Return to New TLD Agreements Forum - Message Thread - FAQ

Username:	domebase
Date/Time:	Fri, August 17, 2001 at 11:27 PM GMT
Browser:	Netscape Communicator V4.7 using Windows NT
Subject:	I agree that ICANN does not need bad PR on this...
Message:
That is one of the reasons why I said that it would be in ICANN's interest to support the proposal outlined at DomeBase.com.  Without addressing the concerns of honest folks who pre-registered in the Land Rush period, PR will only go from bad to worse.  This is absolutely, completely avoidable.
Link:	DomeBase.com

Message Thread:

• Incompetence or Fraud??? — FraudBuster, August 17 @ 7:54 PM (2/12)
• You are completely missing the point..... — challenge, August 17 @ 9:41 PM (1/10)
• ICAAN want a decent solution to the .info problem — richyhenderson, August 17 @ 10:39 PM (3/9)
• Sent by ICANN to dampen the negative postings? EOM — psbyowner, August 17 @ 11:37 PM (2/5)
• EOM? — 410, August 18 @ 12:53 AM (1/1)
• End Of Message — psbyowner, August 18 @ 1:41 AM (0/0)
• Not ICAAN, I'm a landrush applicant, with the solution — richyhenderson, August 18 @ 12:17 AM (2/2)
• ICAAN? [Star Trek II: The Wrath iCAAN?] — InternetAdvocate, August 21 @ 1:13 AM (0/0)
• Good People — Garry Anderson, August 18 @ 6:30 PM (0/0)
• I agree that ICANN does not need bad PR on this... — domebase, August 17 @ 11:27 PM (0/0)
• Stuart Lynn — Paul Gill, August 17 @ 10:59 PM (1/1)
• Trying to be honest and constructive — richyhenderson, August 18 @ 12:14 AM (0/0)
• It certainly smells that way, doesn't it? EOM — psbyowner, August 17 @ 9:09 PM (0/0)

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookies Policy