Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username: Garry Anderson
Date/Time: Thu, August 16, 2001 at 11:29 AM GMT
Browser: Microsoft Internet Explorer V5.5 using Windows 98
Subject: WELL DONE

Message:
 

 
410 - WELL DONE - could not have put it better myself.

This is one of reasons why I also believe them corrupt.

***

Sunrise period:

Somebody please correct me if I am wrong. I find it hard to believe they hoped to get away with it.

As I understand it:

They have illegal unregistered lottery for sunrise period.

At the same time, they have illegal unregistered lottery for a later land-rush period.

BUT this time, there may be NO PRIZE to give out.

I would have thought this against the law - fraudulant.

Everything they have done seems to be done in greed for the most profit.

Even simple verification has been ignored.

Am I wrong?

***

The Authorities:

If they do not verify validity of trademark, then sunrise is all a load of bull* - just spin, lies and propaganda.

Am I wrong?

Go on - some clever attorney or official prove me wrong. I dare you.

The authorities know the answer to trademark problems.

ICANN - WIPO - US DoC - Do not say nobody did not tell you.

If you TRULY wanted to avoid 'consumer confusion', 'trademark conflict' problems and to stop anybody 'passing off' then you would use name.class.coutry.reg

You would then have no excuse to stop anybody else using these words.

I believe you are ALL corrupt.
 

Link: WIPO.org.uk


Message Thread: