Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Mon, June 18, 2001 at 10:51 PM GMT (Mon, June 18, 2001 at 3:51 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0
Subject:	A Solution to Answer your Objection.
Message:
> > ... the solution would be for the alt roots to use alt protocols [ahttp, aftp].  The public is smart enough to deal with that. > It goes against principle of the Internet - a single collection of computers joined together. Read my messages in the thread linked below. A GREAT solution to Colliding .BIZ TLD's? — InternetAdvocate, May 17 @ 2:45 AM (5/7) Likewise for Colliding Dot-Info TLD's? — InternetAdvocate, May 17 @ 3:47 AM (0/0) A Great Compromise with New.Net and ICANN? — InternetAdvocate, May 17 @ 3:46 AM (1/1) ICANN should recognize IOD as sole .WEB registry. — InternetAdvocate, May 17 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)
Link:	A GREAT solution to Colliding .BIZ TLD's?

Message Thread:

• Attention — Elvis, June 7, 2001 @ 9:56 PM (1/33)
• A more fair and just statement — Garry Anderson, June 7, 2001 @ 10:59 PM (2/32)
• Garry contradicts his other posts. Or did he flipflop? Or Lie like Gore? — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 10:39 PM (2/30)
• FlipFlop? You are wrong — Garry Anderson, June 8, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/13)
• Here you go! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 8, 2001 @ 11:51 PM (1/12)
• WRONG — Garry Anderson, June 9, 2001 @ 12:34 AM (1/11)
• Garry Anderson contradicts his own logic. — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 10:45 PM (1/10)
• You twist logic — Garry Anderson, June 10, 2001 @ 12:39 AM (1/9)
• I twist nothing. — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:46 AM (1/8)
• Sorry - you do not see it — Garry Anderson, June 12, 2001 @ 7:56 AM (1/7)
• You don't see it.  Imaginary Conflict and Real Moneygrubbing. — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:12 AM (1/6)
• Methinks you are wrong because — Garry Anderson, June 14, 2001 @ 11:01 AM (1/5)
• Sorry charlie, urr, Garry! I am right. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:45 AM (1/4)
• The Internet redefined - due to corruption and ineptitude? — Garry Anderson, June 15, 2001 @ 7:32 PM (1/3)
• A Solution to Answer your Objection. — InternetAdvocate, June 18, 2001 @ 10:51 PM (1/2)
• May work - but — Garry Anderson, June 19, 2001 @ 1:30 AM (1/1)
• My Reply. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:29 AM (0/0)
• Positive? — Elvis, June 8, 2001 @ 11:10 PM (2/15)
• Who Cares.... — afterhours, June 10, 2001 @ 2:39 AM (1/2)
• Who cares what Afterhours Al says? He knows nothing! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:52 AM (1/1)
• Let's see Elvis attack Afterhours Al for not being positive! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 1:00 AM (0/0)
• Positive? Elvis is less positive than I am! LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 9, 2001 @ 10:47 PM (1/11)
• What are you mumbling about — Elvis, June 9, 2001 @ 11:56 PM (1/10)
• ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 12:49 AM (2/9)
• Let's see Elvis attack Elvis for not being positive! LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (0/0)
• Let's see Elvis attack Garry Anderson for not being positive! LOL — InternetAdvocate, June 12, 2001 @ 1:07 AM (1/7)
• Lets see you calm down — Elvis, June 12, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (1/6)
• Not positive? Mumbling? Not calm? Make up your mind! Sheesh! :) — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 2:17 AM (1/5)
• Stop talking in your sleep then. — Elvis, June 14, 2001 @ 9:31 PM (1/4)
• Ring! Ring! — InternetAdvocate, June 14, 2001 @ 10:16 PM (1/3)
• Don't use the word Bell — Elvis, June 14, 2001 @ 11:11 PM (1/2)
• Don't use the word Elvis. The Estate of Elvis Presley has a TM on it. LOL. — InternetAdvocate, June 15, 2001 @ 12:11 AM (1/1)
• Don't use the word Internet — Elvis, June 15, 2001 @ 1:55 AM (0/0)
• Good observation — Elvis, June 8, 2001 @ 9:53 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy