Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Thu, June 7, 2001 at 10:59 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	A more fair and just statement
Message:
IMO a more fair and just statement would be: Attention, We at NeuLevel have ignored trademark laws "first use" in commerce principle to take the .biz TLD. But, we are a bigger business and so ICANN have allowed us to do this. Before registering your .biz domain, please be aware the original registry has prior rights. As such your registration could be taken away from you. But, given our money and supporters, it is not very likely.
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• Attention — Elvis, June 7, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (1/33)
• A more fair and just statement — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (2/32)
• Garry contradicts his other posts. Or did he flipflop? Or Lie like Gore? — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (2/30)
• FlipFlop? You are wrong — Garry Anderson, June 8, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/13)
• Here you go! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/12)
• WRONG — Garry Anderson, June 9, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (1/11)
• Garry Anderson contradicts his own logic. — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/10)
• You twist logic — Garry Anderson, June 10, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (1/9)
• I twist nothing. — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (1/8)
• Sorry - you do not see it — Garry Anderson, June 12, 2001 @ 7:56 AM (1/7)
• You don't see it.  Imaginary Conflict and Real Moneygrubbing. — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (1/6)
• Methinks you are wrong because — Garry Anderson, June 14, 2001 @ 11:01 AM (1/5)
• Sorry charlie, urr, Garry! I am right. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/4)
• The Internet redefined - due to corruption and ineptitude? — Garry Anderson, June 15, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (1/3)
• A Solution to Answer your Objection. — InternetAdvocate, June 18, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/2)
• May work - but — Garry Anderson, June 19, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)
• My Reply. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
• Positive? — Elvis, June 8, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (2/15)
• Who Cares.... — afterhours, June 10, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (1/2)
• Who cares what Afterhours Al says? He knows nothing! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/1)
• Let's see Elvis attack Afterhours Al for not being positive! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
• Positive? Elvis is less positive than I am! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 10:47 PM (1/11)
• What are you mumbling about — Elvis, June 9, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (1/10)
• ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (2/9)
• Let's see Elvis attack Elvis for not being positive! LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Let's see Elvis attack Garry Anderson for not being positive! LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (1/7)
• Lets see you calm down — Elvis, June 12, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (1/6)
• Not positive? Mumbling? Not calm? Make up your mind! Sheesh! :) — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:17 AM (1/5)
• Stop talking in your sleep then. — Elvis, June 14, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (1/4)
• Ring! Ring! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/3)
• Don't use the word Bell — Elvis, June 14, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/2)
• Don't use the word Elvis. The Estate of Elvis Presley has a TM on it. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
• Don't use the word Internet — Elvis, June 15, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
• Good observation — Elvis, June 8, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy