Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	onmove
Date/Time:	Sat, March 17, 2001 at 3:26 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.01 using Windows 95
Subject:	Sunset for all except TM......
Message:
This topic was discussed at great lenght on Off-topic forum.  There was overwhelming consensus that Sunrise Period gave unfair advantage to TM/SM holders at the cost of all other Internet stakeholders.  But, it seems ICANN and Affilias just don't bother about public opinion.  How this policy of giving first shot to favoured segment of the society is going to help the basic purpose of introducing new gTLD?  It was claimed that there was need for new TLDs because .com domain space had become saturated and there was dearth of good names.  Does anyone seriously believe that any good name/generic name will be left out at the end of Sunrise Period!  Sunrise Period, particularly in case of .info TLD, is nothing but organized usurpation of cyberspace. Amar

Message Thread:

• A Sunset ALWAYS follows a Sunrise! — Calvin, March 16, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/3)
• No headstart for TM holders. Current law already protects TM's. — Internet Advocate, April 12, 2001 @ 9:01 PM (0/0)
• The Sunrise will put small registeries out of business.......PLEASE look at IOD's solution!!! — Gregory W. Krajewski, March 17, 2001 @ 5:14 AM (0/0)
• Sunset for all except TM...... — onmove, March 17, 2001 @ 3:26 AM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy