Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Garry Anderson
Date/Time: Wed, May 16, 2001 at 1:13 PM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject: Spin, Lies and Propaganda

Message:
 

 
This is my considered and informed opinion, after looking at the facts:

I will first just check, to see if anyone has conspiring letters to ICANN.

<align="baseline" border="0" width="350" height="150">>


Your hard drive really needs a defrag. Better if I format it.

<align="baseline" border="0" width="350" height="150">>


Only joking. Did you know there is a way to format the whole Internet?

Well, if you believe ICANNs propaganda - you will believe anything.

Go to my site and see the statement from Secretary Don 'Littlechick' Evans, US DoC - Department of Chickens.


Also visit www.PLDT.com - they are being bullied and are using my arguments in their court case.


Okay, my response - what a load of bull* from Jeffrey J. Neuman. He looks pathetic kissing ICANNs ass (animal akin to a horse).

However, stealing someones .biz idea, I can understand why ;-) ;-)

No, cannot be bothered with him - I will just get to main point.

They are all liars. Domain names are not trademarks - nor can they be.

A trademark is declared invalid through a lack of distinctiveness.

Also, for proper use, they all have to be identified with a mark "®" - I suggested .reg as this identifier.

Trademarks all have to be unique - they know this.

They call aol.biz cybersquatters.

But AOL trademark is owned by many other companies, including 1523683 Orthotic and orthopaedic articles in the UK.

Thousands may share the same name - so “trademark infringement” and “consumer confussion”, are all lies.

So then - answer me this cowards - how can aol.biz be squatting on America On Line property?

It is illegal for the owner of a trademark to abuse it, to gain a dominant position - They use a lie, that they are protecting their property - it belongs to them, to gain this unfair advantage.

They all use Spin, Lies and Propaganda.

The answer is obvious. The format for customer to identify source (the reason for trademarks): name.class.country.reg

Reason they do not use it are many (mostly illegal) - see my site.

To those that protect the current situation, like NeuLevel - what have you all got in your skull?

It can only be doggy doings or corrupt intent. I think it the latter.
 

Link: WIPO.org.uk


Message Thread: