Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Elvis
Date/Time:	Sat, June 9, 2001 at 1:27 AM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	New or replicated?
Message:
S. Hudgens, wrote....  We need new TLDs, but specifically, we need IOD's .web! I say, yes, but what would you say if ICANN decided they could make a lot of money out of this, and then asked another company other than IOD to administer dotweb, does dotbiz ring a bell here?

Message Thread:

• Questionable need for new TLDs — dnheller, June 6, 2001 @ 3:09 PM (2/12)
• New TLDs — S. Hudgens, June 6, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (1/10)
• New or replicated? — Elvis, June 9, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (1/9)
• TLD Replication — S. Hudgens, June 11, 2001 @ 7:13 PM (1/8)
• Precedent has been set. — Garry Anderson, June 11, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/7)
• Y'all give reasons why every TLD registry should be not-for-profit — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (1/6)
• Not for Profit? — S. Hudgens, June 12, 2001 @ 1:39 PM (1/5)
• The registries should be not-for-profit. Let the for-profit registers own a piece of them. — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (1/4)
• Fees — S. Hudgens, June 14, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (1/3)
• How? Now! Brown Cow! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/2)
• Lower Fees? — S. Hudgens, June 15, 2001 @ 2:49 PM (1/1)
• Lower Fees! — InternetAdvocate, June 18, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
• Trademark Tax & Many More TLD — Garry Anderson, June 6, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy