Several of my postings have been deleted. They were relevant to this forum. If it
was ICANN, not being fans of the First Amendment or open and transparent processes,
they are obviously continuing normal practices.
I was pursuing the reason as to
why a new TLD was not introduced, to solve the ***most important problems*** on the
DNS - including ‘trademark infringement’ and ‘consumer confusion’.
certainly know that class, country and identifier are mandatory requirements for
I suggested, for identifier, using the new TLD ‘.REG’.
can be only two reasons why they have not done this - stupidity or corruption.
my true considered and informed opinion, the authorities must be corrupt not to want
The following is one of my deleted postings, in response to anothers
In it, I give the basis of why this should have been a new TLD and part
my rationale to coming to this conclusive opinion. Also, example of my reasoning
skills - so that critics could not pass me off as somebody of low intelligence.
deleted this one, I presume, because they object to me explaining why I believe them
I must have explained too well.
Why ICANN is CORRUPT
Politicians do more spinning of truth - why I did Analysis
of Spin on my skilful.com site. Spin is worse than a lie - it gives the lie credibility.
before you get funny - skilful is the proper English spelling of the word. After
many millions of domains had gone, I just used logic to find it. I mention this only
to prove my logical ability.
Please explain: "As for expense, .org, would serve
the same purpose as .reg without the high rates of .com."
>there will probably
always be more CC-TLD's than G-TLD's (at least for the foreseeable future).
of gTLDs are being sat on by ICANN. They are the worlds greatest cybersquatters.
What sort of world would it be if we only had two hundred or so towns - each allowed
only one High Street (Americans may call it Main Street)?
>Therefore, a company
protecting its marks in all cc-TLD's would pay more than in all G-TLD's existing
and approved or likely to be approved in the foreseeable future.
THIS IS WHY I
AM SO ANGRY - ARE THE AUTHORITIES REALLY SO BLOODY STUPID?
You are talking silly
- most trademarks all share similar names. How can they say it is THEIR name - when
it belongs to others?
IT HAS TO BE UNIQUE - A trademark is declared invalid through
a lack of distinctiveness.
To use Attorneys words, "The basic tenet of trademark
law is to protect consumers and trademark owners from confusion in the marketplace".
is trademarks 'raison d'ętre' - reason for existance.
From this you may come to
the same conclusion as me - The authorities do not care about trademark law - just
about power and money.
Ask yourself - on the balance of probability, given all
their expertise and great resources. Are they imbeciles or they are corrupt?
IS WHY I TRULY BELIEVE - ICANN IS CORRUPT.
(and WIPO / USPTO / DoC)
Anderson - WIPO.org.uk