Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Garry Anderson
Date/Time:	Sat, June 23, 2001 at 6:59 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Lottery and Trademark tax - and New.net
Message:
Lottery and Trademark tax with .biz. More trademark tax with New.net. Quote: New.net new TLD announcement, the controversial company has instituted a Sunrise Trademark Claim Policy for .arts, .school, .church, .love, .golf, .auction, .agent, .llp, .llc and .scifi. A result of IP intimidation, or joining the milk-the-trademark-cow crowd? IPC minutes reveal that members of the IPC had had dialogue with New.net representatives at the Melbourne ICANN meeting, raising issues such as the need for Whois and acccess to the UDRP. http://www.icbtollfree.com/Article.cfm?ArticleId=5349 *********** Like I have said before - had they dot REG for trademarks, there would be no need to protect mark in thousands of forthcoming TLD. Have the authorities got doggy-do for brains or are they corrupt. I believe they are corrupt.
Link:	WIPO.org.uk

Message Thread:

• .biz domain registration a complete shambles — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/16)
• ICANN & the alt roots are corrupt monopolizers.  Follow the money! — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (2/6)
• Have answered this — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)
• I answered Garry already. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/1)
• Restricted TLD — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)
• Choice — Elvis, June 26, 2001 @ 11:54 PM (1/2)
• ICANN & the alt roots are greedy. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)
• Err.. IA? These are humans we're talking about, remember? What else did you expect?  (No Text) — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
• It is a shame. — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• Agreed: The current .biz registration process is criminal — psbyowner, June 23, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (1/7)
• Lottery and Trademark tax - and New.net — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (1/6)
• The ICP in the internet are acting like the knights in the 16th century — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/5)
• Unattractive — Garry Anderson, June 24, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/4)
• Yes to .reg for trademarks, and something else(.np?) for non-profits eom — psbyowner, June 25, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (1/3)
• On the record — Garry Andersom, June 25, 2001 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)
• The trademark issue. — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
• Amen and Amen eom — psbyowner, June 26, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy