Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	Elvis
Date/Time:	Tue, June 26, 2001 at 11:54 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	Choice
Message:
If people wish to use other roots, fine. If ICANN want to stop them from doing so you have to ask why.  Is it because they see the potential of their business and want to take it for themselves? Now who is greedy?

Message Thread:

• .biz domain registration a complete shambles — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 9:54 AM (3/16)
• ICANN & the alt roots are corrupt monopolizers.  Follow the money! — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:27 PM (2/6)
• Have answered this — Garry Anderson, June 27, 2001 @ 7:42 AM (1/2)
• I answered Garry already. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:31 AM (1/1)
• Restricted TLD — Garry Anderson, June 28, 2001 @ 9:49 AM (0/0)
• Choice — Elvis, June 26, 2001 @ 11:54 PM (1/2)
• ICANN & the alt roots are greedy. — InternetAdvocate, June 28, 2001 @ 1:36 AM (1/1)
• Err.. IA? These are humans we're talking about, remember? What else did you expect?  (No Text) — Slicer, June 28, 2001 @ 5:06 AM (0/0)
• It is a shame. — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:33 AM (0/0)
• Agreed: The current .biz registration process is criminal — psbyowner, June 23, 2001 @ 4:22 PM (1/7)
• Lottery and Trademark tax - and New.net — Garry Anderson, June 23, 2001 @ 6:59 PM (1/6)
• The ICP in the internet are acting like the knights in the 16th century — friedrich, June 24, 2001 @ 9:47 AM (1/5)
• Unattractive — Garry Anderson, June 24, 2001 @ 6:25 PM (1/4)
• Yes to .reg for trademarks, and something else(.np?) for non-profits eom — psbyowner, June 25, 2001 @ 3:14 PM (1/3)
• On the record — Garry Andersom, June 25, 2001 @ 6:31 PM (2/2)
• The trademark issue. — InternetAdvocate, June 26, 2001 @ 9:33 PM (0/0)
• Amen and Amen eom — psbyowner, June 26, 2001 @ 8:27 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy