Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Tue, June 26, 2001 at 9:27 PM GMT (Tue, June 26, 2001 at 2:27 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0
Subject:	ICANN & the alt roots are corrupt monopolizers.  Follow the money!
Message:
ICANN is a corrupt monopolizer.  [Others have descibed such on this forum.] The alt roots also are corrupt monopolizers, trying to tie up every good TLD, thus preventing ICANN from ever introducing good TLD names WITHOUT colliding with alt roots.  But that's the alt roots' tactics.   Their strategy is to get their TLD's placed onto the main root. The alt roots [and their clients] want to become rich instantly which will happen if their TLD's are placed onto the main root. Follow the money with ICANN and with the alt roots, all of which are monopolizers.  A pox on them all. Compromise solutions? After clicking the link below, also read the other posts (including mine) in that thread. A GREAT solution to Colliding .BIZ TLD's? — InternetAdvocate, May 16 @ 7:45 PM (5/7) Likewise for Colliding Dot-Info TLD's? — InternetAdvocate, May 16 @ 8:47 PM (0/0) A Great Compromise with New.Net and ICANN? — InternetAdvocate, May 16 @ 8:46 PM (1/1) ICANN should recognize IOD as sole .WEB registry. — InternetAdvocate, May 16 @ 7:47 PM (0/0) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Link:	A GREAT solution to Colliding .BIZ TLD's?

Message Thread:

• .biz domain registration a complete shambles — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/16)
• ICANN & the alt roots are corrupt monopolizers.  Follow the money! — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (2/6)
• Have answered this — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)
• I answered Garry already. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/1)
• Restricted TLD — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)
• Choice — Elvis, June 26, 2001 @ 11:54 PM (1/2)
• ICANN & the alt roots are greedy. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)
• Err.. IA? These are humans we're talking about, remember? What else did you expect?  (No Text) — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
• It is a shame. — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• Agreed: The current .biz registration process is criminal — psbyowner, June 23, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (1/7)
• Lottery and Trademark tax - and New.net — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (1/6)
• The ICP in the internet are acting like the knights in the 16th century — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/5)
• Unattractive — Garry Anderson, June 24, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/4)
• Yes to .reg for trademarks, and something else(.np?) for non-profits eom — psbyowner, June 25, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (1/3)
• On the record — Garry Andersom, June 25, 2001 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)
• The trademark issue. — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
• Amen and Amen eom — psbyowner, June 26, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy