Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	tomsters
Date/Time:	Tue, August 14, 2001 at 6:47 PM GMT
Browser:	Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject:	That's a good idea but....
Message:
The initial fee and real fee that landrush winners would have to pay is still unfair. The problem that we have here is one of process. It should not have to be the registrants that have to pay for the results of a process that has caused of all of this to occur in the first place. But your idea I believe is a good start.

Message Thread:

• New Proposal for Action by Afilias — domebase, August 14 @ 6:34 PM (5/12)
• But even this doesn't solve... — dtobias, August 14 @ 9:44 PM (1/1)
• You are right — tomsters, August 14 @ 10:00 PM (0/0)
• revised based on your comments — domebase, August 14 @ 7:36 PM (1/1)
• How about the potential disaster of "Closed" lists? — challenge, August 14 @ 8:29 PM (0/0)
• We got this down, now how about this other potential fiasco??? — challenge, August 14 @ 6:57 PM (0/0)
• That's a good idea but.... — tomsters, August 14 @ 6:47 PM (1/2)
• Yes, I agree that Challenge fee should be — domebase, August 14 @ 7:12 PM (1/1)
• Sounds good. — tomsters, August 14 @ 7:17 PM (0/0)
• I disagree with one aspect in this plan — challenge, August 14 @ 6:46 PM (2/3)
• I agree that burden of proof should be on Sunrise Registrant — domebase, August 14 @ 7:16 PM (0/0)
• Good idea — tomsters, August 14 @ 6:57 PM (1/1)
• Excellent! — onmove, August 14 @ 7:30 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy