Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	S. Hudgens
Date/Time:	Thu, June 14, 2001 at 8:47 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Fees
Message:
If the registries are not for profit, then who pays to maintain them?  Would a portion of the registration fee, which is generated by the competing registries, go toward this maintenance?  If so, then how does this differ from the present situation? S. Hudgens

Message Thread:

• Questionable need for new TLDs — dnheller, June 6, 2001 @ 3:09 PM (2/12)
• New TLDs — S. Hudgens, June 6, 2001 @ 6:09 PM (1/10)
• New or replicated? — Elvis, June 9, 2001 @ 1:27 AM (1/9)
• TLD Replication — S. Hudgens, June 11, 2001 @ 7:13 PM (1/8)
• Precedent has been set. — Garry Anderson, June 11, 2001 @ 9:17 PM (1/7)
• Y'all give reasons why every TLD registry should be not-for-profit — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:04 AM (1/6)
• Not for Profit? — S. Hudgens, June 12, 2001 @ 1:39 PM (1/5)
• The registries should be not-for-profit. Let the for-profit registers own a piece of them. — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:24 AM (1/4)
• Fees — S. Hudgens, June 14, 2001 @ 8:47 PM (1/3)
• How? Now! Brown Cow! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:22 PM (1/2)
• Lower Fees? — S. Hudgens, June 15, 2001 @ 2:49 PM (1/1)
• Lower Fees! — InternetAdvocate, June 18, 2001 @ 11:00 PM (0/0)
• Trademark Tax & Many More TLD — Garry Anderson, June 6, 2001 @ 6:00 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy