Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ
Username: |
friedrich |
Date/Time: |
Tue, July 10, 2001 at 9:38 PM GMT |
Browser: |
Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows NT 4.0 |
Subject: |
As long as existing registrations stay, I think your proposal has its merrits. |
Message: |
|
If all the existing alternate root registries are added
under xyz.us and .us needend be entered into the browser, then your suggestion
offers a really viable solution. If a second registry wants to offer .com addresses,
it must choose .com.ca for example, which would have to be entered entirely (not
simply .com, as with .com.us).I think I finally understood your proposal and
I definitely think it has its merits.
|
| |
Message Thread:
- A GREAT solution to Colliding .BIZ TLD's? InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 2:45 AM (6/9)
- As long as existing registrations stay, I think your proposal has its merrits. friedrich, July 10, 2001 @ 9:38 PM (1/1)
- Adding more TLD's Dassa, May 19, 2001 @ 6:26 AM (1/1)
- Pigs might fly Elvis, May 17, 2001 @ 8:32 PM (0/0)
- Likewise for Colliding Dot-Info TLD's? InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:47 AM (0/0)
- A Great Compromise with New.Net and ICANN? InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 3:46 AM (1/1)
- ICANN should recognize IOD as sole .WEB registry. InternetAdvocate, May 17, 2001 @ 2:47 AM (0/0)
Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy