Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	jandl
Date/Time:	Tue, April 17, 2001 at 9:13 AM GMT (Tue, April 17, 2001 at 5:13 AM EDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Huh?
Message:
So far you have advocated duplicating a ccTLD (.co), forcing existing businesses to form partnerships with other entities simply because ICANN chooses to force a duplication of their business product, and to force existing businesses to contract with an entity that would change their business policies, adopt the UDRP, contracts of adhesion...  You have also suggested restraint of trade and price fixing and disenfranchising registrants who have paid for multi-year registrations (up to 10 years).  Why?  What has happened to a free market and the right to do lawful business? I'm confused.

Message Thread:

• The new TLD's recently approved by ICANN are not the best possible. — InternetAdvocate, April 7, 2001 @ 11:03 PM (1/6)
• These are much better.  N'est-ce pas? — Internet Advocate, April 12, 2001 @ 8:46 PM (1/5)
• Huh? — jandl, April 17, 2001 @ 9:13 AM (2/4)
• You want to know real Disenfranchisement? — InternetAdvocate, April 18, 2001 @ 3:28 AM (0/0)
• SLD's, TLD's & ICANN authority. — InternetAdvocate, April 18, 2001 @ 3:23 AM (1/2)
• Unauthorized? — jandl, April 19, 2001 @ 5:14 AM (1/1)
• Unauthorized by USA Govt, which created the Internet. — InternetAdvocate, April 19, 2001 @ 11:48 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy