" Not Resolving ... — GettingScrewed, October 12, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (1/1)

Here's What You Get ... — GettingScrewed, October 12, 2001 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)

Dot biz -- 53,000 names in legal suspension... any other news?..eom — mole, October 12, 2001 @ 4:01 PM (1/2)

Another contradictory statement...!!!! — challenge, October 12, 2001 @ 5:03 PM (1/1)

uhm, have you been following the news ...???........... — mole, October 12, 2001 @ 6:27 PM (0/0)

WIPO.INFO — sanjeevgoyal, October 12, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (0/0)

Name sever changes — ais, October 12, 2001 @ 2:52 AM (3/4)

Name server changes — dtobias, October 12, 2001 @ 3:43 PM (1/1)

More comments — dtobias, October 12, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (0/0)

It is a mess - I've had trouble with three different registrars. But, I did... — SNAFU, October 12, 2001 @ 6:34 AM (0/0)
I DONE — sanjeevgoyal, October 12, 2001 @ 4:09 AM (0/0)

Neulevel's Dot-Biz Applications were unfair & illegal lottery ... — InternetAdvocate, October 12, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (1/1)

smoke dreams eom — antipodes, October 12, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)

Afilias's Dot-Info Application Queues were 100% unfair rip-off... — InternetAdvocate, October 12, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (1/1)

Single pot — Garry Anderson, October 12, 2001 @ 7:17 AM (0/0)

Anyone have any experience with NameCheap.com ? — chrismoran, October 11, 2001 @ 8:16 PM (2/6)

Namecheap.com Prove To Be Honest And Reliable — chrismoran, October 12, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)
I think I may just have been screwed - (again) — chrismoran, October 11, 2001 @ 9:11 PM (3/4)

Namecheap.com Prove To Be Honest And Reliable — chrismoran, October 12, 2001 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)
Extraordinary Amount of Domain Name Theft By .INFO Registrars... — Ron_Bennett, October 12, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (0/0)
What time zone is UTC in relative to EDT ? EOM — chrismoran, October 11, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (1/1)

Difference is 4 hours EDT, 5 hours EST ... — InternetAdvocate, October 11, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (0/0)

More phonies trying to TM claim generic .biz terms... — psbyowner, October 11, 2001 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)

Afilias calls The Register to explain .info fiasco/ICANNwatch.com — icanncant, October 11, 2001 @ 1:05 PM (1/2)

That should be icannwatch.ORG... — dtobias, October 11, 2001 @ 4:04 PM (1/1)

ZZZZZ <yawn> ... — InternetAdvocate, October 11, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (0/0)

read and weep Elvis and Dan - did I get an Afilias reserve? — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 10:41 AM (3/4)

Hahaha — Elvis, October 14, 2001 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)
SHAME.info still available! — vera-city, October 11, 2001 @ 4:49 PM (0/0)
here's a hot tip for you... — jman, October 11, 2001 @ 1:42 PM (1/1)

Even more apt........... — scouser, October 14, 2001 @ 1:24 PM (0/0)

Afilias should declare an amnesty on Sunrise frauds while — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 8:49 AM (1/2)

TM Fraud... — Ron_Bennett, October 11, 2001 @ 10:25 AM (1/1)

thanks Ron - now get some sleep - eom — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 10:44 AM (0/0)

I have just emailed Hal Lubsen and Roland LaPlante, — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 7:40 AM (1/1)

Pre-registrations are Investments?...perhaps you should try Junk Bonds! :-) — Ron_Bennett, October 11, 2001 @ 10:02 AM (0/0)

REQUEST TO AFILIAS — sanjeevgoyal, October 11, 2001 @ 4:57 AM (2/3)

Excellent Idea...and WIPO/Afilias Could Even Make More Money!!! — Ron_Bennett, October 11, 2001 @ 10:35 AM (0/0)
That is actually an excellent idea — rachelmacgregor, October 11, 2001 @ 8:17 AM (1/1)

What has happened to those with honour? — Garry Anderson, October 11, 2001 @ 11:26 AM (0/0)

auction? — Anion, October 10, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (1/3)

Not very likely — challenge, October 11, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (1/2)

My estimate — Elvis, October 11, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (1/1)

add me to your slagging team Elvis - eom — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 10:53 AM (0/0)

xxx.biz TM? — lee2, October 10, 2001 @ 11:37 PM (1/1)

Lots of XXX's — pmaggs, October 11, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

Question for Govinda Leopold, Afilias Board member — richard_henderson, October 10, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

Question for Mickey Beyer of Speednames — richard_henderson, October 10, 2001 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)

Challenge to Vint Cerf — richard_henderson, October 10, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)

Not a bad article, with some substantive material... — DomeBase, October 10, 2001 @ 8:10 PM (3/8)

More ICANNspeak... — richard_henderson, October 10, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (0/0)
alternatives to Landrush II will be gross CORRUPTION — antipodes, October 10, 2001 @ 9:20 PM (1/5)

Tough choices for Land Rushers — DomeBase, October 10, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (1/4)

Bob - is there a technical reason the Landrush — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 6:06 AM (1/3)

Depends on data kept or not by all participating registrars... — DomeBase, October 11, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (1/2)

thanks Bob - yep pretty much looks like Afilias will do what — antipodes, October 11, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (1/1)

Dear Antipodes — DomeBase, October 13, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)

LandGrab II will be significant if .info lives up to its hype EOM — psbyowner, October 10, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)

Anyone knows? — challenge, October 10, 2001 @ 1:44 PM (1/4)

YES -Anyone can file UDRP challenge on .info — sanjeevgoyal, October 10, 2001 @ 1:49 PM (1/3)

Question — challenge, October 10, 2001 @ 2:43 PM (2/2)

After-the-fact TM's show hostile intent, or "bad faith" ... — psbyowner, October 10, 2001 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)
Good question... I could register a trademark now to fight sunrise challenge if NOT...eom — mole, October 10, 2001 @ 2:53 PM (0/0)

.eu tld — zny, October 10, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (2/3)

more information about .eu ... — Nikolai_Tiedemann, October 11, 2001 @ 11:53 AM (0/0)
.EU — GettingScrewed, October 10, 2001 @ 12:29 AM (1/1)

whahahhhahhahahahaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhh — mole, October 10, 2001 @ 1:10 PM (0/0)

inundated with info from the .info registry — antipodes, October 10, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/3)

Registrars moral obligation — Srana, October 10, 2001 @ 10:59 AM (2/2)

Fairness — Garry Anderson, October 10, 2001 @ 2:03 PM (0/0)
The landrush is over, Afilias is trying to bury the past, and auctions are the best way to go .. eom — mole, October 10, 2001 @ 1:09 PM (0/0)

Surely this must be public information... — jman, October 9, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)

pud@fuckedcompany.com can help us — Anion, October 9, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)

Have not heard from DomainDirect.com (Tucows) yet.... — psbyowner, October 9, 2001 @ 4:58 PM (3/5)

DomainDirect has just started to refund. — domainboy, October 9, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (1/2)

Refund to my null account at DomainDirect? Or my credit card ... sheesh -- eom — mole, October 10, 2001 @ 2:57 PM (1/1)

to credit cards — domainboy, October 10, 2001 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)

OK here we go. I will inform once the chargebacks are verified. eom — psbyowner, October 9, 2001 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)
Tucows Refunds may be starting. — Srana, October 9, 2001 @ 5:11 PM (0/0)

New.Net ... what keeps me sane — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 3:41 PM (1/1)

Yes new.net is excellent — Anion, October 9, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

Plank is screwed with the rest, thanks to efforts of the public who recorded events.... — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 2:43 PM (0/0)

ELIMINATE AFILIAS — stephenps, October 9, 2001 @ 2:02 PM (3/4)

IMH&HO, A SUGGESTION ... — InternetAdvocate, October 11, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)
revoke accreditation from rogue registrars — Anion, October 9, 2001 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
Now that is a stupid suggestion eom. — fred48, October 9, 2001 @ 3:35 PM (1/1)

Shut up singing! That was a good suggestion. — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)

The Scam — rachelmacgregor, October 9, 2001 @ 11:45 AM (3/7)

ICANN is the scam — Anion, October 9, 2001 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)
Wait till you see the open auctions in January for rereleased fraud domains ...$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 2:35 PM (2/4)

It would have taken a real crooked business mind... — psbyowner, October 9, 2001 @ 5:11 PM (0/0)
what auctions? — domainboy, October 9, 2001 @ 3:29 PM (2/2)

I have not heard anything about auction instead of LR II, but — DomeBase, October 9, 2001 @ 4:34 PM (0/0)
Does anyone have to announce a real Sunrise? duh ... eom — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)

SCAM — stephenps, October 9, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

.INFO Registry Now Open, but my .INFO domains Still Closed! — Ron_Bennett, October 9, 2001 @ 11:00 AM (2/3)

You are not alone, my friend! — Helveticus, October 9, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (1/1)

I registered 10 new domains with idregister.com ... and all perfect...kudos to the Israelis — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 3:06 PM (0/0)

Dang 3 out of 8 in Netsol control panel???????, and I thought I had it bad...eom — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 2:31 PM (0/0)

The first time Afilias has purged fraudulent data? — antipodes, October 9, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (0/0)

Afilias must employ national trademark authorities — Srana, October 8, 2001 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)

More on Plankenstein — richard_henderson, October 8, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (3/5)

Messrs. P and L are public relations fodder, — vera-city, October 11, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (0/0)
A strategic solution to this mess — spot, October 9, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (0/0)
About Tiscover - e-mail or phone to find out the facts? — richard_henderson, October 8, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (1/2)

Who is Plankenstein? — richard_henderson, October 8, 2001 @ 11:19 PM (1/1)

Article from Tirol Online - immediate action needed by ICANN and Afilias — richard_henderson, October 8, 2001 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)

Anyone get their money back from Tucows (DomainDirect.com) yet? — psbyowner, October 8, 2001 @ 4:54 PM (3/5)

Nope... I have 9 x $29 with them emo — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 2:07 AM (1/2)

it's eom, not emo. eom :-) — spot, October 9, 2001 @ 2:44 AM (1/1)

Woof! ... eom — mole, October 9, 2001 @ 3:11 PM (0/0)

Not yet!. — domainboy, October 9, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)
411.ca — onmove, October 8, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)

what is the dig utility please — chrismoran, October 8, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (1/1)

Dig Utility — dtobias, October 8, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

Question — 410, October 8, 2001 @ 5:30 AM (2/6)

Dotster's .info landrush IS still all messed up — SNAFU, October 8, 2001 @ 6:27 AM (1/3)

Joker.com — onmove, October 8, 2001 @ 7:20 AM (1/2)

Yes I got from Joker — sanjeevgoyal, October 8, 2001 @ 9:13 AM (1/1)

thanks. eom — onmove, October 8, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

Again — 410, October 8, 2001 @ 6:18 AM (1/1)

Use http://www.idregisters.com $29 for 2 years works perfectly all the time --eom — mole, October 8, 2001 @ 9:35 AM (0/0)

Whois updates — SNAFU, October 8, 2001 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)

Sunrise fraud and Afilias's obligations to Landrushers — antipodes, October 8, 2001 @ 2:22 AM (4/7)

clarification - Sunrise fraud and Afilias's obligations to — antipodes, October 8, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (0/0)
Lack of .info from Afilias.info — DaveKing2, October 8, 2001 @ 9:29 AM (1/2)

Afilias site screwed up — dtobias, October 8, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (1/1)

Fixed now... — dtobias, October 8, 2001 @ 3:10 PM (0/0)

Sunrise is bull* propaganda — Garry Anderson, October 8, 2001 @ 8:27 AM (0/0)
The whois data incriminating registrars needs to be raised before a court of law — spot, October 8, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (1/1)

some board members breached ICANN and Afilias registrar — antipodes, October 8, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

Speednames — spot, October 8, 2001 @ 1:44 AM (1/1)

I'd agree — DaveKing2, October 8, 2001 @ 9:35 AM (0/0)

Afilias hear this, please make a statement about sunrise abuse. — Elvis, October 7, 2001 @ 10:12 PM (0/0)

Has anybody here ever received a reply to email sent to Netsol? eom — mole, October 7, 2001 @ 7:42 PM (2/3)

Same experience — Helveticus, October 7, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
call them — Anion, October 7, 2001 @ 8:17 PM (1/1)

Thanks guys, I will try calling them ...eom — mole, October 8, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)

City and general location domain name holders make sure to visit this link... — psbyowner, October 7, 2001 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)

Dig Inconsistency — dtobias, October 7, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)

Afilias Fraud .. — GettingScrewed, October 7, 2001 @ 1:22 PM (0/0)

.INFO DNS Reliability Questioned...no A records for name servers - WHY? — Ron_Bennett, October 7, 2001 @ 8:01 AM (1/5)

.COM A Records in .INFO zone??? — arbitrage, October 7, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (1/4)

WRONG! A records (glue) ARE in ALWAYS used in .com, .net, and .org... — Ron_Bennett, October 7, 2001 @ 6:33 PM (1/3)

Better take another look at those zone files... — arbitrage, October 7, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (1/2)

Confused...I must be looking at different zone files...or don't understand... — Ron_Bennett, October 7, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (1/1)

I'd like a clarification too, if the matters you are discussing — antipodes, October 7, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (0/0)

NameCheap.com --- $8.88/year for .INFO Domains! Shows up IMMEDIATELY in WHOis — IncompetentAfilias, October 7, 2001 @ 3:13 AM (3/4)

Namecheap.com were great for me — chrismoran, October 8, 2001 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
I just used namecheap and after paying got an error and no whois — mole, October 7, 2001 @ 10:31 AM (1/1)

same experience — onmove, October 7, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)

Thanks a lot. — onmove, October 7, 2001 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)

Dot Info is definitely a global TLD... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 7, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (0/0)

What's going to happen about Plankenstein? — spot, October 7, 2001 @ 1:21 AM (2/9)

I reckon Speednames are on the fiddle — spot, October 8, 2001 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
Will Afilias challenge all of them? — richard_henderson, October 7, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (2/7)

Afilias made a public statement — ByteMstr, October 7, 2001 @ 1:56 PM (1/4)

um... reassuring words? — richard_henderson, October 7, 2001 @ 3:31 PM (2/3)

challenge is impossible — Anion, October 7, 2001 @ 8:13 PM (1/1)

Afilias will submit bulk challenge list in December — DaveKing2, October 8, 2001 @ 11:14 AM (0/0)

... but we can trust the Board of Afilias...? — richard_henderson, October 7, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (0/0)

trademarks — geodiego, October 7, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (1/1)

Check out www.theinternetchallenge.com. Extensive spadework — psbyowner, October 7, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)

Can I search WhoIs for all names registered by a certain person? — erikdw, October 6, 2001 @ 8:22 PM (1/1)

your best Bet ! — landofop, October 7, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)

RegisterFly: fast and cheap for live registrations! — Helveticus, October 6, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (2/3)

Except the .info name I registered with them yesterday... — SNAFU, October 7, 2001 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

No, I have not experienced such problems — Helveticus, October 7, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)

Better and better!... — Helveticus, October 6, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)

I Set Up A DotInfo Name that Actually Works! — dtobias, October 6, 2001 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)

Has anyone had any successful reg confirmation from DomainBank? — spot, October 6, 2001 @ 11:48 AM (4/5)

I was able to get a name through DomainBank.com — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 6, 2001 @ 3:17 PM (0/0)
Not heard from them - but they are not the only ones — Helveticus, October 6, 2001 @ 3:05 PM (0/0)
They successfully registered some names for me, but haven't sent me confirmation email — spot, October 6, 2001 @ 2:41 PM (0/0)
NO! — domainboy, October 6, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (1/1)

Domain bank gave 2 pre-registrations to my ISP — landofop, October 6, 2001 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)

007 domains/webex - Mustard Seed eCommunications ???????? — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 10:25 AM (2/10)

Did 007 register names for themselves at Sunrise? — richard_henderson, October 7, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (1/1)

Mustard Seed Strategy and 007names — Srana, October 7, 2001 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)

Mustard Seed — challenge, October 6, 2001 @ 2:04 PM (1/7)

thanks Challenge - they got some really choice names - — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 3:12 PM (1/6)

I agree with you, Antipodes — Helveticus, October 6, 2001 @ 3:56 PM (1/5)

Mustard Seed — onmove, October 6, 2001 @ 5:22 PM (2/4)

mustard seed's strategy — spot, October 6, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)
This is exactly what I suspect... — Helveticus, October 6, 2001 @ 5:36 PM (1/2)

as I didn't find any 007 reg that wasn't a Mustard Seed reg — antipodes, October 7, 2001 @ 1:10 AM (1/1)

a matter of dollars, as well — onmove, October 7, 2001 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)

the icann song — Anion, October 6, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (1/2)

courtesy of ICANNwatch.org — Anion, October 6, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (1/1)

same site has song about Afilias (see link below) — DomeBase, October 6, 2001 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)

credit where credit is due — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (1/3)

DirectNIC have just mailed to indicate that — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (1/2)

Anything with Tucows? eom.. — psbyowner, October 6, 2001 @ 4:08 AM (1/1)

only those in the post above - unless one is reselling — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)

Someone please post URL for list of Afilias reserved domains — ais, October 5, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (1/2)

Reserved names — SNAFU, October 5, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (1/1)

That explains it — ais, October 5, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)

Hear-Ye, Hear Ye! Attn. .info, .com, etc. domain name holders... — psbyowner, October 5, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (1/1)

thanks psbyowner - much better we amplify our voices - much — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)

You won't believe this. — Elvis, October 5, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (2/4)

Reserved .info domain names — ais, October 5, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (0/0)
biz.info and pro.info were both reserved names that were... — SNAFU, October 5, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (1/2)

Yup, maybe it was on the reserved list. — Elvis, October 5, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (1/1)

Reserve list — dtobias, October 6, 2001 @ 1:16 AM (0/0)

I'm waiting for my Tucows Refunds.....They STILL have my money EOM — PSBYOWNER, October 5, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (1/2)

Check out 4domains.com... — psbyowner, October 5, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (1/1)

Cheers mate — Elvis, October 5, 2001 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)

Namebargain — Elvis, October 5, 2001 @ 6:38 PM (3/3)

credit where credit is due - the great differences between — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
I agree — richard_henderson, October 5, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
NAME BARGAIN!! SOUND AS A POUND!! — scouser, October 5, 2001 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)

Afilias Now Let's Us Know Whois Is Not Working For "Realtime" Reg's ... Duh — GettingScrewed, October 5, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (1/1)

Forget Afilias' WHOIS — challenge, October 5, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)

I think the problems with the AwfulAss site are finally fixed... — dtobias, October 5, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (1/1)

Remove this Site Now, Or... — IncompetentAfilias, October 6, 2001 @ 6:42 AM (0/0)

REAL time — jman, October 5, 2001 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

Afilias moving on TM squaters? Not that I can see! — Elvis, October 5, 2001 @ 1:41 PM (1/7)

Mr Rumney and his pals — chrismoran, October 5, 2001 @ 5:41 PM (2/6)

If You Want A Chance - DO NOT WAIT - CHALLENGE NOW!!!! — Ron_Bennett, October 6, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (1/4)

Be Weary of Challenging at WIPO — DaveKing2, October 6, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (1/3)

Dave - how good is your insider information? — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 7:24 AM (1/2)

insider — DaveKing2, October 6, 2001 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)

my money is more and more on contrivence or "planned — antipodes, October 8, 2001 @ 1:58 AM (0/0)

Lets hope Afilias do that, they need to repair their reputation. — Elvis, October 5, 2001 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)

I have used a number of new registrars in the past 24 hours — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 8:13 AM (1/5)

... but beware of their WHOIS! — Helveticus, October 5, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (1/4)

grateful for your concern - I spent nearly two days waiting — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 10:06 AM (1/3)

Yes I confirm that — rachelmacgregor, October 5, 2001 @ 11:10 AM (1/2)

is it true Rachel that you now own every Scots place name — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (1/1)

slainte mo bhalloch — rachelmacgregor, October 5, 2001 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)

Afilias Whois 24 hours out of date? — Srana, October 5, 2001 @ 6:36 AM (1/1)

a slow whois - Afilias still in lottery mode - but I am sure — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 7:15 AM (0/0)

Afilias still mostly down for start-up domains — SNAFU, October 5, 2001 @ 4:47 AM (1/1)

Afilias should credit us from Oct 4th. EOM — psbyowner, October 5, 2001 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

CHALLENGED DOMAINS RESOLVED — mitsuindia, October 5, 2001 @ 4:39 AM (0/0)

ICANN must negotiate with new.net — Anion, October 5, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (3/3)

new.net is a phoney boiler room stock pump.... — psbyowner, October 5, 2001 @ 3:57 AM (0/0)
ICANN don't give a flying shit about New.net or any of their non-domains — spot, October 5, 2001 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)
ICANN needs NOT negotiate with new.net. — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 3:01 AM (0/0)

hats off to WEBCITY - outstanding service!!! — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)

Thank you, useful information — Helveticus, October 5, 2001 @ 10:04 AM (1/1)

your very welcome Helveticus - if we can't help each other — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 11:58 AM (0/0)

AwfulAss Site Update — dtobias, October 5, 2001 @ 12:05 AM (2/10)

YOU ARE A GENIUS! — spot, October 5, 2001 @ 3:18 AM (0/0)
AwfulAss? I suggest AwfullyAss or AfullofAss as better spoofs of Afilias. — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/8)

AwfullSillyAss — vera-city, October 5, 2001 @ 4:22 AM (1/7)

I thought you must have been referring to Internet Advocate — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 10:12 AM (2/6)

Antipodes, AwfullSillyAss? — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)
Vera-city must have been referring to Antipodes — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (2/4)

I can still push your buttons IA - lol eom — antipodes, October 6, 2001 @ 7:29 AM (1/1)

Antipodes still doesn't understand. LOL <<endpost>> — InternetAdvocate, October 7, 2001 @ 9:40 PM (0/0)

The Solution to the Dot-Info Debacle is SO easy ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (3/11)

Why should landrusher's lose their generics just because of sunrise cybersquatters? — spot, October 5, 2001 @ 3:10 AM (3/3)

Point Taken. Here's a revision to the suggestion... — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 8:49 PM (0/0)
you're "spot on" SPOT! — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)
agreed w/ spot. dont hurt the honest ones! eom — psbyowner, October 5, 2001 @ 4:02 AM (0/0)

you must be kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — antipodes, October 5, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)

Not kidding... — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)

I hate to have to agree with you... — rachelmacgregor, October 5, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (2/4)

I've changed my mind, I don't agree with you after all — rachelmacgregor, October 5, 2001 @ 8:50 PM (1/2)

Rachel admits she loves crap. LOL. She forgot her medication... — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)

Rachel's agreement very long, but her second post extra short. What gives? — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)

What .info Needs — dtobias, October 5, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (0/0)

This fiasco will never end — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (1/1)

Site update... — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (0/0)

None for the price of two? — jman, October 4, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (1/4)

Afilias are a complete SHAMBLES - ICANN need to intervene — richard_henderson, October 4, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (1/3)

Afilias .info real time registration remains a lottery — antipodes, October 4, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/2)

Does anyone have a dictionary? — jman, October 4, 2001 @ 11:37 PM (1/1)

Check the Glossary Pages for Afilias, and ICANN — landofop, October 5, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)

Unbelievable: the dot info registry (according to Afilias itself) is NOT yet COMPLETE! — friedrich, October 4, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (1/2)

As Of Two Days Ago, Vint Cerf Didn't Even Know There Was A Problem — GettingScrewed, October 4, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (1/1)

Vint Cerf didn't know there was a problem until two days ago — antipodes, October 4, 2001 @ 11:44 PM (0/0)

no response from GoDaddy — Anion, October 4, 2001 @ 9:24 PM (1/1)

Godaddy did submit, they got me a couple — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (0/0)

Latest .INFO Snafu — GettingScrewed, October 4, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)

Chaos indeed... — Helveticus, October 4, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)

Some of INFO are resolving — aferreira, October 4, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)

OT new.net ? — PAWEL, October 4, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (2/7)

New.net vs. ICANN and the Afilias disaster — friedrich, October 4, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)
save your money EOM — psbyowner, October 4, 2001 @ 8:28 PM (2/5)

The world is... — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 8:51 PM (0/0)
re — PAWEL, October 4, 2001 @ 8:38 PM (1/3)

new.net is defeating ICANN — Anion, October 4, 2001 @ 9:29 PM (2/2)

New.net is NOT defeating ICANN.....New.net is defeating themselves... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 4, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)
Oh, please....dont start with these exaggerations — psbyowner, October 4, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

everything must be gone now — chrismoran, October 4, 2001 @ 7:42 PM (2/3)

Yes, but a few nuances here... — Helveticus, October 4, 2001 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)
foot.info was registrar reserved ! — chrismoran, October 4, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (1/1)

Chair.info — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)

Are they down again? — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (2/3)

Problems again? — Srana, October 4, 2001 @ 7:24 PM (0/0)
Who knows whats happening, I don't think anyone does! — Elvis, October 4, 2001 @ 7:02 PM (1/1)

namebargain.com — richard_henderson, October 4, 2001 @ 7:53 PM (0/0)

registrar advises that Afilias is to start accepting cueued — antipodes, October 4, 2001 @ 1:47 PM (1/3)

Show me the WHOIS? — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 2:44 PM (1/2)

WHOIS out, but registration possible again — Helveticus, October 4, 2001 @ 2:47 PM (1/1)

WHOIS back — Helveticus, October 4, 2001 @ 2:50 PM (0/0)

.BIZ Domain DB Loading...0 to A so far...and few of them even resolve... — Ron_Bennett, October 4, 2001 @ 9:20 AM (1/2)

how do you check? — caru, October 4, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (1/1)

whois.nic.biz:43 is working ... — Nikolai_Tiedemann, October 4, 2001 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)

the Afilias lottery continues - stuff the customers!!!! — antipodes, October 4, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (0/0)

New .info parody site! — dtobias, October 4, 2001 @ 5:04 AM (2/2)

you glorious anarchist Dan - well done!! eom — antipodes, October 4, 2001 @ 7:53 AM (0/0)
This site is great!!!! oem — Landrusher, October 4, 2001 @ 7:38 AM (0/0)

Turning .INFO into a Business Plan — spot, October 4, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (2/7)

I agree, .info will gain ground. — Elvis, October 4, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (0/0)
yup — gunky, October 4, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (1/5)

I think you got some part of cake — sanjeevgoyal, October 4, 2001 @ 3:44 AM (2/4)

No .info is logical enough; unfortunately... — psbyowner, October 4, 2001 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)
Why .INFO beats .org and .net — spot, October 4, 2001 @ 1:04 PM (1/2)

Agree — landofop, October 4, 2001 @ 1:30 PM (1/1)

when is info going live again? — crs, October 3, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (1/2)

latest estimate — crs, October 4, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (1/1)

how many hours is that from now? thanks eom — antipodes, October 4, 2001 @ 1:24 AM (0/0)

icann.com = icann.net = icann.org — Lottery Winner, October 3, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (2/8)

not enough .coms — Anion, October 4, 2001 @ 12:33 AM (1/3)

millions of .com names being deleted for nonpayment — Lottery Winner, October 4, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (1/2)

What are you going on about? You are not accepting reality! — spot, October 4, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)

.info sounds promising — Lottery Winner, October 4, 2001 @ 2:29 AM (0/0)

Get over it — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (1/3)

My advice, follow icann's lead - — Lottery Winner, October 4, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (2/2)

Trademark Tax — Garry Anderson, October 4, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (0/0)
That is 'at one with the ridiculous' — spot, October 4, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)

Second chance for Afilias, second chance for all. — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (0/0)

It's not that hard — Lottery Winner, October 3, 2001 @ 8:17 PM (2/21)

Toll Free Prefixes...they illustrate the point you're making... — Ron_Bennett, October 3, 2001 @ 9:19 PM (2/4)

Misuse of .com — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (1/1)

Blame the negligent registrars and not end users... — psbyowner, October 3, 2001 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

You wish — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (1/1)

You are obviously high on .info — Lottery Winner, October 3, 2001 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)

You miss the point — challenge, October 3, 2001 @ 8:35 PM (3/15)

It would be interesting to see — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)
Should the Fortune 500 move from .com to .biz ?? — Lottery Winner, October 3, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (3/12)

And your point being? — challenge, October 3, 2001 @ 10:41 PM (2/8)

point is: New TLDs foster confusion, dilution, and disputes. — Lottery Winner, October 3, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (1/6)

moronic analysis — gunky, October 4, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/5)

350,000 domains so far say new TLDs ARE NEEDED — spot, October 4, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/4)

Matching their dot coms or hoping to make $, not needed at all — Lottery Winner, October 4, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/3)

I agree most aren't, except for INFO, here is why — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (1/2)

Good Ideas - .info seems promising — Lottery Winner, October 4, 2001 @ 2:16 AM (1/1)

Time will tell — challenge, October 4, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

Thats right — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

Now you are getting a clue — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 10:33 PM (0/0)

We must establish the identity — Srana, October 3, 2001 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)

New INFO Website has gone up again - much more accurate — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 7:20 PM (6/11)

Darn funny — vera-city, October 4, 2001 @ 5:09 AM (0/0)
Love It...Add a New Whois, though... — Ron_Bennett, October 3, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (1/1)

Very funny! — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)

Site down again - must have been a test! — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (1/1)

You best take it down — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)

Thank you Rachel! You made my day! EOM — gckorn, October 3, 2001 @ 8:11 PM (0/0)
Wow..... — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 8:07 PM (1/2)

Heh! — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (1/1)

For what? — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)

Thank you! — Helveticus, October 3, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (1/1)

It's SATIRE :) — dodgy, October 4, 2001 @ 10:27 AM (0/0)

New TLDs - What purpose do they serve? — Lottery Winner, October 3, 2001 @ 7:16 PM (2/6)

icann.com > icann.net > icann.org = same website — Lottery Winner, October 4, 2001 @ 1:25 AM (1/2)

RE: icann.com > icann.net > icann.org = same website — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 1:40 AM (1/1)

RE: .com > .net > .org = same website... OOPS, TYPO ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 1:48 AM (0/0)

Yes, Dell.info points to Dell.com.....but give it time... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 3, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (2/2)

I wanted DELL.info — Garry Anderson, October 4, 2001 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)
See my point about Dell.info by clicking here first — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (0/0)

.info names can't be changed until Oct. 7? — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 2:59 PM (1/1)

Dotster say "by friday" — saskia, October 3, 2001 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)

Why are all landrush names 'LOCKED'. How do you unlock them? eom — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 2:05 PM (1/1)

They threw away the key.... — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 2:52 PM (0/0)

RealTime registrations !!!! — peeved, October 3, 2001 @ 2:02 PM (2/2)

Realtime registrations, realtime waster! — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)
What do you expect? — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 2:29 PM (0/0)

Observation about the value of .info domains — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 1:08 PM (1/9)

Use .biz for b2b sites, use .info for b2b and b2c sites, use .com if unsure --eom — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 2:08 PM (1/8)

Use .net when you can't afford .com and .org to protest about them all ! — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 2:59 PM (1/7)

Use .mil to wage war against everybody else? — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (1/6)

Use .edu to teach 'em a lesson... — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 3:23 PM (1/5)

Use .museum to store any old rubbish — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 3:28 PM (3/4)

Use .tv when you're wearing your wife's bra — spot, October 3, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)
Use .coop for a shared obsession — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 3:43 PM (0/0)
Use .name to defame Elvis (^_^) — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 3:40 PM (1/1)

Use NewNet when you want to hide — Elvis, October 3, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

"LIVE" registry is "DEAD" — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 10:17 AM (2/18)

Quit moaning already! — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (1/16)

hilarious — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (3/15)

Rachel has her Head-Kickin' Boots On Again, I see — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 3:36 AM (0/0)
Rachel needs to take her medication... — psbyowner, October 3, 2001 @ 4:30 PM (3/7)

PES? LMAO ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 3:49 AM (0/0)
Dick Envy? LMAO ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 3:41 AM (1/3)

Dick Envy? ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (1/2)

what are you dribbling on about now... — rachelmacgregor, October 4, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (1/1)

Rachel's dick envy is VERY persistent, to the point of dribbling ... — InternetAdvocate, October 5, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

One other thing, Rachel... — psbyowner, October 3, 2001 @ 4:46 PM (1/1)

Rachel Needs a new pair of Boots... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 3:38 AM (0/0)

Vulgar Moron! eom — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 3:01 PM (1/5)

We may speak in different languages but I still win the argument! — rachelmacgregor, October 3, 2001 @ 4:52 PM (2/4)

Afilias is bad but you are the abomination! — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 5:17 PM (0/0)
What the HELL would you know about decency... — psbyowner, October 3, 2001 @ 4:57 PM (1/2)

Geez, not again... — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 6:44 PM (1/1)

Again... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)

Like you Rachel, I am sweating on what I think must be one — antipodes, October 3, 2001 @ 11:49 AM (0/0)

anyone seen or heard from Richy - sure hope he hasn't been — antipodes, October 3, 2001 @ 5:52 AM (1/2)

I'm still here — richard_henderson, October 3, 2001 @ 6:31 AM (1/1)

welcome back Mate! - word from a registrar on whom I am — antipodes, October 3, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (0/0)

The Past Predicted the Present — icanncant, October 3, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (2/6)

I vote Corruption — Garry Anderson, October 3, 2001 @ 10:51 AM (0/0)
BRAVO - great post great link — antipodes, October 3, 2001 @ 5:42 AM (2/4)

Re: BRAVO post ... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)
News Article Shows Afilias Disregard for the Public — icanncant, October 3, 2001 @ 7:39 AM (1/2)

. — psbyowner, October 3, 2001 @ 8:03 PM (1/1)

???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)

Businessware(.biz) - Brochureware(.info) - Brandware(New.net domains) — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:56 AM (1/2)

mole - you seem to be the only one round here havin fun eom — antipodes, October 3, 2001 @ 5:17 AM (1/1)

Antipodes forgot about somebody... — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)

How About This One ... — GettingScrewed, October 3, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (1/3)

Yeah — fred48, October 3, 2001 @ 4:30 AM (1/2)

I take screenshots of all my names in whois ... never know eom — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:42 AM (1/1)

hmmm... eom — fred48, October 3, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (0/0)

What's the deal with .biz? — spot, October 3, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (3/7)

You can sell your dot-biz domain as part of your bizness's assets. — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
so who will the ".biz cops" be? — psbyowner, October 3, 2001 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)
.BIZ Speculators Throwing Money Down the Drain... — Ron_Bennett, October 3, 2001 @ 4:26 AM (1/4)

On the contrary you have no idea — domainboy, October 3, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (2/3)

Clearly: — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 3:20 PM (0/0)
wrong — gunky, October 3, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (1/1)

Gunky is wrong — InternetAdvocate, October 4, 2001 @ 1:10 AM (0/0)

Quote from Afilias press release... — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (0/0)

How do people compare the value of .info with .biz and the old domains? — spot, October 3, 2001 @ 1:28 AM (2/6)

Businessware(.biz)-Brochure(.info)-Brandware(New.net domains) — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:36 AM (1/3)

Businessware (.biz), Brochureware (.info) -- Nowhere (New.net)! — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (1/2)

WRONG — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:01 PM (1/1)

New.net — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)

The value of INFO — challenge, October 3, 2001 @ 2:46 AM (1/1)

I agree with you in that... — psbyowner, October 4, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

How do I manage my .info ? — attilio, October 2, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (1/2)

Using your names — dtobias, October 3, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (1/1)

May be the one part of... — SNAFU , October 3, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (0/0)

so much for Afilias's claims about promoting competition — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (1/5)

Cheapest Real-time Registrars I've Found... — IncompetentAfilias, October 3, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (3/4)

idregister.com is the cheapest. I paid $24 for two years. — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:30 AM (0/0)
A sleeper but one of the best for me so far — challenge, October 3, 2001 @ 2:55 AM (1/1)

I'll second that. — spot, October 3, 2001 @ 3:08 AM (0/0)

Of Course Afilias has shut down Real-Time Registration until October 3rd... see Afilias.info EOM — IncompetentAfilias, October 3, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)

Question: who is taking live registrations? — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 9:03 PM (1/4)

Registrations suspended til after 1am UTC 3rd Oct — Elvis, October 2, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (2/3)

Now they just say they will resume on Oct 3, time was removed. Of... — SNAFU , October 3, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
for a laugh or a good cry - visit the Policy Deliverables — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/1)

wahhaahhahhhhhaaaaaaaaahahhahhahaaaaaaaaaah — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:25 AM (0/0)

Registrar DomainPeople Gorged Themselves On Location Names — GettingScrewed, October 2, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (3/8)

All the names they took were available in the Afilias whois... — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
Domain People Ripped off RegLand Customers — landofop, October 2, 2001 @ 6:27 PM (2/2)

LOL! eom — fred48, October 2, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (0/0)
Domain people fleeced me too... — scouser, October 2, 2001 @ 7:26 PM (0/0)

All the CA city names are gobbled up... — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 4:25 PM (1/3)

Honesty sometimes pays (a little) — gckorn, October 2, 2001 @ 9:20 PM (1/2)

Fresno (city AND county) and sonoma are Class A.... — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (1/1)

PSI-Japan did Fresno and Sonoma — gckorn, October 2, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (0/0)

ATTENTION NETSOL AND AFILIAS!!!!! SYSTEM MALFUNCTION!!!! — Ron_Bennett, October 2, 2001 @ 3:25 AM (5/13)

Netsol Still Malfunctioning...Names Still in Limbo...Still No Response... — Ron_Bennett, October 2, 2001 @ 6:35 PM (1/2)

1 of my 3 NetSol live acquired names is still missing from my account — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 6:40 PM (1/1)

An example.. — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 7:02 PM (0/0)

Netsol working, but... — Helveticus, October 2, 2001 @ 5:09 PM (1/3)

Wow, Helveticus, can you show us that example?? — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 6:33 PM (1/2)

Yes, here is that example — Helveticus, October 2, 2001 @ 7:22 PM (1/1)

whahahahhahahaahahaaaaaaaaaawwhahahahhahhahhahhaaaaaahh — mole, October 3, 2001 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)

It's falling apart, come on Afilias, get things sorted out! — Elvis, October 2, 2001 @ 11:45 AM (2/3)

DotEarth registering with no problems — spot, October 2, 2001 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)
Namesecure works through Netsol? — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 1:07 PM (1/1)

I dont think so — landofop, October 2, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (0/0)

Network Solutions has separate telephone no. for .info & .biz — sfeibish, October 2, 2001 @ 9:40 AM (0/0)
Me too - 2 complete 1 "system malfunction" but in whois -- eom — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (0/0)

The other shoe finally drops... — dtobias, October 2, 2001 @ 3:18 AM (1/3)

you glorious anarchist Dan — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 6:56 AM (1/2)

I am having the same realizations.... — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 4:50 PM (1/1)

.info will in many cases be intuitively better than .com .... — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 5:06 PM (0/0)

This is stability? — einman, October 2, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/7)

The problem with New.net... — spot, October 2, 2001 @ 1:53 AM (1/6)

That's just dumb — fred48, October 2, 2001 @ 5:23 AM (2/5)

new.net is excellent — Anion, October 2, 2001 @ 2:55 PM (0/0)
Don't get confused Freddy boy — spot, October 2, 2001 @ 10:51 AM (2/3)

Yes, new.net is too expensive, but... — einman, October 2, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (0/0)
This is true....If the value of a domain name is traffic generation — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 5:01 PM (1/1)

The future of .info, .biz and the old domains. — spot, October 2, 2001 @ 11:26 PM (0/0)

just posted on Afilias web site... — jman, October 1, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (2/3)

What it means — Garry Anderson, October 2, 2001 @ 9:04 AM (0/0)
Hey! Afilias accepts TM info "as submitted" in the Land Rush... — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 11:20 PM (1/1)

the only data field integrity checks done in the Sunrise — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)

REGISTRAR PETITION - giving credit where credit is due — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (9/13)

support domainbank — Anion, October 2, 2001 @ 2:56 PM (0/0)
against — chrismoran, October 2, 2001 @ 1:07 PM (1/2)

I agree — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 10:12 PM (1/1)

refunds make me suspicious — chrismoran, October 3, 2001 @ 11:59 AM (0/0)

against — sfeibish, October 2, 2001 @ 10:41 AM (1/1)

Landrush II ? — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 1:11 PM (0/0)

support — spot, October 2, 2001 @ 2:56 AM (0/0)
support — mole, October 2, 2001 @ 2:45 AM (0/0)
support — DomeBase, October 2, 2001 @ 2:44 AM (1/1)

my preference would be for Land Rush II per revised DomeBase Proposal — DomeBase, October 2, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)

support — psbyowner, October 2, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
Tucows "Refund" an Internal matter? — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
support — Elvis, October 1, 2001 @ 11:26 PM (0/0)

This Is Great Humor ... — jeweyjewman, October 1, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (1/1)

inevitable — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

Has Anybody Received Actual Invoices From Registrars? — GettingScrewed, October 1, 2001 @ 10:52 PM (3/3)

Only 1st Domain — Helveticus, October 2, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)
got an e-mail from IDR, but no charge on card yet — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
Registrationtek have sent an invoice... — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

Its dead — Sterlin, October 1, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/1)

Right — Elvis, October 1, 2001 @ 10:42 PM (0/0)

Gone fishing — Elvis, October 1, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (0/0)

Nothing is working ... hmmmmmmmmm .. — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 8:59 PM (1/9)

Netsol works again .. and says the name I just bought is available eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 9:02 PM (3/8)

What name did you buy?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (2/5)

What are your card details? Either tell me or Moshe Fogel ;-) — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (0/0)
dfjopwaeroer.info and aurpa4u0eo4h.info, izopod — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 9:19 PM (1/3)

Silly random names... — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 9:29 PM (1/2)

No, Netsol is NOT working! — Helveticus, October 1, 2001 @ 10:23 PM (1/1)

Registering... — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)

Same thing at Register.com... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
I QUIT ... too silly to go on - eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 9:04 PM (0/0)

WOW Im glad I went through all the Landrush headaches... — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 8:35 PM (3/3)

ca cities all gobbled up already...EOM — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)
Got through the Netsol transaction with 3 names ....but — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)
I'm guessing that Afilias has not unlocked yet, so everything is "taken" until they do. — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 8:39 PM (0/0)

Netsol is live --- eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 8:14 PM (4/4)

"Where the World Goes for Procrastination" ;) — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
Yes, but not working properly — Helveticus, October 1, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (0/0)
But, it looks like Afilias isn't ready yet. _eom_ — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 8:21 PM (0/0)
Nothings is working ...hmmm — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)

.info registrations live? Where??? _eom_ — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (1/1)

Good question ... eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 8:07 PM (0/0)

Does anybody know if NeuLevel is going live today? — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 6:24 PM (1/2)

.BIZ Whois Program Found...but how to query??? — Ron_Bennett, October 1, 2001 @ 10:09 PM (1/1)

whois.nic.biz:43 already working ... — Nikolai_Tiedemann, October 2, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)

How did those of you do who paid $$$ to the "smaller que" registrars... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 6:02 PM (3/6)

Alice's Registry — chrismoran, October 1, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (0/0)
aaaq.com — PAWEL, October 1, 2001 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
AAAQ was the most expensive I used — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (1/3)

Not bad.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (2/2)

AAAQ hit by the Sunrise Fraud — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 6:26 PM (0/0)
The lesson I learnt — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 6:17 PM (0/0)

No success here — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 5:59 PM (1/1)

Total Reg — hiltonian, October 2, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)

LAND RUSHER REGISTRAR REPORT (as of 10/1/01) — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 5:49 PM (6/17)

just got e-mail from DomainBank — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 8:44 PM (1/1)

now let the other registrars follow the ethical lead of — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)

LAND RUSHER REGISTRAR REPORT (revised 10/1/01 4:30 EST) — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)
You've Got At Least One Mistake There ... — GettingScrewed, October 1, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)
LAND RUSHER REGISTRAR REPORT (as of 10/1/01, 2:30 EST) — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (2/2)

I got one through 1st Domain - and strangely through NameSecure — Helveticus, October 1, 2001 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)
Domain People found... — scouser, October 1, 2001 @ 7:18 PM (0/0)

BB Online (R172) = Yes — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)
I've seen these in there — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 5:56 PM (3/8)

MelbourneIT got me one -- eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 6:11 PM (0/0)
Would you be able to say whether they are from Land Rushers or — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (1/3)

As far as I recall — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 6:07 PM (2/2)

Parava Networks — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
thanks! — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 6:07 PM (0/0)

I saw oo7 names in there — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (1/2)

Indeed! — Helveticus, October 1, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (1/1)

I have seen 007 registrations that have me scratching my head — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)

How about Dotster.com ? — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 5:46 PM (5/9)

what do you make of these 007-WebEx registrations — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 12:37 AM (1/3)

Strange Mustard Seed... — Helveticus, October 2, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (1/2)

Mustard Seed + 007 - It becomes stranger and stranger... — Helveticus, October 2, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (1/1)

Stranger and stranger and stranger... — Helveticus, October 2, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)

same with RegistrarsAsiaPtyLtd — antipodes, October 2, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)
Same with Names4ever.com — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)
Dotster was running a highest bidder scenario — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)
answer — domainboy, October 1, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (1/1)

Thank you. — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 6:04 PM (0/0)

R164 is catalog.com and R182 is The Nameit Corporation — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 5:31 PM (1/1)

Thanks ... I was wondering where my names came from --eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 6:08 PM (0/0)

A surprise with Network Solutions + A few additional comments — Helveticus, October 1, 2001 @ 5:29 PM (1/1)

EGB — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)

Anything from total regitrations? — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 5:26 PM (2/2)

Yes — hiltonian, October 2, 2001 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)
here is one from total registrations — chrismoran, October 1, 2001 @ 5:55 PM (0/0)

Message from Afilias — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 5:17 PM (2/3)

Just a question for you Dan... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (1/1)

No... — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)

Insufficient funds? Perhaps GoDaddy is insolvent — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)

Nothing from Godaddy — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 4:50 PM (2/5)

GoDaddy — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 5:05 PM (1/1)

if.. — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)

Their code is R171-LRMS — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 5:05 PM (1/2)

Registrar search? — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 5:07 PM (1/1)

nope — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 5:32 PM (0/0)

T - 4 hours to go live: List of registrar websites ready to take live .info registations? (nm) — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 3:56 PM (1/1)

Domain Bank - queue for live regs (info by Tomsters) eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 4:11 PM (0/0)

Afilias Lawyer Email of 5 July — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (2/2)

the operative word is: — vera-city, October 1, 2001 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)
Contractual???? — vera-city, October 1, 2001 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)

.info Whois Craziness — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 3:30 PM (1/1)

Craziness, again — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)

they cant be done yet — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 3:08 PM (2/4)

blueberryhill.com the best for me... — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (0/0)
That's Tucows..it doesn't look good — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (2/2)

tocows's enoprmous queue — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (0/0)
you are right. bhcom had a very low quere size i predict eom — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)

make sure to copy whois info on successful requests — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 3:01 PM (0/0)

GoDaddy registrations come and go — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 2:46 PM (1/3)

GoDaddy, again — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 2:52 PM (1/2)

This could be.. — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 2:58 PM (1/1)

Nothing from GoDaddy here — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)

Afilias director Moshe Fogel also gets all the good hotel names... — dodgy, October 1, 2001 @ 1:47 PM (0/0)

.info whois — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 1:44 PM (1/3)

Fine here ... snappy — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 1:45 PM (1/2)

The homepage has changed ... 20:00 UTC it is eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 1:48 PM (1/1)

Thanks but I am still struggling EOM — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

Israel based IDR Register the best .info Pre-Registrar — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 1:14 PM (0/0)

- — jeweyjewman, October 1, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)

I got one through Register.com... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 5:45 PM (1/1)

Another plausible explanation... — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

Can anyone identify registrar R171-LRMS? — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 1:16 PM (1/4)

Here is my crude analysis, (R171 is most probably GoDaddy) — challenge, October 1, 2001 @ 1:33 PM (2/3)

GoDaddy — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)
Register.com under suspicion — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 1:52 PM (1/1)

nothing from register.com either — Anion, October 1, 2001 @ 4:51 PM (0/0)

Gee, I Wonder How Moshe Fogel Got TELLURIDE.INFO .. — GettingScrewed, October 1, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (1/2)

They have an advantage — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (1/1)

Bad enough — vera-city, October 1, 2001 @ 3:01 PM (0/0)

what's the deal with Sept 12th ? — chrismoran, October 1, 2001 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)

When will the registrars be ready for live submissions? eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)

im battin bout .400 eom — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (3/10)

Well I'm batting about .1 then! — hiltonian, October 1, 2001 @ 4:38 PM (1/2)

Wouldn't that be battin .500 eom — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 5:01 PM (1/1)

I'm confused — hiltonian, October 2, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (0/0)

it means ive gotten less than 1/2 of names requested eom — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 3:02 PM (1/1)

Thanks eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (0/0)

What does batting .400 mean? — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 11:27 AM (2/4)

I'm not a baseball guy, but isn't that a % instead of a number? — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 2:07 PM (0/0)
explanation — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (2/2)

.400 means 400 per thousand ie 40% <<endpost>> — InternetAdvocate, October 2, 2001 @ 11:26 PM (0/0)
Monsters!!!!!!!!!!! Is psb trying to break Plank's record?? eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (0/0)

Secura were excellent for me — rachelmacgregor, October 1, 2001 @ 6:33 AM (1/1)

congrats Rachel - and boquets to PSI-Japan - Bob Connelly — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)

OnlineNIC — domainboy, October 1, 2001 @ 6:05 AM (0/0)

another TM registration on 13-Sept-2001 — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 5:23 AM (2/2)

Laughlin.info — vera-city, October 1, 2001 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)
Kyrgyz.info — vera-city, October 1, 2001 @ 5:56 AM (0/0)

Anybody knows when LIVE registration starts ? eom — mole, October 1, 2001 @ 3:56 AM (1/1)

Oct 1 after 20:00 UTC - Not that Afilias timelines mean anything at this point. (nm) — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 4:08 AM (0/0)

can the registrar take a name back once it has been registered? — byron, October 1, 2001 @ 2:22 AM (1/1)

they can't — domainboy, October 1, 2001 @ 5:22 AM (0/0)

PROPOSED: Boycott Visiting .INFO Domains and FILTER .INFO Domains OUT! — Ron_Bennett, October 1, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (3/6)

Don't Mistake the Forest for the Trees — kingCPA, October 1, 2001 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)
Re: Boycott of ICANN .info — FineE, October 1, 2001 @ 5:29 AM (0/0)
I'd prefer implementing DomeBase Proposal for Land Rush II and — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (2/3)

Re: PROPOSED: Boycott Visiting .INFO Domains and FILTER .INFO Domains OUT! — Ron_Bennett, October 1, 2001 @ 3:08 AM (1/1)

Dell.info is an example of a goto redirect. — InternetAdvocate, October 2, 2001 @ 11:34 PM (0/0)

I agree. — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 2:59 AM (0/0)

How does one go about asking a refund from the credit card companies — 410, October 1, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (2/2)

simply contest the charges eom — psbyowner, October 1, 2001 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)
Just ASK! NO WRITTEN RECEIPT, NO SALE...I know from experience... — Ron_Bennett, October 1, 2001 @ 2:54 AM (0/0)

Richy, your letter to Lubsen raises an interesting issue... — jman, October 1, 2001 @ 1:54 AM (0/0)

.BIZ and .INFO Applications Not Being Submitted By Registrars???? — Ron_Bennett, October 1, 2001 @ 1:24 AM (1/32)

Let's Make a List Here of Registrars Who Successfully Registered Names — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (16/31)

R 169 whoever that is = yes — chrismoran, October 1, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (2/2)

Registrar Lists — hiltonian, October 2, 2001 @ 6:46 PM (0/0)
R169 = Total Registrations = yes — hiltonian, October 1, 2001 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)

RegistrationTek.com = Yes (Registration Technologies) EOM — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)
Alice's Registry — chrismoran, October 1, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)
AAAQ & Domaininfo = Yes — Srana, October 1, 2001 @ 7:06 AM (0/0)
Registrars — dtobias, October 1, 2001 @ 3:31 AM (1/5)

They didn't submit mine either — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 4:10 AM (2/4)

Go Daddy - have NOT submitted at least 1 of mine EOM — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 4:15 AM (1/1)

DomainPeople.com / RegLand have NOT submitted my .INFO applications... — Ron_Bennett, October 1, 2001 @ 6:40 AM (0/0)

Let's list suspect registrars in this collumn — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 4:13 AM (1/1)

SpyProductions = No? — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 2:08 PM (0/0)

R164 ? = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (1/1)

does anyone know which registrar R164 is? — domainboy, October 1, 2001 @ 10:24 AM (0/0)

R176 ? = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (1/1)

R176 = 1stDomainInternational = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

R182 ? = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)
SpeedNames = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)
DRS = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)
Naame/Parava = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)
SecuraGMBH/TheFreeClassifieds = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:25 AM (0/0)
Names4Ever/Abacus = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:25 AM (0/0)
DomainDirect = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
IDR = yes — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 3:24 AM (1/2)

dd24.net / keystone = yes — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 6:36 AM (1/1)

eNom = yes — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 6:37 AM (0/0)

I will support you holeheartedly DomeBase as on first glance — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 3:02 AM (2/4)

PSI-Japan are champions, — antipodes, October 1, 2001 @ 8:50 AM (0/0)
DomainBank = No? — domainboy, October 1, 2001 @ 6:35 AM (1/2)

152 internet cosmos= yes — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 6:40 AM (1/1)

161 CSL = yes — onmove, October 1, 2001 @ 6:41 AM (0/0)

figure this one out.. — jman, October 1, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (1/7)

Hi Jman, thanks for sharing this. Could be important. — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (2/6)

Domebase, here's the info... — jman, October 1, 2001 @ 1:18 AM (2/2)

You may be challenged by Afilias — bezzant, October 1, 2001 @ 1:38 AM (0/0)
Thanks. Probably just strangeness. I do wonder, however, what their — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

adds to the confusion — spot, October 1, 2001 @ 12:58 AM (1/2)

yes it adds to the confusion — kingCPA, October 1, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (1/1)

If it turns out that these were treated as regular old Land Rush regs — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 1:28 AM (0/0)

Afi;ias site looks like it's about to crash under the strain — Elvis, October 1, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

I am batting about .900.....I owe it all to Richard's website!!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, October 1, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)

Info Names — dtobias, September 30, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/1)

My score — SNAFU, October 1, 2001 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)

The names are UP! — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)

Haha ha, CJ Lovik strikes again.. — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (2/2)

Plankenstein too! — Elvis, October 1, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (0/0)
... and rivers.info — richy, October 1, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (0/0)

WHOIS IS UP!!! — kingCPA, September 30, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen called to account - Day 2 — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 10:58 PM (0/0)

Absolute nonsense — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (1/1)

And one more very important thing — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

I can honestly say this is crackers! — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)

Sept 12 makes perfect sense — gckorn, September 30, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (4/16)

This is obviously registrar error — kingCPA, September 30, 2001 @ 11:20 PM (1/2)

Thanks King. — DomeBase, October 1, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (1/1)

Registrar auto-fillins — kingCPA, October 1, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)

no rational justification : more unacceptable business practice? — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
But how about a September 12th Sunrise/Trademark Registration??? — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (2/9)

sunrise names were defined by date of submission — kingCPA, September 30, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (2/7)

Another Sept. 12th registration with trademark data from diff. registrar! — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)
Thanks King. I appreciate the feedback.... — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 10:32 PM (1/5)

Trademark fields — dtobias, September 30, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (1/4)

Thanks Dan. — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 10:41 PM (3/3)

Obviously Registrar Error — kingCPA, September 30, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)
Dan, I found a second Sept. 12th registration with bogus TM data — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (0/0)
i think this is registrar error — kingCPA, September 30, 2001 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)

SUNRISE REGISTRATION ON SEPT. 12TH?? THIS COULD BE BIG. — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)

I can see that but... — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (1/1)

One-Time Issue — gckorn, September 30, 2001 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)

Extra cash — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/4)

The names will be back — gckorn, September 30, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (1/3)

And in the meantime — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 9:52 PM (1/2)

No They Can't — gckorn, September 30, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (1/1)

We know it's closed — Elvis, October 1, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (0/0)

aerobics.info has a company.... more on sept. 12 — onmove, September 30, 2001 @ 9:01 PM (2/7)

End-date is Sept 12th 2003, so registration date was Sept 12th 2001 — rachelmacgregor, September 30, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (2/4)

If Registration date was Sept 12th, then last week of Landrush is fraud — rachelmacgregor, September 30, 2001 @ 9:14 PM (0/0)
yes, makes sense unless — onmove, September 30, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (1/2)

Possible Prediction : another delay? — rachelmacgregor, September 30, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/1)

I hope they have some explanation.... — onmove, September 30, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)

They also have another that I knew was available after sunrise closed — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 9:07 PM (1/1)

same story — onmove, September 30, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

Future strategy — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (1/2)

HalLubsen.com is the obvious place EOM — spot, September 30, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (1/1)

Lets have consensus on this, make your suggestions now! — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

I agree with Rachel that if any name has "end-date" Sept 12th... — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 8:49 PM (1/1)

true if in real-time, we can't say yet about queue processing — infowatcher, September 30, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

recommendation to all Land Rushers; look up and save results — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 8:06 PM (3/9)

Suggestion: Save results beginning with your surname — spot, September 30, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (0/0)
Right, — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 8:14 PM (1/2)

Elvis please e-mail me urgently EOM — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 8:58 PM (1/1)

OK — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 9:16 PM (0/0)

for example, aerobics was there for a bit and now is gone... — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 8:11 PM (1/4)

and AEROBICS was registered by a registrar employee — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 8:21 PM (1/3)

If AEROBICS terminates on Sept 12th 2003, it was registered on Sept 12th? — rachelmacgregor, September 30, 2001 @ 8:44 PM (1/2)

I don't think that is suspicious... — spot, September 30, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (1/1)

Not so... — rachelmacgregor, September 30, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

My worst fears — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 7:16 PM (2/12)

no, that's consistent with what they've done all along — infowatcher, September 30, 2001 @ 7:47 PM (2/6)

Dear Infowatcher, please respond — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 8:29 PM (1/2)

gotta ask afilias that! — infowatcher, September 30, 2001 @ 9:23 PM (1/1)

If date is submission date, then what is explanation for this? — DomeBase, September 30, 2001 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)

Even worse — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (2/2)

Duh That's not what it means — fred48, September 30, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)
that's wrong too... — infowatcher, September 30, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)

test run? — crs, September 30, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (2/4)

That's not the point — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)
test — crs, September 30, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (1/2)

what do you mean by test? — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 7:39 PM (1/1)

re: test — crs, September 30, 2001 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)

The History of .info — dtobias, September 30, 2001 @ 7:07 PM (1/2)

Do you have the old timeline of their schedule? — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 7:22 PM (1/1)

I have this one.. — challenge, September 30, 2001 @ 7:41 PM (0/0)

Wow... new Afilias site ... shit — mole, September 30, 2001 @ 6:39 PM (1/1)

What's old is new again... — dtobias, September 30, 2001 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)

New whois — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 6:37 PM (1/3)

Well, their site says... — dtobias, September 30, 2001 @ 6:49 PM (2/2)

New whois? — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (0/0)
Same old whois.....eom — psbyowner, September 30, 2001 @ 6:56 PM (0/0)

Stranger and stranger — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 6:29 PM (0/0)

Everyone check the dates, odd things afoot here! — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)

It works!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — Landrusher, September 30, 2001 @ 5:49 PM (2/5)

Not quite — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)
nothing here. whats domain did you get? eom — psbyowner, September 30, 2001 @ 5:59 PM (1/3)

Gone again — Landrusher, September 30, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (2/2)

Same here — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)
I suppose this means that even if we do get a name in the whois... — psbyowner, September 30, 2001 @ 6:16 PM (0/0)

so far...nothing. 9/30/2001 10:00 AM PST ...EOM — psbyowner, September 30, 2001 @ 5:01 PM (1/2)

10am Monday New York time — mole, September 30, 2001 @ 5:27 PM (1/1)

so results wouldnt show in the whois yet? eom — psbyowner, September 30, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)

Good luck everyone ! — mole, September 30, 2001 @ 4:43 PM (0/0)

Follow the Money — arbitrage, September 30, 2001 @ 11:30 AM (2/4)

It is a big racket — Garry Anderson, September 30, 2001 @ 4:16 PM (0/0)
request — rachelmacgregor, September 30, 2001 @ 11:34 AM (2/2)

Sunrise Challenge Link — arbitrage, September 30, 2001 @ 3:34 PM (0/0)
.info ICANN agreement — dtobias, September 30, 2001 @ 3:07 PM (0/0)

don't ever forget that we've been screwed by experts — antipodes, September 30, 2001 @ 1:40 AM (1/1)

Yeah, but they still have to walk past us in the street! — Elvis, September 30, 2001 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen called to account — richy, September 30, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (2/2)

I am proud of you Buddy,lookin forward to Hal's response!eom — antipodes, September 30, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (0/0)
Round of applause!!! — spot, September 30, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (0/0)

How convenient... — spot, September 29, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/1)

...and what immaculate timing — spot, September 29, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)

Afilias.info Update at Last! — Srana, September 29, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (1/2)

My read on this.. — challenge, September 29, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (1/1)

That's right! — Srana, September 30, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (0/0)

A Message from Hal — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/1)

Hand in Glove — Garry Anderson, September 30, 2001 @ 9:25 AM (0/0)

it pays to register fakes? — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (2/4)

It pays more to challenge fakes — Anion, September 29, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (2/2)

Be Careful of Submitting Fake Challenges! — DaveKing2, September 30, 2001 @ 9:01 AM (0/0)
not so sure — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

yes, it pays to register fakes — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (0/0)

results on monday ? — PAWEL, September 29, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (1/2)

meaningless — crs, September 29, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/1)

Only 12 days late... — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)

A response from an Afilias Official — Srana, September 29, 2001 @ 7:59 PM (7/12)

Smoking gun? — vera-city, September 30, 2001 @ 6:06 AM (0/0)
checked AFTER...using the dispute challenge process — Garry Anderson, September 29, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
Pardon Me (I think I need a front lobal lobotomy)? — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 9:29 PM (0/0)
Pardon me (I'm hard of hearing)? — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (0/0)
Pardon me (again)? — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 9:18 PM (0/0)
Pardon me? — rachelmacgregor, September 29, 2001 @ 9:12 PM (1/1)

Absolutely Right Rachel! — Srana, September 29, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)

He told you absolutely nothing !!!! — challenge, September 29, 2001 @ 8:33 PM (1/4)

You'll Probably Be Surprised To Hear How Clueless Posters Here Are — GettingScrewed, September 29, 2001 @ 9:12 PM (1/3)

Is this possible....... — onmove, September 29, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (2/2)

I don't think so, but... — Elvis, September 29, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (0/0)
definite possibiliaty — Anion, September 29, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)

no word nothing yet 9/29/2001 from registrars... — psbyowner, September 29, 2001 @ 1:55 PM (2/2)

afilias what is the real reason for this delay? eom — crs, September 29, 2001 @ 2:30 PM (0/0)
I heard from mine — hiltonian, September 29, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

WHAT'S GOING ON ? — sanjeevgoyal, September 29, 2001 @ 11:53 AM (0/0)

It's time to gear up! — Landrusher, September 29, 2001 @ 10:13 AM (0/0)

Afilias and ICANN demonstrating they are not trustworthy — antipodes, September 29, 2001 @ 2:29 AM (0/0)

Question — 410, September 29, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (1/1)

of course we can and I fully intend too EOM — psbyowner, September 29, 2001 @ 2:02 PM (0/0)

which ever day, week, month or year we may or may not win — antipodes, September 29, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

where are our .infos? (the ones that weren't already hijacked) — Anion, September 29, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

Is Afilias operating an illegal lottery? — Anion, September 28, 2001 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)

Is afilias fixing the results??????????? — Anion, September 28, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (0/0)

Registrar official speculates — Srana, September 28, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/6)

Another rumor bites the dust... — dtobias, September 29, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/5)

Forget the rumors, follow the trail.. — challenge, September 29, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/4)

Round-Robin — onmove, September 29, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (1/3)

Not really — challenge, September 29, 2001 @ 2:32 AM (1/2)

Thanks — onmove, September 29, 2001 @ 2:47 AM (1/1)

You're welcome but.. — challenge, September 29, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (0/0)

This should be made apply to .info — Garry Anderson, September 28, 2001 @ 6:21 PM (1/2)

I hope not... — dtobias, September 28, 2001 @ 7:35 PM (1/1)

They had plans — Garry Anderson, September 29, 2001 @ 8:32 AM (0/0)

Another plan brewing — challenge, September 28, 2001 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)

Incompetent cover up — spot, September 28, 2001 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)

DomeBase and Richy - I would like your opinion on this — antipodes, September 28, 2001 @ 8:02 AM (2/4)

Where ICANN and Afilias are culpable? — richy, September 29, 2001 @ 9:10 AM (2/2)

also agree that there should be culpability — DomeBase, September 29, 2001 @ 2:04 PM (0/0)
I agree with Rich that Afilias should have taken action — DomeBase, September 29, 2001 @ 1:45 PM (0/0)

Just a rough shot at this in response to your question — DomeBase, September 28, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)

Slogan Proposals (please add to the list) — challenge, September 28, 2001 @ 2:50 AM (1/4)

Some more — challenge, September 28, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (3/3)

Even more — challenge, September 28, 2001 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)
More — hiltonian, September 28, 2001 @ 11:23 AM (0/0)
Afilias — Garry Anderson, September 28, 2001 @ 9:29 AM (0/0)

Another registrar keeping us up to date — challenge, September 27, 2001 @ 11:58 PM (1/7)

What if ? — challenge, September 28, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (1/6)

Why Afilias remains under deep suspicion — richy, September 28, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (2/5)

Afilias has certainly developed its brand superbly - not — antipodes, September 28, 2001 @ 2:10 AM (1/1)

Afilias Fraud is worse than the delay — Anion, September 28, 2001 @ 2:18 AM (0/0)

Some more excuses for Afilias to take a few more weeks.. — challenge, September 28, 2001 @ 2:10 AM (2/2)

I thought that .info had already been hijacked — antipodes, September 28, 2001 @ 2:59 PM (0/0)
Did the FBI warning mention Linda Govinda? — Anion, September 28, 2001 @ 2:20 AM (0/0)

the wondrous spin of Michael Palage — richy, September 27, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (2/3)

Congratulations Mr Palage — Garry Anderson, September 28, 2001 @ 8:15 AM (0/0)
integrity? — antipodes, September 28, 2001 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)

They obviously learnt from ICANN — Garry Anderson, September 28, 2001 @ 8:27 AM (0/0)

It was the night before Christmas... — richy, September 27, 2001 @ 9:32 PM (4/6)

Christmas has been postponed — spot, September 28, 2001 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
...and then it was Christmas morning! — DomeBase, September 28, 2001 @ 3:41 AM (1/2)

... and then it was Boxing Day! — Srana, September 28, 2001 @ 8:02 AM (1/1)

back at the north pole, the reindeer got to talking — antipodes, September 28, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)

We're gonna make history, folks... — psbyowner, September 27, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (0/0)
.info blues — Elvis, September 27, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (0/0)

When exactly are we going to get our long-awaited .info names... — hiltonian, September 27, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (3/3)

Even more procrastination — hiltonian, September 28, 2001 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)
Maybe Afilias is run by politicians — hiltonian, September 28, 2001 @ 3:10 PM (0/0)
Blood out of a stone — Elvis, September 27, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)

"the wisdom of the board" - LOL — Garry Anderson, September 27, 2001 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)

chasing the white rabbit... — psbyowner, September 27, 2001 @ 3:41 PM (1/1)

No ... eom — mole, September 27, 2001 @ 4:23 PM (0/0)

Delay theory or wishful thinking? — Elvis, September 27, 2001 @ 8:28 AM (2/3)

wishful thinking — Anion, September 27, 2001 @ 8:16 PM (1/1)

Trademark Abuse — Garry Anderson, September 27, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)

Logically — Garry Anderson, September 27, 2001 @ 8:38 AM (0/0)

Update on landrush results. — onmove, September 27, 2001 @ 2:23 AM (0/0)

Landrush update, an Afilias first!!!!! — challenge, September 27, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (2/3)

NO SURPRISE! — domainboy, September 27, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)
just had a crazy idea - ICANN has just discovered that it is — antipodes, September 27, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (1/1)

hey, stop dreaming :) — domainboy, September 27, 2001 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)

Another afilias delay, the last one was blamed on the terrorists who will afilias blame this time? — Anion, September 26, 2001 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

What do you make of this? Afilias could have purged frauds! — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (1/1)

You expect authorities to follow rules - LOL — Garry Anderson, September 27, 2001 @ 8:33 AM (0/0)

memorable Afilias quotes — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:25 PM (3/5)

Here is another — Garry Anderson, September 27, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)
LIE - names for operational purposes — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)
memorable Afilias quotes — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (1/2)

memorable Afilias quotes — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/1)

memorable Afilias quotes — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:54 PM (0/0)

Afilias is fudging new tms — Anion, September 26, 2001 @ 9:01 PM (2/4)

Hi Anion. Maybe I can help. What date did you check for the name — DomeBase, September 26, 2001 @ 11:33 PM (1/2)

before the 21st — Anion, September 26, 2001 @ 11:36 PM (1/1)

please send your e-mail address to me at webmaster@DomeBase.com — DomeBase, September 27, 2001 @ 3:13 PM (0/0)

sounds fishy to me — psbyowner, September 26, 2001 @ 10:14 PM (0/0)

Can an honest person get a good .info? — Anion, September 26, 2001 @ 6:47 PM (2/3)

Can an honest person get a good .info? Only by mistake. eom — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)
Not from Afilias, you won't — challenge, September 26, 2001 @ 6:55 PM (1/1)

I know trademark holders will be very upset... — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 8:38 PM (0/0)

Whois results will be delayed — fred48, September 26, 2001 @ 6:02 PM (2/2)

Just Remember How Esther Dyson, et al Praised Afilias's Techincal Capabilities ... — jeweyjewman, September 26, 2001 @ 6:17 PM (0/0)
Going to Vegas — challenge, September 26, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (0/0)

Interesting article and serious questions about challenges ? — challenge, September 26, 2001 @ 4:14 PM (3/8)

a real chicken and egg senario — psbyowner, September 26, 2001 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)
does challenger get the name? — DomeBase, September 26, 2001 @ 5:32 PM (1/1)

challenging the challenger who challenged the challenger... — rachelmacgregor, September 26, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

Challenges — dtobias, September 26, 2001 @ 5:26 PM (1/4)

Still, way too many gaps, loop-holes and questions. — challenge, September 26, 2001 @ 6:08 PM (2/3)

Hundreds more Sunrise Challenges are yet to be published — DaveKing2, September 27, 2001 @ 6:24 AM (0/0)
but one thing is clear.. — attilio, September 26, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (1/1)

only an independent auditor will purge all frauds — antipodes, September 27, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (0/0)

Tonight's the night? — dtobias, September 26, 2001 @ 2:42 PM (0/0)

52,245 names claimed by trademarks? Bull* Propaganda — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 11:07 AM (1/2)

some of the press is more balanced, thank goodness — DomeBase, September 26, 2001 @ 2:26 PM (1/1)

good piece made better by the absence of LaPlante crap eom — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:02 PM (0/0)

Duty of Afilias and each Afilias Registrar — Srana, September 26, 2001 @ 7:56 AM (2/3)

Fraudulent Registration — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 9:45 AM (0/0)
well, what did Afilias say? — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 9:32 AM (1/1)

Credibility — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 9:56 AM (0/0)

recipe for a fraudulent domain name registration - — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 4:20 AM (0/0)

Where do I submit challenges for fake trademarks - eom — registros, September 26, 2001 @ 3:03 AM (1/1)

challenge site — onmove, September 26, 2001 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)

My 2 cents: — vera-city, September 26, 2001 @ 2:58 AM (1/1)

you're on the money Vera — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 1:23 PM (0/0)

The decency of America — rachelmacgregor, September 26, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (3/5)

zzzzz — psbyowner, September 26, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (2/2)

Do you ever engage — scouser, September 28, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (0/0)
xxxxxx — rachelmacgregor, September 26, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

Sunrise is a "success"! — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 8:49 AM (0/0)
Inspiring! — onmove, September 26, 2001 @ 1:46 AM (0/0)

Another Sunrise thief, wasting no time — challenge, September 26, 2001 @ 12:00 AM (1/2)

Thanks Schlund - and your Afilias Board Member — rachelmacgregor, September 26, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

Rainer Weiss and others like him are giving me reason to — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (0/0)

$505112 charged by Speednames for helping Plankenstein apply for 3981 fake names — rachelmacgregor, September 25, 2001 @ 11:33 PM (1/1)

Thanks Speednames - and your Afilias Board Member — rachelmacgregor, September 26, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (0/0)

William Lorenz Correspondence - click on the link — rachelmacgregor, September 25, 2001 @ 9:14 PM (1/1)

Thanks DomainBank - and your Afilias Executive — rachelmacgregor, September 26, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)

Join new.net and Overthrow ICANN — Anion, September 25, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (2/9)

Caveat emptor on the new.net names... — psbyowner, September 25, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/1)

Yeah, lets listen to someone — fred48, September 26, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

Ah, didn't New.net registrar "reserve" some choice names as well for themselves?? — Gregory W Krajewski, September 25, 2001 @ 7:27 PM (1/6)

Moron — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 10:35 PM (1/5)

You are wrong Fred — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 8:09 AM (2/4)

No need to be sorry — fred48, September 26, 2001 @ 1:01 PM (2/2)

Your dreamin bro... — psbyowner, September 26, 2001 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)
It is not too scary — Garry Anderson, September 26, 2001 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)

ICANN — dtobias, September 26, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

How many names will Yesnic be allowed to keep? — Anion, September 25, 2001 @ 6:05 PM (1/3)

It seems like a great number will go unchallenged — challenge, September 25, 2001 @ 6:29 PM (2/2)

I agree, except that DomeBase Proposal revised. Can still be done. — DomeBase, September 25, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)
One more thing — challenge, September 25, 2001 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)

An honest one: NewInternetExtensions.com — attilio, September 25, 2001 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

How Hal Lubsen charged William Lorenz $16380 to submit 91 fake names... — rachelmacgregor, September 25, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (2/4)

The beauty of it. — vera-city, September 25, 2001 @ 4:53 AM (0/0)
Quote DomainBank: "No better source of ACCURATE registry information" — rachelmacgregor, September 25, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (1/2)

I will make a prediction now - W.Lorenz will get to keep the — antipodes, September 25, 2001 @ 2:03 AM (1/1)

Hal will certainly be able to keep some names — Anion, September 25, 2001 @ 4:50 PM (0/0)

Remember who ripped you off — Elvis, September 24, 2001 @ 11:50 PM (0/0)

Spy Productions had the right idea — Anion, September 24, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (4/11)

previous communications — DomeBase, September 25, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (1/5)

That was from spyproductions.com — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 4:30 PM (2/4)

Also..... — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)
Hi Fred, no, did not record phone calls, but had an interesting one — DomeBase, September 25, 2001 @ 5:16 PM (2/2)

evidence that Spy and other(?)registrars didn't have even — antipodes, September 26, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (0/0)
That was my experience too — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 10:26 PM (0/0)

SPY's offer to cheat meant that Afilias was cheating — antipodes, September 25, 2001 @ 6:13 AM (1/1)

That's right eom — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 1:03 PM (0/0)

Nah — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 2:43 AM (0/0)
Yeah, sometimes folks swipe something and get away with it — DomeBase, September 24, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (1/1)

well said — Anion, September 25, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

Afilias denies study — Anion, September 24, 2001 @ 10:23 PM (1/1)

Afilias has said that they think bogus regs are under 10%... — DomeBase, September 24, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (0/0)

Will Stuart Lynn reform? — Anion, September 24, 2001 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)

4 out of 5 hawaiian islands stolen — Anion, September 24, 2001 @ 10:04 PM (0/0)

drugs.info whois — Anion, September 24, 2001 @ 10:03 PM (0/0)

A Dishonest Registrar Defends his Sunrise Applicants — richy, September 24, 2001 @ 12:26 AM (4/6)

previous communications on this subject — DomeBase, September 25, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (1/1)

That was from Lars of spyproductions.com eom — fred48, September 25, 2001 @ 4:32 PM (0/0)

Sounds like SpyProductions.com eom — fred48, September 24, 2001 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
hard to respond to this letter — DomeBase, September 24, 2001 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)
Richy - none of the registrars who are now feeling the heat — antipodes, September 24, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (1/1)

feeling the heat? — Anion, September 24, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)

An Honest Registrar Defends the Landrush Applicants — richy, September 23, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (1/2)

An amazingly courageous stand for what is right... — DomeBase, September 24, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (1/1)

a post for the honest registrars — antipodes, September 24, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)

latecomer! — jbrola, September 23, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (1/1)

don't sweat it — Dryweave, September 24, 2001 @ 2:34 PM (0/0)

Sunrise, sunset! — jbrola, September 23, 2001 @ 9:39 PM (1/1)

glad you shared your experience John - although I am sorry — antipodes, September 24, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)

dates keep on changing... — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 8:07 PM (1/1)

Not very clear indeed, but... — Helveticus, September 24, 2001 @ 8:34 AM (0/0)

If you pre-registered a Lorenz name, I'd like to hear from you, thanks — rachelmacgregor, September 23, 2001 @ 6:44 PM (1/5)

??? — fred48, September 23, 2001 @ 7:48 PM (1/4)

Afilias WERE required to delete these names, a court may find — rachelmacgregor, September 23, 2001 @ 8:09 PM (2/3)

Nonsense — fred48, September 24, 2001 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)
Hoisted on their own petard! — vera-city, September 23, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (1/1)

if enough of us like minded souls can hang together — antipodes, September 24, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)

Unbelievable (found the stupidest name thief around) — challenge, September 23, 2001 @ 4:29 PM (0/0)

.info domains are resolving — dtobias, September 23, 2001 @ 2:58 PM (2/11)

dell.info resolves eom — mole, September 25, 2001 @ 4:34 PM (0/0)
Another one — challenge, September 23, 2001 @ 3:16 PM (1/9)

Rumney — crs, September 23, 2001 @ 3:28 PM (2/8)

The CJ Lovik showcase — challenge, September 23, 2001 @ 4:10 PM (1/3)

It concerns me that this vulture is behaving like a peacock — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 4:31 PM (1/2)

Why not a just plain old dumbass??? — challenge, September 23, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (1/1)

that's right thoughtful of you Challenge - I think a framed — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 4:58 PM (0/0)

the score is — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 3:31 PM (1/3)

I am just shaking my head - the umpire didn't seem — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 4:53 PM (1/2)

We got lucky with this one — challenge, September 23, 2001 @ 5:04 PM (1/1)

Yes, slowly but surely, the noose tightens... — rachelmacgregor, September 23, 2001 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)

Why Afilias must answer in court for "Locking in" invalid names — richy, September 23, 2001 @ 1:02 PM (4/11)

Afilias had "right to refuse or cancel any Sunrise Registration at any time" — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (1/3)

So what? — fred48, September 23, 2001 @ 7:37 PM (2/2)

So - very much indeed! It's the heart of the case against Afilias! — rachelmacgregor, September 23, 2001 @ 7:59 PM (0/0)
good point — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)

;) — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 4:40 PM (0/0)
food for thought — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 3:28 PM (2/3)

Trademark Counterfeiting Crime... — Garry Anderson, September 23, 2001 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
From my reading - I suspect that any of the fraudulent — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 4:23 PM (1/1)

The case of William Lorenz will sink them — rachelmacgregor, September 23, 2001 @ 6:17 PM (0/0)

Dream on eom — fred48, September 23, 2001 @ 1:21 PM (1/1)

not end of message actually — richy, September 23, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (0/0)

Afilias were warned in advance about rogue registrars — richy, September 23, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (0/0)

What's happening to the Landrush lottery tickets and money — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 3:40 AM (1/1)

why have Afilias given no guidelines to registrars — richy, September 23, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (0/0)

a lottery without first prizes - but it's all our fault!! — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)

The current ICANN is the sort of watchdog that holds the — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

Are any of those .info domains actually resolving yet??? — dtobias, September 22, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (1/10)

I couldn't find any that resolved either. (EOM) — sfeibish, September 22, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (1/9)

You still believe Afilias ?????? — challenge, September 22, 2001 @ 11:22 PM (1/8)

Makes sense — onmove, September 23, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (1/7)

you guys have summed up my feelings - tired, cynical, sad — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 4:36 AM (2/6)

Dear Antipodes — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 1:30 PM (1/1)

BIG thanks DomeBase — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 3:19 PM (0/0)

ditto — mole, September 23, 2001 @ 5:43 AM (1/3)

At stake is the credilbility of legacy DNS — onmove, September 23, 2001 @ 6:32 AM (1/2)

Here is what I wrote for ICANN over a month ago — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 1:08 PM (1/1)

Robert, I would have thought that you had put enough in that — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 1:26 PM (0/0)

.BIZ fraudsters don't have to provide trademark proof — daveking2, September 22, 2001 @ 4:34 PM (1/4)

If it's a fake Trademark, it will not win the dispute process.. — badregistrars, September 22, 2001 @ 6:07 PM (1/3)

If a trademark is generic, it will probably not win the dispute process ... — InternetAdvocate, September 22, 2001 @ 8:30 PM (2/2)

I would argue - as this is the TRUTH — Garry Anderson, September 23, 2001 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)
In fact, false .biz TM Claimants may be their own worst enemy ? — daveking2, September 23, 2001 @ 8:33 AM (0/0)

Serving notice to the Afilias and ICANN boards and executives — rachelmacgregor, September 22, 2001 @ 11:11 AM (2/4)

Here are the Answers to Rachel's Questions. — InternetAdvocate, September 22, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (2/2)

seeing you in a new light IA - good post - eom — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 5:19 AM (0/0)
:) Great post IA! LOL — DomeBase, September 23, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (0/0)

ICANN knows that Afilias is cybersquatting - and doing zip!! — antipodes, September 22, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)

a simple question — rachelmacgregor, September 22, 2001 @ 10:02 AM (1/3)

The conduct of the men and women of Afilias and ICANN during — antipodes, September 22, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/2)

Conduct unbecoming officials — Garry Anderson, September 23, 2001 @ 3:18 PM (1/1)

I don't have access to private meetings, but the email I — antipodes, September 23, 2001 @ 3:40 PM (0/0)

And the award for Worst registrar fraud goes to..... — mbillards, September 21, 2001 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

Received today from AAAQ!!!!!!!! — challenge, September 21, 2001 @ 5:12 PM (0/0)

Thankfully, only a few registrars seem to be using unnecessary credit card authorizations — fred48, September 21, 2001 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)

ICANN's rules cause individuals to register for many names. A message to ICANN. — sfeibish, September 21, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)

Why Hal Lubsen should disqualify himself? — rachelmacgregor, September 21, 2001 @ 3:10 PM (1/1)

...and the source... — rachelmacgregor, September 21, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

Is afilias awarding names now? — fred48, September 21, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (2/3)

No names yet as of 4:45 PM PT..... — psbyowner, September 21, 2001 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)
It Really Seems Pathetic ... — jeweyjewman, September 21, 2001 @ 3:21 AM (1/1)

it's your posts that are pathetic - eom — antipodes, September 21, 2001 @ 7:02 AM (0/0)

Another scam? — jman, September 21, 2001 @ 3:01 AM (0/0)

Afilias denies incompotence (is this a joke?) — Anion, September 20, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (2/2)

part truth - part psychobabble from Afilias — antipodes, September 21, 2001 @ 1:18 AM (0/0)
I told you so - it was not incompotence — Garry Anderson, September 21, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (0/0)

Corrections to DomeBase.com website — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 10:21 PM (1/15)

DomeBase Error Correction 2 — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (2/14)

Thanks IA... My original purpose for DomeBase was to provide — DomeBase, September 20, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/4)

You're Welcome. BTW, I did not intend to imply that you were incompetent. — InternetAdvocate, September 21, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (1/3)

DomeBase Webmaster Lacked Time to Make Corrections Because Very Busy. Duh! I Know That! — InternetAdvocate, September 21, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (1/2)

peace — DomeBase, September 21, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (1/1)

completed updates — DomeBase, September 21, 2001 @ 3:22 PM (0/0)

DomeBase Error Correction 3 — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/8)

DomeBase Error Correction 4 — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (1/7)

Correction 5 — InternetAdvocate, September 21, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (1/6)

Correction 6 — InternetAdvocate, September 21, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/5)

seeing you InternetAdvocate in a different light — antipodes, September 21, 2001 @ 2:08 AM (1/4)

Your Misconception, Antipodes, Causes You to Lash Out at Me. Shame on You... — InternetAdvocate, September 21, 2001 @ 3:00 AM (2/3)

I agree with InternetAdvocate... — psbyowner, September 22, 2001 @ 12:13 AM (1/1)

come to me and let me embrace you — rachelmacgregor, September 22, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)

let's avoid personal attacks. — onmove, September 21, 2001 @ 3:35 AM (0/0)

Richy - be sure to keep these Roland and Hal quotes for — antipodes, September 20, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)

Be Careful! The deadline is the the 21st - not the 25th! — fred48, September 20, 2001 @ 7:29 PM (1/1)

thanks for the clarification EOM — psbyowner, September 20, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (0/0)

Conflicting Information From Afilias And Registrar(s) — jeweyjewman, September 19, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (1/6)

That registrar is confused. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, September 19, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/5)

We need to check it out — onmove, September 20, 2001 @ 6:11 PM (1/4)

Ever-shifting deadlines... — dtobias, September 20, 2001 @ 6:16 PM (2/3)

Afilias site has been updated.. — challenge, September 20, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)
Hey Afilias! extending the deadlines is a great way to lose customers! — psbyowner, September 20, 2001 @ 6:41 PM (1/1)

Cancel your registrations, then re-register. The best way to postpone your ceditcardpayment due date — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)

I have a question — 410, September 19, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (2/2)

22nd — Craig.D, September 20, 2001 @ 6:17 AM (0/0)
Deadline — dtobias, September 19, 2001 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)

Legal action against Afilias - is a lawsuit on the horizon? — Anion, September 19, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/1)

Lawyer biting the hand that feeds him? — Garry Anderson, September 20, 2001 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

Domebase article at ICANN-WATCH — richy, September 19, 2001 @ 9:16 PM (2/9)

ICANNWatch — dtobias, September 19, 2001 @ 11:15 PM (1/1)

and then there's ICANNwatch.info... — DomeBase, September 20, 2001 @ 2:22 AM (0/0)

...and my response at that site — richy, September 19, 2001 @ 9:20 PM (1/6)

Angola.info and those pesky TM numbers! — vera-city, September 20, 2001 @ 5:44 AM (1/5)

the importance of the William Lorenz case — antipodes, September 20, 2001 @ 2:01 PM (1/4)

The William Lorenz case continued... — rachelmacgregor, September 20, 2001 @ 4:11 PM (1/3)

Afilias knew — vera-city, September 21, 2001 @ 5:13 AM (1/2)

set up — antipodes, September 21, 2001 @ 8:10 AM (1/1)

An attractive nuisance? — vera-city, September 21, 2001 @ 5:31 PM (0/0)

Is ICANN honest? — Anion, September 19, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (2/4)

Is the Pope Catholic? — Garry Anderson, September 20, 2001 @ 10:31 AM (0/0)
Why the present status quo should be changed — richy, September 19, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (2/2)

too late for that now... — psbyowner, September 20, 2001 @ 5:17 AM (0/0)
To what the status quo should be changed. — InternetAdvocate, September 19, 2001 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

Does ICANN rubber stamp accreditations? — Anion, September 19, 2001 @ 9:12 PM (0/0)

Will Linda Govinda be allowed to keep Hawaii.info? — Anion, September 19, 2001 @ 9:03 PM (1/2)

Why she will lose Hawaii.info — richy, September 19, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (1/1)

hmm..... — Anion, September 19, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)

dear rabbit... — rachelmacgregor, September 19, 2001 @ 4:00 PM (0/0)

Extract from yesterday's TheRegister.co.uk — rachelmacgregor, September 19, 2001 @ 3:47 PM (1/2)

The article is mistaken — dtobias, September 19, 2001 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

thanks Dan — rachelmacgregor, September 19, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (0/0)

Request — Elvis, September 18, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)

Beat this! — Srana, September 18, 2001 @ 9:46 PM (4/7)

despair at antics and at some registrar's emails and sites — antipodes, September 19, 2001 @ 8:15 AM (0/0)
I received an e-mail on 9/13 saying that names had been registered — DomeBase, September 19, 2001 @ 3:32 AM (1/1)

You are correct — Srana, September 19, 2001 @ 8:25 AM (0/0)

The Twilight Zone — Elvis, September 19, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (1/1)

Nobody knows for sure — Elvis, September 19, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)

which one? EOM — psbyowner, September 18, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/1)

The registrar — Srana, September 19, 2001 @ 8:29 AM (0/0)

.INFO: Top Ten Questions for Investigation — DomeBase, September 18, 2001 @ 9:18 PM (5/11)

.INFO SUNRISE: QUESTIONS TO BE INVESTIGATED & LESSONS TO BE LEARNED — DomeBase, September 19, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)
Link to article. Another question -- why corporate restructuring? — DomeBase, September 19, 2001 @ 2:17 PM (1/1)

the establishment of Afilias USA — antipodes, September 19, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Anyone get a large charge from 'Computer Network' on credit card — DomeBase, September 19, 2001 @ 2:10 AM (0/0)
You are right, all kinds of odd things are happening. — Elvis, September 18, 2001 @ 11:53 PM (1/4)

The same thing happened to me at 1stDomainNet — richy, September 19, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (1/3)

Keep checking your credit card statements — Elvis, September 19, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/2)

correction — richy, September 19, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (1/1)

Here's hoping — Elvis, September 19, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (0/0)

What Do You Mean? — jeweyjewman, September 18, 2001 @ 11:22 PM (1/1)

What do I mean by -- purging pre-reg information? — DomeBase, September 19, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

Will ICANN ever call free elections? — Anion, September 18, 2001 @ 7:11 PM (1/1)

No — Elvis, September 18, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)

is neulevel unjustly enriching itself? — Anion, September 18, 2001 @ 7:09 PM (2/3)

Yes — Elvis, September 18, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)
link to discussion of ethics of auctions.. not simple issue — DomeBase, September 18, 2001 @ 7:28 PM (1/1)

Bob, your best shot is good enough for me. Thanks. eom — antipodes, September 18, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)

any .info's left after sunrise? — byron, September 18, 2001 @ 8:48 AM (5/6)

Probably not. Thanks to Afilias, and the TM squatters — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 12:26 AM (1/1)

TheInternetChallenge.com wrong about CJLovik ? — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 1:43 AM (0/0)

We will be watching Afilias to see if they challenge TM fraudsters — Elvis, September 19, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
Afilias encouraged it — Anion, September 18, 2001 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)
Common Misconception — Garry Anderson, September 18, 2001 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)
Afilias pass blame — Garry Anderson, September 18, 2001 @ 12:20 AM (0/0)

why is domaindirect.com still accepting pre-regs for .info? — psbyowner, September 17, 2001 @ 7:08 PM (1/2)

Who Said The .INFO Prereg Process Is "Closed"? — jeweyjewman, September 18, 2001 @ 12:05 AM (1/1)

My mistake EOM — psbyowner, September 18, 2001 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)

registrars submitting "payment authorizations" for products that don't yet exist? — sfeibish, September 17, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (2/3)

Plan on challenging these charges. — psbyowner, September 17, 2001 @ 6:56 PM (1/1)

"payment authorizations" are not charges (unfortunately) — sfeibish, September 18, 2001 @ 9:52 PM (0/0)

yep - me too - and I guess most of us trying to win a .info — antipodes, September 17, 2001 @ 6:24 AM (0/0)

.BIZ --- IP Claims and Confirming .BIZ Pre-Reg's — IncompetentAfilias, September 17, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)

Domainregistry is honest about Dot-Biz — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)

HURRY! Email Neulevel to extend the Dot-Biz deadlines, due to the tragic events in New York City — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (1/3)

Neulevel dishonors victims, stiffs biznesses, refuses to extend deadlines. — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 8:18 PM (2/2)

Neulevel bows to pressure, honors victims, extends DOT-BIZ deadline for all ... — InternetAdvocate, September 18, 2001 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)
Damned if they do, damned if they don't... — dtobias, September 18, 2001 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)

***New Hal Lubsen Fan Club***PreRegister to Join Now*** — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (5/25)

Don't you mean "The Official Hal Lubsen Boot-Licking Club"? [endpost] — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
How much do you charge for membership in the Official Rachel MacGregor Boot-Kicking Club? [endpost] — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (1/1)

Special Offer — rachelmacgregor, September 20, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)

This Good and Noble Man — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (2/5)

"Can't cheat an honest man"..., — vera-city, September 17, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (1/3)

Internet Advocate - you are BANNED from my fan club — rachelmacgregor, September 17, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (1/2)

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha! — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)

More! — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)

Your Investment is Safe with Hal — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (1/1)

ROFLOL — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)

Photo call — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 10:33 PM (1/13)

Rachel - you beat me to it - I was going to register — antipodes, September 17, 2001 @ 12:20 AM (1/12)

A Warning for Antipodes — rachelmacgregor, September 17, 2001 @ 6:09 AM (1/11)

I have TMs Rachel- just as good as yours!! — antipodes, September 17, 2001 @ 11:25 AM (1/10)

Yeah but you don't own Hal Lubsen.com.......... — rachelmacgregor, September 18, 2001 @ 3:22 PM (1/9)

but do you have thegreathallubsen.com? — antipodes, September 18, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (1/8)

Yeah but you don't have HalLubsenisthegreatesthumanitarianheroevertowalkthefaceoftheplanet.com — rachelmacgregor, September 18, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (2/7)

geez Rach - we could have been so good together - what with — antipodes, September 19, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (2/3)

What? You don't believe your eyes? — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 1:24 AM (1/1)

More ... — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 1:25 AM (0/0)

Antipodes is itching for a headkicking. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

What long wordphrase you use, my dear! <<<EoM>>> — InternetAdvocate, September 19, 2001 @ 3:58 AM (1/2)

YOUR dear... ??? — rachelmacgregor, September 19, 2001 @ 6:13 PM (1/1)

What long wordphrase you use, my DEER !!!!! Is that better? HaHaHaHa ha ha ha! C'LICK for MORE >>> — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 1:03 AM (0/0)

35,000 names stolen by tm squatters — Anion, September 16, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/7)

Anion, where did you get that figure? eom — antipodes, September 17, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (1/6)

http://theinternetchallenge.com/namelists.htm — InternetAdvocate, September 19, 2001 @ 11:44 PM (1/5)

Pondering questionable dot-info domains... — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (1/4)

Internet Advocate - please, please stop these posts eom — antipodes, September 20, 2001 @ 9:57 AM (1/3)

I was just about to delete this post, ... — InternetAdvocate, September 20, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (1/2)

oh well, it can stand as a monument to your idiocy eom — antipodes, September 21, 2001 @ 2:53 AM (1/1)

I'll match my wits against yours anytime, smart-a$$. — InternetAdvocate, September 21, 2001 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)

Another suit filed against neulevel and ICANN — Anion, September 16, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)

Afilias trying to exploit the tradgedy — Anion, September 16, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (2/9)

WRONG! Consider customers in New York City. — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 10:09 PM (1/7)

Incorrect — Anion, September 16, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (1/6)

STILL WRONG? — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (1/5)

incorrect (once again) — Anion, September 16, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (1/4)

Again UR still wrong! — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 10:52 PM (2/3)

Logical error — Anion, September 18, 2001 @ 2:19 AM (1/1)

Maybe. Maybe Not. — InternetAdvocate, September 18, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (0/0)

I'm not as cynical as you. However I also have doubts about Afilias. — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)

I would hope that is not the case. — Elvis, September 16, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)

.biz launch — crs, September 16, 2001 @ 11:31 AM (1/6)

Will Dot-Biz deadlines be extended due to the tragic events in New York City? — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 9:16 PM (2/5)

HURRY! Email Neulevel to extend the Dot-Biz deadlines, due to the tragic events in New York City — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)
Deadlines — dtobias, September 16, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (2/3)

Hey Dan, Don't You Work For Register.com? — jeweyjewman, September 17, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (1/1)

No, I don't... — dtobias, September 17, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (0/0)

True, they can't please everyone. — Elvis, September 16, 2001 @ 9:58 PM (0/0)

DomeBase request — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 9:45 AM (2/7)

I know from antipodes and internetadvocate that Bob is a good guy — psbyowner, September 16, 2001 @ 3:06 PM (1/5)

apologies to psbyowner — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (1/4)

So you admit misusing your head-kicking boots? ROFLOL. <<<EOM>>> — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 9:02 PM (1/3)

I'm just a sweet little girl — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 9:32 PM (1/2)

ROFLMAOLOL. — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (1/1)

Thanks Rachel and IA for the laughs. — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (0/0)

thanks for a moving post — DomeBase, September 16, 2001 @ 2:50 PM (0/0)

.INFO LandRush further delayed... — IncompetentAfilias, September 16, 2001 @ 4:48 AM (5/12)

Afilias DOT-INFO Startup Schedule [as of Sat, 15 Sep 2001]. — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)
more monkey business EOM — psbyowner, September 16, 2001 @ 3:12 PM (0/0)
good track record? — richy, September 16, 2001 @ 9:06 AM (0/0)
Afilias - where the world goes for frustration and disappointment — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 6:28 AM (1/1)

I agree this is nothing but bad business EOM — psbyowner, September 16, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

That is for queue 2 — mole, September 16, 2001 @ 5:33 AM (2/6)

Revised schedule — dtobias, September 16, 2001 @ 7:10 PM (1/4)

Afilias details to Registrars — richy, September 16, 2001 @ 7:35 PM (1/3)

the mute Afilias makes the changes it wants — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 8:46 PM (1/2)

Why else would Afilias eliminate Queue 2 [Sept 23-25]? — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 8:50 PM (1/1)

More fishy stench from Afilias. — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 8:30 PM (0/0)

Hrmm — IncompetentAfilias, September 16, 2001 @ 7:51 AM (0/0)

Could not login to accept .biz name, anyone else have this trouble? — sfeibish, September 16, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (2/3)

APOLOGIES TO NEULEVEL, MISTOOK one (1) for ell (L) - EOM — sfeibish, September 17, 2001 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)
Same Problem — RayF, September 16, 2001 @ 3:02 PM (1/1)

Problem Corrected — RayF, September 18, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (0/0)

I hereby accept 326014 homes.biz, just so its on record (EOM) — sfeibish, September 16, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (2/4)

APOLOGIES TO NEULEVEL, MISTOOK ONE (1) for ELL (L) - EOM — sfeibish, September 17, 2001 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)
? — IncompetentAfilias, September 16, 2001 @ 3:12 AM (2/2)

answer — sfeibish, September 16, 2001 @ 9:09 AM (0/0)
overmedicating? — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 3:58 AM (0/0)

ICANN reserves Dot-Info Country Domains, exempting Sunrisers. — InternetAdvocate, September 15, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (2/6)

country names — Elvis, September 16, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/3)

Gambia.info a hoax? — vera-city, September 19, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (1/2)

Don't blame Hal Lubsen — rachelmacgregor, September 19, 2001 @ 6:19 PM (1/1)

HAL — vera-city, September 19, 2001 @ 7:33 PM (0/0)

ICANN - arbitrary and unacceptable — rachelmacgregor, September 15, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (1/1)

...and then there's the fake TMs by Afilias Board members — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 12:13 AM (0/0)

Unbelievably Depraved behavior by the single worst registrar in existence — fred48, September 15, 2001 @ 5:49 PM (1/2)

SPYProductions - hmmm — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 3:33 AM (1/1)

Not as depraved as ... — InternetAdvocate, September 18, 2001 @ 4:33 AM (0/0)

One of the registrars is asking to have Land Rush delayed for undefined period of time — DomeBase, September 15, 2001 @ 4:09 PM (3/18)

I bet you anything that.... — challenge, September 15, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)
Lets Just Get it Over With — Nicholas Bernstein, September 15, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (2/5)

The Schedule for Land Rush — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (1/1)

Afilias changed schedule again... — InternetAdvocate, September 18, 2001 @ 10:03 PM (0/0)

Land Rush is still as originally scheduled. — InternetAdvocate, September 15, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (1/2)

No Thats Not Right — Nicholas Bernstein, September 15, 2001 @ 11:46 PM (1/1)

Must be age or Afilias. LOL — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

Lets get the Landrush over with — psbyowner, September 15, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (1/10)

one more thing... — psbyowner, September 15, 2001 @ 8:21 PM (2/9)

You are right — DomeBase, September 16, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)
What the hell are you talking about? — rachelmacgregor, September 15, 2001 @ 10:40 PM (3/7)

I see we are hitting some nerves here... — psbyowner, September 16, 2001 @ 2:29 AM (1/1)

...And my politics are simply to not delay the landrush EOM — psbyowner, September 16, 2001 @ 2:30 AM (0/0)

add one more to Bob Connor's team — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (1/2)

Well Said... — IncompetentAfilias, September 16, 2001 @ 3:09 AM (1/1)

We should not fight each other — Elvis, September 16, 2001 @ 1:13 PM (0/0)

Rachel... — IncompetentAfilias, September 15, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (1/1)

You are right — rachelmacgregor, September 16, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (0/0)

The Internet Challenge going onto the attack against registrars — richy, September 15, 2001 @ 2:27 PM (1/1)

You have my support — Elvis, September 15, 2001 @ 3:45 PM (0/0)

I have 30 times (at least) the money required to register names left after Sunrise — sfeibish, September 15, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (1/1)

Mate - we have gotten ourselves into shark territory - and — antipodes, September 15, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (0/0)

a message to Afilias — rachelmacgregor, September 15, 2001 @ 9:25 AM (1/2)

you're a ballsy gal Rach - see you still got your headkickin — antipodes, September 15, 2001 @ 1:22 PM (1/1)

You bet, John. — onmove, September 15, 2001 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)

payment authorizations for unavailable names — sfeibish, September 15, 2001 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)

credit card authorizations — sfeibish, September 15, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (0/0)

There is simply no value in alternative domain extentions... — psbyowner, September 15, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (3/12)

Domain "value" — dtobias, September 15, 2001 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)
You are right — Elvis, September 15, 2001 @ 1:53 AM (0/0)
Agree — kbritt, September 15, 2001 @ 1:43 AM (1/9)

Not Quite — InternetAdvocate, September 15, 2001 @ 10:19 PM (2/8)

Also ABC — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (0/0)
playuk.tv - only after failed reverse hijack — Garry Anderson, September 16, 2001 @ 10:29 AM (2/6)

Playuk sounds like play yuck. UK yuck! — InternetAdvocate, September 16, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (1/3)

There is always the option of..... — Elvis, September 16, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/2)

But due to big business protectionism... — Garry Anderson, September 16, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (1/1)

Not widely known — Elvis, September 17, 2001 @ 10:13 AM (0/0)

bbc.tv — hiltonian, September 16, 2001 @ 10:34 AM (1/1)

Thankyou - but it promotes bbc.co.uk — Garry Anderson, September 16, 2001 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)

And They Double-Billed Me For One .INFO Request — jeweyjewman, September 14, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (1/1)

You are right — Elvis, September 15, 2001 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)

How to win against fraudulent IP claims - rules ? — trademark, September 14, 2001 @ 6:45 PM (0/0)

The real problem with .info — kbritt, September 14, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/1)

fraud and greed — antipodes, September 14, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (0/0)

Afilias approved "trademarks" -- what a joke! — kbritt, September 14, 2001 @ 6:19 PM (3/4)

Trademarked word — dtobias, September 15, 2001 @ 3:07 AM (1/1)

That is abuse of trademark — Garry Anderson, September 16, 2001 @ 9:20 AM (0/0)

the tradmarked word: — kbritt, September 15, 2001 @ 1:35 AM (0/0)
I hate soft TMs — antipodes, September 14, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)

.biz fraudulent trademarks — DaveKing2, September 14, 2001 @ 4:31 PM (1/4)

Your fears are correct, this one too promises to get UGLY — challenge, September 14, 2001 @ 5:21 PM (2/3)

how to discover ip claims? — crs, September 14, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (1/1)

; — crs, September 15, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (0/0)

.biz IP Claims — dtobias, September 14, 2001 @ 5:56 PM (0/0)

Is this true with 1st domain.net??????!!!! — fred48, September 14, 2001 @ 4:11 PM (3/5)

True about 1stdomain.net and a warning! — Elvis, September 15, 2001 @ 1:26 AM (0/0)
a few words — richy, September 14, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (2/2)

ICANN and Afilias will be happy if we all look the other way — antipodes, September 15, 2001 @ 5:50 AM (0/0)
Well said Richy — Elvis, September 15, 2001 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)

an enforcable code of practice needed for registrars — antipodes, September 14, 2001 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)

lawsuit to help Afilias release names taken by fraudulent sunrise applications — sfeibish, September 14, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (0/0)

deposited $ > credit limit , credit card company won't budge on limit — sfeibish, September 14, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (0/0)

Sharing info — Elvis, September 14, 2001 @ 8:46 AM (2/4)

Registrars Charging Credit Cards Beforehand/etc. — IncompetentAfilias, September 14, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
I am in total agreement... — psbyowner, September 14, 2001 @ 3:31 PM (2/2)

you are right - we have to help ourselves and each other - — antipodes, September 14, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
Constructive initiative — onmove, September 14, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (0/0)

Sunrise Challenges & Resulting Domain "Transfers" — IncompetentAfilias, September 14, 2001 @ 4:04 AM (0/0)

SHOCKING PHOTO. — InternetAdvocate, September 14, 2001 @ 4:02 AM (1/7)

It was only a matter of time. . . — 410, September 14, 2001 @ 10:32 AM (1/6)

Stupidity? ROFLMAOLOL. R U Blind? — InternetAdvocate, September 14, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (1/5)

InternetAdvocate - I'm with 410 - you are a major loon!!! — antipodes, September 15, 2001 @ 6:08 AM (1/4)

IC that U2R blind. U think Philadelphia Daily News editors are loons too? — InternetAdvocate, September 15, 2001 @ 10:54 PM (1/3)

No - photos don't speak for themselves - it takes — antipodes, September 16, 2001 @ 7:25 AM (1/2)

Ha ha ha ha ha! You proved that you are the stupid loon! — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (1/1)

More! Another Photo to Ponder. — InternetAdvocate, September 17, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

eNom borrows a page from Afilias — challenge, September 13, 2001 @ 11:53 PM (3/7)

accountability and integrity - not words the experienced — antipodes, September 14, 2001 @ 7:37 AM (1/1)

Trust is lost.... — onmove, September 14, 2001 @ 4:41 PM (0/0)

what's the point... too much scam already — kbritt, September 14, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (0/0)
Enom — IncompetentAfilias, September 14, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/3)

The honor of gas station owners — challenge, September 14, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (1/2)

i was able to up my bids by a penny — sfeibish, September 14, 2001 @ 3:37 AM (1/1)

It's really amazing — peeved, September 14, 2001 @ 2:28 PM (0/0)

filing an info challenge — caru, September 13, 2001 @ 7:28 PM (4/5)

Afilias can still challenge a Challenger in December — daveking2, September 14, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (0/0)
I believe that the crazy "Musical Chairs Lottery" has come upon us — DomeBase, September 13, 2001 @ 9:10 PM (0/0)
.info challenge rules — dtobias, September 13, 2001 @ 9:08 PM (1/1)

when dealing with the apparently unscrupulous, one becomes — antipodes, September 14, 2001 @ 7:20 AM (0/0)

hmm... — Anion, September 13, 2001 @ 8:28 PM (0/0)

Your of extention.. — Pholeron, September 13, 2001 @ 6:43 PM (2/5)

Yes you can outside of ICANN — FineE, September 14, 2001 @ 6:21 PM (0/0)
to reach majority of internet users, you need to use "icann" extension — sfeibish, September 14, 2001 @ 3:19 AM (1/3)

that's not an answer i was hoping for... :( — Pholeron, September 14, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (1/2)

Info on domain structure — dtobias, September 14, 2001 @ 4:58 PM (1/1)

.it — InternetAdvocate, September 15, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)

Sunrise challenge List Is Out — sanjeevgoyal, September 13, 2001 @ 4:01 AM (1/2)

only 184 domains challenged — sanjeevgoyal, September 13, 2001 @ 4:40 AM (1/1)

Challenges — dtobias, September 13, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (0/0)

Afilias Rollout Confusing? Here's the CLARIFICATION for you all. — InternetAdvocate, September 13, 2001 @ 3:15 AM (0/0)

There's a difference between InternetAdvocate and InternetAdvocate_ (note the underscore) — Slicer, September 12, 2001 @ 11:40 PM (1/4)

Err, it's a space, not an underscore — Slicer, September 12, 2001 @ 11:41 PM (2/3)

No difference. LOL — InternetAdvocate, September 14, 2001 @ 4:11 AM (0/0)
ICANN Conspiracy? — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (1/1)

Yeah right — hiltonian, September 13, 2001 @ 10:54 AM (0/0)

Entrusting ICANN with the name space is like giving IMF money to Russia — Anion, September 12, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (2/3)

Ah - you spotted ICANNs plan — Garry Anderson, September 13, 2001 @ 9:34 AM (1/1)

Apple — IncompetentAfilias, September 13, 2001 @ 10:42 AM (0/0)

Flush. — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:58 PM (0/0)

What's going on? (besides more fraud) — Anion, September 12, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (1/3)

Registration begins September 12th. — InternetAdvocate , September 13, 2001 @ 12:00 AM (1/2)

and what's the difference between... — jman, September 13, 2001 @ 1:49 AM (1/1)

Reg and Pre-Reg — InternetAdvocate, September 13, 2001 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)

More confusion — challenge, September 12, 2001 @ 2:10 PM (3/5)

Here's the Landrush schedule. — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/2)

Here's more details — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (1/1)

CLARIFICATION — InternetAdvocate, September 13, 2001 @ 3:20 AM (0/0)

Afilias website up: today is the day on schedule — psbyowner, September 12, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)
Reply — 410, September 12, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (0/0)

Outrage — Elvis, September 12, 2001 @ 8:50 AM (1/6)

Why it was such a shock — Garry Anderson, September 12, 2001 @ 1:22 PM (2/5)

Massive revenge will prevent more terrorism against America! — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (1/1)

And zero [or too tiny a] response will invite more terror. — InternetAdvocate, September 14, 2001 @ 4:16 AM (0/0)

Anti-Attack Feds Push Carnivore - Echelon — Garry Anderson, September 12, 2001 @ 2:34 PM (1/2)

Carnivore and Echelon violate privacy without combatting smart terrorists. — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (1/1)

People do not realize - surveillance society — Garry Anderson, September 13, 2001 @ 8:44 AM (0/0)

Shocking events in the US — Srana, September 11, 2001 @ 9:40 PM (1/2)

The world weeps — Garry Anderson, September 11, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (1/1)

My prediction. — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)

Message from my Registrar — hiltonian, September 11, 2001 @ 6:47 PM (2/2)

Sorry, Dotsters date differs: 17th not 14th — saskia, September 12, 2001 @ 7:01 AM (0/0)
Same info at Dotster — saskia, September 12, 2001 @ 6:55 AM (0/0)

Nobody can deny this — Garry Anderson, September 11, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (1/3)

Gutless Cowards — Garry Anderson, September 12, 2001 @ 1:51 PM (1/2)

Almost as gutless cowards as BinLaden, Taliban, Hamas, PLO, DFLP, Arafatso, et al. — InternetAdvocate , September 12, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (1/1)

Demon image in WTC Tower Smoke. — InternetAdvocate, September 14, 2001 @ 3:59 AM (0/0)

Bhavin AIN'T MISBeHAVIN'. But Afilias and Neulevel are! — InternetAdvocate, September 11, 2001 @ 3:31 AM (1/4)

Alphabetical list of QUESTIONABLE dot-info DOMAINS — InternetAdvocate, September 11, 2001 @ 3:53 AM (1/3)

need time to work on these — richy, September 11, 2001 @ 6:16 AM (2/2)

Richy, you deserve a knighthood for the work you've already! — Elvis, September 11, 2001 @ 8:43 AM (0/0)
We can expect nothing from Afilias but lies about their — antipodes, September 11, 2001 @ 7:24 AM (0/0)

country code reservations — jman, September 11, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)

If you have registered a bid with eNom, be sure to check their e-mail — DomeBase, September 11, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/1)

for the public good, a registrar code of practice is needed — antipodes, September 11, 2001 @ 7:05 AM (0/0)

Now, back to business, just say no to registrars. — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (3/3)

It could be worse — Anion, September 11, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)
As for Afilias and ICANN, there should be consumer — antipodes, September 11, 2001 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)
Saying "NO" To Registrars ... — jeweyjewman, September 10, 2001 @ 11:28 PM (0/0)

"if you give it too much power, someone's going to abuse it" — Garry Anderson, September 10, 2001 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)

freeze on geographic names? — sfeibish, September 10, 2001 @ 4:04 PM (3/28)

Country .info names only — psbyowner, September 10, 2001 @ 10:27 PM (0/0)
geographic freeze? — gckorn, September 10, 2001 @ 8:28 PM (1/23)

Yes ICANN threw in a last-minute Rule...Here it is... — challenge, September 10, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (4/22)

How about country dot coms? — Srana, September 10, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)
Where can rule be found? — gckorn, September 10, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (0/0)
I beg to differ gentlemen, — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (1/15)

You do, then tell me this.. — challenge, September 10, 2001 @ 10:40 PM (3/14)

Somebody with common-sense — Garry Anderson, September 11, 2001 @ 8:34 AM (1/3)

Not against free speech — Elvis, September 11, 2001 @ 8:59 AM (2/2)

Force of voice — Garry Anderson, September 11, 2001 @ 11:13 AM (0/0)
Contry name to the government? ..NO! — cello, September 11, 2001 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)

At least business interests are rational... — psbyowner, September 10, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (2/2)

Look at it this way — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)
It's the label and stigma.... — challenge, September 10, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)

I raised this issue some time ago, they do have a genuine point on this. — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (1/6)

Seen too many "Arnold" movies haven't we.. — challenge, September 10, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (2/5)

America.us or info.us — Garry Anderson, September 11, 2001 @ 8:53 AM (0/0)
And I thought you were going to go on about Arnold Layne, — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (1/3)

Re- Arnold Layne — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (1/2)

Chilling is fine, but... — challenge, September 10, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (1/1)

I don't disagree for the sake of it, — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (0/0)

ISO Country Names — challenge, September 10, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (1/3)

Garry Anderson's nightmare! ROFLMAOLOL. — InternetAdvocate, September 10, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (2/2)

Cannot see it happening — Garry Anderson, September 11, 2001 @ 8:02 AM (0/0)
Points raised — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 10:34 PM (0/0)

Why? — Garry Anderson, September 10, 2001 @ 5:53 PM (2/2)

I think they are right on this — Elvis, September 10, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)
Yeah: and American locations are www.ci.location.ca.us... — psbyowner, September 10, 2001 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)

News on the BBC — Garry Anderson, September 10, 2001 @ 2:19 PM (0/0)

No movement from Afilias — jman, September 10, 2001 @ 4:01 AM (0/0)

registrar says .info registry charges non-refundable 5 euro fee? — sfeibish, September 10, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)

Stuart Lynn, 2001 @ Montevideo ... — jeweyjewman, September 9, 2001 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)

Message sent to Uruguay — onmove, September 9, 2001 @ 9:34 PM (1/2)

Thank you — rachelmacgregor, September 9, 2001 @ 10:14 PM (1/1)

You are welcome... — onmove, September 9, 2001 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)

No answer from Uruguay — rachelmacgregor, September 9, 2001 @ 9:02 PM (1/1)

Good message Rachel! — DomeBase, September 9, 2001 @ 11:19 PM (0/0)

script.info register reserved — vera-city, September 9, 2001 @ 7:34 PM (2/2)

ports.info register reserved — vera-city, September 13, 2001 @ 2:43 AM (0/0)
webhosting.info (eNOM Inc.) and nudes.info (123 EasyDomain) — bezzant, September 9, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)

Stuart Lynn Lied — 410, September 9, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (1/1)

Sounds like a chicken ad. — InternetAdvocate, September 9, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)

Open Mic Today at Montevideo — bezzant, September 9, 2001 @ 1:09 PM (3/7)

That 1000 character limit is a bear — psbyowner, September 9, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (1/1)

good thinking! — onmove, September 9, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

questions about submission of comments to Montevideo — DomeBase, September 9, 2001 @ 2:50 PM (1/3)

Sunrise Squatters raised in Uruguay — richy, September 9, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (2/2)

Thanks... I missed first open mike due to time diff foul up — DomeBase, September 9, 2001 @ 4:46 PM (0/0)
Next Opportunity in about 4 Hours Time — Srana, September 9, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)

Sorry...That's 4:00pm to 5:00pm Eastern Std.Time -TODAY — bezzant, September 9, 2001 @ 1:15 PM (0/0)

stealth, self-interest, deceit, negligence, incompetence, and plain — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 8:30 AM (4/11)

IDR registry and PSI-Japan — DomeBase, September 10, 2001 @ 5:14 PM (1/4)

PSI-Japan — Nicholas Bernstein, September 10, 2001 @ 8:10 PM (1/3)

Your opinion on charge & refund if unsuccessful? — DomeBase, September 10, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (1/2)

Opinion — Nicholas Bernstein, September 11, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (1/1)

yeah, maybe you're right — DomeBase, September 11, 2001 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

Consumer protection should be a priority for ICANN — psbyowner, September 10, 2001 @ 2:51 AM (0/0)
He's a Fraud — Nicholas Bernstein, September 9, 2001 @ 11:29 AM (2/2)

Robert Connelly is definitely a guy you want to do business with. — sfeibish, September 9, 2001 @ 1:08 PM (0/0)
The Honesty of Robert Connelly — richy, September 9, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (0/0)

Robert Connelly of Psi-USA Explains — Srana, September 9, 2001 @ 11:15 AM (1/1)

I suspect that I owe IDRegister an apology for the remarks I — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)

congratulations Afilias on all the European .info registrations — vera-city, September 9, 2001 @ 6:10 AM (0/0)

The Bullsh$t Afilias Presentation — icanncant, September 9, 2001 @ 5:51 AM (2/4)

Is laPlante an idiot or just deceptive and dishonest? — richy, September 9, 2001 @ 8:38 AM (1/2)

can't tell right from wrong — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (1/1)

When will Austria declare WAR? — richy, September 9, 2001 @ 1:07 PM (0/0)

I beg to differ Roland, you have done nothing to be proud of — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 6:55 AM (0/0)

Afilias - where the world goes for information — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)

beware your credit cards — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 3:30 AM (1/2)

re — PAWEL, September 9, 2001 @ 1:36 PM (1/1)

my apology to IDRegister — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 2:15 PM (0/0)

Over 9400 names now listed at The Internet Challenge — richy, September 9, 2001 @ 2:43 AM (1/3)

Richy, you site and your hard work have been inspirational. — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (1/2)

Richy, Don't Lose That Number!!! — InternetAdvocate, September 9, 2001 @ 9:50 PM (1/1)

Thanks — InternetAdvocate, September 11, 2001 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

OPEN LETTER TO ICANN AND AFILIAS BOARDS - in defence of — antipodes, September 9, 2001 @ 12:42 AM (1/1)

May good sense prevail......... — onmove, September 9, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (0/0)

Afilias, answer this, when will you release names claimed by TM fraudsters — Elvis, September 8, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

Individual Registrar Emails — Srana, September 8, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (0/0)

Contacts for Neulevel Dot-Biz and Afilias Dot-Info Registries. — Internet Advocate, September 8, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (3/3)

Individual Registrar Emails — Srana, September 8, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)
Afilias Dot-Info — Internet Advocate, September 8, 2001 @ 10:57 PM (0/0)
Neulevel Dot-Biz — Internet Advocate, September 8, 2001 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)

back in the forum — richy, September 8, 2001 @ 10:33 PM (5/5)

Nice!! Block him again, guys! Go for his IP this time! — Slicer, September 9, 2001 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)
Welcome back Rich. ICANN do not block him again, please. — DomeBase, September 9, 2001 @ 4:05 AM (0/0)
Welcome back Richy — FineE, September 9, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
Rock on — Elvis, September 8, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (0/0)
Welcome Back Richy! — Srana, September 8, 2001 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)

UNBLOCK RICHY HENDERSON!!!!!! — Srana, September 8, 2001 @ 9:58 PM (1/1)

I AGREE: UNBLOCK RICH HENDERSON! — DomeBase, September 9, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (0/0)

"Management of Afilias is out of control. — antipodes, September 8, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)

Govinda at it again!!! — rachelmacgregor, September 8, 2001 @ 7:21 PM (1/1)

type German.com not Germans.com — rachelmacgregor, September 8, 2001 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)

7100 names now listed on The Internet Challenge — rachelmacgregor, September 8, 2001 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)

Plankenstein registered 4882 names at Sunrise!!! — rachelmacgregor, September 8, 2001 @ 6:23 PM (1/2)

Afilias could solve this with two lines of SQL — Slicer, September 8, 2001 @ 6:47 PM (1/1)

Are you drunk, already? — friedrich, September 8, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)

The .biz lottery is crooked and unethical... — psbyowner, September 8, 2001 @ 4:28 PM (1/1)

ICANN is biased to the registrars on .biz lottery...Why? — psbyowner, September 8, 2001 @ 4:55 PM (0/0)

Registrars Leasing Landrush Queues? — Srana, September 8, 2001 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)

I guess kindergarten is in session now... — dtobias, September 8, 2001 @ 2:51 PM (1/1)

Exactly — hiltonian, September 8, 2001 @ 2:54 PM (0/0)

surrendering .info domains — domini, September 8, 2001 @ 2:39 PM (1/1)

Try This — InternetAdvocate, September 8, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (0/0)

Latest from Robert Connelly on dnso.org — Srana, September 8, 2001 @ 11:09 AM (0/0)

HOLY GOD!!! WE'VE GOTTA ACT NOW! PETITION!!! — PissedJesus, September 8, 2001 @ 2:13 AM (2/4)

Regarding your comment ... "ICANN is evil" — cgrady, September 8, 2001 @ 3:33 AM (1/2)

A combination of truisms and bold assertions — Slicer, September 8, 2001 @ 4:04 AM (1/1)

A combination of over 14 years of experience and expertise on this subject — cgrady, September 8, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (0/0)

Your fight — 410, September 8, 2001 @ 2:49 AM (0/0)

Slicer must be banned for unacceptable behavior — icanncant, September 7, 2001 @ 11:57 PM (4/11)

Slicer should be banned, he has made a threat to this forum, again! — Elvis, September 8, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)

hey, you forgot my other threats — PissedJesus, September 8, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (0/0)

ahh....the glory of being the all mighty — PissedJesus, September 8, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (1/5)

So called "Valid Points" — 410, September 8, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (1/4)

You're the pot, i'm the kettle. Who's black? — PissedJesus, September 8, 2001 @ 2:06 AM (1/3)

lol — 410, September 8, 2001 @ 2:33 AM (1/2)

Get the hell out of this forum, your very presence offends me — Slicer, September 8, 2001 @ 5:08 AM (1/1)

Slicer - you are the one who is offensive — antipodes, September 8, 2001 @ 8:10 AM (0/0)

Well. . . — 410, September 8, 2001 @ 12:37 AM (0/0)
*chuckle* *snort* BWAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA... — Slicer, September 8, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (1/1)

I'm galled...aghast...petrified — Vermin, September 8, 2001 @ 3:03 AM (0/0)

Image Online Design's application was "right on target" and visionary. Here is why... — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 7, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (1/1)

woah, calm down there buddy. jizz too early and you'll scare them off.... — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (0/0)

Repost of "ICANN Defraud: The Fraud of the ICANN New TLD Process". — icanncant, September 7, 2001 @ 9:57 PM (1/4)

some advise, because i've been there — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (1/3)

Calm down Slicer, you're gonna have a heart attack at this rate! — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (1/2)

you made a mistake there.... — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (1/1)

Hmmm — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 11:36 PM (0/0)

Did you know ...? — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/15)

did you know that was the worst post i've ever read? — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (2/14)

You. . . — 410, September 8, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

Don't worry - he is slicer ... — friedrich, September 8, 2001 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)

Thank you for the compliment. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 9:45 PM (1/11)

sometimes i wonder why i ever made man...*sigh* — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (1/10)

Thanks for reading my post. You know that there are well-founded arguments behind my questions. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 10:04 PM (1/9)

since when does well founded mean non-existant? — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (2/8)

Stop blaspheming. — hiltonian, September 8, 2001 @ 2:09 PM (1/2)

I SMITE THEE TO HELL!!! — PissedJesus, September 8, 2001 @ 9:25 PM (1/1)

Figure it out. — 410, September 8, 2001 @ 10:30 PM (0/0)

Don't give up! — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/4)

well, you've done it. you're so stupid, you've managed to confuse even jesus. — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 10:48 PM (1/3)

Didn't you understand? Maybe I should write more slowly. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (1/2)

yeah, dumbass, WRITE slower so that your WRITING comes across clearer.... — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (1/1)

I am sorry, if you have troubles with your identity --- and I am glad IOD hasn't. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)

CAN IT GET ANY WORSE? / VOTE OF NO CONFIDENCE IN ICANN — Anthony 2nd, September 7, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)

Isn't it fascinating to see, how quickly a new "Internet Aristocracy" built up its own power? — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 9:23 PM (0/0)

LIST of .INFO AVAILABLE NAMES — sanjeevgoyal, September 7, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (0/0)

Is an illegal lottery good for the internet community? — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 9:15 AM (1/1)

Yes — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 5:57 PM (0/0)

ample justification to withdraw Afilias's contract - DNSO — antipodes, September 7, 2001 @ 4:33 AM (2/2)

being censored — antipodes, September 7, 2001 @ 5:11 AM (0/0)
It just doesn't get more stupid than this — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 4:51 AM (0/0)

WHAT A EXCUSE FROM GOVINA — mitsuindia, September 7, 2001 @ 3:48 AM (2/2)

Why I cannot accept Govinda's position - she should resign — rachelmacgregor, September 7, 2001 @ 9:52 AM (0/0)
Sure, we believe you... — IncompetentAfilias, September 7, 2001 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)

Solution to NCBA and RegistryPro's Non-Performance on Applications — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 2:55 AM (1/31)

ICANN will never accept IOD's dot-web for two reasons. — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 3:31 AM (2/30)

Your Reasons are Unfounded. Here are the FACTS — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 2:01 PM (1/4)

Straddle the fence and impale your balls, IOD — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 5:54 PM (1/3)

Again, you are dead wrong ! — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 6:15 PM (1/2)

Again, you are brain dead ! — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 7:01 PM (1/1)

Again, you clearly don't understand - Just as you have accused others of not understanding. — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 8:26 PM (0/0)

Chairman of the Commerce Cmte seems to like Image Online Design — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 7, 2001 @ 4:32 AM (1/24)

I'm sure Mr. Evans corrected him. — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 4:39 AM (2/23)

The Senate Majorty Leader is very aware of Image Online Design Slicer — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 7, 2001 @ 10:49 PM (1/2)

How do you type with that much dick in your mouth? — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

I am a Republican....Sorry to disappoint Slicer.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 8, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)

REALLY? You have direct contact with Representative Tauzin — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 2:31 PM (1/19)

*I* happen to know his every mortal sin — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 6:44 PM (2/18)

You seem to be making a career out of coming to Slicer's rescue — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/4)

well i can assert just as well that you and fredrich are one in the same — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 10:27 PM (1/3)

4,294,967,296 unique IP addresses and you can't gain access to two? — cgrady, September 7, 2001 @ 11:50 PM (1/2)

Dear Jesus! The IDIOCY!! — Slicer, September 7, 2001 @ 11:57 PM (1/1)

I'm guessing you didn't read the article then — cgrady, September 8, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (0/0)

You fit the process, Slicer. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 8:48 PM (1/12)

say what, nigga? — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (2/11)

say what, nigga? - is that you Lucy22? — antipodes, September 8, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (1/1)

didn't you know? jesus is black. — PissedJesus, September 8, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)

Everyone can easily tell from your spelling problems that you are "Slicer" ... — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 9:51 PM (1/8)

that's it! close the gates, he can't be saved! — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (1/7)

Maybe you should take care of yourself, first. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/6)

you forget, jesus is perfect. — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 10:19 PM (1/5)

Reading the good arguments has obviously a positive effect on you. — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 10:40 PM (1/4)

myself on crutches — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/3)

You shouldn't consider/talk about suicide! — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (1/2)

please, please, please, don't make me strike you with lightning — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 11:05 PM (1/1)

Thanks for showing us your true face, Slicer (alias "dot com domain investor") — friedrich, September 7, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (0/0)

1600 names registered by Afilias for one applicant... claims Tirol online — richyhenderson, September 7, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/2)

Bride of Plankenstein — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (1/1)

lol — psbyowner, September 7, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)

NOW IS THE TIME — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

Long live ICANN watch, they will always hold a torch in this darkness! — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (0/0)

Launch second strike — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 12:13 AM (1/2)

The missiles are already in the air — rachelmacgregor, September 7, 2001 @ 12:25 AM (1/1)

die hard — psbyowner, September 7, 2001 @ 3:49 AM (0/0)

New Registrar Fraud revelation? ... SUSPEND THE LANDRUSH — richyhenderson, September 6, 2001 @ 10:23 PM (0/0)

Pre-registration refunds — jman, September 6, 2001 @ 8:13 PM (2/6)

What Afilias Will Do — Paul Gill, September 6, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (1/4)

Queues Cluttered with Domains Already registered during Sunrise doesn't matter... — IncompetentAfilias, September 7, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (1/3)

Correct — Paul Gill, September 7, 2001 @ 7:39 PM (1/2)

Not true — gckorn, September 7, 2001 @ 10:03 PM (1/1)

Thanks — Paul Gill, September 7, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (0/0)

Honest registrars are being left to twist in the wind.... — DomeBase, September 6, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (0/0)

Afilias directors running for cover? — vera-city, September 6, 2001 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)

RESIGNATION OF AFILIAS BOARD MEMBER: — mitsuindia, September 6, 2001 @ 4:54 PM (1/9)

Robert Connelly's resignation letter...proof that some people actually care — challenge, September 6, 2001 @ 5:46 PM (1/8)

This guy has real integrity. This was not an easy decision. — DomeBase, September 6, 2001 @ 7:10 PM (1/7)

Betcha the guy they hire in his place isn't going to have any :) — Slicer, September 6, 2001 @ 7:53 PM (2/6)

Good God Slicer, your IQ just doubled! — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)
Hey Slicer, not a bad post! Maybe your bad rep is a bum rap? — DomeBase, September 6, 2001 @ 8:15 PM (2/4)

Not really, he is still an ICANN slave — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)
Oh no, I'm quite evil. It's just that I hate *everybody* involved. — Slicer, September 6, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (1/2)

Oh-oh. If you hate people who do wrong, then you must be good! ;) — DomeBase, September 6, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (1/1)

Then that makes misanthropes the best people on Earth, because everybody's to blame — Slicer, September 6, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (0/0)

.iii Stands Ready to enter Testbed as Alternate — bfausett, September 6, 2001 @ 4:19 PM (2/4)

IOD's .web is the next runner up — kodo, September 7, 2001 @ 2:29 PM (1/2)

"first runner up" — bfausett, September 7, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (1/1)

The "basket" method for choosing domains is a non-starter....you can bank on that the next go around — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 8, 2001 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)

You can aready register law.pro, med.pro and cpa.pro! — Lazy, September 7, 2001 @ 10:20 AM (0/0)

Member of Afilias Board Resigns: Calls Sunrise "Abomination" — DomeBase, September 6, 2001 @ 4:12 PM (1/1)

One DECENT man on the Board : now STOP THE LANDRUSH — richyhenderson, September 6, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)

- the legend in his own lunchtime — antipodes, September 6, 2001 @ 1:29 PM (2/3)

You've Lost — Paul Gill, September 6, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (1/1)

you have yet to win a round Pauly — antipodes, September 7, 2001 @ 3:57 AM (0/0)

I love watching domain name speculators beat the crap out of each other.. — Slicer, September 6, 2001 @ 7:57 PM (0/0)

Why some Registrar still accept names already registed in sunrise period ? — aferreira, September 6, 2001 @ 8:55 AM (3/3)

Please read some of the posts here, then decide what to do. — Elvis, September 7, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)
Yes this has happened to me too EOM — psbyowner, September 6, 2001 @ 3:42 PM (0/0)
why? - the question we are all asking — antipodes, September 6, 2001 @ 11:57 AM (0/0)

looking more like a purge - from IDR - Internet Domains — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (1/9)

Misinformation from IDR — rachelmacgregor, September 5, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (1/8)

You Cannot — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 10:03 PM (2/7)

How about you? — challenge, September 6, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (2/5)

You Are Right — Paul Gill, September 6, 2001 @ 8:18 AM (1/3)

Cost Benefit Analysis — Paul Gill, September 6, 2001 @ 8:53 AM (1/2)

re: cost benefit — crs, September 6, 2001 @ 12:30 AM (1/1)

oh — crs, September 6, 2001 @ 1:02 PM (0/0)

nice post Challenge - I think you got him figured right — antipodes, September 6, 2001 @ 6:14 AM (0/0)

Do you have a problem with this? If not, shut up! — rachelmacgregor, September 5, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

looks like a purge - advice from domaindiscount24 — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (1/2)

And stuff the Biz lottery, read the following email I just got. — Elvis, September 6, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (1/1)

.biz — onmove, September 6, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)

Computer Filled in Bogus Trademark Information: First-Hand Account — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (1/2)

My TM dates are wrong — chrismoran, September 5, 2001 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

The plot thickens — Elvis, September 6, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)

Could the credit card companies help us ? — chrismoran, September 5, 2001 @ 10:50 AM (1/1)

basis for chargeback is... — chrismoran, September 5, 2001 @ 11:34 AM (0/0)

the standout contributors to this site - I think not — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 8:45 AM (2/3)

Just Cause We Don't Agree With You... — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 8:56 AM (1/1)

At least Antipodes is saying the things that are true — rachelmacgregor, September 5, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (0/0)

You don't DESERVE a fair shake, speculator boy — Slicer, September 5, 2001 @ 8:48 AM (0/0)

NOW WHERE TO GO FROM HERE — mitsuindia, September 5, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (3/4)

Good luck — Elvis, September 6, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)
Generic Terms / TMs — IncompetentAfilias, September 5, 2001 @ 7:29 AM (0/0)
That Is A Lot — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 6:05 AM (1/1)

a bountiful Sunrise — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 6:58 AM (0/0)

This is the Marathon, not sprint! — onmove, September 5, 2001 @ 2:37 AM (2/2)

we have a worthy enemy - we shouldn't leave the battle yet — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 7:45 AM (0/0)
P.S. — onmove, September 5, 2001 @ 3:48 AM (0/0)

Dallas.info and Plano.info — vera-city, September 4, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (1/2)

And others! — rachelmacgregor, September 5, 2001 @ 1:49 PM (1/1)

Plano.info reserved for catalog.com Direct.info reserved for Bhavin — vera-city, September 5, 2001 @ 2:49 PM (0/0)

After the activists are done attacking ICANN, they can join the campaign to ban DHMO! — Slicer, September 4, 2001 @ 10:21 PM (0/0)

Info Names Up For Pre-Auction — ChrisMoran, September 4, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (1/8)

Those were probably my auctions BEFORE . . . — gckorn, September 4, 2001 @ 8:33 PM (1/7)

So in other words, you're going to register names just to sell them? You leech. — Slicer, September 5, 2001 @ 8:54 AM (1/6)

Hi Slicer... — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (1/5)

Only problem being... — rachelmacgregor, September 5, 2001 @ 1:42 PM (1/4)

Hi Rach — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 4:28 PM (1/3)

Best to not even reply to Slicer, he uses fart to text software anyway. — Elvis, September 6, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (1/2)

Haha...you so funny, Elvis — Scaramoush, September 7, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (1/1)

Elvis, you sick bastard! — PissedJesus, September 7, 2001 @ 5:52 PM (0/0)

window for constructive action is closing as we speak — DomeBase, September 4, 2001 @ 7:50 PM (2/32)

crunch time — antipodes, September 4, 2001 @ 9:47 PM (1/30)

You Really Think ICANN Gives A Crap About A Handful Of Speculators Who Post Here? — jeweyjewman, September 4, 2001 @ 10:20 PM (5/29)

JJ - your posts have inspired me - now f*ck-off and die — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 6:24 AM (0/0)
JJ — DomeBase, September 4, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)
True, they don't care what is said here, never have, never will. — Elvis, September 4, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (1/3)

In Case You Hadn't Noticed ... — jeweyjewman, September 4, 2001 @ 11:23 PM (2/2)

Not all will care — Elvis, September 5, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
OH MY GOD!! Jewey, what HAPPENED?! Your IQ freaking DOUBLED! — Slicer, September 5, 2001 @ 8:35 AM (0/0)

Until Now — Paul Gill, September 4, 2001 @ 10:35 PM (1/15)

Although — Paul Gill, September 4, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (3/14)

Respectfully, I'd like to just correct the emphasis a little — richyhenderson, September 4, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (2/2)

Great work Rich... and keep keeping your family first — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)
I Understand Your Time Limitations — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (0/0)

Percentage of Problem Registrations — DomeBase, September 4, 2001 @ 11:24 PM (1/7)

Your Sample — Paul Gill, September 4, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (1/6)

What?! — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (1/5)

You Have Not... — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (2/4)

Yep — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (1/1)

Thanks — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)

Random samples — dtobias, September 5, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (1/1)

Thanks — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 1:14 AM (0/0)

No way — crs, September 4, 2001 @ 11:22 PM (1/2)

Yes — Paul Gill, September 4, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (1/1)

once upon a time — DomeBase, September 5, 2001 @ 2:15 AM (0/0)

That's got to be the most intelligent thing I've heard you say — Slicer, September 4, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (1/6)

why do auto smashes attract ghouls who have to stop to — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 8:20 AM (2/5)

Elementary School — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 8:38 AM (2/3)

skatboarding tragedy — antipodes, September 5, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)
Stop it! — hiltonian, September 5, 2001 @ 8:52 AM (1/1)

But as Jewey pointed out, they're not paying attention anyway — Slicer, September 5, 2001 @ 8:56 AM (0/0)

And You Deserve Sympathy! — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 8:31 AM (0/0)

A decent man treated with contempt by Hal Lubsen — rachelmacgregor, September 4, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)

At Least One ICANN-Accredited Registrar Will Still Accept Your $5 For A Chance To Get "COKE.INFO" — jeweyjewman, September 4, 2001 @ 4:28 PM (1/2)

who? — antipodes, September 4, 2001 @ 8:17 PM (1/1)

Email Who? — jeweyjewman, September 4, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (0/0)

we don't need no stinkin' .info domains — vera-city, September 4, 2001 @ 4:18 PM (0/0)

.info mess — be_as_one, September 4, 2001 @ 8:25 AM (1/3)

UKReg — Elvis, September 4, 2001 @ 10:54 AM (1/2)

It Appears... — Paul Gill, September 4, 2001 @ 11:49 AM (1/1)

ICANN Accredation is WORTHLESS... — psbyowner, September 4, 2001 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)

inside — rachelmacgregor, September 3, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)

Australian press contacts — antipodes, September 3, 2001 @ 9:23 PM (1/4)

Thanks big boy — rachelmacgregor, September 3, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (2/3)

Rach - please mail me the US and Euro media contacts you — antipodes, September 4, 2001 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)
Canadian Press Contacts — FineE, September 4, 2001 @ 2:22 AM (1/1)

Thanks — rachelmacgregor, September 4, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)

challenge - when ? — PAWEL, September 3, 2001 @ 6:05 PM (0/0)

Please send American Press contacts — rachelmacgregor, September 3, 2001 @ 3:20 PM (5/10)

Press contacts worldwide — bhavin, September 4, 2001 @ 6:39 PM (0/0)
Bhavin and Mitsuindia, do you have any contacts with the media in India? — Elvis, September 3, 2001 @ 11:19 PM (1/1)

YES WE HAVE MEDIA CONTACT — mitsuindia, September 4, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)

Any French or German speakers in here, we need your help. — Elvis, September 3, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (0/0)
What about the UK — hiltonian, September 3, 2001 @ 4:28 PM (1/1)

Thank you - yes - definitely .....EOM — rachelmacgregor, September 3, 2001 @ 8:20 PM (0/0)

I will work on California... — psbyowner, September 3, 2001 @ 4:14 PM (2/3)

Brilliant - thanks - we're in action — rachelmacgregor, September 3, 2001 @ 8:22 PM (0/0)
I will continue with the UK — Elvis, September 3, 2001 @ 4:28 PM (1/1)

brilliant work Elvis — rachelmacgregor, September 3, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)

purge the frauds - not the Landrushers — antipodes, September 2, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (1/2)

The only answer. — Elvis, September 2, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

CONTACT THE MEDIA — Elvis, September 3, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (0/0)

Anyone thinking of challenging Spy Productions? — psbyowner, September 2, 2001 @ 3:13 PM (2/4)

I have challenged one — ChrisMoran, September 3, 2001 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)
? — 410, September 2, 2001 @ 3:26 PM (2/2)

They have several fake trademark claims on premium .info names — psbyowner, September 2, 2001 @ 4:12 PM (0/0)
See it... — Helveticus, September 2, 2001 @ 3:53 PM (0/0)

FILING SUNRISE CHALLENGE AT WIPO - ANOTHER GAME — mitsuindia, September 2, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)

Website of Sunrise Challenge Cases — Srana, September 2, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (1/1)

Its the "...At a later time." that'll getcha EOM — psbyowner, September 2, 2001 @ 3:15 PM (0/0)

ICANN Defraud: The Fraud of the ICANN New TLD Process. — icanncant, September 2, 2001 @ 11:18 AM (0/0)

Top .INFO Registrant has over 200 Trademarks from a small sample set — bhavin, September 2, 2001 @ 9:31 AM (8/13)

Yeah Right — Paul Gill, September 5, 2001 @ 9:44 AM (0/0)
P.: The man who owns Switzerland! — Helveticus, September 2, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (1/3)

P.S. — Helveticus, September 2, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (1/2)

TM Dates - Oct. 1, 2000 — dtobias, September 2, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (1/1)

TM dates - thank you for your remark — Helveticus, September 2, 2001 @ 10:54 PM (0/0)

Database available for download — bhavin, September 2, 2001 @ 3:24 PM (1/1)

Excellent! — onmove, September 2, 2001 @ 4:25 PM (0/0)

Great job, Bhavin, thanks — DomeBase, September 2, 2001 @ 2:50 PM (1/1)

Sunrise fraudsters have taken this now, — Elvis, September 4, 2001 @ 2:01 AM (0/0)

Superb work Directi (Mr. LaPLante this one is for you). — challenge, September 2, 2001 @ 2:26 PM (0/0)
THANKS BHAVIN FROM SANJEEV — mitsuindia, September 2, 2001 @ 2:26 PM (0/0)
Brilliant work! — richyhenderson, September 2, 2001 @ 12:58 AM (0/0)
Pass the ammo — Elvis, September 2, 2001 @ 11:05 AM (0/0)

Elvis - these are their War Crimes — rachelmacgregor, September 2, 2001 @ 9:13 AM (1/1)

Launch the first wave — Elvis, September 2, 2001 @ 11:11 AM (0/0)

.info Landrush spam for "the greatest land rush since the inception of the web... — antipodes, September 2, 2001 @ 9:07 AM (0/0)

I hold no brief for ICANN.......... — onmove, September 2, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (2/5)

Re: I hold no brief for ICANN.......... — kerry, September 2, 2001 @ 9:20 AM (1/3)

Afilias who have to act first - and act NOW — rachelmacgregor, September 2, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (1/2)

Re: Afilias who have to act first - and act NOW — kerry, September 2, 2001 @ 10:08 AM (1/1)

DomeBase Proposal, Land Rush II, and Roles of Registrars/stry — DomeBase, September 2, 2001 @ 2:39 PM (0/0)

You are absolutely right — rachelmacgregor, September 2, 2001 @ 8:23 AM (0/0)

Hmm. Has Big Business bought ICANN? — psbyowner, September 2, 2001 @ 1:35 AM (1/1)

Stuart and Hans — WorldThoughts, September 2, 2001 @ 3:37 AM (0/0)

What does an "Acreditation from ICANN" mean, anyway? EOM — psbyowner, September 2, 2001 @ 1:33 AM (0/0)

Accredited Registrars — Elvis, September 1, 2001 @ 11:44 PM (4/4)

What about the fraud committed by their own companies? — rachelmacgregor, September 2, 2001 @ 8:08 AM (0/0)
Elvis - rework Hound Dog for me in a dedication to ICANN — antipodes, September 2, 2001 @ 1:06 AM (0/0)
Elvis - it's time you reprised Heartbreak Hotel — antipodes, September 2, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (0/0)
Elvis - are you still practising Jail House Rock the way — antipodes, September 2, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

As I see it. . . — WorldThoughts, September 1, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (1/4)

P.S. — WorldThoughts, September 1, 2001 @ 10:27 PM (2/3)

Well said, but — onmove, September 2, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (1/1)

Absolutely.... — WorldThoughts, September 2, 2001 @ 3:24 AM (0/0)

You're Right — Paul Gill, September 1, 2001 @ 11:17 PM (0/0)

is there a .biz official WHOIS, and if so, where? — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 9:12 PM (2/5)

WHOIS — hiltonian, September 2, 2001 @ 11:15 AM (1/2)

WHOIS — dtobias, September 2, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (1/1)

Sorry — hiltonian, September 2, 2001 @ 1:18 PM (0/0)

.biz WHOIS — dtobias, September 1, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (1/1)

Anyone care to guess who would be on that list? — Elvis, September 2, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)

Please consider this....... — onmove, September 1, 2001 @ 9:07 PM (2/10)

Re: Please consider this....... — kerry, September 1, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (2/8)

Treating people like shit — rachelmacgregor, September 1, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (3/4)

I like a girl who lifts her skirt to reveal she is wearing — antipodes, September 2, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
Re: Treating people like shit — kerry, September 1, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)
I like a girl who lifts her skirts to reveal she is wearing — antipodes, September 1, 2001 @ 11:31 PM (1/1)

I love a man who cringes — rachelmacgregor, September 2, 2001 @ 12:25 AM (0/0)

Doesn't sound fair.......... — onmove, September 1, 2001 @ 10:21 PM (1/2)

Re: Doesn't sound fair.......... — kerry, September 1, 2001 @ 11:12 PM (1/1)

Afilias has power to delete thousands of names — rachelmacgregor, September 2, 2001 @ 8:04 AM (0/0)

LandRush II — IncompetentAfilias, September 1, 2001 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)

tucows(domaindirect.com) continues to sell tickets of sunrise claimed names — Anion, September 1, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (1/1)

Ah, hello?? If you are still requesting domains and not looking at the WHOIS.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 1, 2001 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)

Lets all do business in good faith and avoid an investigation — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 5:08 PM (2/7)

I tried doing business in good faith and look what it got me. — antipodes, September 1, 2001 @ 11:07 PM (0/0)
Sir with all due respect....this is lame... — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 1, 2001 @ 5:27 PM (2/5)

I just want fairness for myself and everyone else who pre-reg domains from... — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 5:55 PM (1/1)

Sounds fair enough for me.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 1, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)

My constructive criticism is that people are being cheated — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 5:36 PM (1/2)

And I DONT see how you can just look the other way on this issue — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 5:41 PM (1/1)

I am not saying I agree with everything that has happened.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, September 1, 2001 @ 5:53 PM (0/0)

FILING SUNRISE CHALLENGE AT WIPO - ANOTHER GAME — mitsuindia, September 1, 2001 @ 10:43 AM (2/6)

Sanjeev, I can understand your concern and suspicions. — antipodes, September 1, 2001 @ 12:55 AM (1/1)

Watch Out For The Registrars ... Buyer Beware — jeweyjewman, September 1, 2001 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)

hmmmm.... curiouser and curiouser.... — rachelmacgregor, September 1, 2001 @ 11:09 AM (1/3)

thanks for the lol Rachel — antipodes, September 1, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (1/2)

WANT SOME REAL REPLY — mitsuindia, September 2, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (1/1)

WIPO Challenge — Elvis, September 4, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)

.INFO FRAUD — mitsuindia, September 1, 2001 @ 10:30 AM (0/0)

Heresy — MicrowvCat, September 1, 2001 @ 7:24 AM (5/7)

Cats and dogs — dtobias, September 1, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)
Trademark law — dtobias, September 1, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/1)

I agree with this statement... — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 4:07 PM (0/0)

Very good points - thank you — rachelmacgregor, September 1, 2001 @ 11:05 AM (0/0)
Facts that poke the corporate bullies in the eye — Garry Anderson, September 1, 2001 @ 8:09 AM (1/1)

Is this misrepresentation deliberate? — Garry Anderson, September 1, 2001 @ 8:44 AM (0/0)

Trademark Problems — Paul Gill, September 1, 2001 @ 7:54 AM (0/0)

Some thoughts on the .info debacle — kerry, September 1, 2001 @ 2:50 AM (1/4)

Good Points! — Paul Gill, September 1, 2001 @ 3:10 AM (1/3)

NOT such good points! — rachelmacgregor, September 1, 2001 @ 10:58 AM (2/2)

Re: Some thoughts on the .info debacle — kerry, September 1, 2001 @ 3:37 PM (0/0)
Yeah Right — Paul Gill, September 1, 2001 @ 11:26 AM (0/0)

Get typing! — Elvis, September 1, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (0/0)

This weeks gold award for trademark fraudsters — Elvis, September 1, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (1/3)

BUSINESS.INFO — mitsuindia, September 1, 2001 @ 8:52 AM (1/2)

Anyone Know a Link to .INFO's being Challenged? — IncompetentAfilias, September 1, 2001 @ 9:38 AM (1/1)

Mitsuindia is Stephen Rumney? — rachelmacgregor, September 1, 2001 @ 10:45 AM (0/0)

2 Groups Try to Involve Public In Internet Address Policy — Garry Anderson, August 31, 2001 @ 11:26 PM (1/3)

Have just read the NY Times article — antipodes, September 1, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)

Elect an ICANN board with qualified individuals, chosen by the public — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (1/1)

the three monkeys of the ICANN board — antipodes, September 1, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (0/0)

REVISED DOMEBASE PROPOSAL (8/31/2001) feedback welcome — DomeBase, August 31, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (3/6)

Afilias need to say something......... — onmove, August 31, 2001 @ 11:53 PM (0/0)
Feedback — Garry Anderson, August 31, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (0/0)
I'm Sorry — Paul Gill, August 31, 2001 @ 9:26 PM (2/3)

Hi Paul, thanks for feedback, some comments — DomeBase, August 31, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (0/0)
Domebase is a voice of sanity — rachelmacgregor, August 31, 2001 @ 10:03 PM (1/1)

Well done Rachel - I particularly liked your PS — antipodes, August 31, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)

non-profit status — Vera-City, August 31, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (1/1)

Mafilias - a high profit, secret organisation operating with — antipodes, August 31, 2001 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)

.info sunrise is over for the second (and final???) time... — dtobias, August 31, 2001 @ 11:42 AM (1/7)

I lost one of my domains during the extension — psbyowner, August 31, 2001 @ 4:05 PM (1/6)

If I may ask, which one was that? — peeved, August 31, 2001 @ 7:40 PM (2/5)

bogus — psbyowner, August 31, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (1/3)

I Noticed That Too — Paul Gill, August 31, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (1/2)

Palm Springs.... — gckorn, September 1, 2001 @ 1:28 AM (1/1)

Then why the hell were we allowed to pre-register it?! — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)

Me too — Anion, August 31, 2001 @ 10:44 PM (0/0)

Fraud trademark claims — Elvis, August 31, 2001 @ 8:58 AM (2/3)

ICANN profits form this — Anion, August 31, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (1/1)

Yip, I kind of picked that up some time ago. — Elvis, August 31, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (0/0)

ReRun — Vera-City, August 31, 2001 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

.info challenges - why be concerned? — Vera-City, August 31, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (4/9)

VeraCity - there are three types of mails on this site - — antipodes, August 31, 2001 @ 1:32 PM (1/3)

3 types of mails? — Garry Anderson, August 31, 2001 @ 4:04 PM (1/2)

trademark domains need ID — antipodes, August 31, 2001 @ 9:51 PM (1/1)

We all agree on one thing — Garry Anderson, August 31, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (0/0)

I do not wish to rubbish your opinion but... — Garry Anderson, August 31, 2001 @ 8:21 AM (1/1)

Garry: You evaluation sure seems right on the money EOM — psbyowner, August 31, 2001 @ 4:10 PM (0/0)

challenges unlikely — Anion, August 31, 2001 @ 8:07 AM (0/0)
No — rachelmacgregor, August 31, 2001 @ 7:52 AM (1/1)

.info challenge — Vera-City, August 31, 2001 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

If you want to complain to the FBI - — antipodes, August 31, 2001 @ 3:43 AM (1/1)

Thank you, I will (EOM) — sfeibish, August 31, 2001 @ 1:29 PM (0/0)

Leave this Behind, Embrace the Future! — hmg, August 31, 2001 @ 1:09 AM (0/0)

Afilias pollitburo members involved in tm squatting on hawaii.info — Anion, August 30, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (1/1)

ICANN should intervene - here's another — rachelmacgregor, August 31, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (0/0)

If IPC recommendations were followed, we would not have this mess — DomeBase, August 30, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (3/7)

NOT REALLY. — badregistrars, August 31, 2001 @ 5:02 AM (0/0)
Why was the advice of experts ignored and safeguards not put in place when the consequences — antipodes, August 30, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (0/0)
Best Thing That Could Have Happened! — Paul Gill, August 30, 2001 @ 9:52 PM (2/4)

"We will make sure of this."? Oh, the arrogance. — Slicer, August 31, 2001 @ 1:03 AM (1/2)

The Loser's Back — Paul Gill, August 31, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (1/1)

Slicer is an ICANN pollitburo squatter — Anion, August 31, 2001 @ 4:44 AM (0/0)

With closed TLDs - no problems — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)

lol....What did you expect from Afilias? — WorldThoughts, August 30, 2001 @ 8:06 PM (0/0)

Afilias fudging registrations - more fraud from afilias — Anion, August 30, 2001 @ 7:38 PM (1/1)

All I know is I better get my credit card refunded or I will deny charges — psbyowner, August 30, 2001 @ 9:04 PM (0/0)

New.net sunrise policy is the only fair solution — Anion, August 30, 2001 @ 6:05 PM (2/3)

It's not Sunrise. — badregistrars, August 31, 2001 @ 5:19 AM (1/1)

New.net — dtobias, August 31, 2001 @ 3:10 PM (0/0)

Domebase proposal and sunrise unfairness — dtobias, August 30, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

The brutal RAPING of .info — psbyowner, August 30, 2001 @ 5:36 PM (0/0)

Partying In Montevideo — schnoerrer2, August 30, 2001 @ 2:59 PM (3/6)

ICANN and the IOC - lifestyles of the rich and famous and systemic corruption — antipodes, August 30, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (1/1)

Afilias grant IOC special SEX status — rachelmacgregor, August 31, 2001 @ 7:45 AM (0/0)

I say antartica — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)
Good Point: Cloak and Dagger operations — psbyowner, August 30, 2001 @ 5:31 PM (2/2)

Cloak, maybe. If they want the dagger, they can always hire me. — Slicer, August 31, 2001 @ 1:01 AM (0/0)
ICANN joins WTO — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (0/0)

Wow, My Password Got Revoked After Only Two Posts ... — schnoerrer2, August 30, 2001 @ 2:23 PM (2/7)

BETTER WATCH WHAT WE SAY — Anion, August 30, 2001 @ 6:30 PM (1/3)

Communist ICANN suppressing and avoiding free press — psbyowner, August 30, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (1/2)

.org/.net status — dtobias, August 30, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (1/1)

Thank you for spending thought on this issue... — psbyowner, August 31, 2001 @ 4:19 PM (0/0)

Sunrise challenge estimates, 6 years to complete... — challenge, August 30, 2001 @ 2:37 PM (2/2)

nah, most fraudsters won't put up a fight — Anion, August 30, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)
A stitch in time saves nine — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 2:46 PM (0/0)

Thought you might have something left?.. Brace yourself, here comes the Oops Sunrise.. — challenge, August 30, 2001 @ 1:40 PM (1/1)

Afilias is fudging registration dates.? — peeved, August 30, 2001 @ 1:50 PM (0/0)

Alarm from the Forum, Domain names of countries. — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 11:21 AM (2/9)

Domain names of countries — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (1/1)

Countries have their own websites EOM — psbyowner, August 30, 2001 @ 5:22 PM (0/0)

Country names — dtobias, August 30, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (2/6)

I Argee EOM — psbyowner, September 1, 2001 @ 4:36 PM (0/0)
Consider this — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (1/4)

.info is gTLD - NOT ccTLD — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/3)

Point being — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 1:12 PM (1/2)

Free speech — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 6:15 PM (1/1)

fall into the wrongs hands? — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (0/0)

Lol — fred48, August 30, 2001 @ 11:03 AM (0/0)

Afilias, Unlock these . — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 9:53 AM (0/0)

Great job Anion! — fred48, August 30, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (0/0)

Join new.net in fighting tyrany — Anion, August 30, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (2/3)

Who is obviously reduced to using laborers to advertise on ICANN's forums — Slicer, August 31, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (0/0)
New.net — Paul Gill, August 30, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

You are right Paul Gill! — fred48, August 30, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

Urgent...Has anyone else encountered this..??? — peeved, August 29, 2001 @ 11:37 PM (5/8)

I noticed this too — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 9:38 AM (0/0)
Yep...Happened to me a lot — gckorn, August 30, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)
you got ripped-off, but be sure it was due to a technical glitch — antipodes, August 29, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)
.info WHOIS — dtobias, August 29, 2001 @ 11:57 PM (1/3)

I'm not sure that was it.. — peeved, August 30, 2001 @ 12:18 AM (2/2)

Case sensitivity — dtobias, August 30, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)
Same Thing Happened to me! — Paul Gill, August 30, 2001 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)

Tampering would not surprise me in the least.... — psbyowner, August 29, 2001 @ 11:45 PM (0/0)

Sunrise extension: who cares about their stupid, goddam names anyway — psbyowner, August 29, 2001 @ 11:22 PM (0/0)

reactions welcome to "DomeBase Proposal B" -- 8/29/01 — DomeBase, August 29, 2001 @ 10:24 PM (3/11)

DomeBase Propsal B --- Suggestion... — IncompetentAfilias, August 30, 2001 @ 2:43 AM (1/3)

registrar reserves -- very tough issue -- some ramblings — DomeBase, August 30, 2001 @ 5:28 PM (1/2)

Closed Lists — Paul Gill, August 30, 2001 @ 8:19 PM (1/1)

percentage of registrar reserved vs. sunrise squatters — DomeBase, August 30, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (0/0)

One Problem — Paul Gill, August 30, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (1/2)

frivolous challenges — DomeBase, August 30, 2001 @ 5:37 PM (1/1)

Balance — Paul Gill, August 30, 2001 @ 8:12 PM (0/0)

Domebase - I like your attitude - I would love to have reason to attend that party. — antipodes, August 29, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/3)

Thanks antipodes — DomeBase, August 30, 2001 @ 4:39 PM (1/2)

Domebase - you are absolutely right - my mistake — antipodes, August 31, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)

no problem, I like your letters! — DomeBase, August 31, 2001 @ 5:23 PM (0/0)

On behalf of the peoples republic of Cyberspace — Elvis, August 29, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/2)

checks and balances needed — antipodes, August 29, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (1/1)

I'll tuneup for Montevideo — Elvis, August 30, 2001 @ 9:42 AM (0/0)

Bloody Hell, It is true SunRise is still ON... — challenge, August 29, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (1/2)

just when you think Afilias/ICANN couldn't pull any more — antipodes, August 29, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (1/1)

oinking - not to be confused with boinking — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 10:44 AM (0/0)

Afiliars — Vera-City, August 29, 2001 @ 8:46 PM (0/0)

Registrar-Reserved .INFO Domains — IncompetentAfilias, August 29, 2001 @ 8:38 PM (1/1)

'HOSTING' violates 69 trademarks - in U.S. alone — Garry Anderson, August 30, 2001 @ 10:35 AM (0/0)

Alldomains.com Claims Sunrise Period Has Been Extended One Day — jeweyjewman, August 29, 2001 @ 8:10 PM (1/1)

How Applied vs. How Intended — gckorn, August 29, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (0/0)

ICANN - Will you now listen to Garry Anderson? — Srana, August 29, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (1/1)

Suhail - public will learn the truth — Garry Anderson, August 29, 2001 @ 7:25 PM (0/0)

Afilias has contractual mandate to cancel non-qualifying registrations — rachelmacgregor, August 29, 2001 @ 2:29 AM (2/2)

Ah ha ha ha ...... that's a good one ICANN's registry cronies actually living up to contracts — Anion, August 29, 2001 @ 6:24 PM (0/0)
Neither Registry Operator nor Registrar will verify any of this information — Garry Anderson, August 29, 2001 @ 9:02 AM (0/0)

Hal Lubsen reserved FortKnox.info... um... WHY? — rachelmacgregor, August 29, 2001 @ 1:25 AM (2/3)

Hal, you missed cashedup.info — antipodes, August 29, 2001 @ 8:37 AM (0/0)
Has the Afilias CEO broken the rules and robbed the US Government? — rachelmacgregor, August 29, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (1/1)

Nah, ICANN and Afilias only like to steal from honest people — Anion, August 29, 2001 @ 5:12 AM (0/0)

The Challenges Begin . . . And a Question — gckorn, August 29, 2001 @ 1:18 AM (1/1)

Yes but... — fred48, August 29, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (0/0)

As the Dot-Biz Turns, The Plot Thickens. — InternetAdvocate, August 29, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (1/4)

How would Neustar like an ICANN/ORSC deal on area codes? — InternetAdvocate, August 29, 2001 @ 1:22 AM (1/3)

Domain Names, Area Codes, and Alternate Roots — dtobias, August 29, 2001 @ 1:44 AM (2/2)

Missed point Dan — Garry Anderson, August 29, 2001 @ 8:45 AM (0/0)
Yes but what makes ICANN "official"? EOM — FineE, August 29, 2001 @ 2:42 AM (0/0)

ARNI stole Dot-Biz from Winstar. — InternetAdvocate, August 29, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/1)

Nobody stole anything from anybody! — dtobias, August 29, 2001 @ 1:47 AM (0/0)

A Solution to the Trademark 'Sunrise' Fiasco in Dot-Info Rollout. — InternetAdvocate, August 28, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

They have got your money and will keep it — Garry Anderson, August 29, 2001 @ 12:16 AM (0/0)

I have a favor to ask all of you... please — DomeBase, August 28, 2001 @ 9:12 PM (1/2)

You forgot the best... — Dryweave, August 28, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (1/1)

Dryweave... — DomeBase, August 29, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)

Golden Harvest - Bitter Harvest — antipodes, August 28, 2001 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)

I Would Be Careful Which Registrar You Use If You "Request" Names Now ... — jeweyjewman, August 28, 2001 @ 7:41 PM (0/0)

stop wasting your time complaining tm fraudsters(including afilias and its registrars) will win — Anion, August 28, 2001 @ 7:35 PM (2/3)

why not challenge once - temporary restraining order — sfeibish, August 28, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (0/0)
You Can Quit Noone else is — psbyowner, August 28, 2001 @ 8:43 PM (1/1)

.......................... — Anion, August 28, 2001 @ 11:57 PM (0/0)

Generic ".info" Sunrise Registrations in Violation of the Rules! $$ Scam! — donato, August 28, 2001 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

Next move? — Srana, August 28, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)

Draft Press Release — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 2:40 PM (4/4)

Why it IS daft — Garry Anderson, August 28, 2001 @ 11:53 PM (0/0)
My Vote... — onmove, August 28, 2001 @ 9:07 PM (0/0)
Lets send this letter to the politicians and the press! EOM — psbyowner, August 28, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (0/0)
As a distinct user, I support this message EOM — psbyowner, August 28, 2001 @ 4:09 PM (0/0)

339 out of 400 .info names taken, $102,000 to challenge. — sfeibish, August 28, 2001 @ 1:54 PM (0/0)

ar.com taking Sunrise Complaints — Srana, August 28, 2001 @ 12:29 AM (1/3)

Decent People — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 1:37 PM (1/2)

Hold on a moment... — challenge, August 28, 2001 @ 3:05 PM (1/1)

good point — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 3:30 PM (0/0)

Another Afilias Board False Trademark — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 9:53 AM (2/4)

any help? — antipodes, August 28, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (2/2)

Watch Out - 'STUFF' has 1008 potential trademark violations — Garry Anderson, August 28, 2001 @ 7:00 PM (0/0)
Heather Carle is Wrong — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 1:28 PM (0/0)

what appears as Afilias board fraud — antipodes, August 28, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (0/0)

NIC.INFO is on appraisal at afternic.com! — Lazy, August 28, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (2/3)

Alternate roots — dtobias, August 28, 2001 @ 11:40 AM (1/1)

I'm profit from the introduction of Afilias .info!!! — Lazy, August 28, 2001 @ 4:39 PM (0/0)

continue — Lazy, August 28, 2001 @ 11:20 AM (0/0)

What's happening - Domain Direct make an error? — antipodes, August 28, 2001 @ 7:30 AM (1/2)

Tucows own mini-landrush? — Srana, August 28, 2001 @ 7:48 AM (1/1)

Fasthosts — Elvis, August 28, 2001 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)

So much for 8 p.m. — gckorn, August 28, 2001 @ 3:40 AM (0/0)

Study of Over 11,000 .INFO Sunrise Registrations Released — DomeBase, August 28, 2001 @ 2:55 AM (2/3)

Great study, adds fuel to the obvious... — Dryweave, August 28, 2001 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)
I vote for the DomeBase Solution™....It think Afilias should seriously consider it! — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 28, 2001 @ 3:39 AM (1/1)

Afilias have nothing to loose............ — onmove, August 28, 2001 @ 5:02 AM (0/0)

To ICANN, Declaration of a CyberWar of independence on this day 28th of August 2001 — Elvis, August 28, 2001 @ 2:50 AM (4/4)

Truth and Honour — Garry Anderson, August 28, 2001 @ 6:33 PM (0/0)
Yep! — hiltonian, August 28, 2001 @ 4:41 PM (0/0)
I agree; 'The people' have ultimate authority, not any Government — psbyowner, August 28, 2001 @ 4:25 PM (0/0)
You're right! — Lazy, August 28, 2001 @ 11:13 AM (0/0)

Now it's time for the Law — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 2:15 AM (1/1)

Injunction — rachelmacgregor, August 28, 2001 @ 9:17 AM (0/0)

It's over, I guess... — dtobias, August 28, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (1/2)

Bogus claims — Elvis, August 28, 2001 @ 2:09 AM (1/1)

Hi Elvis -- a "whole lot'a shaking going on" — DomeBase, August 28, 2001 @ 3:00 AM (0/0)

35,000 bogus registrations approximatley 10 million bucks to contest — Anion, August 27, 2001 @ 8:42 PM (1/2)

Not quite..... — challenge, August 27, 2001 @ 9:00 PM (1/1)

most trademark fraudsters will win — Anion, August 27, 2001 @ 10:27 PM (0/0)

Hope registrars keep data on who pre-requested what — DomeBase, August 27, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (2/3)

the purge of the Landrush applications has started — antipodes, August 27, 2001 @ 8:57 PM (1/1)

:-((( — PAWEL, August 27, 2001 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)

My read on this (it's bad) — challenge, August 27, 2001 @ 6:22 PM (0/0)

The Sunrise bloodbath is finally over... — psbyowner, August 27, 2001 @ 4:14 PM (1/1)

It's not over yet (ends at 8PM EST) — challenge, August 27, 2001 @ 4:37 PM (0/0)

End of .info sunrise? — dtobias, August 27, 2001 @ 3:34 PM (1/2)

I would like to know when it actually ends to release study results — DomeBase, August 27, 2001 @ 3:42 PM (1/1)

It ends at 8 PM EST — challenge, August 27, 2001 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)

Domain Bank - Hal Lubsen - Dishonest Practice? — rachelmacgregor, August 27, 2001 @ 3:21 PM (2/9)

ICANN has a DEFINITE responsibility for this one.. — challenge, August 27, 2001 @ 4:42 PM (0/0)
William Lorenz Owns At Least 414 .WEB Registrations, Thorugh IOD — jeweyjewman, August 27, 2001 @ 3:36 PM (1/7)

Well. . . — 410, August 27, 2001 @ 4:42 PM (1/6)

P.S. — 410, August 27, 2001 @ 4:52 PM (1/5)

Clarification — jeweyjewman, August 27, 2001 @ 5:24 PM (1/4)

Indeed. — 410, August 27, 2001 @ 6:55 PM (1/3)

Clarification for me too, please — rachelmacgregor, August 27, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (1/2)

Clarification — jeweyjewman, August 27, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (1/1)

See what you mean — rachelmacgregor, August 27, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (0/0)

Afialias Praises Itself, Using Bogus Registration As Examle Of Success — jeweyjewman, August 27, 2001 @ 2:35 PM (1/1)

You Are Correct....What a Find! — gckorn, August 27, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (0/0)

Worthy of note. ICANN's actions and inaction has killed one of the applicants from the first round. — 410, August 27, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (3/5)

Rumors of ARNI's demize are greatly overstated :) — jandl, August 28, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/1)

ARNI stole Dot-Biz from Winstar. — InternetAdvocate, August 29, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)

ICANN and reparations? — dtobias, August 27, 2001 @ 3:16 PM (0/0)
Iperdome — jeweyjewman, August 27, 2001 @ 1:47 PM (1/1)

Georgia — InternetAdvocate, August 29, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

ICANN - make up your mind - — antipodes, August 27, 2001 @ 6:55 AM (0/0)

OPEN LETTER # 4 TO THE CEOs — antipodes, August 27, 2001 @ 5:49 AM (2/13)

Lovely..This needed to be said. ICANN respond!!! EOM — psbyowner, August 27, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)
This is a really strong letter - only a coward or a cheat wouldn't reply — rachelmacgregor, August 27, 2001 @ 9:52 AM (1/11)

They are ALL cowards because: — Garry Anderson, August 27, 2001 @ 2:34 PM (2/10)

DOC email address — InternetAdvocate, August 27, 2001 @ 10:36 PM (1/3)

Thanks, have already been communicating — Garry Anderson, August 28, 2001 @ 11:03 AM (1/2)

I posted DOC email address for ICANN discussion board readers. — InternetAdvocate, August 28, 2001 @ 11:46 PM (1/1)

Sorry - been kack - lack of sleep — Garry Anderson, August 29, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (0/0)

Trademarks cannot be descritive and must cross state lines EOM — psbyowner, August 27, 2001 @ 4:23 PM (1/5)

YOU [UK E193276] FAT [UK 2173952] LIAR [UK 2272966] ;-) — Garry Anderson, August 27, 2001 @ 8:06 PM (1/4)

Generic trademarks... — dtobias, August 27, 2001 @ 8:35 PM (1/3)

Further example of trademarks abusing powers — Garry Anderson, August 27, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (1/2)

Proposal — InternetAdvocate, August 27, 2001 @ 10:37 PM (1/1)

Okay with me — Garry Anderson, August 28, 2001 @ 10:30 AM (0/0)

Why registrars get GENERIC.INFO names before anybody else. — badregistrars, August 27, 2001 @ 5:22 AM (2/2)

More 'cybersquaters' — Garry Anderson, August 27, 2001 @ 1:40 PM (0/0)
Registrars and Board Members of Afilias stealing from their customers? — rachelmacgregor, August 27, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)

Internet Challenge Top 50 Multi-Applicants — richyhenderson, August 27, 2001 @ 2:31 AM (0/0)

Afilias must reserve OSTRICH.INFO on the behalf of ICANN — domainboy, August 27, 2001 @ 2:07 AM (0/0)

TURKEY.INFO Trademark Date: 1901-05-30 Trademark Number: Karlsruhe — domainboy, August 27, 2001 @ 1:53 AM (1/1)

More like 'Turkey Shoot' EOM — psbyowner, August 27, 2001 @ 4:20 PM (0/0)

Afilias Board called to account? — rachelmacgregor, August 26, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (0/0)

OPEN LETTER # 3 TO THE CEOs — antipodes, August 26, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (0/0)

OPEN LETTER # 2 TO THE CEOs — antipodes, August 26, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)

What about SpyProductions? — black_bird, August 26, 2001 @ 6:36 PM (1/3)

You haven't seen nothing yet.... — challenge, August 26, 2001 @ 6:56 PM (2/2)

Well..... — black_bird, August 26, 2001 @ 7:40 PM (0/0)
we demand action against spyproductions — Anion, August 26, 2001 @ 7:04 PM (0/0)

we demand action against joker.com — Anion, August 26, 2001 @ 6:18 PM (0/0)

We demand action against catalog.com — Anion, August 26, 2001 @ 5:30 PM (0/0)

We Demand Action against YESNIC — Anion, August 26, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)

Some .info names I'd like to see taken. — sfeibish, August 26, 2001 @ 3:49 PM (0/0)

Not Good Enough — fred48, August 26, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (1/2)

Precisely — gckorn, August 26, 2001 @ 6:05 PM (1/1)

New.net sunrise policy is much better — anion, August 26, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

Board of Afilias submitting false Sunrise claims too? — rachelmacgregor, August 26, 2001 @ 1:19 PM (1/3)

HAWAII.INFO Is Fraud By AFILIAS BOARD MEMBER. Thanks Vint! Thanks Hans! Thanks Linda! — jeweyjewman, August 26, 2001 @ 1:33 PM (1/2)

Even if it is not fraud... — fred48, August 26, 2001 @ 4:19 PM (1/1)

We Demand Action against Afilias - Post support here — Anion, August 26, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (0/0)

Is this trademark correct? — rachelmacgregor, August 26, 2001 @ 10:24 AM (1/1)

Why does ICANN acreditied registrar catalog.com tm squat on webhosting.info — Anion, August 26, 2001 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)

TheInternetChallenge.com Is The Saving Grace............... — onmove, August 25, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (2/2)

sure — cello, August 26, 2001 @ 2:21 PM (0/0)
TO add to this.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)

Afilias, more info for you. — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 9:32 PM (0/0)

The INTERNET CHALLENGE is the BIGGEST SCAM ! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25, 2001 @ 9:19 PM (7/28)

the registrant of sex.info has no valid trademark — Lazy, August 28, 2001 @ 8:54 AM (0/0)
What a bunch of bull — fred48, August 26, 2001 @ 3:38 PM (0/0)
re: — crs, August 26, 2001 @ 12:31 AM (1/1)

Thanks CRS for major contribution to DomeBase Proposal idea — DomeBase, August 26, 2001 @ 3:00 PM (0/0)

Dear Nicholas — DomeBase, August 25, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)
Afilias are doing the right thing challenging the sunrise fraudsters — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 10:40 PM (0/0)
Anyone can "challenge" the names taken in the sunrise...What's your problem? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 10:06 PM (1/8)

I have NO problem, It seems YOU have a PROBLEM — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25, 2001 @ 10:43 PM (1/7)

If they had the technology Nicholas as you state.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (1/6)

Where have you been? You've lied enough! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 25, 2001 @ 11:55 PM (1/5)

Now you're after me? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 26, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (1/4)

You're Paranoid ! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 26, 2001 @ 12:27 AM (1/3)

Children, behave... — dtobias, August 26, 2001 @ 12:56 AM (1/2)

I agree Dan.......My apologies Nicholas — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 26, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (1/1)

Apology accepted Gregory — Nicholas Bernstein, August 26, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)

Good Point — Paul Gill, August 25, 2001 @ 9:55 PM (2/12)

Wrong, wrong, wrong.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 10:11 PM (1/2)

Sunrise — Paul Gill, August 25, 2001 @ 10:18 PM (1/1)

I think the "internet challenge" intentions are still very noble... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 10:25 PM (0/0)

In defence of the internet challenge — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (1/8)

Yes, I Already Know That — Paul Gill, August 25, 2001 @ 10:12 PM (1/7)

So Generic Words are o.k to trademark? Think about what you are saying... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (1/6)

Only because its the law — Paul Gill, August 25, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/5)

Agreed... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 25, 2001 @ 10:34 PM (1/4)

Your Right — Paul Gill, August 25, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (1/3)

Indisputable fact and proof of corruption — Garry Anderson, August 26, 2001 @ 12:29 AM (1/2)

Bravo! FYI, click here. — InternetAdvocate, August 27, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/1)

Mike - they are more clever than us all — Garry Anderson, August 28, 2001 @ 9:58 AM (0/0)

Afilias take note, Three more frauds. — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 6:58 PM (1/2)

However... — dtobias, August 25, 2001 @ 7:04 PM (1/1)

Yes but, — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 7:09 PM (0/0)

As The .INFO Sunrise Period Comes To A Close ... — jeweyjewman, August 25, 2001 @ 2:45 PM (1/1)

Hurray for coke — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)

PENIS.INFO Fraudulent — jeweyjewman, August 25, 2001 @ 2:05 PM (0/0)

BUSH.INFO Taken By Employee Of ICANN-Accredited Registrar .... Thanks Vint! Thanks Hans! — jeweyjewman, August 25, 2001 @ 2:03 PM (2/2)

OKLAHOMA.info — DomeBase, August 25, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)
great catch jjman! — DomeBase, August 25, 2001 @ 4:38 PM (0/0)

Nice Trademark Number Here ... — jeweyjewman, August 25, 2001 @ 1:59 PM (0/0)

Here's Some More Registrar Abuse/Fraud ... But Afilias "OK" And "Locked" It ... — jeweyjewman, August 25, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

Is this for real? — fred48, August 25, 2001 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

Overboard — Paul Gill, August 25, 2001 @ 9:13 PM (0/0)

I Just Don't Understand Why ICANN-Accredited Registrars Are Allowed To Commit Fraud .... — jeweyjewman, August 25, 2001 @ 12:57 AM (1/1)

Why Doesn't Lynn Do What A Real CEO Would Do ... — schnoerrer, August 25, 2001 @ 1:48 PM (0/0)

This one is a classic! Look up the WHOIS for "Vienna":) — DomeBase, August 25, 2001 @ 12:24 AM (1/2)

Yes and it puts the fault where it belongs...ICANN and Afilias — FineE, August 25, 2001 @ 2:32 AM (1/1)

Hahaha — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 8:20 AM (0/0)

Oh, I Almost Forgot, Why Is Ken Stubbs Still Around? — schnoerrer, August 24, 2001 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)

Fraudster Squats On TOLLFREE.INFO — jeweyjewman, August 24, 2001 @ 8:41 PM (0/0)

Aren't Those Who Predicted This .INFO Debacle Entitled To Future Decision Making Powers, 2001 @ ICANN? — schnoerrer, August 24, 2001 @ 7:03 PM (2/2)

If I screwed up like that, I'd be fired — Garry Anderson, August 25, 2001 @ 2:23 PM (0/0)
Well said — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 8:24 AM (0/0)

TRADEMARK.INFO Scooped Up By ICANN Accredited Registrar ... — jeweyjewman, August 24, 2001 @ 4:15 PM (0/0)

ARCHITECTURE.INFO Bogus — jeweyjewman, August 24, 2001 @ 1:58 PM (0/0)

ICANN-Accredited Registrar(s) Biggest Offender(s) in .INFO — jeweyjewman, August 24, 2001 @ 1:15 PM (1/2)

True — darby, August 24, 2001 @ 2:57 PM (1/1)

the registrars and the registry too — Anion, August 24, 2001 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

I'm going to publish the book of these events — richyhenderson, August 24, 2001 @ 12:24 AM (4/4)

Previous postings — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 8:33 AM (0/0)
Total Watergate. U Go Dude EOM — psbyowner, August 24, 2001 @ 5:15 PM (0/0)
You could not make this stuff up! — Garry Anderson, August 24, 2001 @ 2:12 PM (0/0)
Excellent — fred48, August 24, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)

OPEN LETTER # 1 TO THE CEOs — antipodes, August 24, 2001 @ 9:39 AM (1/3)

This Time, Sunrise is Good — Paul Gill, August 24, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (2/2)

Thanks Paul — Garry Anderson, August 24, 2001 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)
but at what a price to the .info Landrushers — antipodes, August 24, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (0/0)

"If successfully challenged?"......Say what??? — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 24, 2001 @ 1:45 AM (1/2)

No Need To Worry — Paul Gill, August 24, 2001 @ 1:54 AM (1/1)

Thanks for that info.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 24, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

Hahaha, what a lot of moaning! — Elvis, August 24, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (3/8)

Flawed Logic — Garry Anderson, August 24, 2001 @ 9:15 AM (1/3)

Not really — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 12:48 AM (1/2)

I.P. — Garry Anderson, August 25, 2001 @ 2:19 PM (1/1)

True — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)

Sorry, Leon, you can not use name "Elvis" (TM) here because.... — DomeBase, August 24, 2001 @ 2:14 AM (1/1)

The real 'ELVIS' is trademarked by — Garry Anderson, August 24, 2001 @ 9:32 AM (0/0)

Lotta moanin' goin' on! — InternetAdvocate, August 24, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)

Winstar — Elvis, August 25, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (0/0)

Afilias Mini-Land Rush Solution Is Best — gckorn, August 24, 2001 @ 12:20 AM (4/6)

Address Concern by Replacing Lock-Out With Warning — DomeBase, August 24, 2001 @ 11:56 AM (1/2)

Problems with this fix — gckorn, August 24, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (1/1)

Why I still favour Domebase — richyhenderson, August 24, 2001 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)

very interesting — richyhenderson, August 24, 2001 @ 8:59 AM (0/0)
Has potential, but specifics will be important — DomeBase, August 24, 2001 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)
These Are Some New Considerations — Paul Gill, August 24, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (0/0)

Whats happened to the forum? The times of posts are distorted and it's displaying all messages ever! — spot, August 23, 2001 @ 3:27 PM (0/0)

I Support the domebase.com solution.... — psbyowner, August 23, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/3)

I support the DomeBase Initiative — Anion, August 23, 2001 @ 9:37 PM (1/2)

I support the Domebase Proposal — richyhenderson, August 23, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (1/1)

I reiterate my support for DomeBose proposal. — onmove, August 24, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)

Total .info sunrise is a farce- even afilias registrars are sunrise squatters! — Lazy, August 23, 2001 @ 8:44 PM (2/5)

Icann acreditted registrar catalog.com steals webhosting.info — Anion, August 23, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)
Afillias is a cybersquatter check out who registered search.info — Anion, August 23, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/3)

You missed posting — Garry Anderson, August 23, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/2)

Could I successfully challenge search.info???? — Lazy, August 25, 2001 @ 10:02 AM (1/1)

Possibly ;-) — Garry Anderson, August 25, 2001 @ 1:50 PM (0/0)

WIPO challenge against Land Rush winner ? — PAWEL, August 23, 2001 @ 8:40 PM (1/1)

Sunrise and UDRP — Garry Anderson, August 23, 2001 @ 11:04 PM (0/0)

LaPlante Estimate — Srana, August 23, 2001 @ 3:22 PM (1/2)

is too low — crs, August 23, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (1/1)

Study of Over 7,500 Sunrise Registrations — DomeBase, August 23, 2001 @ 5:19 PM (0/0)

Mailing List of Fraudsters [now THAT would be fun] — tmh93us, August 23, 2001 @ 2:50 PM (0/0)

millions !!! — PAWEL, August 23, 2001 @ 3:56 PM (1/1)

there are only a few days left... propaganda — Garry Anderson, August 23, 2001 @ 4:02 PM (0/0)

They're cybersquatting on my name now... — dtobias, August 23, 2001 @ 2:40 PM (2/3)

Probably done purposely to "throw off the scent"... EOM — psbyowner, August 23, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)
Irrelevant — black_bird, August 23, 2001 @ 4:01 PM (1/1)

Re: Irrelevant — dtobias, August 23, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)

More........ — onmove, August 23, 2001 @ 11:19 AM (0/0)

New star is emerging on Indian horizon! — onmove, August 23, 2001 @ 10:49 AM (0/0)

Another 10 by Cass Foster — NameList, August 23, 2001 @ 9:48 AM (0/0)

Unconfirmed report of a new Afilias proposal.... — challenge, August 23, 2001 @ 6:05 AM (1/3)

So, — cello, August 23, 2001 @ 11:36 AM (1/2)

That's not going to happen — challenge, August 23, 2001 @ 1:54 PM (1/1)

Very Good Insight — Paul Gill, August 23, 2001 @ 1:31 PM (0/0)

I have an idea how some domains could be released before the landrush... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 23, 2001 @ 5:43 AM (0/0)

Over 700 names now on www.theinternetchallenge — richyhenderson, August 23, 2001 @ 3:45 AM (0/0)

Free roots — Elvis, August 23, 2001 @ 3:01 AM (0/0)

Breaking_News: ICANN allows Afilias to register 10,000 info domain names for its own. — JohnR, August 23, 2001 @ 2:55 AM (0/0)

I have a question — 410, August 22, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (2/3)

re: I have a question — wessorh, August 23, 2001 @ 9:46 AM (0/0)
Answer — Elvis, August 23, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (1/1)

Another — Garry Anderson, August 23, 2001 @ 10:33 AM (0/0)

ICANN approves cybersquatting by Afilias — Garry Anderson, August 22, 2001 @ 5:22 PM (1/5)

Above is final proof of what I have been saying — Garry Anderson, August 22, 2001 @ 5:53 PM (1/4)

It's not really as bad as you say... — dtobias, August 22, 2001 @ 6:22 PM (1/3)

IT IS - you fail to see importance — Garry Anderson, August 22, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/2)

domains are not trademarks and cannot be used as such. — domainboy, August 23, 2001 @ 2:19 AM (1/1)

Yeah — Elvis, August 23, 2001 @ 3:08 AM (0/0)

It justs keeps getting better and better. — sfeibish, August 22, 2001 @ 5:08 PM (1/1)

sorry - wrote above post while you this - EOM — Garry Anderson, August 22, 2001 @ 5:26 PM (0/0)

330 out of 400 names taken, $99,000 to challenge (EOM) — sfeibish, August 22, 2001 @ 7:37 AM (1/2)

no sense beating a dead dog — challenge, August 22, 2001 @ 4:33 PM (1/1)

The same dead dog owns..... — gckorn, August 22, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (0/0)

Get Real….Stop Whining, Cursing and Day-Dreaming — CommonSense101, August 22, 2001 @ 7:22 AM (2/2)

Fraud (if committed) is illegal in any country....Sorry you are that naive! — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 23, 2001 @ 12:29 AM (0/0)
Thanks for support of Domebase Proposal. Link to it here. — DomeBase, August 22, 2001 @ 5:44 PM (0/0)

I suggest a class action challenge of domains. — InternetAdvocate, August 22, 2001 @ 6:27 AM (2/2)

Thanks but ... — Garry Anderson, August 22, 2001 @ 11:41 AM (0/0)
no - rewards Afilias and WIPO for mistakes — sfeibish, August 22, 2001 @ 7:45 AM (0/0)

Lovers.info? — black_bird, August 22, 2001 @ 5:31 AM (1/1)

Also from the same registrant...... — gckorn, August 22, 2001 @ 6:51 AM (0/0)

Take a look at this! — fred48, August 22, 2001 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)

March 12 2001 is probably last time ICANN read this board EOM — psbyowner, August 22, 2001 @ 2:58 AM (1/1)

June 30, 2001 is probably the last time ICANN read this board ! — InternetAdvocate, August 22, 2001 @ 4:38 AM (0/0)

Lars from Spy Productions — richyhenderson, August 22, 2001 @ 2:29 AM (1/1)

Here is another email some have sent me — fred48, August 22, 2001 @ 4:35 AM (0/0)

no progress — domainboy, August 22, 2001 @ 2:17 AM (1/2)

Icann and Afilias are probably................... — Nishtarian, August 22, 2001 @ 3:21 AM (1/1)

Riq Ghafoor, Nishtarian, is an ASS! — tmh93us, August 22, 2001 @ 4:57 AM (0/0)

Another ... — fjackie, August 22, 2001 @ 1:51 AM (1/2)

Hmmmm — 410, August 22, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (1/1)

Yes, That Seems More Efficient, But ... — fjackie, August 22, 2001 @ 2:14 AM (0/0)

And Again ... — fjackie, August 22, 2001 @ 1:49 AM (0/0)

And Yet Another One .... — fjackie, August 22, 2001 @ 1:42 AM (0/0)

And Where Is Karl Auerbach? — fjackie, August 22, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (1/3)

Mess — richyhenderson, August 22, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (2/2)

Jack ass — Dryweave, August 22, 2001 @ 4:38 AM (0/0)
Karl Ought To ... — fjackie, August 22, 2001 @ 2:18 AM (0/0)

I bet if these fraudulent registrations were being handled by the FBI... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 22, 2001 @ 1:19 AM (1/1)

You're Right. But ... — jeweyjewman, August 22, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

Down In Front, I Can't See! — jonpostel, August 21, 2001 @ 11:32 PM (0/0)

ICANN ignore this board at your own peril — psbyowner, August 21, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (0/0)

AT&T Files Bogus Sunrise Registration, For ATT.INFO, And Lies On Application — fjackie, August 21, 2001 @ 11:21 PM (1/3)

Too Bad. There Are Lots Of Companys That Should Have Had A Chance ... — jeweyjewman, August 21, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (1/2)

Companies — InternetAdvocate, August 22, 2001 @ 5:23 AM (1/1)

My 'aim' is to prove them all corrupt — Garry Anderson, August 22, 2001 @ 11:26 AM (0/0)

153278563... — psbyowner, August 21, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (0/0)

This is what can happen . . . . — gckorn, August 21, 2001 @ 10:41 PM (1/1)

Sounds Really Familiar...Somebody Call Ashcroft EOM — psbyowner, August 21, 2001 @ 10:50 PM (0/0)

Spy Productions — richyhenderson, August 21, 2001 @ 7:27 PM (3/4)

Tucows to blame — Srana, August 21, 2001 @ 8:10 PM (0/0)
Agreed; Lets Make Landrush Fair; Dont reward frauds — psbyowner, August 21, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)
Who put in the numbers? — richyhenderson, August 21, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (1/1)

Who put the numbers in? — richyhenderson, August 21, 2001 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)

Afilias needs our help! A call to arms. — sfeibish, August 21, 2001 @ 6:30 PM (1/1)

Count me in. Its good to know something is being done EOM — psbyowner, August 21, 2001 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)

One More ... — fjackie, August 21, 2001 @ 5:16 PM (0/0)

And Another ... — fjackie, August 21, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

Here's Another One ... — fjackie, August 21, 2001 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)

ICANN Had Warning This Would Happen ... — fjackie, August 21, 2001 @ 4:32 PM (1/1)

Sunrise warnings before November 2000 — Garry Anderson, August 21, 2001 @ 6:36 PM (0/0)

Afilias's Sunrise Disaster — jlconnors, August 21, 2001 @ 6:53 AM (1/1)

different levels of fraud — Antipodes, August 21, 2001 @ 1:52 PM (0/0)

.INFO ADVERTISING ERROR — antipodes, August 21, 2001 @ 5:35 AM (0/0)

And what does the USPTO database say? — gckorn, August 21, 2001 @ 5:19 AM (0/0)

Would like an official comment from Afilias or ICANN regarding "challenges" — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 21, 2001 @ 4:44 AM (1/1)

Isn't Afilias checking doubtful registrations too? — antipodes, August 21, 2001 @ 6:01 AM (0/0)

Stu Lynn, it seems, is setting the stage. . . — 410, August 21, 2001 @ 4:09 AM (1/2)

a pretext? — cello, August 21, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (1/1)

Hmmm — 410, August 21, 2001 @ 6:10 PM (0/0)

From an email sent today to Afilias: Please just close it down! — gckorn, August 21, 2001 @ 3:00 AM (1/1)

Affilias.....The Situation is way out of control!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 21, 2001 @ 3:53 AM (0/0)

Scrap the Dot-Info & Dot-Biz Roll-outs. Here's a better idea. — InternetAdvocate, August 21, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (2/2)

Very Good But... — Nicholas Bernstein, August 21, 2001 @ 1:48 AM (0/0)
Trademark disputes — InternetAdvocate, August 21, 2001 @ 1:34 AM (0/0)

Here's Another Bogus .INFO Sunrise Registration: FORD.INFO — fjackie, August 20, 2001 @ 7:56 PM (2/2)

Wow — jlconnors, August 21, 2001 @ 6:28 AM (0/0)
bogus, but the type that Sunrise was designed to correct — DomeBase, August 20, 2001 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)

Looking more like my prediction is right. — challenge, August 20, 2001 @ 7:40 PM (1/1)

Ditto: When in doubt: Take Action! — psbyowner, August 22, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

ICANN & WIPO - I dare you to deny this — Garry Anderson, August 20, 2001 @ 1:47 PM (1/2)

apple.info — dtobias, August 20, 2001 @ 2:32 PM (1/1)

It is very possible — Garry Anderson, August 20, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)

COMPUTER dot INFO and other generic words — Garry Anderson, August 20, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)

Afiliass Suckers' PRESS RELEASE — Antipodes, August 20, 2001 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)

Is it true? — richyhenderson, August 20, 2001 @ 3:56 AM (1/5)

The truth is........!!!!! — Nishtarian, August 20, 2001 @ 7:24 AM (3/4)

Innocent Sunrise Squatters: What Can You Do? — DomeBase, August 20, 2001 @ 4:14 PM (0/0)
What to do...... — gckorn, August 20, 2001 @ 4:13 PM (1/1)

Do What He Says too :) — DomeBase, August 20, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)

They refuse to take back any names. — SunriseFraudster, August 20, 2001 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)

List of questioned names now over 500 — richyhenderson, August 20, 2001 @ 3:39 AM (0/0)

Here's Another Bogus Sunrise Registration ... OPTOMETRY .INFO — fjackie, August 20, 2001 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)

Criminal Charges — Anion, August 20, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (1/2)

FBI — 410, August 20, 2001 @ 3:34 AM (1/1)

fraud = criminal offense — Anion, August 20, 2001 @ 5:02 AM (0/0)

theinternetchallenge.com — IncompetentAfilias, August 20, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (2/3)

"Technical Glitch" — johnmp, August 20, 2001 @ 6:40 AM (0/0)
Being fair — richyhenderson, August 20, 2001 @ 3:26 AM (1/1)

Easy Boys - I was only re-hashing old Stuff previously discussed — IncompetentAfilias, August 20, 2001 @ 7:09 AM (0/0)

Scripters may end up with all the fraudulent .info domains.. — Xero, August 20, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (1/1)

Many sunrise fraudsters will get away with good names — Anion, August 20, 2001 @ 1:15 AM (0/0)

Payday for Rumney et al — crs, August 19, 2001 @ 9:04 PM (1/2)

I doubt it. — 410, August 19, 2001 @ 9:52 PM (1/1)

sunrise transfers — onmove, August 19, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

The Daily Whois — blackbirds, August 19, 2001 @ 4:21 PM (1/1)

Well done and thanks! — richyhenderson, August 19, 2001 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)

Evidence of Sunrise Fraud — Srana, August 19, 2001 @ 3:17 PM (1/1)

Tucows is Philosophically Opposed to Sunrise — bezzant, August 20, 2001 @ 5:04 AM (0/0)

154 names now on the Suspect List — richyhenderson, August 19, 2001 @ 2:00 PM (1/2)

What about false claims by big business? — Garry Anderson, August 19, 2001 @ 5:06 PM (1/1)

Big Business and compromised Trademark claims — richyhenderson, August 19, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)

More proof - big business abuse of trademark — Garry Anderson, August 19, 2001 @ 12:32 AM (1/1)

Well done Gary! — Elvis, August 19, 2001 @ 8:35 PM (0/0)

Well done Afilias — Elvis, August 19, 2001 @ 3:07 AM (3/4)

kidding? — domainboy, August 19, 2001 @ 3:59 PM (0/0)
"Well done Afilias" ?? — dust, August 19, 2001 @ 9:05 AM (0/0)
Shilling — johnmp, August 19, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (1/1)

Afilias have done a good job — Elvis, August 19, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)

METAL.INFO Should Not Be Valid, But Still Locked By Afilias — fjackie, August 19, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (1/1)

weird? — domainboy, August 19, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (0/0)

Afilias needs our help! — sfeibish, August 19, 2001 @ 1:46 AM (1/4)

No Lawyer Will Take the Case — Paul Gill, August 19, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (2/3)

Are you a lawyer, Paul? — johnmp, August 19, 2001 @ 3:16 AM (1/1)

Nothing has changed. — dust, August 19, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)

They have paul? — dust, August 19, 2001 @ 2:54 AM (0/0)

Burden of proof — Anion, August 19, 2001 @ 1:37 AM (0/0)

Afilias Has Lost Control — johnmp, August 19, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

It only gets worse: AFILIAS WON'T TAKE BACK NAMES! — gckorn, August 19, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (3/6)

Well — Elvis, August 19, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (0/0)
You must be kidding! — dust, August 19, 2001 @ 1:08 AM (1/1)

I agree with your viewpoint: this is a burn. I lost money too — psbyowner, August 21, 2001 @ 2:36 AM (0/0)

Innocent Sunrise Victims? — Srana, August 19, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (1/2)

You are absolutely right — richyhenderson, August 19, 2001 @ 12:02 AM (1/1)

Accredited registrars — Elvis, August 19, 2001 @ 8:52 PM (0/0)

How about TLD just for trademarks? — donstauffer, August 18, 2001 @ 7:38 PM (1/1)

Please visit WIPO.org.uk — Garry Anderson, August 18, 2001 @ 9:06 PM (0/0)

The daily whois — black_bird, August 18, 2001 @ 4:32 PM (1/1)

Thanks for these — richyhenderson, August 19, 2001 @ 11:54 AM (0/0)

Website where you can list false claims — richyhenderson, August 18, 2001 @ 2:23 PM (1/1)

Suggestions -RE: Website where you can list false claims — johnmp, August 19, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

.INFO Domain Buyers BEWARE — bhavin, August 18, 2001 @ 1:23 PM (1/1)

Sunrise Transfer Restriction — srana, August 18, 2001 @ 1:54 PM (0/0)

Dot Info Mediation — MicrowvCat, August 18, 2001 @ 12:12 AM (2/3)

Pardon — Garry Anderson, August 18, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)
Why Should COKE.INFO Go To The Soda Pop Company ... — fjackie, August 18, 2001 @ 6:28 PM (1/1)

Actually, "coke" vs. "Coke" was considered by ICANN — bezzant, August 20, 2001 @ 5:16 AM (0/0)

Another Solution? — Dryweave, August 18, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (2/10)

and Richyhenderson's plan — Dryweave, August 18, 2001 @ 7:49 AM (1/1)

i aggree too. — 2oo1, August 18, 2001 @ 11:17 AM (0/0)

this is similar to Dombase's plan... — Dryweave, August 18, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (1/7)

Yep. Good analogies are worth their weight in gold ;) — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 7:55 AM (1/6)

OK - now all phone Afilias with this plan! — richyhenderson, August 18, 2001 @ 10:30 AM (2/5)

(Afilias challenge & LR reserve) vs. (LR challenge w/o TM) — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 5:33 PM (1/1)

I agree with you Domebase — richyhenderson, August 19, 2001 @ 11:43 AM (0/0)

Not Quite — Nicholas Bernstein, August 18, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (2/2)

Please Provide Info — Dryweave, August 19, 2001 @ 3:40 AM (0/0)
The ALL names at Landrush solution is so simple — richyhenderson, August 18, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (0/0)

Telephone Conversation With Afilias - Michael Palage — bezzant, August 18, 2001 @ 5:45 AM (3/4)

Great. Thanks Bill. Thanks Michael. I offer some comments. — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 7:06 PM (0/0)
The only ones that make $$ are Afilias and it's registrars!! — badregistrars, August 18, 2001 @ 7:59 AM (0/0)
Thanks For the Post — Paul Gill, August 18, 2001 @ 6:56 AM (1/1)

Not quite.... — Dryweave, August 18, 2001 @ 7:12 AM (0/0)

Deception at it's best. — dust, August 18, 2001 @ 4:11 AM (0/0)

Beyond DomeBase — onmove, August 18, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (1/4)

Hi onmove — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 6:58 AM (1/3)

Afilias must do the Challenging: No Other Option! — Dryweave, August 18, 2001 @ 7:21 AM (1/2)

proposal would enable Land Rush winner to challenge without TM — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 7:41 AM (1/1)

oops — Dryweave, August 18, 2001 @ 7:44 AM (0/0)

Afilias centrainly does not want to kill the cybersquatters — JohnR, August 18, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (1/1)

Cybersquatters - REVISED — Garry Anderson, August 19, 2001 @ 11:25 AM (0/0)

If fraudulent Sunrise registrations are deleted before Landrush, it ok, but... — José, August 17, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (1/2)

There is a better solution — challenge, August 18, 2001 @ 12:02 AM (1/1)

...well, if Afilias plan is acomplished it's not necessary — José, August 18, 2001 @ 2:18 PM (0/0)

Incompetence or Fraud??? — FraudBuster, August 17, 2001 @ 7:54 PM (2/12)

You are completely missing the point..... — challenge, August 17, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (1/10)

ICAAN want a decent solution to the .info problem — richyhenderson, August 17, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (3/9)

Sent by ICANN to dampen the negative postings? EOM — psbyowner, August 17, 2001 @ 11:37 PM (2/5)

EOM? — 410, August 18, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)

End Of Message — psbyowner, August 18, 2001 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)

Not ICAAN, I'm a landrush applicant, with the solution — richyhenderson, August 18, 2001 @ 12:17 AM (2/2)

ICAAN? [Star Trek II: The Wrath iCAAN?] — InternetAdvocate, August 21, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
Good People — Garry Anderson, August 18, 2001 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)

I agree that ICANN does not need bad PR on this... — domebase, August 17, 2001 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
Stuart Lynn — Paul Gill, August 17, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (1/1)

Trying to be honest and constructive — richyhenderson, August 18, 2001 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)

It certainly smells that way, doesn't it? EOM — psbyowner, August 17, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)

If you have thoughts or advice on this .info Solution... — richyhenderson, August 17, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)

This is a simple solution to .info False Trademark problem! — richyhenderson, August 17, 2001 @ 6:45 PM (3/3)

differences between proposals for discussion — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 5:51 PM (0/0)
Hi richyhenderson — DomeBase, August 18, 2001 @ 7:36 AM (0/0)
A fair solution but will ICANN / Afilias accept it? — FineE, August 18, 2001 @ 4:18 AM (0/0)

Message to ICANN officials about Sunrise Period — Garry Anderson, August 17, 2001 @ 5:46 PM (0/0)

Reluctant to learn? ---- www.swiss.tv could serve as an example for new gtlds. — friedrich, August 17, 2001 @ 4:44 PM (0/0)

"Domebase" here is why Afilias chose to ignore your solution — challenge, August 17, 2001 @ 5:35 AM (0/0)

This Government & Corporate Conspiracy Hurts Consumers — psbyowner, August 16, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (2/9)

U R 99% right, but 1% wrong. — InternetAdvocate, August 17, 2001 @ 2:31 AM (1/1)

.biz root — dtobias, August 17, 2001 @ 3:44 AM (0/0)

.org clarification — dtobias, August 16, 2001 @ 11:43 PM (1/6)

There still remains the problem of regulating content — psbyowner, August 17, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (1/5)

Content regulation — dtobias, August 17, 2001 @ 2:17 AM (2/4)

Choke it up to experience — psbyowner, August 17, 2001 @ 9:28 PM (0/0)
Dot-Com for government agencies? — InternetAdvocate, August 17, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (2/2)

Community Colleges — dtobias, August 17, 2001 @ 3:37 AM (0/0)
DotCom — dtobias, August 17, 2001 @ 3:27 AM (0/0)

What Happened to New.Net? — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 1:27 PM (2/2)

New.net Works Fine, Not Down One Minute In Last Week ... — jeweyjewman, August 16, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)
Works fine for me ... — mole, August 16, 2001 @ 4:17 PM (0/0)

Solution to the BIG DROP after Afilias Challenges Fake Sunrise TMs — IncompetentAfilias, August 16, 2001 @ 9:04 AM (2/2)

Well it isn't Perfect, but then again this is Afilias/ICANN we are talking about — IncompetentAfilias, August 16, 2001 @ 11:14 AM (0/0)
Very Worthy Proposal — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 10:56 AM (0/0)

Who really owns dot-biz G-TLD ? It looks like Winstar does! — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (0/0)

And yet there goes even more of my cash that I bust my ass for everyday of my life. — dust, August 16, 2001 @ 6:14 AM (2/6)

His reply to my e-mail.. — dust, August 16, 2001 @ 8:34 PM (0/0)
Dust, you just don't understand — 410, August 16, 2001 @ 9:00 AM (3/4)

I agree; couldn't have said it better myself eom — psbyowner, August 16, 2001 @ 10:28 PM (0/0)
WELL DONE — Garry Anderson, August 16, 2001 @ 11:29 AM (0/0)
Very Plausible — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 10:59 AM (1/1)

delays = $$$$$.com — stuart, August 16, 2001 @ 5:04 PM (0/0)

A Better Alternative to the current rollout of .info and .biz TLD's. — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 5:53 AM (1/1)

Addendum — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 6:34 AM (0/0)

Get ICANN out of the G-TLD process completely. Here's how... — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 5:18 AM (1/3)

Well, ALMOST completely! — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 5:27 AM (1/2)

Trademarks — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 5:28 AM (1/1)

Ok But — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 5:31 AM (0/0)

In The News — dust, August 16, 2001 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

I have a question. — 410, August 16, 2001 @ 2:18 AM (1/1)

Yes, you are guaranteed to get it — onmove, August 16, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (0/0)

Here's The Phone Number To Complain To: — fjackie, August 15, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)

Don't give up — onmove, August 15, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (1/4)

Your Numbers Are Wrong — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/3)

Counting chickens before they are hatched! — onmove, August 16, 2001 @ 2:07 AM (1/2)

You Said It! — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 3:41 AM (1/1)

You don't want to get it..... — onmove, August 16, 2001 @ 10:16 AM (0/0)

WHAT CAN BE DONE — José, August 15, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/2)

That's just it — challenge, August 15, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/1)

So let's act — José, August 16, 2001 @ 5:43 PM (0/0)

I keep seeing this quote from Afilias. Is it true? — DomeBase, August 15, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (1/4)

quick analysis — Dryweave, August 15, 2001 @ 8:39 PM (1/3)

I still don't get it, Dryweave. Please look at the following — DomeBase, August 15, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/2)

New look, different interpretation — Dryweave, August 15, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

Thanks! Now I get it! — DomeBase, August 15, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (0/0)

What's up with the other five new TLDs???` — dtobias, August 15, 2001 @ 6:14 PM (0/0)

Revised ICANN disclaimers for pre-regitration — challenge, August 15, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (0/0)

ILLEGAL UNREGISTERED LOTTERY — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 5:43 PM (1/2)

Lotteries and Amazon — dtobias, August 15, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (1/1)

Amazon abuse of trademark — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 9:24 PM (0/0)

At least its something — Craig.D, August 15, 2001 @ 5:20 PM (0/0)

What Makes You Think Afilias Can Clean Up This Huge Mess? They Can't. — fjackie, August 15, 2001 @ 5:02 PM (1/1)

CORRUPTION — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 5:29 PM (0/0)

Roland LaPlante quote — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 4:56 PM (1/1)

Another Roland LaPlante quote — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)

TRO . . . Class Action — gckorn, August 15, 2001 @ 4:31 PM (0/0)

Proposed Solution and Afilias Action — DomeBase, August 15, 2001 @ 1:01 PM (1/1)

This proposal makes sense — FineE, August 15, 2001 @ 7:58 PM (0/0)

Afilias looking for a solution — srana, August 15, 2001 @ 11:40 AM (1/2)

Where Have You Been? — Paul Gill, August 15, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)

Sunrise Fraudsters & Closed Lists — srana, August 15, 2001 @ 1:53 PM (0/0)

...At a later time? My misplaced glee. — bezzant, August 15, 2001 @ 8:26 AM (1/4)

Exactly — black_bird, August 15, 2001 @ 8:37 AM (1/3)

They still don't get it — FineE, August 15, 2001 @ 9:21 AM (1/2)

Its The Best They Could Do — Paul Gill, August 15, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (1/1)

Afilias was a bit naive in trusting people to submit true information — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 2:25 PM (0/0)

Thank you ICANN for giving us info on ".info" — bezzant, August 15, 2001 @ 7:33 AM (0/0)

Announcement — Paul Gill, August 15, 2001 @ 7:16 AM (0/0)

At a later time? — black_bird, August 15, 2001 @ 7:07 AM (0/0)

Utter nonsense! — black_bird, August 15, 2001 @ 6:41 AM (1/2)

sex.info — dtobias, August 15, 2001 @ 6:48 AM (1/1)

I was using that as an example — black_bird, August 15, 2001 @ 6:53 AM (0/0)

Afilias to challenge bogus registrations if nobody else does — dtobias, August 15, 2001 @ 6:14 AM (2/5)

Sunrise lets trademarks abuse mark — Garry Anderson, August 15, 2001 @ 3:49 PM (1/2)

Your Right — Nicholas Bernstein, August 16, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (1/1)

Thank you — Garry Anderson, August 16, 2001 @ 11:43 AM (0/0)

Ah well... I tried... :( — domebase, August 15, 2001 @ 7:17 AM (1/1)

You did a great job — black_bird, August 15, 2001 @ 8:41 AM (0/0)

Why can't affilias check all aplications? — Anion, August 15, 2001 @ 3:19 AM (1/2)

? — 410, August 15, 2001 @ 3:58 AM (1/1)

Are you a boardsquatter? — Anion, August 15, 2001 @ 4:11 AM (0/0)

Afilias Policy Change — Nicholas Bernstein, August 15, 2001 @ 2:28 AM (2/7)

Breach of Contract? — gckorn, August 15, 2001 @ 3:05 AM (0/0)
Correct — daveking2, August 15, 2001 @ 2:53 AM (2/5)

That Makes Sense — Paul Gill, August 15, 2001 @ 4:20 AM (1/2)

My proposal not workable because Afilias can not change policy? — domebase, August 15, 2001 @ 7:23 AM (1/1)

Of course it was! — black_bird, August 15, 2001 @ 9:11 AM (0/0)

only correct in theory — Anion, August 15, 2001 @ 3:16 AM (1/1)

could stop further squatting — Anion, August 15, 2001 @ 3:17 AM (0/0)

Disturbing — Anion, August 15, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (0/0)

Afilias should adopt the new.net sunrise policy — Anion, August 14, 2001 @ 11:18 PM (0/0)

Domebase Proposal — srana, August 14, 2001 @ 8:36 PM (2/6)

Thanks srana. How about you folks call or e-mail Afilias? — domebase, August 14, 2001 @ 8:54 PM (0/0)
Not yet, we still need to cover one more critical stipulation. — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 8:52 PM (1/4)

The solution is.... — tomsters, August 14, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (1/3)

Quite a few — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 10:19 PM (1/2)

I agree — tomsters, August 14, 2001 @ 10:30 PM (1/1)

Afilias is upgrading!?!? — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (0/0)

Lets start notifying the Press & LOCAL POLITICIANS — psbyowner, August 14, 2001 @ 6:37 PM (0/0)

New Proposal for Action by Afilias — domebase, August 14, 2001 @ 6:34 PM (5/12)

But even this doesn't solve... — dtobias, August 14, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (1/1)

You are right — tomsters, August 14, 2001 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)

revised based on your comments — domebase, August 14, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (1/1)

How about the potential disaster of "Closed" lists? — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)

We got this down, now how about this other potential fiasco??? — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
That's a good idea but.... — tomsters, August 14, 2001 @ 6:47 PM (1/2)

Yes, I agree that Challenge fee should be — domebase, August 14, 2001 @ 7:12 PM (1/1)

Sounds good. — tomsters, August 14, 2001 @ 7:17 PM (0/0)

I disagree with one aspect in this plan — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 6:46 PM (2/3)

I agree that burden of proof should be on Sunrise Registrant — domebase, August 14, 2001 @ 7:16 PM (0/0)
Good idea — tomsters, August 14, 2001 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)

Excellent! — onmove, August 14, 2001 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)

GRAVE SITUATION AT AFILIAS — José, August 14, 2001 @ 2:29 PM (2/3)

Another Scandal — bradtillis, August 14, 2001 @ 4:27 PM (0/0)
Why isn't ICANN doing anything? — mole, August 14, 2001 @ 4:05 PM (1/1)

Because ICANN authorized these operations — psbyowner, August 14, 2001 @ 6:42 PM (0/0)

Afilias - No purging possible until the quiet period — srana, August 14, 2001 @ 12:15 AM (2/7)

Sunrise is bull* propaganda — Garry Anderson, August 14, 2001 @ 4:25 PM (1/1)

Divide the Work — srana, August 14, 2001 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)

Not Quite — Paul Gill, August 14, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/4)

ICANN or Afilias Accredited? — srana, August 14, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/3)

Kind of In Between — Paul Gill, August 14, 2001 @ 1:16 PM (1/2)

That too will be blatant FRAUD — challenge, August 14, 2001 @ 5:11 PM (1/1)

This is evidence of Lottery — bezzant, August 14, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (0/0)

More fiasco to come — Garry Anderson, August 14, 2001 @ 11:42 AM (0/0)

how big is the scandal ? — PAWEL, August 13, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

Not big enough, yet. — bezzant, August 14, 2001 @ 6:12 AM (0/0)

Afilias - Watching and Waiting? — srana, August 13, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (1/2)

Considering. . . — 410, August 13, 2001 @ 11:41 PM (1/1)

Afilias can modify any part of sunrise policy! — onmove, August 14, 2001 @ 2:35 AM (0/0)

"infogate" — stuart, August 13, 2001 @ 8:02 PM (0/0)

dot info (trademark rego) — Craig.D, August 13, 2001 @ 6:15 PM (0/0)

ICANN blamed for US recession! — stuart, August 13, 2001 @ 6:03 PM (0/0)

extensive site on .info Sunrise and summary of action proposals — domebase, August 13, 2001 @ 5:50 PM (1/1)

This is great. — Craig.D, August 14, 2001 @ 3:08 PM (0/0)

The biggest Flaw — daveking2, August 13, 2001 @ 1:43 PM (0/0)

??? Pre-Planned Fraud by Afilias / Registrars / Icann ??? — FraudBuster, August 13, 2001 @ 11:28 AM (1/1)

I agree with you: There is some corporate/gov conspiracy — psbyowner, August 14, 2001 @ 6:48 PM (0/0)

Looking for Class Action Plaintiffs — bezzant, August 13, 2001 @ 7:29 AM (1/1)

Time for action! — onmove, August 13, 2001 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)

Afilias, time is running out for you, read on why............ — onmove, August 12, 2001 @ 11:47 PM (0/0)

Newly taken....Afilias still processing Sunrise? — gckorn, August 12, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (1/3)

Siegfried Langenbach is an Afilias-approved Registrar! — bezzant, August 13, 2001 @ 6:53 AM (2/2)

Another registrar gaming the system — badregistrars, August 14, 2001 @ 6:36 AM (0/0)
Are you sure? — daveking2, August 13, 2001 @ 1:56 PM (0/0)

.info cheats exposed — crs, August 12, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (1/3)

Rumney seems to have opened a TM office in Namibia — bezzant, August 13, 2001 @ 6:47 AM (1/2)

Rumney has no TMs in Egypt — challenge, August 13, 2001 @ 8:03 PM (1/1)

Not Quite! — Paul Gill, August 14, 2001 @ 12:10 AM (0/0)

It's raining cats and dogs on .info's sunrise... — dtobias, August 12, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (3/4)

Thank you for letting us know WWW.Cat.info has nothing to do with the animal.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 14, 2001 @ 12:41 AM (1/1)

There are 1746 'cat' trademarks - IN THE U.S. ALONE — Garry Anderson, August 14, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (0/0)

WIPO challenge - deny they have bastardized our language — Garry Anderson, August 13, 2001 @ 4:39 PM (0/0)
Right On! — Paul Gill, August 13, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)

Creativity is still flowing........... — onmove, August 12, 2001 @ 6:51 PM (0/0)

What A Shame! Where is Icann? — Black_Bird, August 12, 2001 @ 2:53 PM (1/1)

You mean - What A SHAM! Where is Icann? — Garry Anderson, August 13, 2001 @ 1:55 PM (0/0)

Help Wanted: Team of Challengers — sfeibish, August 12, 2001 @ 2:14 PM (2/2)

A Team of Thousands for Challenges would cut fee to 1 dollar per person — InternetAdvocate, August 16, 2001 @ 5:07 AM (0/0)
Sorry, but noone will pay $75 to do it... — saskia, August 12, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (0/0)

Original 400 name list down to 121 - $84,000 to challenge — sfeibish, August 12, 2001 @ 1:57 PM (0/0)

"moonrise" the false light — maitreya, August 12, 2001 @ 7:21 AM (0/0)

Storm brewing over new domain names — Garry Anderson, August 12, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (0/0)

Intellectual property = only TM/SM ? — cello, August 11, 2001 @ 10:21 AM (1/4)

IP theft from individuals — Garry Anderson, August 11, 2001 @ 5:47 PM (1/3)

Priority — onmove, August 11, 2001 @ 8:23 PM (1/2)

Sunrise a mockery? — Garry Anderson, August 11, 2001 @ 10:52 PM (1/1)

Proof of Concept — cello, August 12, 2001 @ 6:14 AM (0/0)

Icann's war on honest people — Anion, August 11, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (1/8)

Afilias: Is it ego or fear? — onmove, August 11, 2001 @ 5:50 AM (1/7)

Replace This Scam With Another!?! — Paul Gill, August 11, 2001 @ 6:40 AM (1/6)

Don't try to create confusion. — onmove, August 11, 2001 @ 6:31 PM (1/5)

No, You Are Wrong — Paul Gill, August 11, 2001 @ 10:29 PM (2/4)

Everybody's missing the point... — dtobias, August 12, 2001 @ 12:24 AM (0/0)
We ALL agree on one thing — Garry Anderson, August 11, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (1/2)

Great! but, we need more than agreement... — onmove, August 12, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/1)

ICANN should sort this mess out — Garry Anderson, August 12, 2001 @ 10:04 AM (0/0)

Afilias here is the solution — crs, August 10, 2001 @ 2:44 AM (5/7)

Yes but ... — daveking2, August 13, 2001 @ 1:15 PM (1/1)

solutions are simple — crs, August 13, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (0/0)

Landrush Petition — srana, August 11, 2001 @ 4:31 AM (0/0)
A sensible solution — onmove, August 10, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (0/0)
.info Sunrise problems and proposed solutions — domebase, August 10, 2001 @ 10:10 PM (1/1)

Also...... — Elvis, August 11, 2001 @ 1:54 AM (0/0)

$ is the King — vincent1, August 10, 2001 @ 4:12 AM (0/0)

Awards for registrant of the week and the imaginative use of trademark info award!!! — Elvis, August 10, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (1/6)

DuPont is more deserving — Anion, August 11, 2001 @ 3:14 AM (1/5)

Too bad. . . — 410, August 11, 2001 @ 6:17 AM (2/4)

Sarcasm — Anion, August 14, 2001 @ 8:02 AM (0/0)
Big business ABUSE of process and law — Garry Anderson, August 11, 2001 @ 10:37 AM (1/2)

Countries are Inconsistent With Each Other — daveking2, August 13, 2001 @ 2:12 PM (1/1)

Thanks — Garry Anderson, August 13, 2001 @ 4:07 PM (0/0)

Are TLDs Protected By Trademark? — fjackie, August 9, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (0/0)

Names taken off my list - $45,000 to contest — sfeibish, August 9, 2001 @ 8:19 PM (1/1)

Wow...that is a comprehensive search..... — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 10, 2001 @ 4:52 AM (0/0)

Top 100 .info — crs, August 9, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (1/1)

Good post — Elvis, August 10, 2001 @ 1:11 AM (0/0)

"Sunrise" Cheaters and Accredited Registrars first! — vincent1, August 8, 2001 @ 10:30 PM (1/2)

More — onmove, August 8, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (1/1)

Correction — onmove, August 9, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (0/0)

Hijacking of .info — onmove, August 8, 2001 @ 7:49 PM (0/0)

A strict definition of .org as non-profit is now unconstitutional — psbyowner, August 8, 2001 @ 7:36 PM (0/0)

Dot com is king. — dotcomisking, August 8, 2001 @ 9:04 AM (1/2)

Then what is Dot org? — dtobias, August 8, 2001 @ 3:25 PM (1/1)

A strict definition for .org as non-profit is now unconstitutional — psbyowner, August 8, 2001 @ 7:37 PM (0/0)

Image Online Design (dot web) has it right. First Come First Served....However.. — Gregory W. Krajewski, August 8, 2001 @ 4:29 AM (0/0)

Hey, Look At This Article From Daily News: "Bogus .INFO Domain Names ... " — jonpostel, August 8, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)

Letter From Rep Tauzin To DoC, Regarding New TLDs — fjackie, August 8, 2001 @ 12:47 AM (1/1)

It's About Time ... #151; jonpostel, August 8, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (0/0)

DEFECTIVE Sunrise Queue parsing by Afilias - My Observations — bhavin, August 7, 2001 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)

unlock the TLD's !! How about a DOT-WHATEVER-YOU-WANT — deanayer, August 7, 2001 @ 8:06 AM (1/1)

Land grabs and TLDs — dtobias, August 7, 2001 @ 5:00 PM (0/0)

ISP's !! Boycott resolving .INFO till they fix it !!! — deanayer, August 7, 2001 @ 7:41 AM (0/0)

AFILIAS responds to speculation — Afilias, August 7, 2001 @ 5:36 AM (4/5)

Will Afilias stop aiding cybersquaters? — Elvis, August 10, 2001 @ 1:56 AM (0/0)
The best solution? — saskia, August 7, 2001 @ 6:38 PM (0/0)
.info rollout update — dtobias, August 7, 2001 @ 5:03 PM (0/0)
I would like to believe it but .................... — onmove, August 7, 2001 @ 6:46 AM (1/1)

Validation — Garry Anderson, August 7, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (0/0)

The whois is back and is as bogus as ever — kellyjones, August 7, 2001 @ 5:03 AM (1/4)

Its NOT all bogus — Nicholas Bernstein, August 7, 2001 @ 6:36 AM (1/3)

Wrong! — kellyjones, August 7, 2001 @ 7:07 AM (2/2)

Who is Kelly Jones? — Stellin, August 8, 2001 @ 2:16 AM (0/0)
Startup period will finish before start! — onmove, August 7, 2001 @ 8:56 AM (0/0)

Not all generic .info's were bogus - some were stupid — dingle, August 7, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (1/4)

Many "Real" .info Registrations under Sunrise — Nicholas Bernstein, August 7, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (1/3)

Wrong — kellyjones, August 7, 2001 @ 4:46 AM (2/2)

source on latest developments concerning Sunrise in addition — domebase, August 11, 2001 @ 12:30 AM (0/0)
I agree to an extent — dingle, August 7, 2001 @ 5:01 AM (0/0)

! lawsuit ! — stuart, August 6, 2001 @ 11:38 PM (1/1)

Yes Glad to hear it Lottery is a sham eom — psbyowner, August 7, 2001 @ 10:05 PM (0/0)

Guess what folks: We dont even need more domain names — psbyowner, August 6, 2001 @ 8:09 PM (1/1)

Well, good! — dtobias, August 6, 2001 @ 8:37 PM (0/0)

Are Afilias And Neulevel Running Their Own Registries Yet? — jonpostel, August 6, 2001 @ 5:09 PM (0/0)

See my site for comments on the new TLDs — dtobias, August 6, 2001 @ 3:32 AM (0/0)

Manipulation of Biz and info could damage the domain registration business — JohnR, August 5, 2001 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)

ICANN needs to acknowledge problems — donstauffer, August 4, 2001 @ 7:16 PM (1/4)

A possible solution - scrap the sunrise period — onmove, August 4, 2001 @ 11:14 PM (2/3)

Sunrise Period is a fiasco — Garry Anderson, August 6, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (1/1)

You are worng — kellyjones, August 6, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)

Yes — kellyjones, August 5, 2001 @ 7:28 AM (0/0)

Pure Nonsense — kellyjones, August 4, 2001 @ 2:58 PM (1/12)

Do you mean me? — Garry Anderson, August 4, 2001 @ 5:42 PM (2/11)

Well — kellyjones, August 5, 2001 @ 7:16 AM (1/3)

Yes you are right - it is fraudulent — Garry Anderson, August 6, 2001 @ 12:06 AM (1/2)

Wrong again! — kellyjones, August 6, 2001 @ 9:25 AM (1/1)

Please read in context — Garry Anderson, August 6, 2001 @ 10:58 AM (0/0)

There is a remedy in place — Paul Gill, August 4, 2001 @ 11:41 PM (1/6)

Wrong! — kellyjones, August 5, 2001 @ 6:52 AM (1/5)

No, You Have It All Wrong — Paul Gill, August 5, 2001 @ 7:55 AM (2/4)

No — kellyjones, August 6, 2001 @ 9:31 AM (1/2)

Whats That? — Paul Gill, August 6, 2001 @ 1:06 PM (1/1)

I checked 119 - most of them seemed bogus! — onmove, August 6, 2001 @ 5:28 PM (0/0)

Let's not sidetrack the main issue........... — onmove, August 5, 2001 @ 9:26 AM (0/0)

.INFO Sunrise - Dawn of the Dead — bezzant, August 4, 2001 @ 12:19 AM (1/1)

Great job! — kellyjones, August 4, 2001 @ 3:02 PM (0/0)

Muahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha....... — jeweyjewman, August 3, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (1/2)

Probably because they detected the problem and are trying to solve it. — Slicer, August 4, 2001 @ 6:31 AM (1/1)

Yeah, right ... — jeweyjewman, August 4, 2001 @ 4:33 PM (0/0)

Afilias Offers .INFO Whois Information, Then Removes It From Their Site ... — jeweyjewman, August 3, 2001 @ 5:44 PM (2/11)

Get a clue.... — Gregory W Krajewski, August 4, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (1/9)

A possibility — onmove, August 4, 2001 @ 7:24 AM (2/8)

What they need to do is.... — kellyjones, August 4, 2001 @ 5:34 PM (0/0)
You would be suprised — Paul Gill, August 4, 2001 @ 9:06 AM (2/6)

Utterly Irrelevant — kellyjones, August 4, 2001 @ 2:47 PM (1/1)

A perspective — onmove, August 4, 2001 @ 8:43 PM (0/0)

UDRP — Garry Anderson, August 4, 2001 @ 1:11 PM (1/3)

Interesting but....... — kellyjones, August 4, 2001 @ 3:31 PM (1/2)

From bad to worse... — dtobias, August 6, 2001 @ 3:04 AM (1/1)

It is all a con — Garry Anderson, August 6, 2001 @ 4:45 PM (0/0)

"This will be ICANN's downfall. They spent years on this and it is a hopelessly screwed up mess. " — Stuart, August 3, 2001 @ 7:47 PM (0/0)

: ICANN Signs Registry Agreeement for .Name — WeTLD, August 3, 2001 @ 5:13 PM (1/3)

That's not fair... — dtobias, August 6, 2001 @ 3:10 AM (1/2)

.Name — mab007, August 7, 2001 @ 9:46 AM (1/1)

.name dispute process — dtobias, August 7, 2001 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)

More: — kellyjones, August 3, 2001 @ 9:25 AM (1/1)

Yes, they are many... — saskia, August 7, 2001 @ 5:39 PM (0/0)

Bogus .Info sunrise! — kellyjones, August 3, 2001 @ 8:53 AM (2/2)

MONUMENTAL SHAME — onmove, August 3, 2001 @ 5:07 PM (0/0)
You are right - because of the LAW — Garry Anderson, August 3, 2001 @ 1:00 PM (0/0)

ICANN General Assembly Chairman Speaks — jeweyjewman, July 30, 2001 @ 1:17 AM (1/1)

Got Bullshit? — Slicer, July 30, 2001 @ 10:09 AM (0/0)

New ".biz" Internet domain faces legal challenge — Garry Anderson, July 26, 2001 @ 7:01 PM (1/1)

Bet now, on the ICANNWINALOT lottery!!! — Elvis, July 26, 2001 @ 8:17 PM (0/0)

ICANN Just As Lame As Ordinary Netizens ... — jeweyjewman, July 19, 2001 @ 11:08 PM (1/2)

Are you sure about example used? — sfeibish, July 20, 2001 @ 5:55 PM (1/1)

Yes, I'm Sure. Here's The Article And Link ... — jeweyjewman, July 21, 2001 @ 10:52 AM (0/0)

Trademark 'Squatters' Pillaging .INFO ... — jeweyjewman, July 15, 2001 @ 3:23 PM (1/1)

mouse waiting for piece of cheese to drop on floor — sfeibish, July 19, 2001 @ 10:31 AM (0/0)

Let's Just All Blow Verisign ... — jonpostel, July 14, 2001 @ 1:44 AM (0/0)

More Of Ben Edelman — jeweyjewman, July 11, 2001 @ 2:33 PM (1/2)

Big Ben [AKA Jeweyjewman?] must have had tons of religion. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, July 11, 2001 @ 11:52 PM (1/1)

More>>> — InternetAdvocate, July 11, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (0/0)

Read About Ben Edelman And A Bong!!! After All, It's "Public Record" — jeweyjewman, July 11, 2001 @ 1:42 PM (0/0)

.Sex domain scam — ugamedia, July 11, 2001 @ 11:46 AM (0/0)

Okay, Now Everybody Chant ... — JeweyJewman, July 10, 2001 @ 5:33 PM (0/0)

ICANN bringing chaos to the internet. — Elvis, July 9, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (0/0)

dotregister.com is violating 4(a)(iii) — Dragon, July 5, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (1/1)

Madness — Elvis, July 5, 2001 @ 11:42 PM (0/0)

Graphic Of .BIZ Collision — jeweyjewman, July 5, 2001 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)

The Best Way To Remove ICANN from regulating G-TLD's. — InternetAdvocate, July 4, 2001 @ 12:24 AM (1/3)

Does anybody WANT any solution to that problem? — friedrich, July 8, 2001 @ 11:35 AM (1/2)

My Reply — InternetAdvocate, July 9, 2001 @ 10:28 PM (1/1)

Your proposal may have its merits ... — friedrich, July 10, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (0/0)

Another Way To Avoid Colliding TLD's. — InternetAdvocate, July 4, 2001 @ 12:22 AM (0/0)

New TLDs suck.. — jmaguire123, July 3, 2001 @ 7:39 PM (0/0)

.info confusion — crs, July 3, 2001 @ 3:28 PM (0/0)

Boycott Neulevel! — afterhours, July 2, 2001 @ 7:23 PM (0/0)

Image Online Design and Dot WEB...."It's time..." — Gregory W. Krajewski, July 1, 2001 @ 8:58 PM (1/1)

Goodluck DotWeb but....... — Elvis, July 1, 2001 @ 10:01 PM (0/0)

who has the power..? — stuart, June 29, 2001 @ 11:01 PM (3/4)

.sex domain registration started — alx2, July 4, 2001 @ 4:36 PM (1/1)

Yup, a scam — Slicer, July 4, 2001 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)

SEX dot KIDS — Garry Anderson, June 30, 2001 @ 12:07 AM (0/0)
DotKids — Elvis, June 30, 2001 @ 12:28 AM (0/0)

NEWSFLASH: neulevel.biz & afilias.info are in the USG's A-root now! — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (1/1)

And it's about time. — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:04 AM (0/0)

As A For-Profit Domain Name Speculator, I Would Just Like To Say ... — jeweyjewman, June 27, 2001 @ 9:44 PM (0/0)

HOW DO I USE A TRADEMARK PROPERLY? — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:54 AM (1/2)

Already answered this. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 2:23 AM (1/1)

Expose their corruption. — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 3:36 PM (0/0)

Shame on ICANN — alans, June 27, 2001 @ 3:30 AM (2/2)

Well, what do you expect, they will be selling burgers next! — Elvis, June 28, 2001 @ 10:38 PM (0/0)
Warning! ALLCAPS inside! — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (0/0)

stranger.than.pro — lanthus, June 26, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/1)

offline.bum - get a .com — lanthus, June 26, 2001 @ 11:39 PM (0/0)

ICANN and DoC call Americans IMBECILES — Garry Anderson, June 26, 2001 @ 8:54 AM (1/5)

Americans ARE imbeciles! — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:39 PM (1/4)

Just those in power — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:15 AM (1/3)

Don't blame the leaders. Folks get the leaders they choose & deserve. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:39 AM (2/2)

Which is why... — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 10:05 AM (0/0)
That's the whole problem with representative democracy — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:03 AM (0/0)

ICANN obviously wants to avoid any REAL opposition — psbyowner, June 25, 2001 @ 4:47 PM (0/0)

.biz domain registration a complete shambles — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/16)

ICANN & the alt roots are corrupt monopolizers. Follow the money! — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (2/6)

Have answered this — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)

I answered Garry already. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/1)

Restricted TLD — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)

Choice — Elvis, June 26, 2001 @ 11:54 PM (1/2)

ICANN & the alt roots are greedy. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)

Err.. IA? These are humans we're talking about, remember? What else did you expect? — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)

It is a shame. — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
Agreed: The current .biz registration process is criminal — psbyowner, June 23, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (1/7)

Lottery and Trademark tax - and New.net — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (1/6)

The ICP in the internet are acting like the knights in the 16th century — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/5)

Unattractive — Garry Anderson, June 24, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/4)

Yes to .reg for trademarks, and something else(.np?) for non-profits eom — psbyowner, June 25, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (1/3)

On the record — Garry Andersom, June 25, 2001 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)

The trademark issue. — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
Amen and Amen eom — psbyowner, June 26, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

.vc ccTLD release — CiderBob, June 22, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (0/0)

New online petition — fr05t, June 22, 2001 @ 5:02 PM (0/0)

Wake up world — Elvis, June 22, 2001 @ 12:02 AM (0/0)

Changing the .org and .net formats now is unconstitutional — psbyowner, June 21, 2001 @ 5:50 PM (0/0)

STOP ICANN's Property Theft and Destruction of Pre-existing Internet Domain Name Space — dotbizowner, June 20, 2001 @ 11:49 PM (2/2)

Something must be done. — Elvis, June 21, 2001 @ 5:35 PM (0/0)
Hear, hear. — TimInNY, June 21, 2001 @ 3:06 AM (0/0)

new TLDs means nothing .com=.corp=.llc=... — Lanthus, June 20, 2001 @ 7:11 PM (0/0)

Comments on WIPO.org Interim Report - by WIPO.org.uk — Garry Anderson, June 17, 2001 @ 10:55 AM (1/1)

Well said Sir! — Elvis, June 18, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)

.vc ccTLD — CiderBob, June 17, 2001 @ 1:44 AM (1/3)

New TLDs — S. Hudgens, June 18, 2001 @ 1:42 PM (2/2)

Image Online Design's Dot Web™ is the most sought after domain.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, June 20, 2001 @ 4:07 AM (0/0)
You are right — Elvis, June 18, 2001 @ 9:45 PM (0/0)

CONflict a Bit & Moneygrubbing a Plenty! — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:38 AM (1/1)

Consider this — Elvis, June 15, 2001 @ 1:51 AM (0/0)

Do these imbeciles even know what the "®" is for? — Garry Anderson, June 14, 2001 @ 11:21 AM (1/1)

They think it means renumeration, as in money money money for them and their cronies! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:26 PM (0/0)

The free roots must be supported — Elvis, June 12, 2001 @ 10:34 PM (1/2)

Go fuck yourself — Slicer, June 13, 2001 @ 8:10 AM (1/1)

Nice post Slicer — afterhours, June 13, 2001 @ 12:53 AM (0/0)

.net & .org owners should not be punished for ICANN negligence — psbyowner, June 12, 2001 @ 6:35 PM (3/6)

ICANN should leave .net alone! Too late to change requirements now — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 1:57 AM (1/1)

ICANN should recognize alt root .npo TLD for non-profits. Leave .org alone! — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:03 AM (0/0)

True — Elvis, June 12, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/1)

Thanks & keep fighting eom — psbyowner, June 13, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (0/0)

Money and Power - is all they care about — Garry Anderson, June 12, 2001 @ 8:03 PM (1/1)

power — jandl, June 26, 2001 @ 6:48 AM (0/0)

Non-ICANN domains spark e-commerce fears — Garry Anderson, June 12, 2001 @ 8:38 AM (1/2)

Sparks — jandl, June 26, 2001 @ 8:22 AM (1/1)

SPIN — Garry Anderson, June 26, 2001 @ 9:20 AM (0/0)

Touton said - raises the question — Garry Anderson, June 11, 2001 @ 8:02 PM (1/4)

Where's Vint Cerf? Why does he ignore the Forum? — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:23 AM (2/3)

By not replying - they show their contempt for us — Garry Anderson, June 12, 2001 @ 8:10 AM (1/1)

Garry Anderson is the strongest link. He should be ICANN CEO. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (0/0)

Because Vint Cerf Is Like An Ostrich ... — jonpostel, June 12, 2001 @ 2:58 AM (0/0)

Attention — Elvis, June 7, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (1/33)

A more fair and just statement — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (2/32)

Garry contradicts his other posts. Or did he flipflop? Or Lie like Gore? — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (2/30)

FlipFlop? You are wrong — Garry Anderson, June 8, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/13)

Here you go! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/12)

WRONG — Garry Anderson, June 9, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (1/11)

Garry Anderson contradicts his own logic. — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/10)

You twist logic — Garry Anderson, June 10, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (1/9)

I twist nothing. — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (1/8)

Sorry - you do not see it — Garry Anderson, June 12, 2001 @ 7:56 AM (1/7)

You don't see it. Imaginary Conflict and Real Moneygrubbing. — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (1/6)

Methinks you are wrong because — Garry Anderson, June 14, 2001 @ 11:01 AM (1/5)

Sorry charlie, urr, Garry! I am right. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/4)

The Internet redefined - due to corruption and ineptitude? — Garry Anderson, June 15, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (1/3)

A Solution to Answer your Objection. — InternetAdvocate, June 18, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/2)

May work - but — Garry Anderson, June 19, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)

My Reply. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)

Positive? — Elvis, June 8, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (2/15)

Who Cares.... — afterhours, June 10, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (1/2)

Who cares what Afterhours Al says? He knows nothing! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/1)

Let's see Elvis attack Afterhours Al for not being positive! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)

Positive? Elvis is less positive than I am! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 10:47 PM (1/11)

What are you mumbling about — Elvis, June 9, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (1/10)

ZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (2/9)

Let's see Elvis attack Elvis for not being positive! LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
Let's see Elvis attack Garry Anderson for not being positive! LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (1/7)

Lets see you calm down — Elvis, June 12, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (1/6)

Not positive? Mumbling? Not calm? Make up your mind! Sheesh! :) — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:17 AM (1/5)

Stop talking in your sleep then. — Elvis, June 14, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (1/4)

Ring! Ring! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/3)

Don't use the word Bell — Elvis, June 14, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/2)

Don't use the word Elvis. The Estate of Elvis Presley has a TM on it. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)

Don't use the word Internet — Elvis, June 15, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)

Good observation — Elvis, June 8, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (0/0)

New TLD's are needed due to low supply of available domains. — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 10:00 PM (4/6)

CCTLD's are TOO SHORT. Here's why! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:57 AM (1/1)

Addendum — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 3:21 AM (0/0)

Choice — Elvis, June 7, 2001 @ 9:05 PM (0/0)
Free Market — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 8:17 AM (0/0)
Here's the link to my earlier posts. — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 10:07 PM (1/1)

Here's the Link to Another Post. — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 10:09 PM (0/0)

New TLD's increase cost of protecting your Trademark/ServiceMark!!! — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (1/2)

COWARDS — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 8:00 AM (1/1)

Cowards & Chickens, yes. But the MOST IMPORTANT QUESTION is ... — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (0/0)

Questionable need for new TLDs — dnheller, June 6, 2001 @ 3:09 PM (2/12)

New TLDs — S. Hudgens, June 6, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (1/10)

New or replicated? — Elvis, June 9, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (1/9)

TLD Replication — S. Hudgens, June 11, 2001 @ 7:13 PM (1/8)

Precedent has been set. — Garry Anderson, June 11, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/7)

Y'all give reasons why every TLD registry should be not-for-profit — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (1/6)

Not for Profit? — S. Hudgens, June 12, 2001 @ 1:39 PM (1/5)

The registries should be not-for-profit. Let the for-profit registers own a piece of them. — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (1/4)

Fees — S. Hudgens, June 14, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (1/3)

How? Now! Brown Cow! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/2)

Lower Fees? — S. Hudgens, June 15, 2001 @ 2:49 PM (1/1)

Lower Fees! — InternetAdvocate, June 18, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

Trademark Tax & Many More TLD — Garry Anderson, June 6, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

Acceptable Use Policy for all ICANN forums. — InternetAdvocate, June 4, 2001 @ 11:13 PM (1/1)

WARNING: ICANN violates its OWN RULES. So what else is new? LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 4, 2001 @ 11:16 PM (0/0)

Changing the .org and .net format now is un-constitutional — psbyowner, June 4, 2001 @ 4:56 PM (0/0)

Listen up. — Elvis, June 3, 2001 @ 9:21 PM (1/2)

Yes, you're right. There should be compensation. — Slicer, June 3, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (1/1)

Slicer has a knack for getting things wrong. — Elvis, June 18, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (0/0)

A Proposal to Introduce Market-Based - New.Net Policy Paper — Easy, June 1, 2001 @ 10:16 AM (1/1)

LAW 691: CYBERLAW — Easy, June 1, 2001 @ 10:22 AM (0/0)

A letter hierarchy based scheme for arbitrary TLDs — porttikivi, May 31, 2001 @ 2:00 PM (1/2)

Note that local resolving and global caching makes it effective — porttikivi, May 31, 2001 @ 2:01 PM (1/1)

A mistake on the first line — porttikivi, May 31, 2001 @ 4:08 PM (0/0)

Evans urged ICANN not to rest on its laurels — Garry Anderson, May 30, 2001 @ 12:01 AM (1/1)

Q: Why is a new TLD like a bus? — Garry Anderson, May 30, 2001 @ 9:30 AM (0/0)

directly from the Fed. Government — stuart, May 29, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (1/3)

I support Image Online Design as well....."They have the public trust, and yes they have earned it!" — Gregory W. Krajewski, May 30, 2001 @ 4:01 AM (1/2)

Support for IOD — S. Hudgens, May 30, 2001 @ 1:24 PM (1/1)

IOD has been working very hard on .web — Anion, May 31, 2001 @ 3:29 AM (0/0)

Open up the new frontier. — Elvis, May 28, 2001 @ 9:00 PM (1/1)

And...... — Elvis, May 28, 2001 @ 10:13 PM (0/0)

Why are TLD's allowed to be a corporate commodity? — Warlock, May 23, 2001 @ 12:09 AM (2/2)

Hound dogs! — Elvis, May 23, 2001 @ 9:51 PM (0/0)
If I owned domino.biz — Garry Anderson, May 23, 2001 @ 4:05 PM (0/0)

Who the hell are the alternate roots to claim ownership anyway? — Slicer, May 22, 2001 @ 10:46 PM (3/13)

what is neulevel's claim? — Anion, May 23, 2001 @ 10:08 PM (1/5)

Fwaaahahaha... — Slicer, May 24, 2001 @ 3:18 AM (1/4)

not true — Anion, May 24, 2001 @ 5:46 AM (1/3)

*snicker* *snort* — Slicer, May 24, 2001 @ 10:31 PM (1/2)

. — Anion, May 25, 2001 @ 5:05 AM (1/1)

Damn right. — Slicer, May 25, 2001 @ 5:09 AM (0/0)

Choice — Elvis, May 23, 2001 @ 9:40 PM (1/1)

No Choice — Slicer, May 24, 2001 @ 10:43 PM (0/0)

You must be the kind of person..... — Warlock, May 23, 2001 @ 11:56 AM (1/4)

From me to you: Die of heart disease. — Slicer, May 24, 2001 @ 3:02 AM (1/3)

Ha Ha Ha, logic escapes you! — Elvis, May 24, 2001 @ 9:48 PM (1/2)

SIEG! HEIL! SIEG! HEIL! — Slicer, May 24, 2001 @ 10:26 PM (1/1)

Lucky you — Elvis, May 25, 2001 @ 2:00 AM (0/0)

AOL Time Warner - aimster.com — Garry Anderson, May 22, 2001 @ 8:22 AM (3/9)

If Aimster violates AOL's AIM trademark, then Yahoo! Incorporated is in BIG TROUBLE. — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:41 PM (0/0)
AIMSTER is NOT an AOL trademark. Notwithstanding Crooked Courts! — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 9:25 PM (0/0)
For the Greedy Big Shot Attorneys — Garry Anderson, May 22, 2001 @ 10:16 AM (2/6)

Legal action against ICANN — hashashin, June 2, 2001 @ 7:53 AM (1/2)

A suggestion — Slicer, June 2, 2001 @ 8:36 AM (1/1)

correction — hashashin, June 2, 2001 @ 10:11 AM (0/0)

More for AOL to take / Reprobates exposed — Garry Anderson, May 25, 2001 @ 8:37 AM (2/2)

Hey Garry! You forgot one! — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 9:36 PM (0/0)
Hear Hear! — hashashin, June 2, 2001 @ 7:57 AM (0/0)

TLD's for global interests — cnelson, May 18, 2001 @ 3:47 PM (1/1)

TLD's for global interests — Dassa, May 19, 2001 @ 6:30 AM (0/0)

Prior use. — Elvis, May 18, 2001 @ 9:27 AM (2/4)

Hijacking - a misleading term — Dassa, May 19, 2001 @ 6:19 AM (1/1)

How selective! — Elvis, May 19, 2001 @ 9:39 PM (0/0)

Neulevel's response — TimInNY, May 19, 2001 @ 1:53 AM (1/1)

Sunrise — enforcer, May 19, 2001 @ 6:08 AM (0/0)

Garry Anderson for ICANN Board of Directors. — InternetAdvocate, May 18, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (1/2)

You got my cheque then ;-) — Garry Anderson, May 18, 2001 @ 7:55 AM (1/1)

Check never requested. — InternetAdvocate, May 18, 2001 @ 9:19 PM (0/0)

New TLD for trademarks is needed. — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:54 AM (1/11)

Thank you — Garry Anderson, May 17, 2001 @ 8:09 AM (1/10)

Do you really like uk domain? I think .brit better than .uk — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (1/9)

Personal preference irrelevant — Garry Anderson, June 6, 2001 @ 5:43 PM (1/8)

Majority preferences ARE relevant. — InternetAdvocate, June 6, 2001 @ 9:14 PM (1/7)

Yucky — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 7:47 AM (1/6)

Yucky! Yuck! — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:59 PM (1/5)

UK makes perfect sense to us in UK — Garry Anderson, June 9, 2001 @ 1:10 PM (1/4)

.uk yuck! — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/3)

Are .zr registrants forced to change to .cd? — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 11:30 PM (1/2)

You miss point - again and again ... — Garry Anderson, June 10, 2001 @ 9:32 AM (1/1)

You'd REALLY make a perfect ICANN CEO. You keep missing the point ad nauseum! :) — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 11:40 PM (0/0)

A GREAT solution to Colliding .BIZ TLD's? — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 2:45 AM (6/9)

As long as existing registrations stay, I think your proposal has its merrits. — friedrich, July 10, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (1/1)

My Proposal that was referred to by Friedrich. — InternetAdvocate, July 11, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)

Adding more TLD's — Dassa, May 19, 2001 @ 6:26 AM (1/1)

ICANN can accept some alt roots into USG root w/o obligation to other alt roots. — InternetAdvocate, May 22, 2001 @ 12:51 AM (0/0)

Pigs might fly — Elvis, May 17, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)
Likewise for Colliding Dot-Info TLD's? — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)
A Great Compromise with New.Net and ICANN? — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:46 AM (1/1)

Compromise is a noble and judicious concept....... — Anion, May 17, 2001 @ 4:59 AM (0/0)

ICANN should recognize IOD as sole .WEB registry. — InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)

please explain random system — fbulldog, May 17, 2001 @ 2:26 AM (0/0)

new domains..fill me in-as it were — sj, May 16, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)

Image Online Design is hope for real competition in the name-space in the future... — Gregory W. Krajewski, May 16, 2001 @ 3:16 AM (0/0)

Responses to letter to ICANN from NeuLevel — namecritic1, May 16, 2001 @ 1:45 AM (1/3)

Spin, Lies and Propaganda — Garry Anderson, May 16, 2001 @ 1:13 PM (1/2)

Previous posting was moderated — Garry Anderson, May 16, 2001 @ 11:35 PM (1/1)

The point being / question for NeuLevel about sunrise — Garry Anderson, May 17, 2001 @ 7:58 AM (0/0)

regsiter.ad — MyselfAndIren, July 13, 2001 @ 9:18 AM (0/0)

The duplication of DotBiz — Elvis, May 15, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)

New TLD Agreements — jonpostel, May 14, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (2/2)

I don't understand the "batch" system — fbulldog, May 16, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (0/0)
.biz is horrible. — Anion, May 15, 2001 @ 1:20 AM (0/0)

It's difficult to argue with success... — hrswaim, May 14, 2001 @ 7:52 PM (0/0)

Prodigy(R) Joins New.net's Team of ISP Partners — digitalfuture, May 14, 2001 @ 6:40 PM (1/1)

Read this Gregory W. Krajewski — Anion, May 14, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (0/0)

new.net is a revolution — thecurve, May 13, 2001 @ 3:15 AM (1/1)

Good Luck! — Elvis, May 15, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (0/0)

NEW.net's competing 20 new gTLD's are gaining ground. — csingleton, May 12, 2001 @ 11:57 PM (3/4)

The meaning of the word "is" and definition of "sex" — csingleton, May 13, 2001 @ 1:34 PM (0/0)
Oh and another thing.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, May 13, 2001 @ 4:26 AM (0/0)
Although I applaud your enthusiam — Gregory W. Krajewski, May 13, 2001 @ 2:14 AM (1/1)

you still have a chance — digitalfuture, May 13, 2001 @ 2:40 AM (0/0)

Dear Icann — Anion, May 12, 2001 @ 10:48 PM (2/7)

Anion, listen up. — Elvis, May 16, 2001 @ 12:59 AM (1/1)

Icann can't do anything. — ppp, May 16, 2001 @ 2:17 PM (0/0)

I disagree profusely.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, May 13, 2001 @ 4:06 AM (2/4)

Fallacious Logic — Anion, May 13, 2001 @ 5:10 AM (0/0)
NS has already lost the war — digitalfuture, May 13, 2001 @ 4:22 AM (1/2)

one more thing — digitalfuture, May 13, 2001 @ 4:23 AM (1/1)

Re: one more thing — ppp, May 16, 2001 @ 2:19 PM (0/0)

Icann is just as usefull as M$-Window$ - WORTHLESS! — ppp, May 12, 2001 @ 1:05 AM (0/0)

NEWS: Most European ISP's Will Publish Altroots — PPP, May 7, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (1/2)

Highly Implausable — Anion, May 14, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (1/1)

Hey (farmer) Joe, is this your backwater? — Elvis, May 16, 2001 @ 12:50 AM (0/0)

can anyone now register a .net domain even if it is not a network — torres10024, May 6, 2001 @ 2:43 PM (1/2)

I have a .net — PPP, May 7, 2001 @ 12:44 AM (1/1)

.com, .net, and .org are open to everybody — psbyowner, May 7, 2001 @ 3:35 PM (0/0)

Why Domain Names are a First Amendment issue & Truth — Garry Anderson, May 5, 2001 @ 8:30 AM (0/0)

"generic" trademarks and .info — sfeibish, May 4, 2001 @ 10:15 PM (1/1)

..AGREE.. — cello, May 5, 2001 @ 3:43 AM (0/0)

.biz already exists! — bizEXISTSalready, May 3, 2001 @ 6:54 AM (1/5)

re BIZ Exists — RJ, May 4, 2001 @ 12:33 AM (3/4)

Flawed logic — jandl, May 7, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (1/1)

Agree — Garry Anderson, May 8, 2001 @ 9:20 AM (0/0)

.biz, .info, dot whatever; they are only valuable to speculators — psbyowner, May 4, 2001 @ 9:08 PM (0/0)
You're Stupid, Really ... — jonpostel, May 4, 2001 @ 1:20 PM (0/0)

www.Killer.web to be seen globally......soon.....it's only a matter of time. — Gregory W. Krajewski, May 2, 2001 @ 3:40 AM (0/0)

Aside from the collision... — jandl, May 1, 2001 @ 3:48 PM (0/0)

Build one internet system, — eventregistry, May 1, 2001 @ 9:08 AM (1/1)

ICANN At Large Membership number: 380709 — Garry Anderson, May 1, 2001 @ 2:13 PM (0/0)

Mike Roberts? Is That You? Listen To Me ... — jonpostel, April 29, 2001 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)

John? Peter? Klaas? David? Abraham? Bill? Is that you? — ppp, April 29, 2001 @ 5:10 PM (0/0)

Louis? Is That You? Listen To Me ... — jonpostel, April 29, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (0/0)

Hans? Is That You? Listen To Me ... — jonpostel, April 29, 2001 @ 12:42 AM (0/0)

Vint? Is That You? Listen To Me ... — jonpostel, April 28, 2001 @ 8:53 PM (0/0)

ICANN: "...we don't generally censor postings on the ICANN forums, even crude ones." — InternetAdvocate, April 27, 2001 @ 10:40 PM (1/2)

This should make PoPs (Profane-Obscene Posters) very GAY indeed! Yippee! Yahoo! — InternetAdvocate, April 27, 2001 @ 10:53 PM (1/1)

WARNING: ICANN violates its OWN RULES. So what else is new? LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 4, 2001 @ 11:02 PM (0/0)

IOD .WEB Agreement — kodo, April 27, 2001 @ 8:00 PM (0/0)

SUNRISE IS WRONG! — kodo, April 27, 2001 @ 7:48 PM (1/1)

Big Business abuse of power — Garry Anderson, April 28, 2001 @ 7:20 AM (0/0)

allowing generic trademark holders registration in sunrise period — sfeibish, April 27, 2001 @ 2:09 PM (1/1)

Sunrise is excuse to abridge freedom of speech — Garry Anderson, April 27, 2001 @ 2:32 PM (0/0)

SIGNATUREDOMAINS.COM REGISTER NAMES TO HIGHEST BIDDER FOR THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS — philphil, April 27, 2001 @ 3:42 AM (1/3)

That's one way to make money... — ppp, April 27, 2001 @ 2:44 PM (1/2)

SIGNATUREDOMAINS — philphil, April 28, 2001 @ 12:40 AM (1/1)

I know... — ppp, April 30, 2001 @ 3:51 AM (0/0)

"flash" new tld agreements — haha, April 26, 2001 @ 5:52 AM (0/0)

Confidentiality Restrictions in Appendix U — Bret_Fausett, April 25, 2001 @ 3:23 PM (0/0)

ICANN suppress freedom of speech again? — Garry Anderson, April 22, 2001 @ 7:55 PM (2/5)

Why are you surprised? Communist China Deletes messages to... — psbyowner, April 23, 2001 @ 9:22 PM (1/2)

RE:why are you surprised — anthonyo, April 25, 2001 @ 6:21 AM (1/1)

They disobey the rules and ignore law — Garry Anderson, April 25, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (0/0)

ICANN did NOT suppress your freedom of speech! — InternetAdvocate, April 23, 2001 @ 8:04 PM (1/1)

Which is why I said - "If it was ICANN" — Garry Anderson, April 24, 2001 @ 8:46 AM (0/0)

Reform cc-TLD's. — InternetAdvocate, April 21, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (0/0)

An Unofficial Forum Poll. — InternetAdvocate, April 21, 2001 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)

Why the delay? — Stauffer, April 20, 2001 @ 8:49 PM (2/4)

Why the delay? — Stauffer, April 24, 2001 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
What did you expect? — jandl, April 21, 2001 @ 1:11 AM (1/2)

Corruption — Garry Anderson, April 21, 2001 @ 9:43 AM (1/1)

Maybe Corrupt. But you way overestimate the bureaucrats' smarts. — InternetAdvocate, April 21, 2001 @ 9:35 PM (0/0)

Email and privacy concerns with DoC duplication of a TLD — jandl, April 18, 2001 @ 10:56 PM (1/3)

Tough Luck. Boo-Hoo! Yahoo! — InternetAdvocate, April 20, 2001 @ 12:36 AM (1/2)

Grow up — jandl, April 21, 2001 @ 1:06 AM (1/1)

Stop talking to your Mirror! — InternetAdvocate, April 21, 2001 @ 7:43 PM (0/0)

Media coverage re: GA — jandl, April 18, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)

ccTLD — jklenoff, April 16, 2001 @ 6:20 PM (0/0)

Why support ICANN — cyber-cynic, April 12, 2001 @ 11:25 PM (1/4)

Alternate Root Servers do what ICANN does. Monopolize! — InternetAdvocate, April 13, 2001 @ 9:43 PM (2/3)

Yes they do. They are fighting ICANN's .biz and .info TLD's. Duh! — InternetAdvocate, April 28, 2001 @ 8:05 PM (1/1)

You suck! — ppp, April 30, 2001 @ 3:37 AM (0/0)

No they don't! — ppp, April 26, 2001 @ 2:09 AM (0/0)

An idea on the .org argument — psbyowner, April 11, 2001 @ 5:20 PM (1/1)

Better? — InternetAdvocate, April 11, 2001 @ 9:34 PM (0/0)

The Future !!!!!! - New TLDs if they turn up ???????? — eventregistry, April 10, 2001 @ 12:04 AM (1/5)

new tlds — cyber-cynic, April 12, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (1/4)

First read the very fine print about the Alternate Root Servers ... — InternetAdvocate, April 13, 2001 @ 9:47 PM (1/3)

Careful — jandl, April 17, 2001 @ 9:35 AM (1/2)

Careful? You warned the wrong party! — InternetAdvocate, April 18, 2001 @ 10:55 PM (1/1)

Huh? — jandl, April 19, 2001 @ 4:38 AM (0/0)

A reasonable solution to the conflicting TLD's. — InternetAdvocate, April 7, 2001 @ 11:15 PM (0/0)

The new TLD's recently approved by ICANN are not the best possible. — InternetAdvocate, April 7, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (1/6)

These are much better. N'est-ce pas? — Internet Advocate, April 12, 2001 @ 8:46 PM (1/5)

Huh? — jandl, April 17, 2001 @ 9:13 AM (2/4)

You want to know real Disenfranchisement? — InternetAdvocate, April 18, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)
SLD's, TLD's & ICANN authority. — InternetAdvocate, April 18, 2001 @ 3:23 AM (1/2)

Unauthorized? — jandl, April 19, 2001 @ 5:14 AM (1/1)

Unauthorized by USA Govt, which created the Internet. — InternetAdvocate, April 19, 2001 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

Record Expiry — nauman, April 6, 2001 @ 6:01 PM (0/0)

Think about boycotting ICANN forum — friedrich, April 5, 2001 @ 9:57 AM (0/0)

Current Information About "New" TLDs — ICANTREGISTER, April 3, 2001 @ 8:14 PM (1/1)

ICANN warns against pre-registering domains — Garry Anderson, April 4, 2001 @ 8:54 AM (0/0)

Letter to Congress — jandl, April 2, 2001 @ 9:08 PM (2/3)

Letting The Sister Twist ... — pilot6, April 3, 2001 @ 6:42 PM (0/0)
Contacting Congress is very important. — S. Hudgens, April 3, 2001 @ 2:04 PM (1/1)

EU Protest — Elvis, April 4, 2001 @ 7:04 PM (0/0)

Hey, Check This Out ... Domain Name Hijack — pilot6, April 1, 2001 @ 3:04 PM (1/1)

The Problem is Network Solutions — Anion, April 1, 2001 @ 8:59 PM (0/0)

I Smell a Dirty Stinking Rat! Where's the Rat? — icanncant, April 1, 2001 @ 1:37 PM (0/0)

A Vote In June for Image Online Design is a vote to keep competition alive and well.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 31, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (0/0)

The Mysterons — Elvis, March 30, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

Response to Review of Dispute Resolution Service for Nominet UK — Garry Anderson, March 30, 2001 @ 9:20 AM (1/2)

Garry Anderson should be on the ICANN board. Maybe even replace Cerf? — InternetAdvocate, April 27, 2001 @ 9:40 PM (1/1)

Thanks Mike - I will give you the $100 later ;-) — Garry Anderson, April 28, 2001 @ 7:11 AM (0/0)

ICANN Exposed — Garry Anderson, March 29, 2001 @ 9:37 AM (3/6)

Garry Anderson should be on the ICANN board. — InternetAdvocate, April 27, 2001 @ 9:41 PM (0/0)
Read this for an Idea Better than dot-reg! — InternetAdvocate, April 8, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (1/2)

Too Late — Garry Anderson, April 10, 2001 @ 8:29 AM (1/1)

Too Late for Tiny Minds, But Not Too Late for the rest of us. — Internet Advocate, April 12, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

re:ICANN exposed — anthonyo, April 2, 2001 @ 6:29 AM (1/1)

Better self governance — Garry Anderson, April 2, 2001 @ 8:47 AM (0/0)

New agreements are improvement — dgardy, March 28, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)

Do we need the DNS? — TomField, March 28, 2001 @ 5:13 PM (0/0)

Senator Burns Focusing On ICANN's Performance & Legality ... — pilot6, March 27, 2001 @ 9:59 PM (1/1)

Contact List — S. Hudgens, March 27, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (0/0)

Duplication of the DotBiz TLD — Elvis, March 27, 2001 @ 10:31 AM (2/4)

re: duplication of the DotBiz TLD — jandl, April 2, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)
Analogy — S. Hudgens, March 28, 2001 @ 10:32 PM (1/2)

Too true — Elvis, March 29, 2001 @ 8:39 AM (1/1)

.Biz — S. Hudgens, March 29, 2001 @ 3:54 PM (0/0)

Trademarks - the Solution — Garry Anderson, March 24, 2001 @ 1:59 PM (3/4)

Sunrise Period — onmove, March 25, 2001 @ 5:40 PM (1/1)

ICANN bastardized our language into trademark system — Garry Anderson, March 25, 2001 @ 7:48 PM (0/0)

Those with head in sand - expose their thinking parts — Garry Anderson, March 25, 2001 @ 11:32 AM (0/0)
My vote. — S. Hudgens, March 24, 2001 @ 2:22 PM (0/0)

FTC Contact Information — S. Hudgens, March 23, 2001 @ 9:42 PM (0/0)

Re-consideration Request for Image Online Design's .WEB TLD Application — rambler, March 23, 2001 @ 7:08 AM (4/4)

Rambler is so appropriate a moniker for you. — Internet Advocate, April 12, 2001 @ 8:56 PM (0/0)
Bottome line.....Image Online Design has a large following who respect what they have done.... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 24, 2001 @ 4:05 AM (0/0)
Please reply with facts. — S. Hudgens, March 23, 2001 @ 6:12 PM (0/0)
Are you sure about what you write? — friedrich, March 23, 2001 @ 8:47 AM (0/0)

ICANN Board Members (RE: Image Online Design & .web) — S. Hudgens, March 22, 2001 @ 8:24 PM (0/0)

Personal message to Dr Cerf — Anthony 2nd, March 22, 2001 @ 7:35 AM (0/0)

TO: The board members and its chairman, Dr Vint Cerf.....Take a serious look at Image Online Design — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 22, 2001 @ 4:30 AM (0/0)

Dear Dr. Cerf And Board Member Colleagues- Image Online Design — Anion, March 21, 2001 @ 7:14 AM (0/0)

I think there is a flaw in the planned procedures for .info sunrise dispute resolution — nb, March 21, 2001 @ 12:43 AM (0/0)

Exclusion of Registered Professional Engineers from .PRO — daart, March 19, 2001 @ 10:00 PM (1/1)

Exclusion of many "registered professionals" — kozakoff, April 3, 2001 @ 3:46 PM (0/0)

Re: Merlin's Post "Objections to Sunrise" — Mario, March 18, 2001, 2001 @ 8:51 PM (0/0)

True power to change comes from the people... — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 17, 2001, 2001 @ 5:58 PM (1/1)

Contact List — S. Hudgens, March 23, 2001 @ 7:08 PM (0/0)

Objections to Sunrise — Merlin, March 17, 2001, 2001 @ 5:28 AM (0/0)

A Sunset ALWAYS follows a Sunrise! — Calvin, March 16, 2001, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/3)

No headstart for TM holders. Current law already protects TM's. — Internet Advocate, April 12, 2001 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)
The Sunrise will put small registeries out of business.......PLEASE look at IOD's solution!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 17, 2001, 2001 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)
Sunset for all except TM...... — onmove, March 17, 2001, 2001 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

DotBiz tld — Elvis, March 13, 2001, 2001 @ 12:23 AM (0/0)

Inconsistent ICANN Policy — Rebeka, March 11, 2001, 2001 @ 8:21 AM (1/1)

They can legal do it, unless , you have the money to fight !!!!!!!!!! — eventregistry, March 20, 2001 @ 7:11 AM (0/0)

Generalize TLD's — Lanthus, March 11, 2001, 2001 @ 12:21 AM (0/0)

government for, the people: p-mail-address@PS.US — Lanthus, March 10, 2001, 2001 @ 11:29 PM (0/0)

IOD/NSI - registry/registrar - NOT the same thing? — Rebeka, March 10, 2001, 2001 @ 9:39 AM (0/0)

All your base are belong to us. — Cats, March 10, 2001, 2001 @ 6:42 AM (0/0)

Astronomic Registry Operator Transfer Fee not justified — Werner Staub, March 9, 2001, 2001 @ 9:00 PM (0/0)

website names and extentions — woodennickelguy, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 3:57 AM (1/1)

Yes, for unrestricted TLDs — Eventregistry, March 9, 2001, 2001 @ 11:34 AM (0/0)

new.net vs. domainisland.com vs. icann — noend, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (2/8)

Should we trust 'em? — plex, March 11, 2001, 2001 @ 10:58 AM (0/0)
Name-Space.com — Merlin, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 11:06 PM (2/6)

RE: Name-Space.com — rambler, March 15, 2001, 2001 @ 7:32 AM (0/0)
Yeah but — tomsey, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 12:54 AM (2/4)

I'm wrong — tomsey, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
Its pending — tomsey, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 12:58 AM (1/2)

TM the String ???? — Eventregistry, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 1:11 AM (1/1)

I am just saying — tomsey, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 1:32 AM (0/0)

ICANN is DEATH! - check www.new.net!! — Rebeka, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 8:45 PM (1/1)

Not — 410, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 8:02 AM (0/0)

.name domain — edlancey, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 9:21 AM (1/1)

Please explain — Tor_Albert, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 9:47 PM (0/0)

Read About Legal Action Agianst ICANN — universal, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 4:26 AM (1/1)

.NAME's Response — Panzer, March 24, 2001 @ 6:19 PM (0/0)

Domain Name with accent ? — cynhrnet, March 6, 2001, 2001 @ 9:38 AM (0/0)

Objection to .xxx TLD as rstriction of Freedom of Speech — BillMyers, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 11:15 PM (1/1)

Bogus on a number of grounds — jonball, March 6, 2001, 2001 @ 1:01 PM (0/0)

Why no .SAT domain names for satellite services ? — verdy-p, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 5:56 PM (2/2)

There's been a .SAT for a really long time now... — carey3, March 14, 2001, 2001 @ 9:11 PM (0/0)
For Stability reasons — Tor_Albert, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (0/0)

Sunrise Proposal is Avoiding the Real Problem — hrob, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 8:48 AM (1/1)

Sunrise Period - Tradesmarks and Service Marks — EventRegistry, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 9:12 AM (0/0)

<firstname>.<lastname>.NAME conflicts with <ccTLD>.NAME — verdy-p, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 5:26 AM (2/3)

There IS a differnce between ccTLD's and SLD's. — InternetAdvocate, April 18, 2001 @ 3:43 AM (0/0)
.NAME already exist, colliding TLDS by ICANN will destablize the Internet — universal, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 4:37 AM (1/1)

.NAME's Response — Panzer, March 24, 2001 @ 6:28 PM (0/0)

This Forum for Everything or for the New TLDs???? — EventRegistry, March 4, 2001, 2001 @ 4:15 AM (1/1)

comments to placate the public — stuart, March 5, 2001, 2001 @ 7:10 PM (0/0)

Network Solutions - the puppeteer of ICANN — totter3, March 4, 2001, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (1/1)

Network Solutions needs to go out of business — cindyl, March 16, 2001, 2001 @ 4:22 AM (0/0)

A collision course? ...this biz vs. that biz? ...old info vs. new info? — cello, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 9:41 AM (2/5)

Other existing TLDs to take legal action to avoid colliding TLDs, besides .BIZ — universal, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 4:31 AM (2/3)

.NAME's Response — Panzer, March 24, 2001 @ 6:32 PM (0/0)
.info domain — russland, March 11, 2001, 2001 @ 6:58 PM (1/1)

re: What will happen — jandl, April 2, 2001 @ 8:55 PM (0/0)

You're Starting To Get It ... — pilot6, March 4, 2001, 2001 @ 2:31 AM (0/0)

How does ICANN's selection of duplicate TLDs promote Stability on the Internet? — jpalmer, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 7:12 AM (1/2)

For ICANN, they do not want stability, but funding for their pay checks only — universal, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 4:36 AM (1/1)

.NAME's Response — Panzer, March 24, 2001 @ 6:35 PM (0/0)

ICANN and the proposal to take the business product of other lawful businesses — jpalmer, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 6:36 AM (1/4)

ICANN does not listen to anybody, except via legal action for colliding TLDs — universal, March 7, 2001, 2001 @ 4:32 AM (1/3)

.NAME's Response — Panzer, March 24, 2001 @ 6:34 PM (1/2)

Repeating... — jandl, April 2, 2001 @ 9:30 PM (1/1)

Are multiple roots one DNS? — timsexton, April 13, 2001 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

TLD .XXX — mrhelper.1, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 5:28 AM (1/1)

You Now Have It! — pilot6, March 6, 2001, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (0/0)

irregular ICANN behavior — stuart, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 1:02 AM (0/0)

Linda Wilson, President Emerita Of Radcliffe College, Silent On Abuse Of Leah Gallegos — pilot6, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 4:48 PM (2/9)

Not sure — 410, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 7:59 AM (1/1)

It Is What It Is ... — pilot6, March 8, 2001, 2001 @ 6:46 PM (0/0)

Did Leah Gallegos put a proposal up to ICANN — EventRegistry, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 1:12 AM (3/6)

Why waste money? — jandl, April 2, 2001 @ 10:02 PM (0/0)
Leah Gallegos and ARNI never applied to ICANN — rambler, March 15, 2001, 2001 @ 9:04 AM (0/0)
Answer ... — pilot6, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 2:21 AM (1/3)

Interesting Response — EventRegistry, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 3:18 AM (1/2)

Answer. — pilot6, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 4:13 AM (1/1)

irrational arguement — Anion, April 3, 2001 @ 10:45 AM (0/0)

Verisign's Proposed Contract — taxmama, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 3:51 PM (4/5)

Are you talking about NSI Registrar or Registry? — bedelman, March 4, 2001, 2001 @ 5:18 PM (1/1)

NSI Registrar or Registry — taxmama, March 6, 2001, 2001 @ 12:35 AM (0/0)

The worst customer service model online - NSI/Verisign — taxmama, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 1:39 PM (0/0)
I've complained to NSI and I've been double billed by them!!! — First1, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 4:46 AM (0/0)
Complaints To ICANN About NSI — pilot6, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 4:24 PM (0/0)

Waiting, and Waiting, and Still Waiting !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! — EventRegistry, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 5:37 AM (1/8)

The Inclusive Namespace has hundreds of new TLDs already — jpalmer, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 7:26 AM (2/7)

too complex — Lanthus, March 11, 2001, 2001 @ 12:00 AM (0/0)
Why??? — EventRegistry, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 2:11 PM (1/5)

Because — jpalmer, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 4:46 PM (1/4)

Answer — EventRegistry, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 11:48 PM (1/3)

Wrong! — jpalmer, March 4, 2001, 2001 @ 12:26 AM (1/2)

Answer II — EventRegistry, March 4, 2001, 2001 @ 4:03 AM (1/1)

market share — jandl, April 2, 2001 @ 10:17 PM (0/0)

The Sunrise proposal will dilute the system....Also What is the status on IOD's Rec. Request?? — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 4:56 AM (2/2)

We Support IOD! — first1, March 3, 2001, 2001 @ 2:32 AM (0/0)
More Support For IOD — Eliahu, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 7:38 AM (0/0)

Pending "Requests for Reconsideration" — James Ross, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 2:06 AM (0/0)

New TLDs, Sunrise Period — pilot6, March 2, 2001, 2001 @ 12:08 AM (0/0)

gTLD's and the New York City Telephone Yellow Pages — bezzant, March 1, 2001, 2001 @ 11:09 PM (0/0)

7168 Total headers

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy