Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	InternetAdvocate
Date/Time:	Tue, June 26, 2001 at 9:33 PM GMT (Tue, June 26, 2001 at 2:33 PM PDT)
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0
Subject:	The trademark issue.
Message:
As for the trademark issue, maybe Garry Anderson's idea of an identifier TLD (he says .reg, I say .rtm, .rsm, .tmk, and .smk) for registered (and unregistered) trademarks and servicemarks, is the best or even maybe the ONLY solution?

Message Thread:

• .biz domain registration a complete shambles — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/16)
• ICANN & the alt roots are corrupt monopolizers.  Follow the money! — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (2/6)
• Have answered this — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)
• I answered Garry already. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/1)
• Restricted TLD — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)
• Choice — Elvis, June 26, 2001 @ 11:54 PM (1/2)
• ICANN & the alt roots are greedy. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)
• Err.. IA? These are humans we're talking about, remember? What else did you expect?  (No Text) — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
• It is a shame. — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• Agreed: The current .biz registration process is criminal — psbyowner, June 23, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (1/7)
• Lottery and Trademark tax - and New.net — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (1/6)
• The ICP in the internet are acting like the knights in the 16th century — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/5)
• Unattractive — Garry Anderson, June 24, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/4)
• Yes to .reg for trademarks, and something else(.np?) for non-profits eom — psbyowner, June 25, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (1/3)
• On the record — Garry Andersom, June 25, 2001 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)
• The trademark issue. — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
• Amen and Amen eom — psbyowner, June 26, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy